Hey Ya Know What?

[Esmeralda]

Seventy or eighty. You are right, it seems full.

How many did Martin Luther King start with?

Gandhi?

Jesus?

All movements have a beginning.

You compared Trump to Gandhi and Jesus? With a straight face?

 

[Esmeralda]

Seventy or eighty. You are right, it seems full.

How many did Martin Luther King start with?

Gandhi?

Jesus?

All movements have a beginning.

The Trump movement had its beginning. It was a grunt. "He's only a hero because he was captured. I like my soldiers not getting captured, okay?" "They're sending murderers, they're sending rapists and drug dealers. Some of them, I assume, are good people". "You can tell them to go fuck themselves"

Now, let's wait for the finish of the Trump movement. That'll sound like a splash in November.

Trump. He's a movement alright. And we all need a movement every day.

Are you comparing him to a bowel movement? Tsk, tsk.....he is full of shit.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Seventy or eighty. You are right, it seems full.

How many did Martin Luther King start with?

Gandhi?

Jesus?

All movements have a beginning.

The fact that you hold Trump in the same regard as your list shows your delusion quite clearly.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

How many did Martin Luther King start with?

Gandhi?

Jesus?

All movements have a beginning.

The Trump movement had its beginning. It was a grunt. "He's only a hero because he was captured. I like my soldiers not getting captured, okay?" "They're sending murderers, they're sending rapists and drug dealers. Some of them, I assume, are good people". "You can tell them to go fuck themselves"

Now, let's wait for the finish of the Trump movement. That'll sound like a splash in November.

Trump. He's a movement alright. And we all need a movement every day.

I have never understood the Democrats' obsession with bodily functions.

I've never understood why Conservatives say they want government out of their lives, yet want to impose government on damn near everything that goes on in the bedroom. Seems matters below the waist are of utmost importance to the Right Wing.

But that's not their bailiwick any more! Donald Trump and the AltRight can't tell anyone how to behave after the examples they have thrown up.

Permitting the lower animal instincts to be practiced openly de-civilizes societies. Reference history.

The Right Wing has ceded the moral high ground by supporting Donald Trump. Your assessments of right and wrong have been effectively dismissed by the antics of Trump and the AltRight. In short, you don't have a moral voice anymore.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Seventy or eighty. You are right, it seems full.

How many did Martin Luther King start with?

Gandhi?

Jesus?

All movements have a beginning.

The fact that you hold Trump in the same regard as your list shows your delusion quite clearly.

I do not. Only illiterate people would assume that.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Seventy or eighty. You are right, it seems full.

How many did Martin Luther King start with?

Gandhi?

Jesus?

All movements have a beginning.

The fact that you hold Trump in the same regard as your list shows your delusion quite clearly.

I do not. Only illiterate people would assume that.

Illiterate?
It's clear what you were inferring. What is the "Trump movement" you refer to anyway?

 

[owebo]

Seventy or eighty. You are right, it seems full.

How many did Martin Luther King start with?

Gandhi?

Jesus?

All movements have a beginning.

The fact that you hold Trump in the same regard as your list shows your delusion quite clearly.

I do not. Only illiterate people would assume that.

Illiterate?
It's clear what you were inferring. What is the "Trump movement" you refer to anyway?

It's an American thing....you wouldn't understand.....

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Seventy or eighty. You are right, it seems full.

How many did Martin Luther King start with?

Gandhi?

Jesus?

All movements have a beginning.

The fact that you hold Trump in the same regard as your list shows your delusion quite clearly.

I do not. Only illiterate people would assume that.

Illiterate?
It's clear what you were inferring. What is the "Trump movement" you refer to anyway?

I was referring to the growth of movements from small beginnings.

I do not know that there IS a "Trump movement", but there is a definite movement to get the Democrats out of the kitchen. How successful it will be, only time will tell.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

who is that space alien with the blonde wig on the left?

I don't know, but the one on the right looks a little like Michelle.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Seventy or eighty. You are right, it seems full.

How many did Martin Luther King start with?

Gandhi?

Jesus?

All movements have a beginning.

The fact that you hold Trump in the same regard as your list shows your delusion quite clearly.

So it is said, so it is written:

 

[2aguy]

Seventy or eighty. You are right, it seems full.

How many did Martin Luther King start with?

Gandhi?

Jesus?

All movements have a beginning.

The Trump movement had its beginning. It was a grunt. "He's only a hero because he was captured. I like my soldiers not getting captured, okay?" "They're sending murderers, they're sending rapists and drug dealers. Some of them, I assume, are good people". "You can tell them to go fuck themselves"

Now, let's wait for the finish of the Trump movement. That'll sound like a splash in November.

Trump. He's a movement alright. And we all need a movement every day.

I have never understood the Democrats' obsession with bodily functions.

Remember....they are mentally on the level of 4 year olds.....not very bright 4 year olds......

 

[Onyx]

Permitting the lower animal instincts to be practiced openly de-civilizes societies. Reference history.

And the logical conclusion is population control?

If that ain't swell!

Anyways, that is false. Ancient Greece and Rome were fuck crazy, and they were pretty successful by all accounts.

 

[Onyx]

Not only was the KKK a creation and arm of the Democrat Party, but that party is and has always been the party of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow laws, and second class citizenship.

The old Democratic party was southern and conservative.

It isn't really a good characterization at all.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Not only was the KKK a creation and arm of the Democrat Party, but that party is and has always been the party of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow laws, and second class citizenship.

The old Democratic party was southern and conservative.

Cue Laff-Trak.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Seventy or eighty. You are right, it seems full.

How many did Martin Luther King start with?

Gandhi?

Jesus?

All movements have a beginning.

The fact that you hold Trump in the same regard as your list shows your delusion quite clearly.

I do not. Only illiterate people would assume that.

Illiterate?
It's clear what you were inferring. What is the "Trump movement" you refer to anyway?

I was referring to the growth of movements from small beginnings.

I do not know that there IS a "Trump movement", but there is a definite movement to get the Democrats out of the kitchen. How successful it will be, only time will tell.

So if there's no movement per se and no comparison personally with Trump, then what's your point?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Not only was the KKK a creation and arm of the Democrat Party, but that party is and has always been the party of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow laws, and second class citizenship.

The old Democratic party was southern and conservative.

It isn't really a good characterization at all.

That's a fabrication....proven by the fact that Bill 'the rapist' Clinton is the most popular former President to Democrats far and wide....

....and he has been a racist for all of his 40-year political life.


Challenge me on that and I'll make you eat those words.

 

[Onyx]

Challenge me on that.

Okay, well I should not have to challenge simple facts.

Perhaps you could argue why the old Democratic party was closer to liberalism.

I do not really care either way though.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Challenge me on that.

Okay, well I should not have to challenge simple facts.

Perhaps you could argue why the old Democratic party was closer to liberalism.

I do not really care either way though.

'Simple' is the operate term for any who believe what you posted.


The fact is that Bill 'the rapist' Clinton is the most popular former President to Democrats far and wide....

....and he has been a racist for all of his 40-year political life.


You haven't denied that fact....hence I've proven that the 'old' Democrat Party is the same as the 'new' Democrat Party: the party of the KKK, slavery, segregation, Jim Crow laws, and second class citizenship.



Wise up.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And...for the dolts who keep trying to blame the South to shift the blame for segregation from the Democrat Party itself.....

1. Language is important, so in any discussion of who the segregationists were, liberals switch the word “Democrats” to “southerners.” Remember, the Civil Rights Act of 1957 was supported by all the Republicans in the Senate, but only 29 of 47 Democrats…and a number of the ‘segregationist’ Democrats were northern Dems (Oregon, Washington, Montana, and Wyoming). Not southerners: Democrats.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Challenge me on that.

Okay, well I should not have to challenge simple facts.

Perhaps you could argue why the old Democratic party was closer to liberalism.

I do not really care either way though.

"Perhaps you could argue why the old Democratic party was closer to liberalism."

Also false.

The communist John Dewey had the Socialist Party change it's name to 'Liberal.'
Hence, Modern Liberals.....socialists.

That and the Democrat Party bear no resemblance to the classical liberals who founded this nation.
They, and modern conservatives, center their doctrines on individualism, limited constitutional governments, and free markets.....all of which are anathema to Liberals, Democrats, and socialists.



Gads, you're full of malarkey.