Here is how to oppose Trump's registry

[JakeStarkey]

I understand you are not an intelligent sort so allow me to explain this. Gun ownership in the US is a Constitutional right. Refugees from foreign nations do not have a Constitutional right or any other right to be welcomed here.

I am sure your right to own arms is being considered even now. We know I am a Republican and you are a far right wannabee racialist terrorist. But you are a coward. Just embrace your cowardice.

 

[PredFan]

I am no more liberal than lonestar_logic is a mainstream Republican.

You're a mainstream establishment idiot

Which is the same as a liberal.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Jroc, come here, my mouth to your ear: there are data bases for refugees already. We just can't do them based on religion.

Do you understand now?

Under federal law, the executive branch is expressly required to take religion into account in determining who is granted asylum. Under the provision governing asylum (section 1158 of Title 8, U.S. Code), an alien applying for admission must establish that … religion [among other things] … was or will be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corne...merican-except-federal-law-requires-it-Andrew

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I understand you are not an intelligent sort so allow me to explain this. Gun ownership in the US is a Constitutional right. Refugees from foreign nations do not have a Constitutional right or any other right to be welcomed here.

I am sure your right to own arms is being considered even now. We know I am a Republican and you are a far right wannabee racialist terrorist. But you are a coward. Just embrace your cowardice.

I bet the majority here knows exactly what you are and it's not a Republican.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Jroc, come here, my mouth to your ear: there are data bases for refugees already. We just can't do them based on religion.

Do you understand now?

Under federal law, the executive branch is expressly required to take religion into account in determining who is granted asylum. Under the provision governing asylum (section 1158 of Title 8, U.S. Code), an alien applying for admission must establish that … religion [among other things] … was or will be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant.

Read more at: Barack Obama's Refugee Crisis Comments Show He Misreads the Law | National Review Online

But not for denying them.

You just don't get it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I bet the majority here knows exactly what you are and it's not a Republican.

Everyone on this Board who knows you are a racialist coward who has backed down from your betters here, including me, all the time.

Why do you lie about Trump and his comments about a database based on religion? To deny people from coming here?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Jroc, come here, my mouth to your ear: there are data bases for refugees already. We just can't do them based on religion.

Do you understand now?

Under federal law, the executive branch is expressly required to take religion into account in determining who is granted asylum. Under the provision governing asylum (section 1158 of Title 8, U.S. Code), an alien applying for admission must establish that … religion [among other things] … was or will be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant.

Read more at: Barack Obama's Refugee Crisis Comments Show He Misreads the Law | National Review Online

But not for denying them.

You just don't get it.

No, you don't get it.

But then again. you're a stupid ass liberal so it stands to reason.

 

[Dan Daly]

How about we just save ourselves a lot of trouble and ensure neither Trump, Clinton or any other of the usual statist creeps come anywhere near the White House...and Congress too?

 

[JakeStarkey]

How about we just save ourselves a lot of trouble and ensure neither Trump, Clinton or any other of the usual statist creeps come anywhere near the White House...and Congress too?

Because Carson or Cruz or Santorum etc would be even worse?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I bet the majority here knows exactly what you are and it's not a Republican.

Everyone on this Board who knows you are a racialist coward who has backed down from your betters here, including me, all the time.

Why do you lie about Trump and his comments about a database based on religion? To deny people from coming here?

Your concession is duly noted.


BTW I never mentioned Trump in this thread.

 

[theHawk]

I am pinning my version on tomorrow morning.

Here is the model for opposition.

Why are you participating in this lie Jake?

Progressives have to pretend they are all victims. It gives them a noble "cause" to fight for, even if it's a sham created by them.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I am pinning my version on tomorrow morning.

Here is the model for opposition.

Why are you participating in this lie Jake?

Progressives have to pretend they are all victims. It gives them a noble "cause" to fight for, even if it's a sham created by them.

They are victims. Victims of their own stupidity.

 

[theHawk]

The far right screams the lie that he did not say what he said, what many of us heard him say it.
Fox, CNN, and ABCNews report the truth.

Trump would 'certainly implement' national database for ... CNN
20 hours ago - Donald Trump on Thursday called for the creation of a national database to register all Muslims living in the U.S. to protect the country ... More Videos . ..... on Fox Business that Trump "is just saying he won't rule anything out.".
Trump Would 'Certainly Implement' a Registry of Muslims Trump causes firestorm with Muslim registry remarks – but ...

Fox News Channel
1 day ago - Donald Trump has caused a media and political firestorm with his answers to questions on ... Fox News Home · Watch Live · Trending; Video ... Whether he would support making Muslims register in a national database. ... article Thursday based on aninterview with the Republican presidential candidate.
Donald Trump's Muslim database, explaine

But you lefties are all for creating a national database for buying a gun.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Your concession is duly noted. BTW I never mentioned Trump in this thread.

That's why your deflection failed. The thread is about Trump, not your far right nonsense. Now you will admit your concession is somehow my concession.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Smart people are all for creating a data base of potential far right criminals.

 

[Dan Daly]

How about we just save ourselves a lot of trouble and ensure neither Trump, Clinton or any other of the usual statist creeps come anywhere near the White House...and Congress too?

Because Carson or Cruz or Santorum etc would be even worse?

Carson, Cruz and Santorum are more of the same statist creeps. Bout the only one's I can think of off hand that might not be totally in that sad mold "might" be Paul or Webb. Former NM Governor Gary Johnson comes to mind as well, but I don't think he's willing to step into the cesspool again.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Your concession is duly noted. BTW I never mentioned Trump in this thread.

That's why your deflection failed. The thread is about Trump, not your far right nonsense.

Like I said, your concession is noted.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Ilar, you are silly, almost no common sense.

He said it, he does dread it. Of course he does.

No Fakey, you perpetually dishonest bitch. He did NOT say it. As you know. Of course.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Your concession is duly noted. BTW I never mentioned Trump in this thread.

That's why your deflection failed. The thread is about Trump, not your far right nonsense. Now you will admit your concession is somehow my concession.

Like I said, your concession is noted.

Called it! I am glad Ilar demonstrates that he is as stupid as Lonestar.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

I have said for national elections no far right candidate would be nominated. I was right, and you, Ilar, were wrong. You will be wrong again. And I believe Rubio or Kasich or Bush can beat any Dem.

You were wrong, you pathetically dishonest asshole.

Reagan was very far right compared to any liberal Dem. HE won, you ignorant twit.

And the exposure of the flagrant dishonesty and dangerous stupidity of the liberal Dumbocraps (and their handmaiden biased liberal main stream media apparatchik) will lead to the defeat of any of the assholes currently striving to get the Dim Party nod.

Kasich will never get the GOP nod. Neither will Jeb. Rubio is a mixed bag of nuts, but might get the nod.

Cruz is not presently favored. Certainly not by the RINO GOP leadershit. But he can still prevail. And if he were to get the GOP nomination, he would FLAIL poor old Shrillary, Let's be clear. You want her to win, since despite your always dishonest claims, you are in fact just a liberal Democratic,

You will be disappointed.

Good.