saveliberty
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2009
- 58,693
- 10,750
- 2,030
Here's what the fucking thing says...Remember when I told you that you didn't understand the words you were trying to use? This is a good example. The words you are misunderstanding mean that treaties entered into by the Executive Branch apply to all states in the Union, NOT that teaties take on the same imperative as the US Constitution or that they in any way preclude the US from taking whatever actions are deemed necessary in the interests of national security. You are too fucking stupid for words, you really are.
Since there is only one Supreme Law of the Land, that means treaties carry the same weight.all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land;
And you're wrong about "national security interests". Our government can in no way do that which is un-Constitutional. That's what separates us from other governments. If it was okay for the President to do anything he wanted and all he had to do was declare his actions in the interest of national security, then there is nothing to stop him from becoming a dictator. In fact, that's how Hitler became a dictator.
You support policies that are turning us into nazi Germany. American, my ass! Fuck you, brownshirt.
Loinboy:
I'm proud of you on this one! Score another point for the good guys as the darkside goes down in 'da feet'.
What absolute idiots you guys are. Guess what? If a treaty violated the Constitution, the Supreme court could strike it down. That would make the Constitution the ultimate "Law of the Land". Of course, you're too busy being lunatic conspiracists to actually learn what things mean or subvert it to match your cause.
Last edited: