How Franklin Roosevelt Made Memorial Day Necessary

[PoliticalChic]

Oooo......look how easy it was to get you to lie....

Or....can you find any post of mine that suggested a treaty with Hitler?

You guys always lie when I eviscerate you with facts.


C'mon.....try.

Oh PC you're right... he's sooo dreamy!

So.....there is no such post of mine....out of thousands......that suggests any such treaty with Hitler???

You were just lying out of embarrassment????

Glad we were able to work together to show that I never lie.


Cool.

Even as dense as you are.....

....do you ever get to the point, based on the realization that you can't refute anything I post....

....that you begin to question your indoctrination?


Ever????

Yeah if we'd just slapped Hitler on the wrist the war would have ended way sooner and he could have been our friend! And Stalin wouldn't have been able to... uh... it would have stopped him from... uh... hmm

Don't hide behind your fabrication about Hitler....
Answer the question:

....do you ever get to the point, based on the realization that you can't refute anything I post....

....that you begin to question your indoctrination?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I thought we celebrated Decoration Day/ Memorial Day since the Civil War

Didn't know FDR went back that far

Perhaps you'd like to try...all the other indoctrinees have declined....

Can you rebut these facts?

1. . The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."
And, it wasn't.


2. The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.
It served no American purpose....only those of Joseph Stalin.
And that was good enough for Roosevelt.


Now....be careful....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!

Frau Braun at her best for Memorial Day

Unconditional Surrender is the only option America would accept
But Frau Braun here wants us to take it easy on Hitler

I know you're on the Left....but that could be you in the middle, too.

 

[TheOldSchool]

I thought we celebrated Decoration Day/ Memorial Day since the Civil War

Didn't know FDR went back that far

Perhaps you'd like to try...all the other indoctrinees have declined....

Can you rebut these facts?

1. . The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."
And, it wasn't.


2. The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.
It served no American purpose....only those of Joseph Stalin.
And that was good enough for Roosevelt.


Now....be careful....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!

Frau Braun at her best for Memorial Day

Unconditional Surrender is the only option America would accept
But Frau Braun here wants us to take it easy on Hitler

She thinks he's sexxy

 

[PoliticalChic]

I thought we celebrated Decoration Day/ Memorial Day since the Civil War

Didn't know FDR went back that far

Perhaps you'd like to try...all the other indoctrinees have declined....

Can you rebut these facts?

1. . The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."
And, it wasn't.


2. The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.
It served no American purpose....only those of Joseph Stalin.
And that was good enough for Roosevelt.


Now....be careful....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!

Frau Braun at her best for Memorial Day

Unconditional Surrender is the only option America would accept
But Frau Braun here wants us to take it easy on Hitler

She thinks he's sexxy

Inadvertently, you have answered the question: a palpable fear of confronting the truth.

 

[rightwinger]

I thought we celebrated Decoration Day/ Memorial Day since the Civil War

Didn't know FDR went back that far

Perhaps you'd like to try...all the other indoctrinees have declined....

Can you rebut these facts?

1. . The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."
And, it wasn't.


2. The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.
It served no American purpose....only those of Joseph Stalin.
And that was good enough for Roosevelt.


Now....be careful....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!

Frau Braun at her best for Memorial Day

Unconditional Surrender is the only option America would accept
But Frau Braun here wants us to take it easy on Hitler

I know you're on the Left....but that could be you in the middle, too.

Frau Braun

That is your best retort for defending Hitler?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Oh PC you're right... he's sooo dreamy!

So.....there is no such post of mine....out of thousands......that suggests any such treaty with Hitler???

You were just lying out of embarrassment????

Glad we were able to work together to show that I never lie.


Cool.

Even as dense as you are.....

....do you ever get to the point, based on the realization that you can't refute anything I post....

....that you begin to question your indoctrination?


Ever????

Yeah if we'd just slapped Hitler on the wrist the war would have ended way sooner and he could have been our friend! And Stalin wouldn't have been able to... uh... it would have stopped him from... uh... hmm

Don't hide behind your fabrication about Hitler....
Answer the question:

....do you ever get to the point, based on the realization that you can't refute anything I post....

....that you begin to question your indoctrination?

Your questions are stupid and based entirely on wild speculations that could only be dreamed up with decades worth of hindsight.

 

[miketx]

This place never runs short of America hating losers, does it?

 

[irosie91]

Memorial Day, a time of remembrance of our war dead, is the time to note that hundred of thousands of same need not have died....had Roosevelt been more pro-America and less pro-Stalin.



Here's more evidence that there could have been an end to the war if not for Roosevelt and Stalin:

7. " In 1940, [George H.] Earle was appointed as Ambassador to Bulgaria. During World War II, he served again in the United States Navy, this time as Lieutenant Commander and as a special emissary to the Balkans, where Earle proposed a plan that he believed might bring the war in Europe to an early end.

The German ambassador and the head of the German secret service had secretly proposed a coup against Adolf Hitler that would end with Hitler turned over to the US as a war criminal, but the plot was not approved by the US government." "George Howard Earle", Governors of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission,David Martin, "How FDR Dragged out WW II for Stalin


Again? ".... bring the war in Europe to an early end."



Bringing the war to an early end would have saved 200 thousand American servicemen's lives.

that the US did not approve-----by no means PROVES that the US did not want
an early end to the war------could be that the plan was no damned good

"...could be that the plan was no damned good..."

Well.....let's investigate that....

And....the same George Earle that Roosevelt had selected for a fact-finding mission to Europe....and then ignored the facts that Earle provided.....


8. "George H. Earle’s series of secret negotiations with the German underground, which began with [Hitler’s chief spy Adm. Wilhelm] Canaris…. he sent Canaris’s initial query regarding a negotiated peace to the White House via diplomatic pouch in early 1943….

The next approach to Earle, also in that spring of 1943, came from Baron Kurt von Lersner, a German aristocrat of Jewish extraction who lived in virtual exile in Turkey. He, too, had a proposal for the Allies. Earle wrote, “According to Lersner— and I could not doubt him; he had placed his life in my hands— some of the highest officials in Germany, [ambassador to Turkey Franz von] Papen included, loved their country but hated Hitler. They wanted to end the war before he bled Germany of all her youth, all her strength and resources. At the same time, they were deeply concerned about Russia’s growing might and power.” …





Earle sent off another dispatch to FDR at the White House marked “Urgent.” Again, Earle received no reply. “I pressed the matter with every ounce of my persuasion and judgment,” Earle wrote, “but I sensed the old trouble. Lersner’s call for an overt stand against Communist expansion distressed Roosevelt.” …



Earle wrote that his German contacts came back to him with another more specific plan, laying out the involvement of Field Marshal Ludwig Beck; Count Wolf Heinrich von Helldorf, chief of police of Berlin; Prince Gottfried Bismarck, a Potsdam official and grandson of the “Iron Chancellor”; and a well-known cavalry officer, Freiherr von Boeselager. Again, the plan was to stage a coup, turn over Hitler and his top henchmen to the Allies, and bring about Germany’s “unconditional surrender, with one condition”: The Russians were not to be allowed into Central Europe, including Germany or territory at that time controlled by Germany." "Wedemeyer Reports!: An objective, dispassionate examination of World War II, postwar policies, and Grand Strategy," Hardcover – 1959by General Albert C. Wedemeyer


Get the picture??? FDR would not sign on to ending the war unless Stalin inherited...occupied...... Europe.




Soooo......what's the explanation for Roosevelt refusing to allow the war to end???

Answer: Joseph Stalin





Or....do you find this a "bad plan">.".. the plan was to stage a coup, turn over Hitler and his top henchmen to the Allies, and bring about Germany’s “unconditional surrender, with one condition”: The Russians were not to be allowed into Central Europe, including Germany or territory at that time controlled by Germany."

....at the benefit of saving 200,000 American lives.
Happy Memorial Day.

you said nothing particularly new-----there was an anti hitler movement and it consistently failed in attempts to kill adolf

 

[PoliticalChic]

I thought we celebrated Decoration Day/ Memorial Day since the Civil War

Didn't know FDR went back that far

Perhaps you'd like to try...all the other indoctrinees have declined....

Can you rebut these facts?

1. . The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."
And, it wasn't.


2. The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.
It served no American purpose....only those of Joseph Stalin.
And that was good enough for Roosevelt.


Now....be careful....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!

Frau Braun at her best for Memorial Day

Unconditional Surrender is the only option America would accept
But Frau Braun here wants us to take it easy on Hitler

I know you're on the Left....but that could be you in the middle, too.

Frau Braun

That is your best retort for defending Hitler?

Beyond the lie in your avi.....this one is simplest to reveal.....

See if you can find any post of mine that defended Hitler.


We both know that the motive for your attempted smear is that I provide the truth about FDR.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So.....there is no such post of mine....out of thousands......that suggests any such treaty with Hitler???

You were just lying out of embarrassment????

Glad we were able to work together to show that I never lie.


Cool.

Even as dense as you are.....

....do you ever get to the point, based on the realization that you can't refute anything I post....

....that you begin to question your indoctrination?


Ever????

Yeah if we'd just slapped Hitler on the wrist the war would have ended way sooner and he could have been our friend! And Stalin wouldn't have been able to... uh... it would have stopped him from... uh... hmm

Don't hide behind your fabrication about Hitler....
Answer the question:

....do you ever get to the point, based on the realization that you can't refute anything I post....

....that you begin to question your indoctrination?

Your questions are stupid and based entirely on wild speculations that could only be dreamed up with decades worth of hindsight.

"....stupid and based entirely on wild speculations...."


Every one is linked, sourced and documented.

You have been unable to dispute any.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Even as dense as you are.....

....do you ever get to the point, based on the realization that you can't refute anything I post....

....that you begin to question your indoctrination?


Ever????

Yeah if we'd just slapped Hitler on the wrist the war would have ended way sooner and he could have been our friend! And Stalin wouldn't have been able to... uh... it would have stopped him from... uh... hmm

Don't hide behind your fabrication about Hitler....
Answer the question:

....do you ever get to the point, based on the realization that you can't refute anything I post....

....that you begin to question your indoctrination?

Your questions are stupid and based entirely on wild speculations that could only be dreamed up with decades worth of hindsight.

"....stupid and based entirely on wild speculations...."


Every one is linked, sourced and documented.

You have been unable to dispute any.

PC: if we had gone for conditional surrender, my magical time oracle tells me we would never have needed a memorial day! Just look at all my links about people speculating wildly!!!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Memorial Day, a time of remembrance of our war dead, is the time to note that hundred of thousands of same need not have died....had Roosevelt been more pro-America and less pro-Stalin.



Here's more evidence that there could have been an end to the war if not for Roosevelt and Stalin:

7. " In 1940, [George H.] Earle was appointed as Ambassador to Bulgaria. During World War II, he served again in the United States Navy, this time as Lieutenant Commander and as a special emissary to the Balkans, where Earle proposed a plan that he believed might bring the war in Europe to an early end.

The German ambassador and the head of the German secret service had secretly proposed a coup against Adolf Hitler that would end with Hitler turned over to the US as a war criminal, but the plot was not approved by the US government." "George Howard Earle", Governors of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission,David Martin, "How FDR Dragged out WW II for Stalin


Again? ".... bring the war in Europe to an early end."



Bringing the war to an early end would have saved 200 thousand American servicemen's lives.

that the US did not approve-----by no means PROVES that the US did not want
an early end to the war------could be that the plan was no damned good

"...could be that the plan was no damned good..."

Well.....let's investigate that....

And....the same George Earle that Roosevelt had selected for a fact-finding mission to Europe....and then ignored the facts that Earle provided.....


8. "George H. Earle’s series of secret negotiations with the German underground, which began with [Hitler’s chief spy Adm. Wilhelm] Canaris…. he sent Canaris’s initial query regarding a negotiated peace to the White House via diplomatic pouch in early 1943….

The next approach to Earle, also in that spring of 1943, came from Baron Kurt von Lersner, a German aristocrat of Jewish extraction who lived in virtual exile in Turkey. He, too, had a proposal for the Allies. Earle wrote, “According to Lersner— and I could not doubt him; he had placed his life in my hands— some of the highest officials in Germany, [ambassador to Turkey Franz von] Papen included, loved their country but hated Hitler. They wanted to end the war before he bled Germany of all her youth, all her strength and resources. At the same time, they were deeply concerned about Russia’s growing might and power.” …





Earle sent off another dispatch to FDR at the White House marked “Urgent.” Again, Earle received no reply. “I pressed the matter with every ounce of my persuasion and judgment,” Earle wrote, “but I sensed the old trouble. Lersner’s call for an overt stand against Communist expansion distressed Roosevelt.” …



Earle wrote that his German contacts came back to him with another more specific plan, laying out the involvement of Field Marshal Ludwig Beck; Count Wolf Heinrich von Helldorf, chief of police of Berlin; Prince Gottfried Bismarck, a Potsdam official and grandson of the “Iron Chancellor”; and a well-known cavalry officer, Freiherr von Boeselager. Again, the plan was to stage a coup, turn over Hitler and his top henchmen to the Allies, and bring about Germany’s “unconditional surrender, with one condition”: The Russians were not to be allowed into Central Europe, including Germany or territory at that time controlled by Germany." "Wedemeyer Reports!: An objective, dispassionate examination of World War II, postwar policies, and Grand Strategy," Hardcover – 1959by General Albert C. Wedemeyer


Get the picture??? FDR would not sign on to ending the war unless Stalin inherited...occupied...... Europe.




Soooo......what's the explanation for Roosevelt refusing to allow the war to end???

Answer: Joseph Stalin





Or....do you find this a "bad plan">.".. the plan was to stage a coup, turn over Hitler and his top henchmen to the Allies, and bring about Germany’s “unconditional surrender, with one condition”: The Russians were not to be allowed into Central Europe, including Germany or territory at that time controlled by Germany."

....at the benefit of saving 200,000 American lives.
Happy Memorial Day.

you said nothing particularly new-----there was an anti hitler movement and it consistently failed in attempts to kill adolf

"-there was an anti hitler movement and it consistently failed in attempts to kill adolf"

Know why?

1. The Allies had the contacts with the anti-Nazi resistance in every other nation....except Germany.
Stalin forbid any talks with anti-Nazi Germans.



a. The Allied command was not allowed to support or associate itself with the anti-Nazi resistance. Following the Soviet orders, only unconditional surrender would be considered....an order which obviously prolonged the war; the German army, which would have overthrown Hitler and surrendered to the Allies, would not be allowed to expect any hand in determining conditions of their post-war treatment.


b. "A SHAEF (Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force) directive prohibited activities aimed at promoting German revolt against the Nazi regime.
The Allied doctrine of unconditional surrender meant that "... those Germans — and particularly those German generals — who might have been ready to throw Hitler over, and were able to do so, were discouraged from making the attempt by their inability to extract from the Allies any sort of assurance that such action would improve the treatment meted out to their country." German Resistance to Nazism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




c. "Archival evidence indicates that the Soviet’s wanted the war to continue long enough for them to conquer Eastern Europe and in order for Germany to be utterly destroyed or “pastoralized” which was called for in the Morgenthau Plan which was actually written by Soviet spy Harry Dexter White. The Soviets were also clamoring for a “second front” in France in order to deflect the allies out of Italy and the Balkans which was too close to Russia."
Chuck Morse Speaks: The Canaris Cover-up


2.. Under Stalin's orders, backed by Roosevelt, Eisenhower was not allowed to offer aid to the anti-Nazi, anti-communist German resistance in the Wehrmacht, or the Abwehr....


On May 10, 1945, shortly after the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany, General Dwight Eisenhower saluted and gave credit to Europe's resistance forces. He mentioned them by name, as follows: France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark and Norway. 'You fought on,' he said in a speech carried by the BBC, "regardless of the disappointments you suffered and the danger you have undergone."
NYTimes, May 11, 1945, "Eisenhower Praises Anti-Nazi Resistance."


a. Who is missing from Eisenhower's list of national anti-Nazi resistance?

That's right: German anti-Nazis, of whom thousands were executed by the Reich.
"The History of the German Resistance, 1933-1945, Third Edition," by Peter Hoffman

 

[TheOldSchool]

I bet I can find a bunch of links around the internet saying that without FDR, the Nazi's would have taken over the world! And since wild speculation can never be debunked, because there is LITERALLY NO WAY TO EVER TEST YOUR THEORY, I can just claim I won! Bwahahahaha!

 

[rightwinger]

I thought we celebrated Decoration Day/ Memorial Day since the Civil War

Didn't know FDR went back that far

Perhaps you'd like to try...all the other indoctrinees have declined....

Can you rebut these facts?

1. . The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."
And, it wasn't.


2. The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.
It served no American purpose....only those of Joseph Stalin.
And that was good enough for Roosevelt.


Now....be careful....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!

Frau Braun at her best for Memorial Day

Unconditional Surrender is the only option America would accept
But Frau Braun here wants us to take it easy on Hitler

I know you're on the Left....but that could be you in the middle, too.

Frau Braun

That is your best retort for defending Hitler?

Beyond the lie in your avi.....this one is simplest to reveal.....

See if you can find any post of mine that defended Hitler.


We both know that the motive for your attempted smear is that I provide the truth about FDR.

Frau Braun

How else could you object to the unconditional surrender of a Nazi regime engaged in genocide?

Are you really that sick or just play that way on USMB?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Even as dense as you are.....

....do you ever get to the point, based on the realization that you can't refute anything I post....

....that you begin to question your indoctrination?


Ever????

Yeah if we'd just slapped Hitler on the wrist the war would have ended way sooner and he could have been our friend! And Stalin wouldn't have been able to... uh... it would have stopped him from... uh... hmm

Don't hide behind your fabrication about Hitler....
Answer the question:

....do you ever get to the point, based on the realization that you can't refute anything I post....

....that you begin to question your indoctrination?

Your questions are stupid and based entirely on wild speculations that could only be dreamed up with decades worth of hindsight.

"....stupid and based entirely on wild speculations...."


Every one is linked, sourced and documented.

You have been unable to dispute any.

PC: if we had gone for conditional surrender, my magical time oracle tells me we would never have needed a memorial day! Just look at all my links about people speculating wildly!!!

1. We would have had 200,000 fewer American dead.
Isn't that enough reason?

2. We gave all sorts of conditions anyway....
a. The German scientists who populated NASA
b. "Reinhard Gehlen (3 April 1902 – 8 June 1979) was a German general who served as chief of the Foreign Armies East (FHO) military intelligence unit during World War II, and who later became leader of the Gehlen Organization and the first president of theFederal Intelligence Service (Bundesnachrichtendienst) (BND) during the Cold War. Gehlen is considered one of the most legendary Cold War spymasters."
Reinhard Gehlen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Founded our CIA during the Cold War.


My facts are clear and correct.
FDR simply wanted to be loved by Stalin.....at the cost of immense American blood and treasure.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I bet I can find a bunch of links around the internet saying that without FDR, the Nazi's would have taken over the world! And since wild speculation can never be debunked, because there is LITERALLY NO WAY TO EVER TEST YOUR THEORY, I can just claim I won! Bwahahahaha!

"I bet I can find a bunch of links around the internet saying that without FDR, the Nazi's would have taken over the world! "

Why don't you try.

Consensus of experts is the very opposite.

Germany would not have conquered the USSR.

Hitler knew that....and so must have Roosevelt.

Here are the facts:
.. when Operation Barbarossa started on June 22, 1941, the available (German) supplies of fuel, tires, spare parts etc., were only good enough for about two months.....

Stalin, in fact, had been supplying resources to Hitler.

'The Wehrmacht continued to advance, albeit very slowly, and by mid-November some units found themselves at only 30 kilometers from the capital. But the troops were now totally exhausted, and running out of supplies. Their commanders knew that it was simply impossible to take Moscow.'
Hitler s Failed Blitzkrieg against the Soviet Union. The Battle of Moscow and Stalingrad Turning Point of World War II Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
72 Years Ago, December 1941: Turning Point of World War II
'The Victory of the Red Army in front of Moscow was a Major Break'…
by Jacques Pauwels



By attacking in June, Hitler had planned to avoid Russia's three greatest generals....December, January, and February.
He didn't.


So....once one recognizes that Stalin was going to be the winner.....
....why did FDR send him supplies that the Allies could have used?

The schools hide the truth to shield FDR from richly deserved contumely.


"....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger Ussr in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence (comment)

 

[TheOldSchool]

If only we'd made love with Hitler, there would be no Memorial Day!

Oh my!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Perhaps you'd like to try...all the other indoctrinees have declined....

Can you rebut these facts?

1. . The only way the 'Unconditional Surrender Policy' would be appropriate is if this were true:
"... There existed an 'unwavering, monolithic German support for Nazism and Hitler,' throughout Germany."
And, it wasn't.


2. The policy of "Unconditional Surrender," originated in the Kremlin, and followed slavishly by FDR, was predicated on the fallacy of unwavering and monolithic support for Nazism and for Adolf Hitler.
It served no American purpose....only those of Joseph Stalin.
And that was good enough for Roosevelt.


Now....be careful....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!

Frau Braun at her best for Memorial Day

Unconditional Surrender is the only option America would accept
But Frau Braun here wants us to take it easy on Hitler

I know you're on the Left....but that could be you in the middle, too.

Frau Braun

That is your best retort for defending Hitler?

Beyond the lie in your avi.....this one is simplest to reveal.....

See if you can find any post of mine that defended Hitler.


We both know that the motive for your attempted smear is that I provide the truth about FDR.

Frau Braun

How else could you object to the unconditional surrender of a Nazi regime engaged in genocide?

Are you really that sick or just play that way on USMB?

"...a Nazi regime engaged in genocide?"

Are you nuts?????

What do you think Stalin was doing, you dunce???

"The Soviet NKVD trained the SS, taught them how to build concentration camps, as they had been operating for 20 years before the origin of the Nazis." Viktor Suvorov, former Soviet Military Intelligence Officer. "According to Suvorov, Stalin planned to use Nazi Germany as a proxy (the “Icebreaker”) against the West. For this reason Stalin provided significant material and political support to Adolf Hitler, while at the same time preparing the Red Army to “liberate” the whole of Europe from Nazi occupation." Viktor Suvorov - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gads, you FDR-groupies are stupid.

 

[LTCArmyRet]

Monday morning quarter backing

And you...a closed mind.

Clearly, you can't point to anything in my posts that is inaccurate.

Consider this: you may be ignorant of the facts.

Usually when a crazy person posts something insane and innaccurate, it's impossible to convince them they've posted something insane and innaccurate because they are crazy.

Seems that Post #18 rammed your words back down your throat, huh?

oohhh.,, I get it now...you're just smarter than everyone else, huh? fucking lunatic

 

[LTCArmyRet]

Surely these revelations will convince American historians of your charges. Please package all this intelligence up and send copies to the appropriate historical organizations. I can't wait to hear the historian's response.

Oh no...now here comes the same old BS appeal to authority.

If the state says jump, you say how high.

It is the only response he can come up with.....he certainly can't deny the facts.

just because you posted something with a reference doesn't make it a fact moron.
all of your references are opeds , not fact fucking lunatic.