Hey liberals, just a simple question how are you going to impeach Trump when....

[Wyatt earp]

Having Trump stand for re-election in 2020 may be preferable.

God no. Who the fuck knows what will happen before 2020 while Trump is president. NO ONE can predict such a thing and it could be disastrous.

Well, I was speaking from a strictly political standpoint.

One has to remember that Clinton wasn’t supposed to win given the time honored tradition of the US electorate not awarding a 3rd term to the same party. There have been 15 Presidential elections since 1960. Enough for a good sample I think. Only once has the US electorate awarded 12 years of control of the Oval office to the same Party and that was Bush I in 1988; the follow up act to arguably the most popular President of the last Century.

Still, given this historical trend, she lost three states that would have turned the election by about 100,000 votes; PA, MI, and WI.

View attachment 127465

This far, Trump’s record on fulfilling high profile campaign promises has been dismal. One would think that the negatives of whomever the Dems nominate in 2020 would not be so pronounced.

Can you imagine all the things we WOULDN'T be talking about for the last six months if the GOP had been their normal self and nominated a normal candidate like say, Bush, or Rubio,

and then beat the very vulnerable, baggage ridden, bad candidate Hillary Clinton?

I doubt anyone else could of beat her...

 

[candycorn]

Having Trump stand for re-election in 2020 may be preferable.

God no. Who the fuck knows what will happen before 2020 while Trump is president. NO ONE can predict such a thing and it could be disastrous.

Well, I was speaking from a strictly political standpoint.

One has to remember that Clinton wasn’t supposed to win given the time honored tradition of the US electorate not awarding a 3rd term to the same party. There have been 15 Presidential elections since 1960. Enough for a good sample I think. Only once has the US electorate awarded 12 years of control of the Oval office to the same Party and that was Bush I in 1988; the follow up act to arguably the most popular President of the last Century.

Still, given this historical trend, she lost three states that would have turned the election by about 100,000 votes; PA, MI, and WI.

View attachment 127465

This far, Trump’s record on fulfilling high profile campaign promises has been dismal. One would think that the negatives of whomever the Dems nominate in 2020 would not be so pronounced.

I'm more worried about his control over nuclear weapons.

We have the two-man rule and several career officers that stand between this jerk and them. I doubt the generals and admirals take him very seriously.

 

[Aries]

....after 7 years the republicans can't even repeal Obamacare care? LMFAO so in your world you think you're going to get republicans to agree on anything?


Much less impeach Trump?



View attachment 127001

We're much more efficient then repubs, you haven't noticed?

....after 7 years the republicans can't even repeal Obamacare care? LMFAO so in your world you think you're going to get republicans to agree on anything?


Much less impeach Trump?



View attachment 127001

We're much more efficient then repubs, you haven't noticed?

Yea I know , your way more about party then country ...


We seen that with the democrats standing behind Obama care at all cost even losing their own seats because of it.


We seen democrats like Susan go to jail before knarking on Bill ...



Very impressive...

.

I will always put country over party unlike the treasonous republicans.

 

[Wyatt earp]

....after 7 years the republicans can't even repeal Obamacare care? LMFAO so in your world you think you're going to get republicans to agree on anything?


Much less impeach Trump?



View attachment 127001

We're much more efficient then repubs, you haven't noticed?

....after 7 years the republicans can't even repeal Obamacare care? LMFAO so in your world you think you're going to get republicans to agree on anything?


Much less impeach Trump?



View attachment 127001

We're much more efficient then repubs, you haven't noticed?

Yea I know , your way more about party then country ...


We seen that with the democrats standing behind Obama care at all cost even losing their own seats because of it.


We seen democrats like Susan go to jail before knarking on Bill ...



Very impressive...

.

I will always put country over party unlike the treasonous republicans.

You don't have a country, you have a warped ideology of reality.



.

 

[hadit]

True, he was going down for the cover up, which we have learned is usually worse than the crime. Ask slick Willie, who was impeached.

For a blow job

Get a better history book. You don't lose your law license for 5 years and bill your handlers for almost 6 figures in fines for getting a BJ.

Yes it as for a blow job. A consensual blow job.

Like I said, you need a better history book. A judge who strips a lawyer of his license and fines him $90 K doesn't do it for a BJ.

Tell you what, give us an example of a judge imposing those punishments on someone for consensual sex, and site the law broken.

You know as well as I do that Bubba got himself in trouble for lying under oath and filing false affidavits. Put it this way, had he not done so, would he have lost his license and been fined? Be honest.

All based on a consensual blow job

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

 

[BULLDOG]

For a blow job

Get a better history book. You don't lose your law license for 5 years and bill your handlers for almost 6 figures in fines for getting a BJ.

Yes it as for a blow job. A consensual blow job.

Like I said, you need a better history book. A judge who strips a lawyer of his license and fines him $90 K doesn't do it for a BJ.

Tell you what, give us an example of a judge imposing those punishments on someone for consensual sex, and site the law broken.

You know as well as I do that Bubba got himself in trouble for lying under oath and filing false affidavits. Put it this way, had he not done so, would he have lost his license and been fined? Be honest.

All based on a consensual blow job

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

Don't be silly.Just because they were able to make a big deal out of a consensual blowjob doesn't mean anything. We both know it was over a blowjob.

 

[hadit]

Get a better history book. You don't lose your law license for 5 years and bill your handlers for almost 6 figures in fines for getting a BJ.

Yes it as for a blow job. A consensual blow job.

Like I said, you need a better history book. A judge who strips a lawyer of his license and fines him $90 K doesn't do it for a BJ.

Tell you what, give us an example of a judge imposing those punishments on someone for consensual sex, and site the law broken.

You know as well as I do that Bubba got himself in trouble for lying under oath and filing false affidavits. Put it this way, had he not done so, would he have lost his license and been fined? Be honest.

All based on a consensual blow job

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

Don't be silly.Just because they were able to make a big deal out of a consensual blowjob doesn't mean anything. We both know it was over a blowjob.

You're still reading that history book written in crayon. Perjury and obstruction of justice are serious matters. The things Bubba did were denying a woman her day in court, and it wasn't the least powerful woman in the office that the most powerful man in the office (perhaps in the world), was using for his sexual pleasure. Had he simply admitted what he was doing, public opinion would have maybe cost him a little, but certainly not impeachment. Now, since the prosecutor was establishing a pattern of behavior, it would have strengthened Jones' case, but since he lied, we won't know.

 

[BULLDOG]

Yes it as for a blow job. A consensual blow job.

Like I said, you need a better history book. A judge who strips a lawyer of his license and fines him $90 K doesn't do it for a BJ.

Tell you what, give us an example of a judge imposing those punishments on someone for consensual sex, and site the law broken.

You know as well as I do that Bubba got himself in trouble for lying under oath and filing false affidavits. Put it this way, had he not done so, would he have lost his license and been fined? Be honest.

All based on a consensual blow job

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

Don't be silly.Just because they were able to make a big deal out of a consensual blowjob doesn't mean anything. We both know it was over a blowjob.

You're still reading that history book written in crayon. Perjury and obstruction of justice are serious matters. The things Bubba did were denying a woman her day in court, and it wasn't the least powerful woman in the office that the most powerful man in the office (perhaps in the world), was using for his sexual pleasure. Had he simply admitted what he was doing, public opinion would have maybe cost him a little, but certainly not impeachment. Now, since the prosecutor was establishing a pattern of behavior, it would have strengthened Jones' case, but since he lied, we won't know.

Lewinsky as using him for her pleasure

 

[Thinker101]

Get a better history book. You don't lose your law license for 5 years and bill your handlers for almost 6 figures in fines for getting a BJ.

Yes it as for a blow job. A consensual blow job.

Like I said, you need a better history book. A judge who strips a lawyer of his license and fines him $90 K doesn't do it for a BJ.

Tell you what, give us an example of a judge imposing those punishments on someone for consensual sex, and site the law broken.

You know as well as I do that Bubba got himself in trouble for lying under oath and filing false affidavits. Put it this way, had he not done so, would he have lost his license and been fined? Be honest.

All based on a consensual blow job

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

Don't be silly.Just because they were able to make a big deal out of a consensual blowjob doesn't mean anything. We both know it was over a blowjob.

Perhaps...but lying to a Grand Jury is a big deal.

 

[BULLDOG]

Yes it as for a blow job. A consensual blow job.

Like I said, you need a better history book. A judge who strips a lawyer of his license and fines him $90 K doesn't do it for a BJ.

Tell you what, give us an example of a judge imposing those punishments on someone for consensual sex, and site the law broken.

You know as well as I do that Bubba got himself in trouble for lying under oath and filing false affidavits. Put it this way, had he not done so, would he have lost his license and been fined? Be honest.

All based on a consensual blow job

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

Don't be silly.Just because they were able to make a big deal out of a consensual blowjob doesn't mean anything. We both know it was over a blowjob.

Perhaps...but lying to a Grand Jury is a big deal.

He lied about a blow job. Big deal. At least he didn't lie about collusion with Putin.

 

[Thinker101]

Like I said, you need a better history book. A judge who strips a lawyer of his license and fines him $90 K doesn't do it for a BJ.

Tell you what, give us an example of a judge imposing those punishments on someone for consensual sex, and site the law broken.

You know as well as I do that Bubba got himself in trouble for lying under oath and filing false affidavits. Put it this way, had he not done so, would he have lost his license and been fined? Be honest.

All based on a consensual blow job

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

Don't be silly.Just because they were able to make a big deal out of a consensual blowjob doesn't mean anything. We both know it was over a blowjob.

Perhaps...but lying to a Grand Jury is a big deal.

He lied about a blow job. Big deal. At least he didn't lie about collusion with Putin.

No kidding, somehow you left out Grand Jury...may be a keying error.

 

[hadit]

Like I said, you need a better history book. A judge who strips a lawyer of his license and fines him $90 K doesn't do it for a BJ.

Tell you what, give us an example of a judge imposing those punishments on someone for consensual sex, and site the law broken.

You know as well as I do that Bubba got himself in trouble for lying under oath and filing false affidavits. Put it this way, had he not done so, would he have lost his license and been fined? Be honest.

All based on a consensual blow job

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

Don't be silly.Just because they were able to make a big deal out of a consensual blowjob doesn't mean anything. We both know it was over a blowjob.

You're still reading that history book written in crayon. Perjury and obstruction of justice are serious matters. The things Bubba did were denying a woman her day in court, and it wasn't the least powerful woman in the office that the most powerful man in the office (perhaps in the world), was using for his sexual pleasure. Had he simply admitted what he was doing, public opinion would have maybe cost him a little, but certainly not impeachment. Now, since the prosecutor was establishing a pattern of behavior, it would have strengthened Jones' case, but since he lied, we won't know.

Lewinsky as using him for her pleasure

Don't you remember the feminists telling us it was impossible for a more powerful man to have a truly consensual affair with a less powerful woman? At least they told us that before Bubba, for whom they sold out their principles.

 

[hadit]

Like I said, you need a better history book. A judge who strips a lawyer of his license and fines him $90 K doesn't do it for a BJ.

Tell you what, give us an example of a judge imposing those punishments on someone for consensual sex, and site the law broken.

You know as well as I do that Bubba got himself in trouble for lying under oath and filing false affidavits. Put it this way, had he not done so, would he have lost his license and been fined? Be honest.

All based on a consensual blow job

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

Don't be silly.Just because they were able to make a big deal out of a consensual blowjob doesn't mean anything. We both know it was over a blowjob.

Perhaps...but lying to a Grand Jury is a big deal.

He lied about a blow job. Big deal. At least he didn't lie about collusion with Putin.

He was under oath, and being a lawyer, knew better.

 

[BULLDOG]

All based on a consensual blow job

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

Don't be silly.Just because they were able to make a big deal out of a consensual blowjob doesn't mean anything. We both know it was over a blowjob.

You're still reading that history book written in crayon. Perjury and obstruction of justice are serious matters. The things Bubba did were denying a woman her day in court, and it wasn't the least powerful woman in the office that the most powerful man in the office (perhaps in the world), was using for his sexual pleasure. Had he simply admitted what he was doing, public opinion would have maybe cost him a little, but certainly not impeachment. Now, since the prosecutor was establishing a pattern of behavior, it would have strengthened Jones' case, but since he lied, we won't know.

Lewinsky as using him for her pleasure

Don't you remember the feminists telling us it was impossible for a more powerful man to have a truly consensual affair with a less powerful woman? At least they told us that before Bubba, for whom they sold out their principles.

No they didn't. That is the exaggeration that people like Hannity and Rush spoured. You, being a good little RWNJ, believed what they told you.

 

[BULLDOG]

All based on a consensual blow job

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

Don't be silly.Just because they were able to make a big deal out of a consensual blowjob doesn't mean anything. We both know it was over a blowjob.

Perhaps...but lying to a Grand Jury is a big deal.

He lied about a blow job. Big deal. At least he didn't lie about collusion with Putin.

He was under oath, and being a lawyer, knew better.

Trump isn't a lawyer, so you think it's OK for him to lie about his ties to Russia?

 

[hadit]

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

Don't be silly.Just because they were able to make a big deal out of a consensual blowjob doesn't mean anything. We both know it was over a blowjob.

You're still reading that history book written in crayon. Perjury and obstruction of justice are serious matters. The things Bubba did were denying a woman her day in court, and it wasn't the least powerful woman in the office that the most powerful man in the office (perhaps in the world), was using for his sexual pleasure. Had he simply admitted what he was doing, public opinion would have maybe cost him a little, but certainly not impeachment. Now, since the prosecutor was establishing a pattern of behavior, it would have strengthened Jones' case, but since he lied, we won't know.

Lewinsky as using him for her pleasure

Don't you remember the feminists telling us it was impossible for a more powerful man to have a truly consensual affair with a less powerful woman? At least they told us that before Bubba, for whom they sold out their principles.

No they didn't. That is the exaggeration that people like Hannity and Rush spoured. You, being a good little RWNJ, believed what they told you.

Of course they did. Before Bubba, it was A Vary Bad Thing for a CEO to have an affair with a secretary or other lower ranking female, because of the power imbalance. After Bubba, not so much. They sold their souls for abortion.

 

[hadit]

Irrelevant. He, a lawyer, lied under oath and filed false papers with the court. That's what got him in trouble. As far as the court was concerned, the BJ was totally inconsequential.

Don't be silly.Just because they were able to make a big deal out of a consensual blowjob doesn't mean anything. We both know it was over a blowjob.

Perhaps...but lying to a Grand Jury is a big deal.

He lied about a blow job. Big deal. At least he didn't lie about collusion with Putin.

He was under oath, and being a lawyer, knew better.

Trump isn't a lawyer, so you think it's OK for him to lie about his ties to Russia?

If he's under oath, you bet it's a big deal. It's not okay to lie about it any other time either, but with politicians it kind of comes with the territory. I mean, Hillary was famous for it. Either way, someone's going to have to prove that it happened and that he lied about it. So far, no one has.