Heroin in Huntington

So what?

Using the old definition one on 10 must be removed. They were born with an addiction not removed or killed
I knew you would reveal your lack of understanding even when I excused you before you replied.

So you either want to use the older definition or the one that is less precise
Make up your mind

and FYI since you only used a birth statistic as your one in ten you still can't say the city has been decimated only the number of infants born in the city
I can use both at my discretion no matter how confused you become.

but you specifically said even using the old definition did you not?
Thats correct.

so you did not illustrate the city wide decimation you are claiming because you only used newborns in your one in ten example
 
I knew you would reveal your lack of understanding even when I excused you before you replied.

So you either want to use the older definition or the one that is less precise
Make up your mind

and FYI since you only used a birth statistic as your one in ten you still can't say the city has been decimated only the number of infants born in the city
I can use both at my discretion no matter how confused you become.

but you specifically said even using the old definition did you not?

by limiting your example to newborns you certainly did not illustrate that the entire city had been decimated
I didnt limit anything. I just used one example.

then you failed to prove the entire city has been decimated as you claim
 
I knew you would reveal your lack of understanding even when I excused you before you replied.

So you either want to use the older definition or the one that is less precise
Make up your mind

and FYI since you only used a birth statistic as your one in ten you still can't say the city has been decimated only the number of infants born in the city
I can use both at my discretion no matter how confused you become.

but you specifically said even using the old definition did you not?
Thats correct.

so you did not illustrate the city wide decimation you are claiming because you only used newborns in your one in ten example
The article did that. I just posted it and made a few comments.
 
So you either want to use the older definition or the one that is less precise
Make up your mind

and FYI since you only used a birth statistic as your one in ten you still can't say the city has been decimated only the number of infants born in the city
I can use both at my discretion no matter how confused you become.

but you specifically said even using the old definition did you not?

by limiting your example to newborns you certainly did not illustrate that the entire city had been decimated
I didnt limit anything. I just used one example.

then you failed to prove the entire city has been decimated as you claim
I wasnt trying to prove anything to you.
 
I can use both at my discretion no matter how confused you become.

but you specifically said even using the old definition did you not?

by limiting your example to newborns you certainly did not illustrate that the entire city had been decimated
I didnt limit anything. I just used one example.

then you failed to prove the entire city has been decimated as you claim
I wasnt trying to prove anything to you.

sure
 
but you specifically said even using the old definition did you not?

by limiting your example to newborns you certainly did not illustrate that the entire city had been decimated
I didnt limit anything. I just used one example.

then you failed to prove the entire city has been decimated as you claim
I wasnt trying to prove anything to you.

sure
Glad you finally get it.
 
by limiting your example to newborns you certainly did not illustrate that the entire city had been decimated
I didnt limit anything. I just used one example.

then you failed to prove the entire city has been decimated as you claim
I wasnt trying to prove anything to you.

sure
Glad you finally get it.
Oh I got that you like to be vague a long time ago
 
I didnt limit anything. I just used one example.

then you failed to prove the entire city has been decimated as you claim
I wasnt trying to prove anything to you.

sure
Glad you finally get it.
Oh I got that you like to be vague a long time ago
I can tell by how you were outraged over you inability to understand my OP.
 
then you failed to prove the entire city has been decimated as you claim
I wasnt trying to prove anything to you.

sure
Glad you finally get it.
Oh I got that you like to be vague a long time ago
I can tell by how you were outraged over you inability to understand my OP.

outraged?

wow you really like to make shit up.
 
I wasnt trying to prove anything to you.

sure
Glad you finally get it.
Oh I got that you like to be vague a long time ago
I can tell by how you were outraged over you inability to understand my OP.

outraged?

wow you really like to make shit up.
Yes outraged. Your inability to understand the OP caused you to create at least 10 increasingly embarrassing posts in a row. So now youre outraged at your own lack of understanding.
 
Oh I got that you like to be vague a long time ago
I can tell by how you were outraged over you inability to understand my OP.

outraged?

wow you really like to make shit up.
Yes outraged. Your inability to understand the OP caused you to create at least 10 increasingly embarrassing posts in a row. So now youre outraged at your own lack of understanding.

Yes you say I don't understand a word when you don't use it correctly I get it.

Tell me which definition do you want to use and we'll go from there
 
Last edited:
Glad you finally get it.
Oh I got that you like to be vague a long time ago
I can tell by how you were outraged over you inability to understand my OP.

outraged?

wow you really like to make shit up.
Yes outraged. Your inability to understand the OP caused you to create at least 10 increasingly embarrassing posts in a row. So now youre outraged at your own lack of understanding.

Yes you say I don't understand a word when you don't us it correctly I get it.

Tell me which definition do you want to use and we'll go from there
Your first sentence is not written in english.

I already told you I can use any definition i choose as long as its in the dictionary.
 
Oh I got that you like to be vague a long time ago
I can tell by how you were outraged over you inability to understand my OP.

outraged?

wow you really like to make shit up.
Yes outraged. Your inability to understand the OP caused you to create at least 10 increasingly embarrassing posts in a row. So now youre outraged at your own lack of understanding.

Yes you say I don't understand a word when you don't us it correctly I get it.

Tell me which definition do you want to use and we'll go from there
Your first sentence is not written in english.


I already told you I can use any definition i choose as long as its in the dictionary.
Well I missed an e on my keyboard and you didn't capitalize the e in English

use this definition from Merriam Webster

to destroy a large number of (plants, animals, people, etc.)

and for clarity let's use this definition of destroy

to cause (something) to end or no longer exist : to cause the destruction of (something) : to damage (something) so badly that it cannot be repaired

 
I can tell by how you were outraged over you inability to understand my OP.

outraged?

wow you really like to make shit up.
Yes outraged. Your inability to understand the OP caused you to create at least 10 increasingly embarrassing posts in a row. So now youre outraged at your own lack of understanding.

Yes you say I don't understand a word when you don't us it correctly I get it.

Tell me which definition do you want to use and we'll go from there
Your first sentence is not written in english.


I already told you I can use any definition i choose as long as its in the dictionary.
Well I missed an e on my keyboard and you didn't capitalize the e in English

use this definition from Merriam Webster

to destroy a large number of (plants, animals, people, etc.)

and for clarity let's use this definition of destroy

to cause (something) to end or no longer exist : to cause the destruction of (something) : to damage (something) so badly that it cannot be repaired
Unfortunately for you there is no reason for me to allow you to dictate what definitions I use.
 
outraged?

wow you really like to make shit up.
Yes outraged. Your inability to understand the OP caused you to create at least 10 increasingly embarrassing posts in a row. So now youre outraged at your own lack of understanding.

Yes you say I don't understand a word when you don't us it correctly I get it.

Tell me which definition do you want to use and we'll go from there
Your first sentence is not written in english.


I already told you I can use any definition i choose as long as its in the dictionary.
Well I missed an e on my keyboard and you didn't capitalize the e in English

use this definition from Merriam Webster

to destroy a large number of (plants, animals, people, etc.)

and for clarity let's use this definition of destroy

to cause (something) to end or no longer exist : to cause the destruction of (something) : to damage (something) so badly that it cannot be repaired
Unfortunately for you there is no reason for me to allow you to dictate what definitions I use.


so what definition are you using? since you can't seem to decide
 
Yes outraged. Your inability to understand the OP caused you to create at least 10 increasingly embarrassing posts in a row. So now youre outraged at your own lack of understanding.

Yes you say I don't understand a word when you don't us it correctly I get it.

Tell me which definition do you want to use and we'll go from there
Your first sentence is not written in english.


I already told you I can use any definition i choose as long as its in the dictionary.
Well I missed an e on my keyboard and you didn't capitalize the e in English

use this definition from Merriam Webster

to destroy a large number of (plants, animals, people, etc.)

and for clarity let's use this definition of destroy

to cause (something) to end or no longer exist : to cause the destruction of (something) : to damage (something) so badly that it cannot be repaired
Unfortunately for you there is no reason for me to allow you to dictate what definitions I use.


so what definition are you using? since you can't seem to decide
I've already explained that. Please refer to the thread. You have used up all of your "help me please" cards.
 
Yes you say I don't understand a word when you don't us it correctly I get it.

Tell me which definition do you want to use and we'll go from there
Your first sentence is not written in english.


I already told you I can use any definition i choose as long as its in the dictionary.
Well I missed an e on my keyboard and you didn't capitalize the e in English

use this definition from Merriam Webster

to destroy a large number of (plants, animals, people, etc.)

and for clarity let's use this definition of destroy

to cause (something) to end or no longer exist : to cause the destruction of (something) : to damage (something) so badly that it cannot be repaired
Unfortunately for you there is no reason for me to allow you to dictate what definitions I use.


so what definition are you using? since you can't seem to decide
I've already explained that. Please refer to the thread. You have used up all of your "help me please" cards.

OK you gave this

kill, destroy, or remove a large percentage or part of.

that definition does not support your statement that the city was decimated

you said no one need be killed so that leaves destroyed or removed
and we have yet to define what a large percentage is
 
Your first sentence is not written in english.


I already told you I can use any definition i choose as long as its in the dictionary.
Well I missed an e on my keyboard and you didn't capitalize the e in English

use this definition from Merriam Webster

to destroy a large number of (plants, animals, people, etc.)

and for clarity let's use this definition of destroy

to cause (something) to end or no longer exist : to cause the destruction of (something) : to damage (something) so badly that it cannot be repaired
Unfortunately for you there is no reason for me to allow you to dictate what definitions I use.


so what definition are you using? since you can't seem to decide
I've already explained that. Please refer to the thread. You have used up all of your "help me please" cards.

OK you gave this

kill, destroy, or remove a large percentage or part of.

that definition does not support your statement that the city was decimated

you said no one need be killed so that leaves destroyed or removed
and we have yet to define what a large percentage is
Of course it does support it. I cant be blamed because you cant seem to comprehend the meaning of words.
 

Forum List

Back
Top