citizenal
Living in Paradise
- Thread starter
- #681
Did you ask for any? Did you ask him to explain his reasoning? Or did you just jump to conclusions with no proof of your own? Granted, the person making the claim does have the burden of proof (initially), but unless you can provide evidence to the contrary, you can't automatically assume the person's claim as false. That can be your opinion, but it's definately not a fact.Interesting, considering your butt buddy had zero proof.
So if I say the sky was pink tonight, its up to you to prove otherwise? Learned historians have carefully documented the past of the US. The burden is crushing upon citizenal.
And what do you think I have been doing in all my previous posts? No, I wasn't proving. What I was doing was demonstrating that based upon the available facts, the most reasonable and cogent explanation for each of the 20 events I identified is behind the scenes manipulation by the same group of people. Each event taken alone establishes nothing, but when taken together, the case is overwhelming. This being the case, the burden of establishing the truth is not on me, because I have done that. Instead, as Loinboy said, the burden of demonstrating why I am wrong rests squarely on your shoulders.
No put up or shut up. I am sure you will do neither and instead just call me few more names.