Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How much time should women get for having an abortion?Jailed for ending a pregnancy: how prosecutors get inventive on abortion
Once Roe v Wade is ultimately struck down as Trump predicted -- since Trump promised to appoint judges who will overturn the 1973 SC decision; how much time should women and abortionists get for having an abortion?? If you knowingly drive a woman to get an abortion, should you also be charged?
Now I highly doubt we are going to insist that women get the death penalty for having an illegal abortion, but they have to be punished somehow -- Also, would killing an abortion doctor then be considered justified?
No one who calls abortion murder would be here flapping their figurative jaws on the Internet. Anyone who really believed abortion is murder would go do something about it. Otherwise, such a person is the worst kind of hypocrite.
Abortion is without any doubt in lots of cases murder. The criteria:
(1) it hurts the human rights to kill human beings
(2) the killed human being is not able to defend itself
(3) the reason to kill a human being for to prevent some month gestation is not substantial, because average life span is about 80 years.
Whether I am a worst hypocrite or not is not part of the truth of such sentences.
How much time for paying taxes to kill babies?How much time should women get for having an abortion?Jailed for ending a pregnancy: how prosecutors get inventive on abortion
Once Roe v Wade is ultimately struck down as Trump predicted -- since Trump promised to appoint judges who will overturn the 1973 SC decision; how much time should women and abortionists get for having an abortion?? If you knowingly drive a woman to get an abortion, should you also be charged?
Now I highly doubt we are going to insist that women get the death penalty for having an illegal abortion, but they have to be punished somehow -- Also, would killing an abortion doctor then be considered justified?
I reckon the same amount of time a woman would get when she had her baby and then snuffed it's life out immediately thereafter.
So much for your "gotcha" question.
So let me guess, you are all for women being able to kill their viable infants as soon as they are born, right?
Who can demonstrate that she hasn’t; and instead made an irresponsible decision?That whole “responsibility” thing really pisses you selfish abortionists off doesn’t it?
So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:
It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.
Check
No. Why is she behaving irresponsibly by having children that she can't afford?
Better question - Why was she not given better sex ed and access to birth control?
You have absolutely no way to quantify your claim...Who can demonstrate that she hasn’t; and instead made an irresponsible decision?That whole “responsibility” thing really pisses you selfish abortionists off doesn’t it?
So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:
It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.
Check
No. Why is she behaving irresponsibly by having children that she can't afford?
Better question - Why was she not given better sex ed and access to birth control?
Nobody - but the chances are better than 50/50 that she lived in a red state and was either home schooled or got an abstinence only sex ed.
How much time for paying taxes to kill babies?How much time should women get for having an abortion?Jailed for ending a pregnancy: how prosecutors get inventive on abortion
Once Roe v Wade is ultimately struck down as Trump predicted -- since Trump promised to appoint judges who will overturn the 1973 SC decision; how much time should women and abortionists get for having an abortion?? If you knowingly drive a woman to get an abortion, should you also be charged?
Now I highly doubt we are going to insist that women get the death penalty for having an illegal abortion, but they have to be punished somehow -- Also, would killing an abortion doctor then be considered justified?
I reckon the same amount of time a woman would get when she had her baby and then snuffed it's life out immediately thereafter.
So much for your "gotcha" question.
So let me guess, you are all for women being able to kill their viable infants as soon as they are born, right?
You have absolutely no way to quantify your claim...Who can demonstrate that she hasn’t; and instead made an irresponsible decision?So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:
It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.
Check
No. Why is she behaving irresponsibly by having children that she can't afford?
Better question - Why was she not given better sex ed and access to birth control?
Nobody - but the chances are better than 50/50 that she lived in a red state and was either home schooled or got an abstinence only sex ed.
That link doesn’t substantiate the speculative claim in your previous post.You have absolutely no way to quantify your claim...Who can demonstrate that she hasn’t; and instead made an irresponsible decision?No. Why is she behaving irresponsibly by having children that she can't afford?
Better question - Why was she not given better sex ed and access to birth control?
Nobody - but the chances are better than 50/50 that she lived in a red state and was either home schooled or got an abstinence only sex ed.
Yes - Actually I do
Research Confirms That Abstinence-Only Education Hurts Kids
That link doesn’t substantiate the speculative claim in your previous post.You have absolutely no way to quantify your claim...Who can demonstrate that she hasn’t; and instead made an irresponsible decision?Better question - Why was she not given better sex ed and access to birth control?
Nobody - but the chances are better than 50/50 that she lived in a red state and was either home schooled or got an abstinence only sex ed.
Yes - Actually I do
Research Confirms That Abstinence-Only Education Hurts Kids
A timely post! I was just about to offer something similar. With that said what is it about birth control and abortion that makes it so appealing to so many? Money. It’s natural that humans start having sex as teenagers. Our biological clocks are set this way. It is also natural that a woman become pregnant as a result of having sex... Still no shocker here.Just to follow up with my other post regarding greed = genocide, this article pretty much says it all
The Real Reason Why Women Get Abortions - ATTN:
About 73% of women who have abortions due so because of concerns about money.
We are really no different that the ancients, for they too sacrificed their children to the gods for financial gain. They would sacrifice their children for better crops, fertility, or victory in battle.
Today, children are sacrificed for that better home or car or career, etc.
Time may change, but we don't.
In the interim we will be deluged with those who are in love with abortion by saying, "What about women who are raped or back alley abortions"?
It is very telling that they NEVER defend why most women get abortions, which is money.
Very disingenuous and deceitful, but they have to be in order to maintain their ideology.
It’s the “unwanted” that is the problem. Abstinence works. The reason their pregnancy may be deemed unwanted is based on a belief that they can trade it for something of greater value to themselves. And that is a failure of education at a moral level. Teaching our women to sacrifice their own children for a seat on the board of directors....That link doesn’t substantiate the speculative claim in your previous post.You have absolutely no way to quantify your claim...Who can demonstrate that she hasn’t; and instead made an irresponsible decision?
Nobody - but the chances are better than 50/50 that she lived in a red state and was either home schooled or got an abstinence only sex ed.
Yes - Actually I do
Research Confirms That Abstinence-Only Education Hurts Kids
Sorry - but unwanted pregnancies are highest in states offering abstinence only education.
Abstinence education: There's almost no getting around it. States with abstinence-only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancies.
In 2008, the Washington Post reported on a University of Washington study which found that teenagers who received comprehensive sex education were 60% less likely to get pregnant than someone who received abstinence-only education. A 2007 federal report found that abstinence-only programs have had "no impacts on rates of sexual abstinence," reported ThinkProgress.
In a 2011 study published in the journal PLOS One, researchers found a similar correlation between a state's commitment to abstinence education and pregnancy rates.
Therefore it stands to reason that the woman in my example was more likely to have been educated in such a manner and was hence under-informed.
The States With the Highest Teenage Birth Rates Have One Thing in Common
A timely post! I was just about to offer something similar. With that said what is it about birth control and abortion that makes it so appealing to so many? Money. It’s natural that humans start having sex as teenagers. Our biological clocks are set this way. It is also natural that a woman become pregnant as a result of having sex... Still no shocker here.Just to follow up with my other post regarding greed = genocide, this article pretty much says it all
The Real Reason Why Women Get Abortions - ATTN:
About 73% of women who have abortions due so because of concerns about money.
We are really no different that the ancients, for they too sacrificed their children to the gods for financial gain. They would sacrifice their children for better crops, fertility, or victory in battle.
Today, children are sacrificed for that better home or car or career, etc.
Time may change, but we don't.
In the interim we will be deluged with those who are in love with abortion by saying, "What about women who are raped or back alley abortions"?
It is very telling that they NEVER defend why most women get abortions, which is money.
Very disingenuous and deceitful, but they have to be in order to maintain their ideology.
So, where does this start to go off the rails? Probably right about the time that natures biological clock interferes with individuals desires to land high paying careers that provide the selfish lixury items they covet. Careers that necessitate ignoring their biological clocks, and postponing procreation till often times a decade past their prime natural cycle...
I find it highly unlikely that the woman in your scenario, was unaware that sex causes pregnancy.That link doesn’t substantiate the speculative claim in your previous post.You have absolutely no way to quantify your claim...Who can demonstrate that she hasn’t; and instead made an irresponsible decision?
Nobody - but the chances are better than 50/50 that she lived in a red state and was either home schooled or got an abstinence only sex ed.
Yes - Actually I do
Research Confirms That Abstinence-Only Education Hurts Kids
Sorry - but unwanted pregnancies are highest in states offering abstinence only education.
Abstinence education: There's almost no getting around it. States with abstinence-only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancies.
In 2008, the Washington Post reported on a University of Washington study which found that teenagers who received comprehensive sex education were 60% less likely to get pregnant than someone who received abstinence-only education. A 2007 federal report found that abstinence-only programs have had "no impacts on rates of sexual abstinence," reported ThinkProgress.
In a 2011 study published in the journal PLOS One, researchers found a similar correlation between a state's commitment to abstinence education and pregnancy rates.
Therefore it stands to reason that the woman in my example was more likely to have been educated in such a manner and was hence under-informed.
The States With the Highest Teenage Birth Rates Have One Thing in Common
Jailed for ending a pregnancy: how prosecutors get inventive on abortion
Once Roe v Wade is ultimately struck down as Trump predicted -- since Trump promised to appoint judges who will overturn the 1973 SC decision; how much time should women and abortionists get for having an abortion?? If you knowingly drive a woman to get an abortion, should you also be charged?
Now I highly doubt we are going to insist that women get the death penalty for having an illegal abortion, but they have to be punished somehow -- Also, would killing an abortion doctor then be considered justified?
I find it highly unlikely that the woman in your scenario, was unaware that sex causes pregnancy.That link doesn’t substantiate the speculative claim in your previous post.You have absolutely no way to quantify your claim...Nobody - but the chances are better than 50/50 that she lived in a red state and was either home schooled or got an abstinence only sex ed.
Yes - Actually I do
Research Confirms That Abstinence-Only Education Hurts Kids
Sorry - but unwanted pregnancies are highest in states offering abstinence only education.
Abstinence education: There's almost no getting around it. States with abstinence-only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancies.
In 2008, the Washington Post reported on a University of Washington study which found that teenagers who received comprehensive sex education were 60% less likely to get pregnant than someone who received abstinence-only education. A 2007 federal report found that abstinence-only programs have had "no impacts on rates of sexual abstinence," reported ThinkProgress.
In a 2011 study published in the journal PLOS One, researchers found a similar correlation between a state's commitment to abstinence education and pregnancy rates.
Therefore it stands to reason that the woman in my example was more likely to have been educated in such a manner and was hence under-informed.
The States With the Highest Teenage Birth Rates Have One Thing in Common
Jailed for ending a pregnancy: how prosecutors get inventive on abortion
Once Roe v Wade is ultimately struck down as Trump predicted -- since Trump promised to appoint judges who will overturn the 1973 SC decision; how much time should women and abortionists get for having an abortion?? If you knowingly drive a woman to get an abortion, should you also be charged?
Now I highly doubt we are going to insist that women get the death penalty for having an illegal abortion, but they have to be punished somehow -- Also, would killing an abortion doctor then be considered justified?
How much time should a president get for killing people by sending warplanes to bomb?
