How will you feel when you find you you are paying for "the wall?"

[IcebergSlim]

How might Trump pay for his wall? He's suggested a tax on goods imported from Mexico. Great, right? Well, just who buys goods imported into the U.S. from Mexico? It's not Mexicans or Canadians.

Why am I expected to pay for the Great Wall of Trump while Trump isn't?

Oh, suddenly you don't like complex tax codes?

Want to support ending them?

Do I like tax codes that make the taxpayer compensate Trump for losing almost a billion dollars in bad investments?

No, I don't

It's even worse than that......Trump lost the bank's money....then, mysteriously, wound up with a nearly 1 billion dollar loss carry forward...

You try that, Home Gamers....

Investing in real estate is risky. Any banker that doesn't know that, is incompetent and should be fired.

Bankers do it all the time.......without it, your skyline would look entirely different...

In this particular instance, as I recall, Trump had personally guaranteed some of these loans...

but that has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Trump took losses to which he should not have been entitled....and it raises questions about why his personal guarantee was acceptable (my guess is that, in some way, the banks were counting on Donny's daddy to bail him out.....as he had before), given that he could not possibly have had the net worth to deliver on it...

The reason he won't release his tax returns is because that particular scam is unlikely to play well with the part of his constituency which does NOT spend the bulk of its day, slack jawed, before FOX News...

 

[ColonelAngus]

Snowflakes are very concerned with government spending, we know.

Yo, Colonel....

Can you post the annual growth rates of federal spending (in nominal dollars) for the following

Carter

Reagan

Poppy

Clinton

Scrub

Obama

?

Just the numbers.......I'll figure out their ordinal ranking....

Why don't you cut right to the point you think you are making?

Here is my point directly.

Liberals have no problem with a $20 trillion debt, but they feign being very concerned about the money being used for border security.

Carter's 21.5% prime interest rate was interesting.

 

[Conservative65]

Oh, suddenly you don't like complex tax codes?

Want to support ending them?

Do I like tax codes that make the taxpayer compensate Trump for losing almost a billion dollars in bad investments?

No, I don't

So, you going to join me in supporting a National Sales Tax, or just bitch about this issue when you can use it to smear your enemies?

Fuck a National Sales Tax
It unfairly hits the poor because a greater portion of their income goes to purchases

If everyone is taxed on an equal percentage, isn't that fair? I thought you lefties said doing the same thing was fair?

That's faulty by design.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Rather than labor the fact that you can't read, Red, why don't you (in the largest bold font available to you) tell everyone what "NL" stands for?

I predict that you won't......because you are just another cowardly bag of ignorant gas....

Why don't you tell me what you think it means since you claim to be so smart. If you don't, it will prove you're not as smart as you claim.

I'm not the one kissing Obama's ass, therefore, I can't be a coward. Pucker up, NL.

It is YOUR thing.......how the fuck am I supposed to know what goes through your simple mind...I have no way to relate....

Man up, you fucking coward......unless you are a slizz, in which case "gird your loins, Lassie!"

Yet you imply you think you know what it means. Guess you really don't know.

I'll mail it to you personally. Provide the necessary information on the open forum is you have the guts.

I'll mail it to you personally. Provide the necessary information on the open forum is you have the guts.

Because you have neither the courage nor the integrity to post what YOU mean, I must demonstrate courage to you by posting personal information?

Clearly you are an even bigger idiot than I suspected, Sniveling Bitch.....

Pucker up, NL.
​

What do you mean by "NL"?

It's an acronym for an Indonesian term. Look it up if you want to know.

If that is the case, why have you been so reluctant to post it, Red?

and why do you persist in your bluff?

Are you an idio.........

never mind....

 

[Conservative65]

Why am I expected to pay for the Great Wall of Trump while Trump isn't?

Oh, suddenly you don't like complex tax codes?

Want to support ending them?

Do I like tax codes that make the taxpayer compensate Trump for losing almost a billion dollars in bad investments?

No, I don't

It's even worse than that......Trump lost the bank's money....then, mysteriously, wound up with a nearly 1 billion dollar loss carry forward...

You try that, Home Gamers....

Investing in real estate is risky. Any banker that doesn't know that, is incompetent and should be fired.

Bankers do it all the time.......without it, your skyline would look entirely different...

In this particular instance, as I recall, Trump had personally guaranteed some of these loans...

but that has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Trump took losses to which he should not have been entitled....and it raises questions about why his personal guarantee was acceptable (my guess is that, in some way, the banks were counting on Donny's daddy to bail him out.....as he had before), given that he could not possibly have had the net worth to deliver on it...

The reason he won't release his tax returns is because that particular scam is unlikely to play well with the part of his constituency which does NOT spend the bulk of its day, slack jawed, before FOX News...

Why don't you prove that claim about his tax returns. If you can make such a claim, surely you have evidence.

 

[Divine Wind]

So being black is how Democrats believe earning something happens? Interesting, NL.

...I'm not the one kissing Obama's ass, therefore, I can't be a coward. Pucker up, NL.

You're just the typical Obama NL.

What does "NL" stand for, Conservative65?

Why don't you say what you think it means. You imply it's negative. What are your thoughts?

I'll give you a hint. It's an acronym referencing a term in the Indonesian language.

I don't speak Indonesian so please stop being coy and just say so. Is it something negative?

 

[Conservative65]

Why don't you tell me what you think it means since you claim to be so smart. If you don't, it will prove you're not as smart as you claim.

I'm not the one kissing Obama's ass, therefore, I can't be a coward. Pucker up, NL.

It is YOUR thing.......how the fuck am I supposed to know what goes through your simple mind...I have no way to relate....

Man up, you fucking coward......unless you are a slizz, in which case "gird your loins, Lassie!"

Yet you imply you think you know what it means. Guess you really don't know.

I'll mail it to you personally. Provide the necessary information on the open forum is you have the guts.

I'll mail it to you personally. Provide the necessary information on the open forum is you have the guts.

Because you have neither the courage nor the integrity to post what YOU mean, I must demonstrate courage to you by posting personal information?

Clearly you are an even bigger idiot than I suspected, Sniveling Bitch.....

Pucker up, NL.
​

What do you mean by "NL"?

It's an acronym for an Indonesian term. Look it up if you want to know.

If that is the case, why have you been so reluctant to post it, Red?

and why do you persist in your bluff?

Are you an idio.........

never mind....

Again, you have said you don't know what I was thinking but now say I'm bluffing despite saying where it comes from.

Post what you think it means, pussy.

 

[Votto]

How might Trump pay for his wall? He's suggested a tax on goods imported from Mexico. Great, right? Well, just who buys goods imported into the U.S. from Mexico? It's not Mexicans or Canadians.

Personally I'm pissed.

Doesn't the President know that taxpayers don't want to pay for anything, hence the $20 trillion debt?

He is new to this government stuff, maybe he will get wise and run to the basement in the Fed and print the billions needed and jus let us live tax free.

 

[Conservative65]

So being black is how Democrats believe earning something happens? Interesting, NL.

...I'm not the one kissing Obama's ass, therefore, I can't be a coward. Pucker up, NL.

You're just the typical Obama NL.

What does "NL" stand for, Conservative65?

Why don't you say what you think it means. You imply it's negative. What are your thoughts?

I'll give you a hint. It's an acronym referencing a term in the Indonesian language.

I don't speak Indonesian so please stop being coy and just say so. Is it something negative?

I don't speak Indonesian either. Look it up you lazy bastard.

Whether it's negative or not is a matter of opinion.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Snowflakes are very concerned with government spending, we know.

Yo, Colonel....

Can you post the annual growth rates of federal spending (in nominal dollars) for the following

Carter

Reagan

Poppy

Clinton

Scrub

Obama

?

Just the numbers.......I'll figure out their ordinal ranking....

Why don't you cut right to the point you think you are making?

Here is my point directly.

Liberals have no problem with a $20 trillion debt, but they feign being very concerned about the money being used for border security.

Carter's spending means dick.

You have no idea.......color me surprised....

Here is the deal on federal spending as percentage of GDP...

Popular Conception

Obama’s rhetoric plays to the misconception that the Republicans are the party of irresponsible deregulation, small government and tax cuts that favor the rich, while the Democrats are the reverse. But the policy history back to Jimmy Carter is inconsistent with that view.


Let’s look at each key component, spending, regulation, and taxes, in turn. Contrary to popular belief, the relationship between the party in the White House and government outlays is the opposite of what one might expect.


Under Carter, total government outlays as a percent of gross domestic product averaged a relatively stable 20.8 percent. Over the next 12 years, when Republicans Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush resided in the White House, spending increased, averaging 22.2 percent of GDP.


The trend reversed under the Democratic leadership of Bill Clinton. Government on average consumed 19.8 percent of GDP during his term.


Finally, Republicans under George W. Bush undid the progress made during the Clinton years with spending rising from just 18.2 percent of GDP in his first year, to 20.7 percent by the time he left office.

Carter Shows Where Obama Needs to Go


And, since I know damned well where you are thinking of heading next, I suggest you google AEI and Kevin Hassett before opening your piehole...

If you would like to see the spending growth data, hollaback...

 

[Frankeneinstein]

How will you feel when you find you you are paying for "the wall?"

I'll be like, dang!

 

[Correll]

How might Trump pay for his wall? He's suggested a tax on goods imported from Mexico. Great, right? Well, just who buys goods imported into the U.S. from Mexico? It's not Mexicans or Canadians.

Why am I expected to pay for the Great Wall of Trump while Trump isn't?

Oh, suddenly you don't like complex tax codes?

Want to support ending them?

Do I like tax codes that make the taxpayer compensate Trump for losing almost a billion dollars in bad investments?

No, I don't

So, you going to join me in supporting a National Sales Tax, or just bitch about this issue when you can use it to smear your enemies?

Fuck a National Sales Tax
It unfairly hits the poor because a greater portion of their income goes to purchases

THere are ways to a address that.

The last big push I saw, included a major "refund" program for the poor.

 

[Correll]

Why am I expected to pay for the Great Wall of Trump while Trump isn't?

Oh, suddenly you don't like complex tax codes?

Want to support ending them?

Do I like tax codes that make the taxpayer compensate Trump for losing almost a billion dollars in bad investments?

No, I don't

It's even worse than that......Trump lost the bank's money....then, mysteriously, wound up with a nearly 1 billion dollar loss carry forward...

You try that, Home Gamers....

Investing in real estate is risky. Any banker that doesn't know that, is incompetent and should be fired.

Real estate was booming at the time. Trump lost money on his casinos and Trump Airlines
But, lucky for him, the taxpayers will make up the difference

Even in a boom, real estate is risky. DId the banker do his due diligence?

 

[IcebergSlim]

So being black is how Democrats believe earning something happens? Interesting, NL.

...I'm not the one kissing Obama's ass, therefore, I can't be a coward. Pucker up, NL.

You're just the typical Obama NL.

What does "NL" stand for, Conservative65?

Why don't you say what you think it means. You imply it's negative. What are your thoughts?

I'll give you a hint. It's an acronym referencing a term in the Indonesian language.

I don't speak Indonesian so please stop being coy and just say so. Is it something negative?

I don't speak Indonesian either. Look it up you lazy bastard.

Whether it's negative or not is a matter of opinion.

I don't speak Indonesian either.

So where did you come up with it?

From a fortune cookie?

Wrong cuisine......

 

[ColonelAngus]

Snowflakes are very concerned with government spending, we know.

Yo, Colonel....

Can you post the annual growth rates of federal spending (in nominal dollars) for the following

Carter

Reagan

Poppy

Clinton

Scrub

Obama

?

Just the numbers.......I'll figure out their ordinal ranking....

Why don't you cut right to the point you think you are making?

Here is my point directly.

Liberals have no problem with a $20 trillion debt, but they feign being very concerned about the money being used for border security.

Carter's spending means dick.

You have no idea.......color me surprised....

Here is the deal on federal spending as percentage of GDP...

Popular Conception

Obama’s rhetoric plays to the misconception that the Republicans are the party of irresponsible deregulation, small government and tax cuts that favor the rich, while the Democrats are the reverse. But the policy history back to Jimmy Carter is inconsistent with that view.


Let’s look at each key component, spending, regulation, and taxes, in turn. Contrary to popular belief, the relationship between the party in the White House and government outlays is the opposite of what one might expect.


Under Carter, total government outlays as a percent of gross domestic product averaged a relatively stable 20.8 percent. Over the next 12 years, when Republicans Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush resided in the White House, spending increased, averaging 22.2 percent of GDP.


The trend reversed under the Democratic leadership of Bill Clinton. Government on average consumed 19.8 percent of GDP during his term.


Finally, Republicans under George W. Bush undid the progress made during the Clinton years with spending rising from just 18.2 percent of GDP in his first year, to 20.7 percent by the time he left office.

Carter Shows Where Obama Needs to Go


And, since I know damned well where you are thinking of heading next, I suggest you google AEI and Kevin Hassett before opening your piehole...

If you would like to see the spending growth data, hollaback...

Snowflakes don't mind $10 trillion additional debt over he past 8 years.

They claim to be angry about spending money to secure the border.

Hypocrites regardless of anything Jimmy Carter did nearly half a century ago.

 

[Correll]

Why am I expected to pay for the Great Wall of Trump while Trump isn't?

Oh, suddenly you don't like complex tax codes?

Want to support ending them?

Do I like tax codes that make the taxpayer compensate Trump for losing almost a billion dollars in bad investments?

No, I don't

It's even worse than that......Trump lost the bank's money....then, mysteriously, wound up with a nearly 1 billion dollar loss carry forward...

You try that, Home Gamers....

Investing in real estate is risky. Any banker that doesn't know that, is incompetent and should be fired.

Bankers do it all the time.......without it, your skyline would look entirely different...

In this particular instance, as I recall, Trump had personally guaranteed some of these loans...

but that has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Trump took losses to which he should not have been entitled....and it raises questions about why his personal guarantee was acceptable (my guess is that, in some way, the banks were counting on Donny's daddy to bail him out.....as he had before), given that he could not possibly have had the net worth to deliver on it...

The reason he won't release his tax returns is because that particular scam is unlikely to play well with the part of his constituency which does NOT spend the bulk of its day, slack jawed, before FOX News...

Sooo, no matter the job responsibilities of the banker, nor standard practices, not anything,

in your mind it all comes back to Trump, because, reasons...


LOL!

 

[Divine Wind]

Flip flopping took place between 1/20/09 and 1/20/17. How many times did Obama say he didn't have the authority to do with immigration what he eventually did with immigration? Just one example.

And the flip-flopping continues.

When President Obama told Governor Brewer she couldn't handle the immigration problem herself then refused to do anything about himself, that was wrong.

 

[Conservative65]

So being black is how Democrats believe earning something happens? Interesting, NL.

...I'm not the one kissing Obama's ass, therefore, I can't be a coward. Pucker up, NL.

You're just the typical Obama NL.

What does "NL" stand for, Conservative65?

Why don't you say what you think it means. You imply it's negative. What are your thoughts?

I'll give you a hint. It's an acronym referencing a term in the Indonesian language.

I don't speak Indonesian so please stop being coy and just say so. Is it something negative?

I don't speak Indonesian either. Look it up you lazy bastard.

Whether it's negative or not is a matter of opinion.

I don't speak Indonesian either.

So where did you come up with it?

From a fortune cookie?

Wrong cuisine......

There's a new invention called the internet. Perhaps you've heard of it.

 

[Conservative65]

Flip flopping took place between 1/20/09 and 1/20/17. How many times did Obama say he didn't have the authority to do with immigration what he eventually did with immigration? Just one example.

And the flip-flopping continues.

When President Obama told Governor Brewer she couldn't handle the immigration problem herself then refused to do anything about himself, that was wrong.

Wouldn't that have been an impeachable offense by Obama being that as Chief Executive it's his responsibility to see that the federal laws are enforced?

 

[IcebergSlim]

Snowflakes are very concerned with government spending, we know.

Yo, Colonel....

Can you post the annual growth rates of federal spending (in nominal dollars) for the following

Carter

Reagan

Poppy

Clinton

Scrub

Obama

?

Just the numbers.......I'll figure out their ordinal ranking....

Why don't you cut right to the point you think you are making?

Here is my point directly.

Liberals have no problem with a $20 trillion debt, but they feign being very concerned about the money being used for border security.

Carter's spending means dick.

You have no idea.......color me surprised....

Here is the deal on federal spending as percentage of GDP...

Popular Conception

Obama’s rhetoric plays to the misconception that the Republicans are the party of irresponsible deregulation, small government and tax cuts that favor the rich, while the Democrats are the reverse. But the policy history back to Jimmy Carter is inconsistent with that view.


Let’s look at each key component, spending, regulation, and taxes, in turn. Contrary to popular belief, the relationship between the party in the White House and government outlays is the opposite of what one might expect.


Under Carter, total government outlays as a percent of gross domestic product averaged a relatively stable 20.8 percent. Over the next 12 years, when Republicans Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush resided in the White House, spending increased, averaging 22.2 percent of GDP.


The trend reversed under the Democratic leadership of Bill Clinton. Government on average consumed 19.8 percent of GDP during his term.


Finally, Republicans under George W. Bush undid the progress made during the Clinton years with spending rising from just 18.2 percent of GDP in his first year, to 20.7 percent by the time he left office.

Carter Shows Where Obama Needs to Go


And, since I know damned well where you are thinking of heading next, I suggest you google AEI and Kevin Hassett before opening your piehole...

If you would like to see the spending growth data, hollaback...

Snowflakes don't mind $10 trillion additional debt over he past 8 years.

They claim to be angry about spending money to secure the border.

Hypocrites regardless of anything Jimmy Carter did nearly half a century ago.

You're an idiot.....I just demonstrated that the assumption "informing" your ignorance is completely at odds with Reality...

Under Obama (in nominal terms) federal spending grew at an annual rate of 2.2%...

Under Scrub, it grew at a rate approaching 7.5% (EXCLUSIVE of Iraqnam)..

That's half of the equation.....the other half covers Revenues......it looks even worse for you...

You wanna see?