How much better would be with Romney?

true for the first two years only. But obozo had both houses for his first two years, and what did we get-------------the failed law known as ACA, high unemployment, an increase in the number of people in poverty, the gap between rich and poor larger than ever, a divided country.
The ACA is a success. And will only get better.

It's the best they could do with the votes they had to work with.
And now that Republicans have failed, and given up their repeal efforts, it will only get better.

It's now becoming a situation where Blue state citizens can finally get insurance, while Red state citizens cannot.

That is an untenable situation, and the pressure on Red states will soon become too great.
 
The GOP proposal had tax cuts to stimulate business growth. The Democrats spent that money on keeping State and local government employees working. So what happens a year later when that money runs out? Ooops...we've got to lay off the State and local government employees. That's why the long term unemployment rate has sucked for Barry's entire five years in office.
A third of Obama's stimulus was tax cuts.

Try again, liar?
 
The GOP proposal had tax cuts to stimulate business growth. The Democrats spent that money on keeping State and local government employees working. So what happens a year later when that money runs out? Ooops...we've got to lay off the State and local government employees. That's why the long term unemployment rate has sucked for Barry's entire five years in office.

Obama isn't in charge of state and local government employees.

They were laid off by Republican governors and legislatures.
 
In what way has it been a failure? A website? :lol:
Seriously, do you follow the news? Even MSNBC is having a hard time finding something positive to report.
Bullshit. Name anything that's wrong with the ACA.

How about five things?

1. the tax on medical devices.
2. complete financial disclosures with no reasonable expectation of privacy
3. government is too bureaucratic to handle 1/6 of the economy
4. does not achieve its stated goal of healthcare coverage for everyone, while disrupting the system for everyone.
5. does absolutely nothing to make malpractice insurance more affordable, so costs will continue to be high
 
Seriously, do you follow the news? Even MSNBC is having a hard time finding something positive to report.
Bullshit. Name anything that's wrong with the ACA.

How about five things?

1. the tax on medical devices.

So?

2. complete financial disclosures with no reasonable expectation of privacy

What are you talking about?

3. government is too bureaucratic to handle 1/6 of the economy

Your opinion. False.


4. does not achieve its stated goal of healthcare coverage for everyone, while disrupting the system for everyone.

That wasn't the stated goal. The majority of Americans - over 96% - have had no disruption at all.


5. does absolutely nothing to make malpractice insurance more affordable, so costs will continue to be high

It was a healthcare reform bill, not a legal reform bill.
 
How would he have done that?

What would Romney and the Republicans in Congress have done that would directly help the economy?


Oh, and Huckameenajad has no influence in the Republican Party. Zero.


They wouldn't have done what Obama did to directly harm the economy.

Obama has done nothing to harm the economy. He has had 30-something months of growth.

<snipped>


30-something months of abysmal growth which would have been better if Obama made sure the stimulus and the mortgage recovery programs were working instead of saying, "yeah, yeah, I'll start paying attention to jobs after I do this Obamacare thing which it is growing more and more clear the nation hates".

We could have had a robust recovery. Doing nothing would have been better than doing what Obama did. Obamacare and the related regulations and the promise of more regulations to be announced as he went along sucked the oxygen out of the recovery.

The end.
 
Last edited:
They wouldn't have done what Obama did to directly harm the economy.

Obama has done nothing to harm the economy. He has had 30-something months of growth.

<snipped>


30-something months of abysmal growth which would have been better if Obama made sure the stimulus and the mortgage recovery programs were working instead of saying, "yeah, yeah, I'll start paying attention to jobs after I do this Obamacare thing which it is growing more and more clear the nation hates".

We could have had a robust recovery. Doing nothing would have been better than doing what Obama did. Obamacare and the related regulations and the promise of more regulations to be announced as he went along sucked the oxygen out of the recovery.

The end.
I guess you forgot that Red State governors, like Rick Perry, took that stimulus money that was SUPPOSED to create jobs and used it to pay down their state deficits that THEY ran up!

Like this:


Texas balanced budget with stimulus money from Washington - Jan. 23, 2011


Texas, which crafts a budget every two years, was facing a $6.6 billion shortfall for its 2010-2011 fiscal years. It plugged nearly all of that deficit with $6.4 billion in Recovery Act money, allowing it to leave its $9.1 billion rainy day fund untouched.

"Stimulus was very helpful in getting them through the last few years," said Brian Sigritz, director of state fiscal studies for the National Association of State Budget Officers, said of Texas.

Even as Perry requested the Recovery Act money, he railed against it. On the very same day he asked for the funds, he set up a petition titled "No Government Bailouts."
 
Last edited:
The GOP proposal had tax cuts to stimulate business growth. The Democrats spent that money on keeping State and local government employees working. So what happens a year later when that money runs out? Ooops...we've got to lay off the State and local government employees. That's why the long term unemployment rate has sucked for Barry's entire five years in office.
A third of Obama's stimulus was tax cuts.

Try again, liar?

And half of the GOP's stimulus were tax cuts. Where am I lying? We're talking huge amounts of money here and where the Democrats chose to spend that money was not the same places that the GOP would have.

The inconvenient truth for you will ALWAYS be that the Obama Administration had to invent a new economic statistic "jobs created or saved" because quite frankly they created very few new jobs with the huge amounts of money that they spent.
 
Funny how the guy that Synth mocks as a "doofus loser" is the guy who sat down with a Democrat and hammered out a compromise budget that passed the House. THAT is what we would have gotten from a Romney/Ryan ticket in the White House. Instead we're stuck with Barry and Biden...one who's clueless and the other who's just plain stupid.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vox
Romney is neither lazy or incompetent, nor intent on deliberately destroying the United States. You'd have been plus three on those three counts alone, instead of zero for three.

F'r instance, there's a report out today that the CIA was under standing orders in Libya to not become involved in any violent conflicts, sorta like the Navy and Army at Pearl Harbor bein' prohibited from shooting back at the Japanese as the Japanese dropped their torpedoes, bombed and strafed our ships, planes and military personnel. So we ended up wit four dead in Benghazi while Barack was gettin' his beauty sleep or humpin Reggie in the Lincoln Bedroom. You've got committed idiots running the show in DC who really should be committed, asylum, prison, or maybe the hangman's noose for a few select.

Dear Leader Looking Down On Us All? | Weasel Zippers

agree with every word of it.
 
Seriously, do you follow the news? Even MSNBC is having a hard time finding something positive to report.
Bullshit. Name anything that's wrong with the ACA.

How about five things?

1. the tax on medical devices.
2. complete financial disclosures with no reasonable expectation of privacy
3. government is too bureaucratic to handle 1/6 of the economy
4. does not achieve its stated goal of healthcare coverage for everyone, while disrupting the system for everyone.
5. does absolutely nothing to make malpractice insurance more affordable, so costs will continue to be high

how about just one - it is UNAFFORDABLE to the vast majority of Americans and will simply lead to people DYING - because they are not able to pay the overblown costs of "insurance" which is not insurance, they actually pay out of pocket by this crap, and they were absolutely able before.
 
The HUGE deductibles will have to drop considerably or Obama will lose the Senate.
Of course that means the lobbyists who paid off the representatives will have to fire more of their American workforce and off-shore more.
 
Iran or Syria? Which of those two countries would President Mitt have us bogged down in by now? Both countries is an acceptable answer.
 

Forum List

Back
Top