Conservative65
Gold Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 26,127
- 2,208
maybe, under Truer forms of Capitalism and a less developed economy.You simply don't understand the concept. Capital must circulate under capitalism to provide that capital efficiency to our First World economy.Capitalism has a natural rate of inefficiency that way.Look what happened in Seattle a few years ago. Demands for an increased minimum wage increase were met then employees began requesting less hours because social welfare benefits were being reduced.
Seattle's economy is driven by a mix of older industrial companies, and "new economy" Internet and technology companies, service, design, and clean technology companies. The city's gross metropolitan product (GMP) was $231 billion in 2010, making it the 11th largest metropolitan economy in the United States.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle#Economy
It's not capitalism that is the problem. It's the lazy POS that want the same end result without having to work for it. Seems it was a lie that people wanted a higher wage in order to support themselves. What they wanted was less hours worked and more freebies.
Why be envious of the Poor who may choose to not work, if You don't Have to be Poor if you are willing to work?
The poor who refuse to work should starve before those that are honorable and work are forced to support them.
In ANY situation where they refuse to do for themselves.