BluesLegend
Diamond Member
Obama got 365 and 332. Did he win HUUUGE?
He sure did.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama got 365 and 332. Did he win HUUUGE?
Why do you suppose the media leans left in general? Got an explanation?
I suspect it is the urban-centric nature of media in general.
New York, Washington and Atlanta...very blue.
That's just supposition. It could also be that left-leaning individuals are drawn to journalism.
But I don't think there is any denying the the anti-republican bias is no longer covert. The ABC panel on election night 2020 looked like someome shot their dogs.
I lol'd.
That's just supposition. It could also be that left-leaning individuals are drawn to journalism.
Two words...Kavanaugh, Biden.Why do you suppose the media leans left in general? Got an explanation?
I suspect it is the urban-centric nature of media in general.
New York, Washington and Atlanta...very blue.
That's just supposition. It could also be that left-leaning individuals are drawn to journalism.
But I don't think there is any denying the the anti-republican bias is no longer covert. The ABC panel on election night 2020 looked like someome shot their dogs.
I lol'd.
You don’t suppose it is because journalists are inquisitive by nature and are trained in researching facts and evidence?
I’d say that being educated and inquisitive gives them the ability to differentiate between truth and fiction.
Glad I wasn't stupid enough, or uncaring about bad character to vote for one of the two POS candidates in 2016. Trumpsters saved us from Hillary. Now Biden will have to save us from Trump. When both candidates deserve to lose, you stuck with a loser after the election and the whole country loses.If polls were science...Hillary would be President.Bet you are not big on science or technology either. If you are in a plane and that altimeter is unwinding while you are having a sinking feeling, you should probably pay no attention to the pilot if he whole plan is to cuss the gauge maker, and throw a hissy fit.Polls are rigged to manipulate the masses...but no one is falling for it anymore. The poll bandwagon effect is dead. Nobody with a ounce of common sense believes for a second that Biden can beat Trump. That leaves two alternatives. The pollees are lying or the pollers are. My money is on the pollers.
So much for that idea.
Apparently they are, since she beat him by three million votes.
Liar, she lost and she lost huge Trump whooped her ass winning 30 states and over 300 EC votes.
Go ahead, check the numbers. Check any of my numbers. On anything. I get them straight before I post.
She lost the election she didn't beat him, just admit you were lying. I may as well slap you around further with facts, Hillary won by 4 million more votes in the single state of California. Trump whooped her ass by 1 million votes in the other 49 states. There now you have some numbers to chew on.
538 members of the Electoral College
270 electoral votes needed to winOpinion polls Turnout 55.7%[1] 0.8 pp
Nominee Donald Trump Hillary Clinton Party Republican Democratic Home state New York New York Running mate Mike Pence Tim Kaine Electoral vote 304[a] 227[a] States carried 30 + ME-02 20 + DC Popular vote 62,984,828 65,853,514 Percentage 46.1% 48.2%
You mean he cannot even hire internal pollster to make it come out his way?Agree to an extent.
The media is overtly partisan. Why would the pollsters be any different?
They are both more interested in shaping opinion than disseminating facts.
Except the battleground polling was terrible. Nobody gives a shit about polling in NYC or LA. Hillary was supposed the win Pennsylvania by 8 points. WTF happened. It was off in every battleground state and was all biased for Hillary.
YouGov’s final pre-election polls in Battleground states: Trump still coming up short | YouGov
Despite some gains, Trump is still short in key statestoday.yougov.com
Glad I wasn't stupid enough, or uncaring about bad character to vote for one of the two POS candidates in 2016. Trumpsters saved us from Hillary. Now Biden will have to save us from Trump. When both candidates deserve to lose, you stuck with a loser after the election and the whole country loses.If polls were science...Hillary would be President.Bet you are not big on science or technology either. If you are in a plane and that altimeter is unwinding while you are having a sinking feeling, you should probably pay no attention to the pilot if he whole plan is to cuss the gauge maker, and throw a hissy fit.Polls are rigged to manipulate the masses...but no one is falling for it anymore. The poll bandwagon effect is dead. Nobody with a ounce of common sense believes for a second that Biden can beat Trump. That leaves two alternatives. The pollees are lying or the pollers are. My money is on the pollers.
So much for that idea.
Apparently they are, since she beat him by three million votes.
Liar, she lost and she lost huge Trump whooped her ass winning 30 states and over 300 EC votes.
Go ahead, check the numbers. Check any of my numbers. On anything. I get them straight before I post.
She lost the election she didn't beat him, just admit you were lying. I may as well slap you around further with facts, Hillary won by 4 million more votes in the single state of California. Trump whooped her ass by 1 million votes in the other 49 states. There now you have some numbers to chew on.
538 members of the Electoral College
270 electoral votes needed to winOpinion polls Turnout 55.7%[1] 0.8 pp
Nominee Donald Trump Hillary Clinton Party Republican Democratic Home state New York New York Running mate Mike Pence Tim Kaine Electoral vote 304[a] 227[a] States carried 30 + ME-02 20 + DC Popular vote 62,984,828 65,853,514 Percentage 46.1% 48.2%
You mean he cannot even hire internal pollster to make it come out his way?Agree to an extent.
The media is overtly partisan. Why would the pollsters be any different?
They are both more interested in shaping opinion than disseminating facts.
Except the battleground polling was terrible. Nobody gives a shit about polling in NYC or LA. Hillary was supposed the win Pennsylvania by 8 points. WTF happened. It was off in every battleground state and was all biased for Hillary.
YouGov’s final pre-election polls in Battleground states: Trump still coming up short | YouGov
Despite some gains, Trump is still short in key statestoday.yougov.com
Two words...Kavanaugh, Biden.Why do you suppose the media leans left in general? Got an explanation?
I suspect it is the urban-centric nature of media in general.
New York, Washington and Atlanta...very blue.
That's just supposition. It could also be that left-leaning individuals are drawn to journalism.
But I don't think there is any denying the the anti-republican bias is no longer covert. The ABC panel on election night 2020 looked like someome shot their dogs.
I lol'd.
You don’t suppose it is because journalists are inquisitive by nature and are trained in researching facts and evidence?
I’d say that being educated and inquisitive gives them the ability to differentiate between truth and fiction.
If polls were science...Hillary would be President.Bet you are not big on science or technology either. If you are in a plane and that altimeter is unwinding while you are having a sinking feeling, you should probably pay no attention to the pilot if he whole plan is to cuss the gauge maker, and throw a hissy fit.Polls are rigged to manipulate the masses...but no one is falling for it anymore. The poll bandwagon effect is dead. Nobody with a ounce of common sense believes for a second that Biden can beat Trump. That leaves two alternatives. The pollees are lying or the pollers are. My money is on the pollers.
So much for that idea.
Apparently they are, since she beat him by three million votes.
Liar, she lost and she lost huge Trump whooped her ass winning 30 states and over 300 EC votes.
Go ahead, check the numbers. Check any of my numbers. On anything. I get them straight before I post.
She lost the election she didn't beat him, just admit you were lying. I may as well slap you around further with facts, Hillary won by 4 million more votes in the single state of California. Trump whooped her ass by 1 million votes in the other 49 states. There now you have some numbers to chew on.
Unfortunately for your fantasy we don't have elections via cherrypicking. I'm sure cherries are delicious and all but your logic here is full of fruit flies.
The fact remains, polling said Clinton would draw morefruit fliesvotes, and she did, although by the time the date was nearing it was too close to call, due to the dysfunction of the Electrical College.
What was dysfunctional about it?
See my above reference to the states of Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Florida, North Cackalackee, Utah, and we could add AridZona and we could also add Nevada, Minnesota and Virginia. In every one of those states NOBODY won as much as 50% of that state's vote yet they all (some by force of unConstitutional state law) sent 100% of their vote to a single candidate. A candidate that that state quantifiably did not choose.
That dysfunction.
That's HALF the total needed to win the EC right there.
Eh?
Votes choose electors. Majority wins. 50% is not required.
I think you'll find that the definition of majority REQUIRES 50% plus one.
Go ahead, check me. I'll wait.
Not with more than two candidates.
Unfortunately for your fantasy we don't have elections via cherrypicking. I'm sure cherries are delicious and all but your logic here is full of fruit flies.
The fact remains, polling said Clinton would draw morefruit fliesvotes, and she did, although by the time the date was nearing it was too close to call, due to the dysfunction of the Electrical College. But you can't poll the EC.
Oh God the irony meter just broke. You said, "she beat him by three million votes" which is at best cherry picking and more akin to an outright lie. She didn't beat him at anything. No such popular vote election took place. No popular vote campaign strategy. No popular vote campaign ads. Nobody knows who may have won a popular vote election had one taken place.
Excellent strawman collection. eBay?
I didn't say there was any particular kind of campaign, now did I.
You were patently DISHONEST its not up for debate it's right there in your own words.
Glad I wasn't stupid enough, or uncaring about bad character to vote for one of the two POS candidates in 2016. Trumpsters saved us from Hillary. Now Biden will have to save us from Trump. When both candidates deserve to lose, you stuck with a loser after the election and the whole country loses.If polls were science...Hillary would be President.Bet you are not big on science or technology either. If you are in a plane and that altimeter is unwinding while you are having a sinking feeling, you should probably pay no attention to the pilot if he whole plan is to cuss the gauge maker, and throw a hissy fit.Polls are rigged to manipulate the masses...but no one is falling for it anymore. The poll bandwagon effect is dead. Nobody with a ounce of common sense believes for a second that Biden can beat Trump. That leaves two alternatives. The pollees are lying or the pollers are. My money is on the pollers.
So much for that idea.
Apparently they are, since she beat him by three million votes.
Liar, she lost and she lost huge Trump whooped her ass winning 30 states and over 300 EC votes.
Go ahead, check the numbers. Check any of my numbers. On anything. I get them straight before I post.
She lost the election she didn't beat him, just admit you were lying. I may as well slap you around further with facts, Hillary won by 4 million more votes in the single state of California. Trump whooped her ass by 1 million votes in the other 49 states. There now you have some numbers to chew on.
538 members of the Electoral College
270 electoral votes needed to winOpinion polls Turnout 55.7%[1] 0.8 pp
Nominee Donald Trump Hillary Clinton Party Republican Democratic Home state New York New York Running mate Mike Pence Tim Kaine Electoral vote 304[a] 227[a] States carried 30 + ME-02 20 + DC Popular vote 62,984,828 65,853,514 Percentage 46.1% 48.2%
You mean he cannot even hire internal pollster to make it come out his way?Agree to an extent.
The media is overtly partisan. Why would the pollsters be any different?
They are both more interested in shaping opinion than disseminating facts.
Except the battleground polling was terrible. Nobody gives a shit about polling in NYC or LA. Hillary was supposed the win Pennsylvania by 8 points. WTF happened. It was off in every battleground state and was all biased for Hillary.
YouGov’s final pre-election polls in Battleground states: Trump still coming up short | YouGov
Despite some gains, Trump is still short in key statestoday.yougov.com
That's just supposition. It could also be that left-leaning individuals are drawn to journalism.
Right leaning journalists are NOT tolerated by the left. Hell even left leaning journalists have been run out of newsrooms for saying something contrary to the liberal narrative.
Unfortunately for your fantasy we don't have elections via cherrypicking. I'm sure cherries are delicious and all but your logic here is full of fruit flies.
The fact remains, polling said Clinton would draw morefruit fliesvotes, and she did, although by the time the date was nearing it was too close to call, due to the dysfunction of the Electrical College. But you can't poll the EC.
Oh God the irony meter just broke. You said, "she beat him by three million votes" which is at best cherry picking and more akin to an outright lie. She didn't beat him at anything. No such popular vote election took place. No popular vote campaign strategy. No popular vote campaign ads. Nobody knows who may have won a popular vote election had one taken place.
Excellent strawman collection. eBay?
I didn't say there was any particular kind of campaign, now did I.
You were patently DISHONEST its not up for debate it's right there in your own words.
I'm afraid it isn't. You just made it up.
If polls were science...Hillary would be President.Bet you are not big on science or technology either. If you are in a plane and that altimeter is unwinding while you are having a sinking feeling, you should probably pay no attention to the pilot if he whole plan is to cuss the gauge maker, and throw a hissy fit.Polls are rigged to manipulate the masses...but no one is falling for it anymore. The poll bandwagon effect is dead. Nobody with a ounce of common sense believes for a second that Biden can beat Trump. That leaves two alternatives. The pollees are lying or the pollers are. My money is on the pollers.
So much for that idea.
Apparently they are, since she beat him by three million votes.
That's just supposition. It could also be that left-leaning individuals are drawn to journalism.
Right leaning journalists are NOT tolerated by the left. Hell even left leaning journalists have been run out of newsrooms for saying something contrary to the liberal narrative.
Why would a journalist be "leaning" right OR left? That ain't what journalism is. That's what commentary is.
Polls are only accurate 4 hours before voting begins so they can later say SEE!The polls aren't "broken". They are intentionally designed to tell lies.
That said, in spite of their polls, I believe Trump will break the back of the Democrat Party on November 3rd.
How Trump has broken the polls
The polls aren't "broken". They are intentionally designed to tell lies.
That said, in spite of their polls, I believe Trump will break the back of the Democrat Party on November 3rd.
How Trump has broken the polls
I recently read a great article on Larry Sabato's web site. Every Presidential election since 2000 has underestimated the actual Republican vote accept one. That was 2012. It still said Obama would win but it was off by a couple of points. Otherwise, they have been dead wrong and generally heavily biased against Republicans.
Bottom line: The polls lie and are almost always biased against the GOP.
That's just supposition. It could also be that left-leaning individuals are drawn to journalism.
Right leaning journalists are NOT tolerated by the left. Hell even left leaning journalists have been run out of newsrooms for saying something contrary to the liberal narrative.
Why would a journalist be "leaning" right OR left? That ain't what journalism is. That's what commentary is.
Maybe in your made up liberal fantasy world.
Obama got 365 and 332. Did he win HUUUGE?
He sure did.
Agreed, but I just couldn't do it last time. I knew they both were totally unfit. I wasn't elated like the trumpers, but wasn't in grief like the hill holes. Actually hoped for the best. Nine months later I gave up on him. Ready for the pendulum of democracy to swing again. My money is on Joe this time. Don't see him making two terms, but we got to change direction. Moderate change would suit me fine.Glad I wasn't stupid enough, or uncaring about bad character to vote for one of the two POS candidates in 2016. Trumpsters saved us from Hillary. Now Biden will have to save us from Trump. When both candidates deserve to lose, you stuck with a loser after the election and the whole country loses.If polls were science...Hillary would be President.Bet you are not big on science or technology either. If you are in a plane and that altimeter is unwinding while you are having a sinking feeling, you should probably pay no attention to the pilot if he whole plan is to cuss the gauge maker, and throw a hissy fit.Polls are rigged to manipulate the masses...but no one is falling for it anymore. The poll bandwagon effect is dead. Nobody with a ounce of common sense believes for a second that Biden can beat Trump. That leaves two alternatives. The pollees are lying or the pollers are. My money is on the pollers.
So much for that idea.
Apparently they are, since she beat him by three million votes.
Liar, she lost and she lost huge Trump whooped her ass winning 30 states and over 300 EC votes.
Go ahead, check the numbers. Check any of my numbers. On anything. I get them straight before I post.
She lost the election she didn't beat him, just admit you were lying. I may as well slap you around further with facts, Hillary won by 4 million more votes in the single state of California. Trump whooped her ass by 1 million votes in the other 49 states. There now you have some numbers to chew on.
538 members of the Electoral College
270 electoral votes needed to winOpinion polls Turnout 55.7%[1] 0.8 pp
Nominee Donald Trump Hillary Clinton Party Republican Democratic Home state New York New York Running mate Mike Pence Tim Kaine Electoral vote 304[a] 227[a] States carried 30 + ME-02 20 + DC Popular vote 62,984,828 65,853,514 Percentage 46.1% 48.2%
You mean he cannot even hire internal pollster to make it come out his way?Agree to an extent.
The media is overtly partisan. Why would the pollsters be any different?
They are both more interested in shaping opinion than disseminating facts.
Except the battleground polling was terrible. Nobody gives a shit about polling in NYC or LA. Hillary was supposed the win Pennsylvania by 8 points. WTF happened. It was off in every battleground state and was all biased for Hillary.
YouGov’s final pre-election polls in Battleground states: Trump still coming up short | YouGov
Despite some gains, Trump is still short in key statestoday.yougov.com
True dat, but it's been the case for at least as long as we've been alive.
A POTUS election is like taking an entomology course. You have to identify the lesser of two weevils.
NO, in practice they can nominate whoever, period.
Sure...they COULD do something ridiculously stupid...but they won't.
The Bernie supporters already know the fix it's in...pass Bernie over and see what happens.
I suspect it will be the end off the Democrat party as we know it.
Prominent Bernie Sanders supporters are calling on Joe Biden to drop out of the 2020 race over Tara Reade's sexual assault allegation
"Out of respect for survivors and for the good of the country, he should withdraw from the race," Sanders' 2020 national organizing director tweeted.www.businessinsider.com