'He wrote all of it down?': Prosecutors claim to have handwritten notes of Trump hush money scheme

Evidence is great. Law is great as well.
Can you post the law, with a link?

Watch everyone. Another democrat that says it is so that wont link or quote the law.

The NY law that Trump is charged with breaking? Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, a class E felony §175.10

Here's the indictment citing the exact law.

Here's a link to the law.

Ignore as you will.
 
Last edited:
Sure, you just wait right there.

I imagine you found it already anyway
I do not see any new filings. Go ahead and post the link for us.

If it is anything other than the 3 laws I already mentioned, it would violate the judge's order from February. That order was based on the Grand Jury record- no new theories are permitted because the Grand Jury has not seen the evidence.
 
Focus - FatFuck Bragg charged Trump with falsifying records. What records did he falsify and how did he falsify them? And what was the crime he was allegedly covering up?

Rawley, we've done this dance before. You demand specific citations of the law, the charges, examples and evidence. I provide you with the indictment, laying that out.

You refuse to look at the indictment. Then insist that because you refuse to look at the laws, the citations and the charges, that there's nothing to back charges against Trump.

Watch, you'll do it again: http://manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf
 
I do not see any new filings. Go ahead and post the link for us.

If it is anything other than the 3 laws I already mentioned, it would violate the judge's order from February. That order was based on the Grand Jury record- no new theories are permitted because the Grand Jury has not seen the evidence.
It violates nothing and was not required to be listed for the in the indictment.

It's the State law regarding promoting or preventing elections.

Edit: New York Election Law. Section 17-152
 
Last edited:
But I think The o p sympathy for melania is misplaced. She knew from the start.She was unfaithful because she was zcrewing him behind his exercise back. The only reason she was allowed to immigrate to the u s is because she was screwing trump when he was already married at the time.
 
FOUR MORE YEARS PAUSE
1713996179328.png
 
At the center of the case is the accusation that Trump took part in a scheme to turn The National Enquirer and its sister publications into an arm of his 2016 presidential campaign. The documents detailed three “hush money” payments made to a series of individuals to guarantee their silence about potentially damaging stories in the months before the election. Because this was done with the goal of helping his election chances, the case implied, these payments amounted to a form of illegal, undisclosed campaign spending. And, Bragg argued, because Trump created paperwork to make the payments seem like regular legal expenses, that amounted to a criminal effort at a coverup. Trump has denied the charges against him.

BUT HUNTER!!!!!!!!!!!! :auiqs.jpg:
EACH of those stories was vetted for truthfulness; the doorman was obviously WRONG and the other two highly suspect. It was sensible not to run with them even for a stupid "tabloid" rag. lmao

Greg
 
The crime is fabricated in the weak minds of leftists by the dems and their media allies.

Or.....the crimes were found to be well supported by the grand jury, resulting in the actual charges.

You'll find that most of MAGA outrage at the law is them just ignoring evidence and not having a clue about how the law works.

Remember when MAGA shit its pants about how Trump wasn't allowed to appeal unless he could secure the bond....days AFTER Trump had already appealed? Or the outrage that Trump wasn't allowed unlimited chances to strike prospective jurors rather than just 10 without cause?

Dipshits are gonna dip.
 
Oopsie.

Well, this is why, like a mob boss, Trump doesn't like people around him taking notes, using email, or recording anything in any way ever.

Notes are usually pretty good evidence. I guess we'll see.

The star witnesses for your side are a porn star and an attorney who admitted to lying under oath over ten times.
 

Its pretty close. I leave a little wiggle room for the law of large numbers.

They don't have a clue how bias claims against a judge work. If Trump says it, they accept that as a legal standard. ANd then are confused and afraid when the court's laugh out baseless accusations of bias.

Every of MAGAs near perfect record of failures in court, they perceive as evidence of corruption.......as the judges are falling the ACTUAL law, rather than MAGA imagination.

You can't fix stupid. But you can charge it with 34 felonies and try it in court.
 

Forum List

Back
Top