I called Diane Feinstein's office and told them she is an anti-Catholic bigot and a babykiller

[bodecea]

You claim to be a lawyer? You should know it's the supreme court's job to evaluate our laws. Nobody took anything away from anybody. It's how our government works dummy.

Roe v. Wade was based on a "right to privacy" which was a legal fiction, invented by the Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut. It is not based on the text or original intent of the United States Constitution. Read the Constitution in vain, there is no such thing as the "right to privacy."

And all those judges on the Supreme Court fell for something like that when you, a person who claims to be a lawyer that nobody will hire, has a better insight into the constitution. No wonder you are so bitter. You should be on the Supreme Court instead of scratching your unemployed ass.

abortion is legalized murder. Why do you find it acceptable?

The court does not look at abortion as murder. Until the baby is born--it is a fetus--not a baby and that's the way the court see's it. There's been much talk about a "personhood bill" that has bombed out in my state on 3 different tries. This is the bill that is stated to end all abortions--but the consequences to it are astounding.

Since our laws do not discriminate.
1. Common miscarraiges would have to be investigated by law enforcement and an autopsy performed.
2. A woman gets into an accident and loses the fetus could be criminally charged with manslaughter.
3. You get into an accident with a pregnant woman you could be charged with criminal manslaughter.
4. A woman get sick and loses the fetus, an investigation by law enforcement would have to be done and an autopsy performed.
5. Doctors and nurses delivering still born fetus could also be charged and held in civil court for financial damages.
6. And of course, Doctors & Nurses could then be charged with murder.

A fetus is a very fragile life, and we don't need to be putting innocent people in prison for medical reasons or accidents. This is why the Personhood bill goes down in a ball of flames at every attempt, let alone it would be immediately overturned by a higher court anyway.

Let's keep it logical and not illogical. Abortion kills plain and simple.

Do not like abortions...do not have one.

 

[gipper]

Roe v. Wade was based on a "right to privacy" which was a legal fiction, invented by the Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut. It is not based on the text or original intent of the United States Constitution. Read the Constitution in vain, there is no such thing as the "right to privacy."

And all those judges on the Supreme Court fell for something like that when you, a person who claims to be a lawyer that nobody will hire, has a better insight into the constitution. No wonder you are so bitter. You should be on the Supreme Court instead of scratching your unemployed ass.

abortion is legalized murder. Why do you find it acceptable?

The court does not look at abortion as murder. Until the baby is born--it is a fetus--not a baby and that's the way the court see's it. There's been much talk about a "personhood bill" that has bombed out in my state on 3 different tries. This is the bill that is stated to end all abortions--but the consequences to it are astounding.

Since our laws do not discriminate.
1. Common miscarraiges would have to be investigated by law enforcement and an autopsy performed.
2. A woman gets into an accident and loses the fetus could be criminally charged with manslaughter.
3. You get into an accident with a pregnant woman you could be charged with criminal manslaughter.
4. A woman get sick and loses the fetus, an investigation by law enforcement would have to be done and an autopsy performed.
5. Doctors and nurses delivering still born fetus could also be charged and held in civil court for financial damages.
6. And of course, Doctors & Nurses could then be charged with murder.

A fetus is a very fragile life, and we don't need to be putting innocent people in prison for medical reasons or accidents. This is why the Personhood bill goes down in a ball of flames at every attempt, let alone it would be immediately overturned by a higher court anyway.

Let's keep it logical and not illogical. Abortion kills plain and simple.

Do not like abortions...do not have one.

Is that your version of morality? I guess you don't find murder unacceptable. Most immoral, but I suppose you have no morals.

 

[gipper]

Roe v. Wade was based on a "right to privacy" which was a legal fiction, invented by the Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut. It is not based on the text or original intent of the United States Constitution. Read the Constitution in vain, there is no such thing as the "right to privacy."

And all those judges on the Supreme Court fell for something like that when you, a person who claims to be a lawyer that nobody will hire, has a better insight into the constitution. No wonder you are so bitter. You should be on the Supreme Court instead of scratching your unemployed ass.

abortion is legalized murder. Why do you find it acceptable?

The court does not look at abortion as murder. Until the baby is born--it is a fetus--not a baby and that's the way the court see's it. There's been much talk about a "personhood bill" that has bombed out in my state on 3 different tries. This is the bill that is stated to end all abortions--but the consequences to it are astounding.

Since our laws do not discriminate.
1. Common miscarraiges would have to be investigated by law enforcement and an autopsy performed.
2. A woman gets into an accident and loses the fetus could be criminally charged with manslaughter.
3. You get into an accident with a pregnant woman you could be charged with criminal manslaughter.
4. A woman get sick and loses the fetus, an investigation by law enforcement would have to be done and an autopsy performed.
5. Doctors and nurses delivering still born fetus could also be charged and held in civil court for financial damages.
6. And of course, Doctors & Nurses could then be charged with murder.

A fetus is a very fragile life, and we don't need to be putting innocent people in prison for medical reasons or accidents. This is why the Personhood bill goes down in a ball of flames at every attempt, let alone it would be immediately overturned by a higher court anyway.

Let's keep it logical and not illogical. Abortion kills plain and simple.

Are you saying that the Republican party is
1. Going to tell a woman who may already have 2 kids at home to raise, along with her husband that she needs to die to give birth to a baby?
2. Going to tell the parents of a young girl that has been repeatedly raped by a relative, that she needs to risk her life to give birth to a baby?
3. Going to tell a "lucky to be alive woman" that was brutally raped, who may also have a husband & other family members who would object to her carrying a rape baby to full term that she needs to give birth?

Until you're ready to say YES to those 3 questions, then stfu. The U.S. Supreme Court has made a decision, and that decision is not yours, nor will it ever be.

I have no use for the R party. They are a bunch of criminals just the D party. If you think the Rs will outlaw baby killing, you are a dupe of the DNC Bolshevik media.

I don't care what scenarios you post, murdering the unborn is still murder. You need some logic and some morals.

 

[bendog]

I'm sure the "babykiller" comment ensured (-: your contact was appropriately filed. LOL

 

[Mr Natural]

Right, but I also don't own any slaves, but somehow your having a slave bothers me.

Stupid analogy.

But expected.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

It is not an issue I would decide. I don't think you should be trying to decide for anyone either.

Support a psychopaths right to kill?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Roe v. Wade was based on a "right to privacy" which was a legal fiction, invented by the Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut. It is not based on the text or original intent of the United States Constitution. Read the Constitution in vain, there is no such thing as the "right to privacy."

And all those judges on the Supreme Court fell for something like that when you, a person who claims to be a lawyer that nobody will hire, has a better insight into the constitution. No wonder you are so bitter. You should be on the Supreme Court instead of scratching your unemployed ass.

abortion is legalized murder. Why do you find it acceptable?

The court does not look at abortion as murder. Until the baby is born--it is a fetus--not a baby and that's the way the court see's it. There's been much talk about a "personhood bill" that has bombed out in my state on 3 different tries. This is the bill that is stated to end all abortions--but the consequences to it are astounding.

Since our laws do not discriminate.
1. Common miscarraiges would have to be investigated by law enforcement and an autopsy performed.
2. A woman gets into an accident and loses the fetus could be criminally charged with manslaughter.
3. You get into an accident with a pregnant woman you could be charged with criminal manslaughter.
4. A woman get sick and loses the fetus, an investigation by law enforcement would have to be done and an autopsy performed.
5. Doctors and nurses delivering still born fetus could also be charged and held in civil court for financial damages.
6. And of course, Doctors & Nurses could then be charged with murder.

A fetus is a very fragile life, and we don't need to be putting innocent people in prison for medical reasons or accidents. This is why the Personhood bill goes down in a ball of flames at every attempt, let alone it would be immediately overturned by a higher court anyway.

Let's keep it logical and not illogical. Abortion kills plain and simple.

Do not like abortions...do not have one.

Do not like lynchings, don't have one..

How fucking stupid can you be, Nazi Pete?

 

[surada]

Roe v. Wade was based on a "right to privacy" which was a legal fiction, invented by the Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut. It is not based on the text or original intent of the United States Constitution. Read the Constitution in vain, there is no such thing as the "right to privacy."

And all those judges on the Supreme Court fell for something like that when you, a person who claims to be a lawyer that nobody will hire, has a better insight into the constitution. No wonder you are so bitter. You should be on the Supreme Court instead of scratching your unemployed ass.

abortion is legalized murder. Why do you find it acceptable?

The court does not look at abortion as murder. Until the baby is born--it is a fetus--not a baby and that's the way the court see's it. There's been much talk about a "personhood bill" that has bombed out in my state on 3 different tries. This is the bill that is stated to end all abortions--but the consequences to it are astounding.

Since our laws do not discriminate.
1. Common miscarraiges would have to be investigated by law enforcement and an autopsy performed.
2. A woman gets into an accident and loses the fetus could be criminally charged with manslaughter.
3. You get into an accident with a pregnant woman you could be charged with criminal manslaughter.
4. A woman get sick and loses the fetus, an investigation by law enforcement would have to be done and an autopsy performed.
5. Doctors and nurses delivering still born fetus could also be charged and held in civil court for financial damages.
6. And of course, Doctors & Nurses could then be charged with murder.

A fetus is a very fragile life, and we don't need to be putting innocent people in prison for medical reasons or accidents. This is why the Personhood bill goes down in a ball of flames at every attempt, let alone it would be immediately overturned by a higher court anyway.

Let's keep it logical and not illogical. Abortion kills plain and simple.

Do not like abortions...do not have one.

Do not like lynchings, don't have one..

How fucking stupid can you be, Nazi Pete?

You seem to think a zygote is the same as a living person. Even the Bible makes a distinction.

 

[surada]

Roe v. Wade was based on a "right to privacy" which was a legal fiction, invented by the Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut. It is not based on the text or original intent of the United States Constitution. Read the Constitution in vain, there is no such thing as the "right to privacy."

And all those judges on the Supreme Court fell for something like that when you, a person who claims to be a lawyer that nobody will hire, has a better insight into the constitution. No wonder you are so bitter. You should be on the Supreme Court instead of scratching your unemployed ass.

abortion is legalized murder. Why do you find it acceptable?

The court does not look at abortion as murder. Until the baby is born--it is a fetus--not a baby and that's the way the court see's it. There's been much talk about a "personhood bill" that has bombed out in my state on 3 different tries. This is the bill that is stated to end all abortions--but the consequences to it are astounding.

Since our laws do not discriminate.
1. Common miscarraiges would have to be investigated by law enforcement and an autopsy performed.
2. A woman gets into an accident and loses the fetus could be criminally charged with manslaughter.
3. You get into an accident with a pregnant woman you could be charged with criminal manslaughter.
4. A woman get sick and loses the fetus, an investigation by law enforcement would have to be done and an autopsy performed.
5. Doctors and nurses delivering still born fetus could also be charged and held in civil court for financial damages.
6. And of course, Doctors & Nurses could then be charged with murder.

A fetus is a very fragile life, and we don't need to be putting innocent people in prison for medical reasons or accidents. This is why the Personhood bill goes down in a ball of flames at every attempt, let alone it would be immediately overturned by a higher court anyway.

Let's keep it logical and not illogical. Abortion kills plain and simple.

Do not like abortions...do not have one.

Is that your version of morality? I guess you don't find murder unacceptable. Most immoral, but I suppose you have no morals.

It appears that bodecia has more morals than you.

 

[gipper]

Roe v. Wade was based on a "right to privacy" which was a legal fiction, invented by the Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut. It is not based on the text or original intent of the United States Constitution. Read the Constitution in vain, there is no such thing as the "right to privacy."

And all those judges on the Supreme Court fell for something like that when you, a person who claims to be a lawyer that nobody will hire, has a better insight into the constitution. No wonder you are so bitter. You should be on the Supreme Court instead of scratching your unemployed ass.

abortion is legalized murder. Why do you find it acceptable?

The court does not look at abortion as murder. Until the baby is born--it is a fetus--not a baby and that's the way the court see's it. There's been much talk about a "personhood bill" that has bombed out in my state on 3 different tries. This is the bill that is stated to end all abortions--but the consequences to it are astounding.

Since our laws do not discriminate.
1. Common miscarraiges would have to be investigated by law enforcement and an autopsy performed.
2. A woman gets into an accident and loses the fetus could be criminally charged with manslaughter.
3. You get into an accident with a pregnant woman you could be charged with criminal manslaughter.
4. A woman get sick and loses the fetus, an investigation by law enforcement would have to be done and an autopsy performed.
5. Doctors and nurses delivering still born fetus could also be charged and held in civil court for financial damages.
6. And of course, Doctors & Nurses could then be charged with murder.

A fetus is a very fragile life, and we don't need to be putting innocent people in prison for medical reasons or accidents. This is why the Personhood bill goes down in a ball of flames at every attempt, let alone it would be immediately overturned by a higher court anyway.

Let's keep it logical and not illogical. Abortion kills plain and simple.

Do not like abortions...do not have one.

Is that your version of morality? I guess you don't find murder unacceptable. Most immoral, but I suppose you have no morals.

It appears that bodecia has more morals than you.

Yes. Advocates of abortion are more moral than those who oppose it, in our upside down society.

 

[surada]

Roe v. Wade was based on a "right to privacy" which was a legal fiction, invented by the Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut. It is not based on the text or original intent of the United States Constitution. Read the Constitution in vain, there is no such thing as the "right to privacy."

And all those judges on the Supreme Court fell for something like that when you, a person who claims to be a lawyer that nobody will hire, has a better insight into the constitution. No wonder you are so bitter. You should be on the Supreme Court instead of scratching your unemployed ass.

abortion is legalized murder. Why do you find it acceptable?

The court does not look at abortion as murder. Until the baby is born--it is a fetus--not a baby and that's the way the court see's it. There's been much talk about a "personhood bill" that has bombed out in my state on 3 different tries. This is the bill that is stated to end all abortions--but the consequences to it are astounding.

Since our laws do not discriminate.
1. Common miscarraiges would have to be investigated by law enforcement and an autopsy performed.
2. A woman gets into an accident and loses the fetus could be criminally charged with manslaughter.
3. You get into an accident with a pregnant woman you could be charged with criminal manslaughter.
4. A woman get sick and loses the fetus, an investigation by law enforcement would have to be done and an autopsy performed.
5. Doctors and nurses delivering still born fetus could also be charged and held in civil court for financial damages.
6. And of course, Doctors & Nurses could then be charged with murder.

A fetus is a very fragile life, and we don't need to be putting innocent people in prison for medical reasons or accidents. This is why the Personhood bill goes down in a ball of flames at every attempt, let alone it would be immediately overturned by a higher court anyway.

Let's keep it logical and not illogical. Abortion kills plain and simple.

Do not like abortions...do not have one.

Is that your version of morality? I guess you don't find murder unacceptable. Most immoral, but I suppose you have no morals.

It appears that bodecia has more morals than you.

Yes. Advocates of abortion are more moral than those who oppose it, in our upside down society.

I think bringing an unwanted child or a child with multiple birth defects into the world is a very difficult issue. What are your plans to take care of such children since you want to abrogate the reproductive rights of women?

 

[Brain357]

It felt good to get it all off my chest.

One day, perhaps 100 years from now, all the babykillers' statues will be torn down in the way Confederate statues are being torn down now.

The Supreme Court building will be dismantled because of the shame of being the institution that killed so many millions of babies.

Planned Parenthood will be remembered with the likes of the Nazi Party and the Communist Party as one of the greatest murderer of humans of all time.

You have too much time on your hands. Get a life....

 

[gipper]

Roe v. Wade was based on a "right to privacy" which was a legal fiction, invented by the Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut. It is not based on the text or original intent of the United States Constitution. Read the Constitution in vain, there is no such thing as the "right to privacy."

And all those judges on the Supreme Court fell for something like that when you, a person who claims to be a lawyer that nobody will hire, has a better insight into the constitution. No wonder you are so bitter. You should be on the Supreme Court instead of scratching your unemployed ass.

abortion is legalized murder. Why do you find it acceptable?

The court does not look at abortion as murder. Until the baby is born--it is a fetus--not a baby and that's the way the court see's it. There's been much talk about a "personhood bill" that has bombed out in my state on 3 different tries. This is the bill that is stated to end all abortions--but the consequences to it are astounding.

Since our laws do not discriminate.
1. Common miscarraiges would have to be investigated by law enforcement and an autopsy performed.
2. A woman gets into an accident and loses the fetus could be criminally charged with manslaughter.
3. You get into an accident with a pregnant woman you could be charged with criminal manslaughter.
4. A woman get sick and loses the fetus, an investigation by law enforcement would have to be done and an autopsy performed.
5. Doctors and nurses delivering still born fetus could also be charged and held in civil court for financial damages.
6. And of course, Doctors & Nurses could then be charged with murder.

A fetus is a very fragile life, and we don't need to be putting innocent people in prison for medical reasons or accidents. This is why the Personhood bill goes down in a ball of flames at every attempt, let alone it would be immediately overturned by a higher court anyway.

Let's keep it logical and not illogical. Abortion kills plain and simple.

Do not like abortions...do not have one.

Is that your version of morality? I guess you don't find murder unacceptable. Most immoral, but I suppose you have no morals.

It appears that bodecia has more morals than you.

Yes. Advocates of abortion are more moral than those who oppose it, in our upside down society.

I think bringing an unwanted child or a child with multiple birth defects into the world is a very difficult issue. What are your plans to take care of such children since you want to abrogate the reproductive rights of women?

You think it’s moral to murder an unborn child because it is unwanted or has multiple birth defects. That’s crazy.

Your question is typical left wing stupidity. We have a government spending trillions on Wall Street and the MIC, but you think it can’t help protect the unborn. Typical.