NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
I'd be interested to know what the conservatives, especially, on this forum, believe qualifies a person as being a socialist.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you are saying that those who fought against the US in other wars, to propagate Communism were victims? Yeah, we know which side you are on you fucking traitor. By the way, those in Japan who were bombed by the nuke, were willing to fight to the last man, woman and child, to defend the emperor in WWII. There woulnt be a Japan today, if the bomb wasn't used. But then you would of loved that wouldn't you. God I hate your fucking kind.Notice how he went with Muss not Hitler or Stalin. Damn man, Socialism has killed more people than capitalism ever has.. Unless planned parenthood is considered capitalism when they sell baby body parts for profit...The U.S.A killed more civilians in a few minutes in Hiroshima, and Nagasaki... than Mussolini did through out WW2.
Yeah you know there's something very, very wrong when the U.S.A makes out Mussolini as the mega-villain...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The U.S.A has actually killed about as much as Hitler since WW2.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-ha...-37-victim-nations-since-world-war-ii/5492051
Are you mad?You never cease to not amaze..Do you make profit from the labor you perform for a company? Do you go home and at the end of the week get a paycheck that you can buy food, a house, and other nice thing? Or are you a welfare queen who sits on their ass, smoking dope, being a miserable wretch who votes for the very people who keep you poor?So you're telling me that capitalist do not make a profit from your labor? That their idea is to break even?Your understanding of capitalism is likely warped by Marxist college professors.You mean how people take from the labors of others to profit from?
No, people exchange labor for money. The money paid for the type of labor depends on the availability of such labor, the skill required, and the competition for that labor.
Everyone still has a choice. Choose to mop floor and clean toilets or chose to gain skills to do labor that pays more.
Everybody is exploiting everyone else. It's not a one-way street. The worker is exploiting the business owner's risk taken to start the enterprise.
I say you liberals are Number 2 and I mean #2.
![]()
Just look in the mirror you fucking tard.I'd be interested to know what the conservatives, especially, on this forum, believe qualifies a person as being a socialist.
I would call myself a liberal, but in response, a socialist is someone who wants to use government to apply the threat of force or death in order to "legally" rob someone else.I'd be interested to know what the conservatives, especially, on this forum, believe qualifies a person as being a socialist.
No, just insane...Are you mad?You never cease to not amaze..Do you make profit from the labor you perform for a company? Do you go home and at the end of the week get a paycheck that you can buy food, a house, and other nice thing? Or are you a welfare queen who sits on their ass, smoking dope, being a miserable wretch who votes for the very people who keep you poor?So you're telling me that capitalist do not make a profit from your labor? That their idea is to break even?Your understanding of capitalism is likely warped by Marxist college professors.You mean how people take from the labors of others to profit from?
No, people exchange labor for money. The money paid for the type of labor depends on the availability of such labor, the skill required, and the competition for that labor.
Everyone still has a choice. Choose to mop floor and clean toilets or chose to gain skills to do labor that pays more.
Everybody is exploiting everyone else. It's not a one-way street. The worker is exploiting the business owner's risk taken to start the enterprise.
I say you liberals are Number 2 and I mean #2.
![]()
I would call myself a liberal, but in response, a socialist is someone who wants to use government to apply the threat of force or death in order to "legally" rob someone else.I'd be interested to know what the conservatives, especially, on this forum, believe qualifies a person as being a socialist.
You, for example.
![]()
Just look in the mirror you fucking tard.I'd be interested to know what the conservatives, especially, on this forum, believe qualifies a person as being a socialist.
Just look in the mirror you fucking tard.I'd be interested to know what the conservatives, especially, on this forum, believe qualifies a person as being a socialist.
Well, what is the difference between robbery and taxation from one to give to another? I broke it down to it's basic elements.LOL, I was kind of hoping for mature responses. I guess I momentarily forgot who I was talking to.
Yeah as long as I work, so you don't have to, you are okay with that?Just look in the mirror you fucking tard.I'd be interested to know what the conservatives, especially, on this forum, believe qualifies a person as being a socialist.
So a person like myself who believes in a nation where there's a blend of capitalism and socialism is defined as a socialist?
That's about 90% of the country. lol
Yeah as long as I work, so you don't have to, you are okay with that?Just look in the mirror you fucking tard.I'd be interested to know what the conservatives, especially, on this forum, believe qualifies a person as being a socialist.
So a person like myself who believes in a nation where there's a blend of capitalism and socialism is defined as a socialist?
That's about 90% of the country. lol
...and have any self respect?
After all, if your worth is due to that which is taken from someone else, someone who earned it....your value is nothing more than the vote you offer up to your patron, big government.
In full disclosure, the title of the thread is just as cogent if other terms are substituted for 'socialist,' terms such as communist, fascist, Progressive, Nazi or modern Liberal.
1. "Socialism is the end of all invention; it is the happy face of slavery. Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest" - J.S. Mill
2. " Capitalism is the only moral system because it requires human beings to deal with one another as traders–that is, as free moral agents trading and selling goods and services on the basis of mutual consent.
Capitalism is the only just system because the sole criterion that determines the value of thing exchanged is the free, voluntary, universal judgement of the consumer. Coercion and fraud are anathema to the free-market system.
It is both moral and just because the degree to which man rises or falls in society is determined by the degree to which he uses his mind. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one’s birth or station in life."
The requirements for success in a free society demand that ordinary citizens order their lives in accordance with certain virtues–namely, rationality, independence, industriousness, prudence, frugality, etc. In a free capitalist society individuals must choose for themselves how they will order their lives and the values they will pursue. Under socialism, most of life’s decisions are made for you.
3. Under socialism a ruling class of intellectuals, bureaucrats and social planners decide what people want or what is good for society and then use the coercive power of the State to regulate, tax, and redistribute the wealth of those who work for a living. In other words, socialism is a form of legalized theft.
The morality of socialism can be summed-up in two words: envy and self-sacrifice.
Envy is the desire to not only possess another’s wealth but also the desire to see another’s wealth lowered to the level of one’s own.
Socialism’s teaching on self-sacrifice was nicely summarized by two of its greatest defenders, Hermann Goering and Bennito Mussolini.
The highest principle of Nazism (National Socialism), said Goering, is: “Common good comes before private good.”
Fascism, said Mussolini, is ” a life in which the individual, through the sacrifice of his own private interests…realizes that completely spiritual existence in which his value as a man lies.
4. Sadly, America is no longer a capitalist nation. We live under what is more properly called a mixed economy–that is, an economic system that permits private property, but only at the discretion of government planners. A little bit of capitalism and a little bit of socialism.
When government redistributes wealth through taxation, when it attempts to control and regulate business production and trade, who are the winners and losers? Under this kind of economy the winners and losers are reversed: the winners are those who scream the loudest for a handout and the losers are those quiet citizens who work hard and pay their taxes." Socialism vs. Capitalism: Which is the Moral System | Ashbrook
Nazi...national socialism....based on nationalism and/or race...
Communism....international socialism.
If most of Americans stood with Socialism, then we would have the crooked vagina candidate Hitlery. But since most Americans (US citizens, not illegals) wanted to keep America from turning into a 3rd world cesspool of Socialism, they voted to "Make America Great Again". But you keep on thinking you are in the majority, and you will continue to lose elections over and over....Yeah as long as I work, so you don't have to, you are okay with that?Just look in the mirror you fucking tard.I'd be interested to know what the conservatives, especially, on this forum, believe qualifies a person as being a socialist.
So a person like myself who believes in a nation where there's a blend of capitalism and socialism is defined as a socialist?
That's about 90% of the country. lol
I asked you to define a socialist. You said I was a socialist. I told you where I stand, which is where most Americans stand. We're all socialists then right?
The Road to Serfdom - Wikipedia...and have any self respect?
After all, if your worth is due to that which is taken from someone else, someone who earned it....your value is nothing more than the vote you offer up to your patron, big government.
In full disclosure, the title of the thread is just as cogent if other terms are substituted for 'socialist,' terms such as communist, fascist, Progressive, Nazi or modern Liberal.
1. "Socialism is the end of all invention; it is the happy face of slavery. Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest" - J.S. Mill
2. " Capitalism is the only moral system because it requires human beings to deal with one another as traders–that is, as free moral agents trading and selling goods and services on the basis of mutual consent.
Capitalism is the only just system because the sole criterion that determines the value of thing exchanged is the free, voluntary, universal judgement of the consumer. Coercion and fraud are anathema to the free-market system.
It is both moral and just because the degree to which man rises or falls in society is determined by the degree to which he uses his mind. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one’s birth or station in life."
The requirements for success in a free society demand that ordinary citizens order their lives in accordance with certain virtues–namely, rationality, independence, industriousness, prudence, frugality, etc. In a free capitalist society individuals must choose for themselves how they will order their lives and the values they will pursue. Under socialism, most of life’s decisions are made for you.
3. Under socialism a ruling class of intellectuals, bureaucrats and social planners decide what people want or what is good for society and then use the coercive power of the State to regulate, tax, and redistribute the wealth of those who work for a living. In other words, socialism is a form of legalized theft.
The morality of socialism can be summed-up in two words: envy and self-sacrifice.
Envy is the desire to not only possess another’s wealth but also the desire to see another’s wealth lowered to the level of one’s own.
Socialism’s teaching on self-sacrifice was nicely summarized by two of its greatest defenders, Hermann Goering and Bennito Mussolini.
The highest principle of Nazism (National Socialism), said Goering, is: “Common good comes before private good.”
Fascism, said Mussolini, is ” a life in which the individual, through the sacrifice of his own private interests…realizes that completely spiritual existence in which his value as a man lies.
4. Sadly, America is no longer a capitalist nation. We live under what is more properly called a mixed economy–that is, an economic system that permits private property, but only at the discretion of government planners. A little bit of capitalism and a little bit of socialism.
When government redistributes wealth through taxation, when it attempts to control and regulate business production and trade, who are the winners and losers? Under this kind of economy the winners and losers are reversed: the winners are those who scream the loudest for a handout and the losers are those quiet citizens who work hard and pay their taxes." Socialism vs. Capitalism: Which is the Moral System | Ashbrook
Nazi...national socialism....based on nationalism and/or race...
Communism....international socialism.
You don't understand Socialism. You quote fascists (the opposite of socialists) to make your point. Try reading a political science book before puking forth your ignorance.
Now ignore once again that some of US actually know what happens when your freedoms are taken away , through socialist policies.in which the author "[warns] of the danger of tyranny that inevitably results from government control of economic decision-making through central planning."[1] He further argues that the abandonment of individualism and classical liberalism inevitably leads to a loss of freedom, the creation of an oppressive society, the tyranny of a dictator, and the serfdom of the individual. Hayek challenged the general view among British academics that fascism (including National Socialism) was a capitalist reaction against socialism. He argued that fascism, National Socialism and socialism had common roots in central economic planning and empowering the state over the individual.
How does this "blend" work? I may agree with you.So a person like myself who believes in a nation where there's a blend of capitalism and socialism is defined as a socialist?
If most of Americans stood with Socialism, then we would have the crooked vagina candidate Hitlery. But since most Americans (US citizens, not illegals) wanted to keep America from turning into a 3rd world cesspool of Socialism, they voted to "Make America Great Again". But you keep on thinking you are in the majority, and you will continue to lose elections over and over....Yeah as long as I work, so you don't have to, you are okay with that?Just look in the mirror you fucking tard.I'd be interested to know what the conservatives, especially, on this forum, believe qualifies a person as being a socialist.
So a person like myself who believes in a nation where there's a blend of capitalism and socialism is defined as a socialist?
That's about 90% of the country. lol
I asked you to define a socialist. You said I was a socialist. I told you where I stand, which is where most Americans stand. We're all socialists then right?
How does this "blend" work? I may agree with you.So a person like myself who believes in a nation where there's a blend of capitalism and socialism is defined as a socialist?
There are things that work better in a monopoly. Military, money minting, roads (in most cases), courts, police and fire protection. Government does monopoly better than anyone else. For things that are improved by competition, the private sector works best.
If the private sector can do it, and have competition, the private sector should do it. The problems arise when government is used to create equality of outcome, rather than equality of opportunity.
An example is the attempt to make wages Equal. Equal wages cannot and should not exist. Employers will always pay as little as the market allows. Count on it. The best way for government to control wages is to control the number of available workers. Government should not control reproduction, but can and should control immigration (legal or otherwise) to keep the supply of workers in balance with job availability. An influx of low-skill workers. in even one part of the economy, has a ripple effect that can drive down wages all over the economy. If the complaint is that men make more than women, there are legitimate reasons for that, not based on sex/gender. Believe me. If the best employee is a woman, and different employers are competing for her services, she will get paid.
If most of Americans stood with Socialism, then we would have the crooked vagina candidate Hitlery. But since most Americans (US citizens, not illegals) wanted to keep America from turning into a 3rd world cesspool of Socialism, they voted to "Make America Great Again". But you keep on thinking you are in the majority, and you will continue to lose elections over and over....Yeah as long as I work, so you don't have to, you are okay with that?Just look in the mirror you fucking tard.I'd be interested to know what the conservatives, especially, on this forum, believe qualifies a person as being a socialist.
So a person like myself who believes in a nation where there's a blend of capitalism and socialism is defined as a socialist?
That's about 90% of the country. lol
I asked you to define a socialist. You said I was a socialist. I told you where I stand, which is where most Americans stand. We're all socialists then right?