Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,205
- 2,320
- Thread starter
- #101
If polls were science...Hillary would be President.Bet you are not big on science or technology either. If you are in a plane and that altimeter is unwinding while you are having a sinking feeling, you should probably pay no attention to the pilot if he whole plan is to cuss the gauge maker, and throw a hissy fit.Polls are rigged to manipulate the masses...but no one is falling for it anymore. The poll bandwagon effect is dead. Nobody with a ounce of common sense believes for a second that Biden can beat Trump. That leaves two alternatives. The pollees are lying or the pollers are. My money is on the pollers.
So much for that idea.
Apparently they are, since she beat him by three million votes.
Liar, she lost and she lost huge Trump whooped her ass winning 30 states and over 300 EC votes.![]()
Go ahead, check the numbers. Check any of my numbers. On anything. I get them straight before I post.
She lost the election she didn't beat him, just admit you were lying. I may as well slap you around further with facts, Hillary won by 4 million more votes in the single state of California. Trump whooped her ass by 1 million votes in the other 49 states. There now you have some numbers to chew on.![]()
Unfortunately for your fantasy we don't have elections via cherrypicking. I'm sure cherries are delicious and all but your logic here is full of fruit flies.
The fact remains, polling said Clinton would draw morefruit fliesvotes, and she did, although by the time the date was nearing it was too close to call, due to the dysfunction of the Electrical College.
What was dysfunctional about it?
See my above reference to the states of Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Florida, North Cackalackee, Utah, and we could add AridZona and we could also add Nevada, Minnesota and Virginia. In every one of those states NOBODY won as much as 50% of that state's vote yet they all (some by force of unConstitutional state law) sent 100% of their vote to a single candidate. A candidate that that state quantifiably did not choose.
That dysfunction.
That's HALF the total needed to win the EC right there.
Eh?
Votes choose electors. Majority wins. 50% is not required.
I think you'll find that the definition of majority REQUIRES 50% plus one.
Go ahead, check me. I'll wait.
Not with more than two candidates.
Yep, with any number.
Wanna see?
majority
noun
ma·jor·i·ty | \ mə-ˈjȯr-ə-tē , -ˈjär- \
plural majorities
Definition of majority
1 a: a number or percentage equaling more than half of a total
a majority of voters; a two-thirds majority
Besides which, we all know there are only effectively two on the ballot given the Duopoly. You get a choice of Bad or Worse. Nobody votes "for" Bad. They vote AGAINST "Worse".
Your arguments are becoming decidedly thin.