How Many Of You Have Never Committed A Crime?

Have you broken the law some time in your life?

  • Yes

  • No

  • I'm a Democrat so the law doesn't apply to me the way it does to Republicans


Results are only viewable after voting.
Because the fucker was caught red handed for perjury and obstruction and plead to both.

.

Over a blowjob. Big deal.
He ILLEGAL used his influence on a subordinate now adays people get sued for that and do jail time.

His subordinate wanted to blow him. I would have let her too.
And it is illegal, now a days you go to jail for that and get sued. AND lose your job.

For about the millionth time-----big deal. The hyper partisan house impeached him; they had been looking for any excuse to do that for a long time, anyway. The senate didn't convict him. All over a blowjob. What did a blowjob have to do with Starr's investigation into Whitewater, anyway?

Not a BJ, but lying under oath.
 
I don't remember any pseudocons asking if anyone had never committed a crime when Clinton was being impeached.
This is how you know the writing's on the wall for the Trump Administration.

When self-professed conservatives, Republicans and other assorted Trump supporters are creating threads like this.

#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC

tenor.gif
They typical response from an asshole that doesn't care if the government is corrupt.
You must be a Democrat.

Democrats don't believe the law matters.
Winning is all that matters, even if winning means you're gonna get fucked like the rest of us by the corrupt motherfuckers you helped get into power.

How is the government corrupt if they are investigating people who broke laws?

You aren't very good at logic are you?


They are investigating people, looking for broken laws. It would be different if they were investigating broken laws to determine who committed them. It's a subtle but very profound difference, there has to be a predicate violation to justify an investigation, that's the law.

.

They are investigating broken laws. You have no clue what evidence they already have that has led to the current investigations... that's how investigations are handled.


Mueller pulled up every DOJ file he could find on anyone associated with Trump. Manafort had been investigated earlier and the DOJ passed on a prosecution. Several of Manaforts "crimes" and already ran the clock on the statute of limitations. Mueller got a judge to resurrect them. No they named the people and went in search of crimes.

.
 
If you voted for hillary, you committed a crime.
if you voted for trump you installed a Russian loving commie, an adulterer, a thief, a con artist, a sexual harasser, a chronic pathological liar, a destroyer, an inhumane waxed over cold being, a lover of all things and people corrupt and crooked, a man of lawlessness!

You got me beat a thousand times over! Congrats! :thup:
You got everything right but the "commie" part.

He favors dictators like Putin and MBS and Duterte and Some Fat Kim

You're a very strange person.

What country are you from?
 
A parking ticket is a little bit different than paying your lawyer to pay off a porn star so that you can attain the highest political position in the world.


It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.

.

The affair happened a decade ago, but the payoff was made weeks before the election. Did Cohen just forget to pay her for ten years?


She wasn't trying to sell her story 10 years ago, but Trump and his friends had a history of paying people to stay quiet to protect his family and his brand. Like John Edwards he will never be convicted in court should it go that far. Of course with all the publicity in the msm, were could you seat an unbiased jury, the press has already pronounced him guilty.

.
john edwards was paying to take care of his present mistress, who became ''with child'' and later mother of their child to keep it from his present, dying of cancer wife, and to hide from the public, which took 3rd place in his concerns AND even after he pulled out of the primary continued to make payments for her and Edward's kid....

so he had a lot more on his side showing it was for other reasons than Trump....

Melania knows she married a whore that was cheating on her.... and it may have not really been cheating, they could have a sexually open marriage... there have been no signs that Melania is retarded and blind.... she knows what he is like and as long as she gets to live in the Castle and be his main squeeze, she seems to be fine with it all.
 
This is how you know the writing's on the wall for the Trump Administration.

When self-professed conservatives, Republicans and other assorted Trump supporters are creating threads like this.

#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC

tenor.gif
They typical response from an asshole that doesn't care if the government is corrupt.
You must be a Democrat.

Democrats don't believe the law matters.
Winning is all that matters, even if winning means you're gonna get fucked like the rest of us by the corrupt motherfuckers you helped get into power.

How is the government corrupt if they are investigating people who broke laws?

You aren't very good at logic are you?


They are investigating people, looking for broken laws. It would be different if they were investigating broken laws to determine who committed them. It's a subtle but very profound difference, there has to be a predicate violation to justify an investigation, that's the law.

.

They are investigating broken laws. You have no clue what evidence they already have that has led to the current investigations... that's how investigations are handled.


Mueller pulled up every DOJ file he could find on anyone associated with Trump. Manafort had been investigated earlier and the DOJ passed on a prosecution. Several of Manaforts "crimes" and already ran the clock on the statute of limitations. Mueller got a judge to resurrect them. No they named the people and went in search of crimes.

.
So how is it you got inside the Mueller investigation to learn all this?

More "sources you already gave me" but didn't?
 
A parking ticket is a little bit different than paying your lawyer to pay off a porn star so that you can attain the highest political position in the world.


It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.

.
really? who are all these other women? is he still f-ing around and paying women off for it? If he wants to use that as an excuse then he'd have to show that there were all these other women, wouldn't he?

Did he illegally set up fake corporations and fake names for those too? And then pay off Cohen for them later with phony and fraudulent invoices and the cherry on top, take tax write offs for their silence, for all of the other women too?


It wasn't a fake corporation, Trump and Cohen were negotiating with Pecker to buy all the stories he purchased over the years, to get control over them. Of course facts don't matter when it comes to Trump for you commies.

.
 
Over a blowjob. Big deal.
He ILLEGAL used his influence on a subordinate now adays people get sued for that and do jail time.

His subordinate wanted to blow him. I would have let her too.
And it is illegal, now a days you go to jail for that and get sued. AND lose your job.

For about the millionth time-----big deal. The hyper partisan house impeached him; they had been looking for any excuse to do that for a long time, anyway. The senate didn't convict him. All over a blowjob. What did a blowjob have to do with Starr's investigation into Whitewater, anyway?

Not a BJ, but lying under oath.

Is that why President Trump won't go under oath?
 
A parking ticket is a little bit different than paying your lawyer to pay off a porn star so that you can attain the highest political position in the world.


It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.

.
really? who are all these other women? is he still f-ing around and paying women off for it? If he wants to use that as an excuse then he'd have to show that there were all these other women, wouldn't he?

Did he illegally set up fake corporations and fake names for those too? And then pay off Cohen for them later with phony and fraudulent invoices and the cherry on top, take tax write offs for their silence, for all of the other women too?


It wasn't a fake corporation, Trump and Cohen were negotiating with Pecker to buy all the stories he purchased over the years, to get control over them. Of course facts don't matter when it comes to Trump for you commies.

.
Is that what the Corporation application for the State of North Carolina says on it? :rolleyes:

that the Business of the Corporation was to buy off dirt?
 
As a young man I was arrested for being a hells angel and when the cops were forced to let me go cause there is no law against being a hells angel they planted weed in my personals bag. Funny thing when I was first searched there was no weed and when I get released there is.

Were you in fact a Hells Angel? It isn't easy being a Hell's Angel. It doesn't happen by accident.
 
List of those indicted

1) George Papadopoulos, former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, was arrested in July 2017 and pleaded guilty last October to making false statements to the FBI. He got a 14-day sentence.

2) Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chair, was indicted on a total of 25 different counts by Mueller’s team, related mainly to his past work for Ukrainian politicians and his finances. He had two trials scheduled, and the first ended in a conviction on eight counts of financial crimes. To avert the second trial, Manafort struck a plea deal with Mueller in September 2018 (though Mueller’s team said in November that he breached that agreementby lying to them).

3) Rick Gates, a former Trump campaign aide and Manafort’s longtime junior business partner, was indicted on similar charges to Manafort. But in February he agreed to a plea deal with Mueller’s team, pleading guilty to just one false statements charge and one conspiracy charge.

4) Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, pleaded guilty last December to making false statements to the FBI.

5-20) 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies were indicted on conspiracy charges, with some also being accused of identity theft. The charges related to a Russian propaganda effort designed to interfere with the 2016 campaign. The companies involved are the Internet Research Agency, often described as a “Russian troll farm,” and two other companies that helped finance it. The Russian nationals indicted include 12 of the agency’s employees and its alleged financier, Yevgeny Prigozhin.

21) Richard Pinedo: This California man pleaded guilty to an identity theft charge in connection with the Russian indictments, and has agreed to cooperate with Mueller. He was sentenced to 6 months in prison and 6 months of home detention in October.

22) Alex van der Zwaan: This London lawyer pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI about his contacts with Rick Gates and another unnamed person based in Ukraine. He was sentenced to 30 days in jail and has completed his sentence.

23) Konstantin Kilimnik: This longtime business associate of Manafort and Gates, who’s currently based in Russia, was charged alongside Manafort with attempting to obstruct justice by tampering with witnesses in Manafort’s pending case this year.

24-35) 12 Russian GRU officers: These officers of Russia’s military intelligence service were charged with crimes related to the hacking and leaking of leading Democrats’ emails in 2016.

36) Michael Cohen: In August, Trump’s former lawyer pleaded guilty to 8 counts — tax and bank charges, related to his finances and taxi business, and campaign finance violations — related to hush money payments to women who alleged affairs with Donald Trump, as part of a separate investigation in New York (that Mueller had handed off). But in November, he made a plea deal with Mueller too, for lying to Congress about efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.


Identity theft is not collusion with the Russians, the guy had no idea who he was dealing with.

.
 
He ILLEGAL used his influence on a subordinate now adays people get sued for that and do jail time.

His subordinate wanted to blow him. I would have let her too.
And it is illegal, now a days you go to jail for that and get sued. AND lose your job.

For about the millionth time-----big deal. The hyper partisan house impeached him; they had been looking for any excuse to do that for a long time, anyway. The senate didn't convict him. All over a blowjob. What did a blowjob have to do with Starr's investigation into Whitewater, anyway?

Not a BJ, but lying under oath.

Is that why President Trump won't go under oath?

No, because it's a pre-arranged trap.
 
As a young man I was arrested for being a hells angel and when the cops were forced to let me go cause there is no law against being a hells angel they planted weed in my personals bag. Funny thing when I was first searched there was no weed and when I get released there is.

Didja help stomp Hunter Thompson?
 
A parking ticket is a little bit different than paying your lawyer to pay off a porn star so that you can attain the highest political position in the world.


It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.

.

The affair happened a decade ago, but the payoff was made weeks before the election. Did Cohen just forget to pay her for ten years?


She wasn't trying to sell her story 10 years ago, but Trump and his friends had a history of paying people to stay quiet to protect his family and his brand. Like John Edwards he will never be convicted in court should it go that far. Of course with all the publicity in the msm, were could you seat an unbiased jury, the press has already pronounced him guilty.

.

But John Edwards was indicted on six felony charges.


And acquitted or not retried on the hung jury. He was acquitted on campaign finance charge because the jury said he would have made the payoff regardless of the campaign. And Edwards didn't have a long history of doing it like Trump.

.
 
John Edwards he will never be convicted in court should it go that far.

Edwards went to trial..because what he was charged with was a crime,. Keep up.

He got off because he convinced a jury he did it to save his wife from knowing.

Trump screwed these women YEARS before and only bought them off when he was trying to get elected.

Can he use that defense?

Only a jury can tell us but it IS a crime


Dual purpose expense, if it helped the candidate personally it's not a legitimate campaign expense, even if the campaign gets a benefit as well. That's the law hero, deal with it.

.
 
How many of you have never committed a crime?

Anyone who supports the Mueller probe is essentially admitting that eventually Mueller will find something to charge Trump with. Who cares that it's not even remotely related to the original reason for the investigation. Everyone has either accidentally or on purpose, broken laws.

Heck, some people break laws every single day.
If you jaywalk, or go one mph over the speed limit, or parked in a handicapped parking space, you've broken the law.

That is the purpose of the Mueller probe. It is a fraudulent investigation in search of a crime. Anyone who supports this kind of witchhunt is essentially saying that they support overturning the election results at any costs. This is immoral and unconstitutional.
There's crime.

Then there's treason.
 
His subordinate wanted to blow him. I would have let her too.
And it is illegal, now a days you go to jail for that and get sued. AND lose your job.

For about the millionth time-----big deal. The hyper partisan house impeached him; they had been looking for any excuse to do that for a long time, anyway. The senate didn't convict him. All over a blowjob. What did a blowjob have to do with Starr's investigation into Whitewater, anyway?

Not a BJ, but lying under oath.

Is that why President Trump won't go under oath?

No, because it's a pre-arranged trap.
pre- arranged how? Them asking him a question that they know, he's been lying to the American people about...?
 
A parking ticket is a little bit different than paying your lawyer to pay off a porn star so that you can attain the highest political position in the world.


It's something that went on for almost two decades, it wasn't unique to the election, therefore it wasn't a crime. It was a dual benefit expense which isn't a valid campaign expense.

.

The affair happened a decade ago, but the payoff was made weeks before the election. Did Cohen just forget to pay her for ten years?


She wasn't trying to sell her story 10 years ago, but Trump and his friends had a history of paying people to stay quiet to protect his family and his brand. Like John Edwards he will never be convicted in court should it go that far. Of course with all the publicity in the msm, were could you seat an unbiased jury, the press has already pronounced him guilty.

.
john edwards was paying to take care of his present mistress, who became ''with child'' and later mother of their child to keep it from his present, dying of cancer wife, and to hide from the public, which took 3rd place in his concerns AND even after he pulled out of the primary continued to make payments for her and Edward's kid....

so he had a lot more on his side showing it was for other reasons than Trump....

Melania knows she married a whore that was cheating on her.... and it may have not really been cheating, they could have a sexually open marriage... there have been no signs that Melania is retarded and blind.... she knows what he is like and as long as she gets to live in the Castle and be his main squeeze, she seems to be fine with it all.


Ok, but you continue to ignore an almost two decade history of Trump and friends buying stories and using NDAs to keep people quiet. Like I said before, this was NOT UNIQUE to the election which is required by the election laws. Trump would have actually violated election laws if he hadn't used his own money.

.
 
They typical response from an asshole that doesn't care if the government is corrupt.
You must be a Democrat.

Democrats don't believe the law matters.
Winning is all that matters, even if winning means you're gonna get fucked like the rest of us by the corrupt motherfuckers you helped get into power.

How is the government corrupt if they are investigating people who broke laws?

You aren't very good at logic are you?


They are investigating people, looking for broken laws. It would be different if they were investigating broken laws to determine who committed them. It's a subtle but very profound difference, there has to be a predicate violation to justify an investigation, that's the law.

.

They are investigating broken laws. You have no clue what evidence they already have that has led to the current investigations... that's how investigations are handled.


Mueller pulled up every DOJ file he could find on anyone associated with Trump. Manafort had been investigated earlier and the DOJ passed on a prosecution. Several of Manaforts "crimes" and already ran the clock on the statute of limitations. Mueller got a judge to resurrect them. No they named the people and went in search of crimes.

.
So how is it you got inside the Mueller investigation to learn all this?

More "sources you already gave me" but didn't?


It's all public access, all you need do is pay attention.

Charges of bank fraud and tax evasion have been floating around for some time against President Donald Trump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort, but the Department of Justice passed on his prosecution a few years ago, National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy noted Tuesday.

Andrew McCarthy: DOJ Passed on Manafort's Prosecution Until Now

BTW, it was Rosenstein that declined that prosecution earlier.

.
 
How many of you have never committed a crime?

Anyone who supports the Mueller probe is essentially admitting that eventually Mueller will find something to charge Trump with. Who cares that it's not even remotely related to the original reason for the investigation. Everyone has either accidentally or on purpose, broken laws.

Heck, some people break laws every single day.
If you jaywalk, or go one mph over the speed limit, or parked in a handicapped parking space, you've broken the law.

That is the purpose of the Mueller probe. It is a fraudulent investigation in search of a crime. Anyone who supports this kind of witchhunt is essentially saying that they support overturning the election results at any costs. This is immoral and unconstitutional.

Where in the poll answers is answering yes to believing Russian propaganda, supporting collusion and subverting American Democracy?


Ya know as good republic’s do.
 

Forum List

Back
Top