Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
really? who are all these other women? is he still f-ing around and paying women off for it? If he wants to use that as an excuse then he'd have to show that there were all these other women, wouldn't he?A parking ticket is a little bit different than paying your lawyer to pay off a porn star so that you can attain the highest political position in the world.
It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.
.
Did he illegally set up fake corporations and fake names for those too? And then pay off Cohen for them later with phony and fraudulent invoices and the cherry on top, take tax write offs for their silence, for all of the other women too?
It wasn't a fake corporation, Trump and Cohen were negotiating with Pecker to buy all the stories he purchased over the years, to get control over them. Of course facts don't matter when it comes to Trump for you commies.
.
john edwards was paying to take care of his present mistress, who became ''with child'' and later mother of their child to keep it from his present, dying of cancer wife, and to hide from the public, which took 3rd place in his concerns AND even after he pulled out of the primary continued to make payments for her and Edward's kid....A parking ticket is a little bit different than paying your lawyer to pay off a porn star so that you can attain the highest political position in the world.
It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.
.
The affair happened a decade ago, but the payoff was made weeks before the election. Did Cohen just forget to pay her for ten years?
She wasn't trying to sell her story 10 years ago, but Trump and his friends had a history of paying people to stay quiet to protect his family and his brand. Like John Edwards he will never be convicted in court should it go that far. Of course with all the publicity in the msm, were could you seat an unbiased jury, the press has already pronounced him guilty.
.
so he had a lot more on his side showing it was for other reasons than Trump....
Melania knows she married a whore that was cheating on her.... and it may have not really been cheating, they could have a sexually open marriage... there have been no signs that Melania is retarded and blind.... she knows what he is like and as long as she gets to live in the Castle and be his main squeeze, she seems to be fine with it all.
Ok, but you continue to ignore an almost two decade history of Trump and friends buying stories and using NDAs to keep people quiet. Like I said before, this was NOT UNIQUE to the election which is required by the election laws. Trump would have actually violated election laws if he hadn't used his own money.
.
Is that what the Corporation application for the State of North Carolina says on it?really? who are all these other women? is he still f-ing around and paying women off for it? If he wants to use that as an excuse then he'd have to show that there were all these other women, wouldn't he?A parking ticket is a little bit different than paying your lawyer to pay off a porn star so that you can attain the highest political position in the world.
It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.
.
Did he illegally set up fake corporations and fake names for those too? And then pay off Cohen for them later with phony and fraudulent invoices and the cherry on top, take tax write offs for their silence, for all of the other women too?
It wasn't a fake corporation, Trump and Cohen were negotiating with Pecker to buy all the stories he purchased over the years, to get control over them. Of course facts don't matter when it comes to Trump for you commies.
.
that the Business of the Corporation was to buy off dirt?
And it is illegal, now a days you go to jail for that and get sued. AND lose your job.He ILLEGAL used his influence on a subordinate now adays people get sued for that and do jail time.
His subordinate wanted to blow him. I would have let her too.
For about the millionth time-----big deal. The hyper partisan house impeached him; they had been looking for any excuse to do that for a long time, anyway. The senate didn't convict him. All over a blowjob. What did a blowjob have to do with Starr's investigation into Whitewater, anyway?
Not a BJ, but lying under oath.
Is that why President Trump won't go under oath?
pre- arranged how? Them asking him a question that they know, he's been lying to the American people about...?And it is illegal, now a days you go to jail for that and get sued. AND lose your job.
For about the millionth time-----big deal. The hyper partisan house impeached him; they had been looking for any excuse to do that for a long time, anyway. The senate didn't convict him. All over a blowjob. What did a blowjob have to do with Starr's investigation into Whitewater, anyway?
Not a BJ, but lying under oath.
Is that why President Trump won't go under oath?
No, because it's a pre-arranged trap.
Cheeto Jesus is a perjury machine with a hair trigger.And it is illegal, now a days you go to jail for that and get sued. AND lose your job.He ILLEGAL used his influence on a subordinate now adays people get sued for that and do jail time.
His subordinate wanted to blow him. I would have let her too.
For about the millionth time-----big deal. The hyper partisan house impeached him; they had been looking for any excuse to do that for a long time, anyway. The senate didn't convict him. All over a blowjob. What did a blowjob have to do with Starr's investigation into Whitewater, anyway?
Not a BJ, but lying under oath.
Is that why President Trump won't go under oath?
Except that his lawyers vetted all his answers, if he was even present when they were written.And it is illegal, now a days you go to jail for that and get sued. AND lose your job.His subordinate wanted to blow him. I would have let her too.
For about the millionth time-----big deal. The hyper partisan house impeached him; they had been looking for any excuse to do that for a long time, anyway. The senate didn't convict him. All over a blowjob. What did a blowjob have to do with Starr's investigation into Whitewater, anyway?
Not a BJ, but lying under oath.
Is that why President Trump won't go under oath?
He has, the written answers he provided carry the same pitfalls as an oral interview.
.
I know.This is how you know the writing's on the wall for the Trump Administration.I don't remember any pseudocons asking if anyone had never committed a crime when Clinton was being impeached.
When self-professed conservatives, Republicans and other assorted Trump supporters are creating threads like this.
#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC
really? who are all these other women? is he still f-ing around and paying women off for it? If he wants to use that as an excuse then he'd have to show that there were all these other women, wouldn't he?A parking ticket is a little bit different than paying your lawyer to pay off a porn star so that you can attain the highest political position in the world.
It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.
.
Did he illegally set up fake corporations and fake names for those too? And then pay off Cohen for them later with phony and fraudulent invoices and the cherry on top, take tax write offs for their silence, for all of the other women too?
It wasn't a fake corporation, Trump and Cohen were negotiating with Pecker to buy all the stories he purchased over the years, to get control over them. Of course facts don't matter when it comes to Trump for you commies.
.
The corporation Cohen created to buy the silence of adult entertainers his client banged was called “Essential Consultants”. The National Enquirer had nothing to do with it.
https://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Essential_Consultants_01_12_17.pdf
john edwards was paying to take care of his present mistress, who became ''with child'' and later mother of their child to keep it from his present, dying of cancer wife, and to hide from the public, which took 3rd place in his concerns AND even after he pulled out of the primary continued to make payments for her and Edward's kid....It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.
.
The affair happened a decade ago, but the payoff was made weeks before the election. Did Cohen just forget to pay her for ten years?
She wasn't trying to sell her story 10 years ago, but Trump and his friends had a history of paying people to stay quiet to protect his family and his brand. Like John Edwards he will never be convicted in court should it go that far. Of course with all the publicity in the msm, were could you seat an unbiased jury, the press has already pronounced him guilty.
.
so he had a lot more on his side showing it was for other reasons than Trump....
Melania knows she married a whore that was cheating on her.... and it may have not really been cheating, they could have a sexually open marriage... there have been no signs that Melania is retarded and blind.... she knows what he is like and as long as she gets to live in the Castle and be his main squeeze, she seems to be fine with it all.
Ok, but you continue to ignore an almost two decade history of Trump and friends buying stories and using NDAs to keep people quiet. Like I said before, this was NOT UNIQUE to the election which is required by the election laws. Trump would have actually violated election laws if he hadn't used his own money.
.
Love the rationalization…”Trumps’ always been this sleazy; creating shell companies to pay off porn stars is so common he didn’t give it a second thought”.
It was about LYING under Oath and trying to get others to do the same for him.And it is illegal, now a days you go to jail for that and get sued. AND lose your job.He ILLEGAL used his influence on a subordinate now adays people get sued for that and do jail time.Because the fucker was caught red handed for perjury and obstruction and plead to both.
.
Over a blowjob. Big deal.
His subordinate wanted to blow him. I would have let her too.
For about the millionth time-----big deal. The hyper partisan house impeached him; they had been looking for any excuse to do that for a long time, anyway. The senate didn't convict him. All over a blowjob. What did a blowjob have to do with Starr's investigation into Whitewater, anyway?
really? who are all these other women? is he still f-ing around and paying women off for it? If he wants to use that as an excuse then he'd have to show that there were all these other women, wouldn't he?A parking ticket is a little bit different than paying your lawyer to pay off a porn star so that you can attain the highest political position in the world.
It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.
.
Did he illegally set up fake corporations and fake names for those too? And then pay off Cohen for them later with phony and fraudulent invoices and the cherry on top, take tax write offs for their silence, for all of the other women too?
It wasn't a fake corporation, Trump and Cohen were negotiating with Pecker to buy all the stories he purchased over the years, to get control over them. Of course facts don't matter when it comes to Trump for you commies.
.
The corporation Cohen created to buy the silence of adult entertainers his client banged was called “Essential Consultants”. The National Enquirer had nothing to do with it.
https://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Essential_Consultants_01_12_17.pdf
Reading is fundamental, Cohen and Trump were discussing buying the stories in the Inquirer's vaults and using this company to do so. That's stated in Cohen's recordings.
.
So how is it you got inside the Mueller investigation to learn all this?How is the government corrupt if they are investigating people who broke laws?
You aren't very good at logic are you?
They are investigating people, looking for broken laws. It would be different if they were investigating broken laws to determine who committed them. It's a subtle but very profound difference, there has to be a predicate violation to justify an investigation, that's the law.
.
They are investigating broken laws. You have no clue what evidence they already have that has led to the current investigations... that's how investigations are handled.
Mueller pulled up every DOJ file he could find on anyone associated with Trump. Manafort had been investigated earlier and the DOJ passed on a prosecution. Several of Manaforts "crimes" and already ran the clock on the statute of limitations. Mueller got a judge to resurrect them. No they named the people and went in search of crimes.
.
More "sources you already gave me" but didn't?
It's all public access, all you need do is pay attention.
Charges of bank fraud and tax evasion have been floating around for some time against President Donald Trump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort, but the Department of Justice passed on his prosecution a few years ago, National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy noted Tuesday.
Andrew McCarthy: DOJ Passed on Manafort's Prosecution Until Now
BTW, it was Rosenstein that declined that prosecution earlier.
.
Except that his lawyers vetted all his answers, if he was even present when they were written.And it is illegal, now a days you go to jail for that and get sued. AND lose your job.
For about the millionth time-----big deal. The hyper partisan house impeached him; they had been looking for any excuse to do that for a long time, anyway. The senate didn't convict him. All over a blowjob. What did a blowjob have to do with Starr's investigation into Whitewater, anyway?
Not a BJ, but lying under oath.
Is that why President Trump won't go under oath?
He has, the written answers he provided carry the same pitfalls as an oral interview.
.
Is that what the Corporation application for the State of North Carolina says on it?really? who are all these other women? is he still f-ing around and paying women off for it? If he wants to use that as an excuse then he'd have to show that there were all these other women, wouldn't he?A parking ticket is a little bit different than paying your lawyer to pay off a porn star so that you can attain the highest political position in the world.
It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.
.
Did he illegally set up fake corporations and fake names for those too? And then pay off Cohen for them later with phony and fraudulent invoices and the cherry on top, take tax write offs for their silence, for all of the other women too?
It wasn't a fake corporation, Trump and Cohen were negotiating with Pecker to buy all the stories he purchased over the years, to get control over them. Of course facts don't matter when it comes to Trump for you commies.
.
that the Business of the Corporation was to buy off dirt?
I just know what was reported, so you tell me. BTW if Trump was trying to hide the payment to Daniels why did he tell Cohen to make the payment with a check? That kind of creates a paper trail, doesn't it?
.
I know.This is how you know the writing's on the wall for the Trump Administration.I don't remember any pseudocons asking if anyone had never committed a crime when Clinton was being impeached.
When self-professed conservatives, Republicans and other assorted Trump supporters are creating threads like this.
#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC
Massive scale of Russian election trolling revealed in draft Senate report
really? who are all these other women? is he still f-ing around and paying women off for it? If he wants to use that as an excuse then he'd have to show that there were all these other women, wouldn't he?It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.
.
Did he illegally set up fake corporations and fake names for those too? And then pay off Cohen for them later with phony and fraudulent invoices and the cherry on top, take tax write offs for their silence, for all of the other women too?
It wasn't a fake corporation, Trump and Cohen were negotiating with Pecker to buy all the stories he purchased over the years, to get control over them. Of course facts don't matter when it comes to Trump for you commies.
.
The corporation Cohen created to buy the silence of adult entertainers his client banged was called “Essential Consultants”. The National Enquirer had nothing to do with it.
https://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Essential_Consultants_01_12_17.pdf
Reading is fundamental, Cohen and Trump were discussing buying the stories in the Inquirer's vaults and using this company to do so. That's stated in Cohen's recordings.
.
Simply not true in the case of Stormy Daniels.
So how is it you got inside the Mueller investigation to learn all this?They are investigating people, looking for broken laws. It would be different if they were investigating broken laws to determine who committed them. It's a subtle but very profound difference, there has to be a predicate violation to justify an investigation, that's the law.
.
They are investigating broken laws. You have no clue what evidence they already have that has led to the current investigations... that's how investigations are handled.
Mueller pulled up every DOJ file he could find on anyone associated with Trump. Manafort had been investigated earlier and the DOJ passed on a prosecution. Several of Manaforts "crimes" and already ran the clock on the statute of limitations. Mueller got a judge to resurrect them. No they named the people and went in search of crimes.
.
More "sources you already gave me" but didn't?
It's all public access, all you need do is pay attention.
Charges of bank fraud and tax evasion have been floating around for some time against President Donald Trump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort, but the Department of Justice passed on his prosecution a few years ago, National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy noted Tuesday.
Andrew McCarthy: DOJ Passed on Manafort's Prosecution Until Now
BTW, it was Rosenstein that declined that prosecution earlier.
.
So? During the current investigation they found more evidence that convinced them to pursue the charges. It happens all the time.
Is that what the Corporation application for the State of North Carolina says on it?really? who are all these other women? is he still f-ing around and paying women off for it? If he wants to use that as an excuse then he'd have to show that there were all these other women, wouldn't he?It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.
.
Did he illegally set up fake corporations and fake names for those too? And then pay off Cohen for them later with phony and fraudulent invoices and the cherry on top, take tax write offs for their silence, for all of the other women too?
It wasn't a fake corporation, Trump and Cohen were negotiating with Pecker to buy all the stories he purchased over the years, to get control over them. Of course facts don't matter when it comes to Trump for you commies.
.
that the Business of the Corporation was to buy off dirt?
I just know what was reported, so you tell me. BTW if Trump was trying to hide the payment to Daniels why did he tell Cohen to make the payment with a check? That kind of creates a paper trail, doesn't it?
.
Why did he go along with the creation of the shell company?
How many of you have never committed a crime?
Anyone who supports the Mueller probe is essentially admitting that eventually Mueller will find something to charge Trump with. Who cares that it's not even remotely related to the original reason for the investigation. Everyone has either accidentally or on purpose, broken laws.
Heck, some people break laws every single day.
If you jaywalk, or go one mph over the speed limit, or parked in a handicapped parking space, you've broken the law.
That is the purpose of the Mueller probe. It is a fraudulent investigation in search of a crime. Anyone who supports this kind of witchhunt is essentially saying that they support overturning the election results at any costs. This is immoral and unconstitutional.
