jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,277
- 29,163
- 2,180
And history has already played out on that under mr. hitler.It's not another word for confiscation at all.
Obviously you keep it then. I think it should have to be registered though.
Too bad. There is no need to register a rifle.
If you dopes were smart, you would willingly offer some concessions to avoid overreach.
Moron.....all the gun owners have done is give in to concessions.......you anti gun extremists don't see concessions as end points, they are just one more item on your list on the way to confiscation........
And nothing you want actually stops criminals or mass shooters...which your leadership knows....you simply want to get to registration, so that you know who has the guns.....
I want registration to track the movement of guns and to hold the owner responsible for it's safety. If a gun turns up at a crime scene in CA and is registered in MN, then the owner has some questions to answer. If people were held to account for the safety of their guns, and background checks as well as a transfer of registration were required, there really couldn't be a black market without someone being accountable.
Yeah the government never misuses information
There is no need to force people to register firearms other than to take them away at a later date