progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,383
- 38,124
- 2,615
when you grow up you will understand what it means,,they arent there to empress you
Lol
What does that mean?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
when you grow up you will understand what it means,,they arent there to empress you
Lol
What does that mean?
when did this become about me??? thats just a dodge cause youre losing the debate,,OK let's air drop you in the middle of the Amazon rain forest and then you can tell me how much it resembles the woods behind your trailer.they arent there to empress you,, get over it cause its not about you,,I live in VA and I see tons of rednecks and none of them impress me very muchI don't think they've ever met a redneck or even seen one in his natural habitat. They believe what they see on the boob tube or their favorite hate sites.the jungle is full of food shelter and safety,,you do realize there are thousands if not millions of people that live in the jungle???
when you grow up you will learn these simple things
Living near or in a jungle you know with other people, supplies and relative safety is a lot different than being dropped off in a jungle you don't know without food, supplies or safety. There are isolated tribes surviving in the Amazon, but those people do that as a team. Even those jungle-attuned people would be in trouble in a jungle they don't know and without their tribe or supplies. The average redneck could not do what we're talking about; very few people could. That's elite special forces territory, and even then some of them would fail.
you dont even know what an average redneck is let alone what he knows,,,
Just because some idiots get drunk and go squirrel hunting is no indication that they would know what to do if dropped into a real jungle with nothing but the clothes on their backs
and what is a real jungle?? jungle is just another word for forest or woods,,
HAve you ever been to the Amazon?
I have and it is a fucking hostile place
I also live in VA and unless you've been down in the southwestern counties, I doubt you've seen true rednecks. You may have seen some posers who haven't gotten over the Civil War and like to act like rednecks, but if you haven't ventured very far outside Richmond or Charlottesville (or, God help us, NOVA), you haven't seen rednecks.I live in VA and I see tons of rednecks and none of them impress me very muchI don't think they've ever met a redneck or even seen one in his natural habitat. They believe what they see on the boob tube or their favorite hate sites.the jungle is full of food shelter and safety,,you do realize there are thousands if not millions of people that live in the jungle???
when you grow up you will learn these simple things
Living near or in a jungle you know with other people, supplies and relative safety is a lot different than being dropped off in a jungle you don't know without food, supplies or safety. There are isolated tribes surviving in the Amazon, but those people do that as a team. Even those jungle-attuned people would be in trouble in a jungle they don't know and without their tribe or supplies. The average redneck could not do what we're talking about; very few people could. That's elite special forces territory, and even then some of them would fail.
you dont even know what an average redneck is let alone what he knows,,,
Just because some idiots get drunk and go squirrel hunting is no indication that they would know what to do if dropped into a real jungle with nothing but the clothes on their backs
neither has the better chance.Okay, take two average city dwellers whose biggest exposure to wildlife has been a rat ducking into a sewer, allow them each to select a tool, strip them of all their clothes and drop them 20 miles into the interior of a jungle. Do the same with two rednecks who have been living in the wilds of Appalachia all their lives. Which do you think will last longer and which do you think has the better chance of making it to the pickup point? That's the point you're studiously ignoring.It's TV therefore it's not REAL
And now that I'm thinking about it they go out there with at least one partner. They both get to bring a tool as well, so they'll often have things like fishing nets and fire starting tools.
No I'm not since I have actually been in the Amazon jungle and I know that it ain't just like the woods in Appalachia.when did this become about me??? thats just a dodge cause youre losing the debate,,OK let's air drop you in the middle of the Amazon rain forest and then you can tell me how much it resembles the woods behind your trailer.they arent there to empress you,, get over it cause its not about you,,I live in VA and I see tons of rednecks and none of them impress me very muchI don't think they've ever met a redneck or even seen one in his natural habitat. They believe what they see on the boob tube or their favorite hate sites.the jungle is full of food shelter and safety,,you do realize there are thousands if not millions of people that live in the jungle???
when you grow up you will learn these simple things
Living near or in a jungle you know with other people, supplies and relative safety is a lot different than being dropped off in a jungle you don't know without food, supplies or safety. There are isolated tribes surviving in the Amazon, but those people do that as a team. Even those jungle-attuned people would be in trouble in a jungle they don't know and without their tribe or supplies. The average redneck could not do what we're talking about; very few people could. That's elite special forces territory, and even then some of them would fail.
you dont even know what an average redneck is let alone what he knows,,,
Just because some idiots get drunk and go squirrel hunting is no indication that they would know what to do if dropped into a real jungle with nothing but the clothes on their backs
and what is a real jungle?? jungle is just another word for forest or woods,,
HAve you ever been to the Amazon?
I have and it is a fucking hostile place
No I'm not since I have actually been in the Amazon jungle and I know that it ain't just like the woods in Appalachia.
You can't drive to the gas station for a chili dog when you're stranded in the Amazon.
you can get turned around in less than 100 yards and be completely lost
you can get turned around in less than 100 yards and be completely lost
Yep.
Imagine trying to do that without a map and a sense of where you are. Better get used to Amazon life; you might spend the rest of your days there even if you can meet your survival needs.
There are countless stories of how the Amazon has broken people who thought themselves to be outdoors-men. Here's a famous one
The Amazonian Expedition That Nearly Killed Theodore Roosevelt | HISTORY
Following a disappointing loss in the 1912 presidential election, Theodore Roosevelt struck out on a treacherous expedition to navigate an unmapped river in the Amazon.www.history.com
Me? I'm neither a redneck nor a survivalist. Don't you know it's a really weak debate tactic to try to make it about the other guy instead of the subject? It makes people laugh at you. And yes, rednecks do have a better chance of surviving than city dwellers. Think about how stupid your statement is. You're claiming that two city dwellers would do as well in the wild as two rednecks.neither has the better chance.Okay, take two average city dwellers whose biggest exposure to wildlife has been a rat ducking into a sewer, allow them each to select a tool, strip them of all their clothes and drop them 20 miles into the interior of a jungle. Do the same with two rednecks who have been living in the wilds of Appalachia all their lives. Which do you think will last longer and which do you think has the better chance of making it to the pickup point? That's the point you're studiously ignoring.It's TV therefore it's not REAL
And now that I'm thinking about it they go out there with at least one partner. They both get to bring a tool as well, so they'll often have things like fishing nets and fire starting tools.
And I though you were going to be naked in the jungle and survive better than anyone.
BFD replace the word you with the word redneck and my argument still holds upMe? I'm neither a redneck nor a survivalist. Don't you know it's a really weak debate tactic to try to make it about the other guy instead of the subject? It makes people laugh at you. And yes, rednecks do have a better chance of surviving than city dwellers. Think about how stupid your statement is. You're claiming that two city dwellers would do as well in the wild as two rednecks.neither has the better chance.Okay, take two average city dwellers whose biggest exposure to wildlife has been a rat ducking into a sewer, allow them each to select a tool, strip them of all their clothes and drop them 20 miles into the interior of a jungle. Do the same with two rednecks who have been living in the wilds of Appalachia all their lives. Which do you think will last longer and which do you think has the better chance of making it to the pickup point? That's the point you're studiously ignoring.It's TV therefore it's not REAL
And now that I'm thinking about it they go out there with at least one partner. They both get to bring a tool as well, so they'll often have things like fishing nets and fire starting tools.
And I though you were going to be naked in the jungle and survive better than anyone.
Me? I'm neither a redneck nor a survivalist. Don't you know it's a really weak debate tactic to try to make it about the other guy instead of the subject? It makes people laugh at you. And yes, rednecks do have a better chance of surviving than city dwellers. Think about how stupid your statement is. You're claiming that two city dwellers would do as well in the wild as two rednecks.neither has the better chance.Okay, take two average city dwellers whose biggest exposure to wildlife has been a rat ducking into a sewer, allow them each to select a tool, strip them of all their clothes and drop them 20 miles into the interior of a jungle. Do the same with two rednecks who have been living in the wilds of Appalachia all their lives. Which do you think will last longer and which do you think has the better chance of making it to the pickup point? That's the point you're studiously ignoring.It's TV therefore it's not REAL
And now that I'm thinking about it they go out there with at least one partner. They both get to bring a tool as well, so they'll often have things like fishing nets and fire starting tools.
And I though you were going to be naked in the jungle and survive better than anyone.
Because you don't.Me? I'm neither a redneck nor a survivalist.
Then who are you to tell people they don't know what they're talking about?
I was working with the scenario you dreamed up. You obviously think someone whose greatest exposure to wildlife is a rat can survive in the wild the same as someone whose been running around in the forest all of his life. That's dumb.BFD replace the word you with the word redneck and my argument still holds upMe? I'm neither a redneck nor a survivalist. Don't you know it's a really weak debate tactic to try to make it about the other guy instead of the subject? It makes people laugh at you. And yes, rednecks do have a better chance of surviving than city dwellers. Think about how stupid your statement is. You're claiming that two city dwellers would do as well in the wild as two rednecks.neither has the better chance.Okay, take two average city dwellers whose biggest exposure to wildlife has been a rat ducking into a sewer, allow them each to select a tool, strip them of all their clothes and drop them 20 miles into the interior of a jungle. Do the same with two rednecks who have been living in the wilds of Appalachia all their lives. Which do you think will last longer and which do you think has the better chance of making it to the pickup point? That's the point you're studiously ignoring.It's TV therefore it's not REAL
And now that I'm thinking about it they go out there with at least one partner. They both get to bring a tool as well, so they'll often have things like fishing nets and fire starting tools.
And I though you were going to be naked in the jungle and survive better than anyone.
I was working with the scenario you dreamed up. You obviously think someone whose greatest exposure to wildlife is a rat can survive in the wild the same as someone whose been running around in the forest all of his life. That's dumb.
I was working with the scenario you dreamed up. You obviously think someone whose greatest exposure to wildlife is a rat can survive in the wild the same as someone whose been running around in the forest all of his life. That's dumb.BFD replace the word you with the word redneck and my argument still holds upMe? I'm neither a redneck nor a survivalist. Don't you know it's a really weak debate tactic to try to make it about the other guy instead of the subject? It makes people laugh at you. And yes, rednecks do have a better chance of surviving than city dwellers. Think about how stupid your statement is. You're claiming that two city dwellers would do as well in the wild as two rednecks.neither has the better chance.Okay, take two average city dwellers whose biggest exposure to wildlife has been a rat ducking into a sewer, allow them each to select a tool, strip them of all their clothes and drop them 20 miles into the interior of a jungle. Do the same with two rednecks who have been living in the wilds of Appalachia all their lives. Which do you think will last longer and which do you think has the better chance of making it to the pickup point? That's the point you're studiously ignoring.It's TV therefore it's not REAL
And now that I'm thinking about it they go out there with at least one partner. They both get to bring a tool as well, so they'll often have things like fishing nets and fire starting tools.
And I though you were going to be naked in the jungle and survive better than anyone.
driving up to a campground with a few cases of beer isn't going to prepare anyone for an actual survival situationI was working with the scenario you dreamed up. You obviously think someone whose greatest exposure to wildlife is a rat can survive in the wild the same as someone whose been running around in the forest all of his life. That's dumb.
No, nobody is saying that. We're saying that redneck camping skills wouldn't amount to much in an extreme survival situation. Both would die.