"I don't care!" if trump is a criminal!

[froggy]

Messing with the People's Choice of their elected official could backfire on the DEM's

 

[jc456]

So a bitter 4 felony convicted criminal on his way to prison bad mouths his ex boss.

Yep, sounds like grounds for impeachment to me. ...

His"boss" was directly involved in one of those felonies, dope.

Directly involved? No. Cohen simply lied/misinformed as to how long he worked on the possible joint venture building project in Russia. Read the plea deal. And, by the way, he needn’t have lied, as doing business in Russia is not against the law.
AMERICAN COMPANIES OPERATING IN RUSSIA | Association of Accredited Public Policy Advocates to the European Union
In total there are almost 3,000 American companies in Russia, and the U.S. is also the leader in terms of foreign companies in Special Economic Zones, with 11 projects.

American Companies Thriving In Russia: Is There Something To Be Ashamed About?
Aug 03, 2016 · American Companies Thriving In Russia: Is There Something To Be Ashamed About? Kenneth Rapoza ... Boeing and the Ural Federal University for joint research and developmentprojects.

I'm talking about the payment and campaign finance violation, dope.

that was a rule 35 add. go look up rule 35. he pleaded guilty for a lighter sentence on campaign finance claim, that wasn't illegal. Rule 35.

Rule 35. Correcting or Reducing a Sentence

"(b) Reducing a Sentence for Substantial Assistance.

(1) In General. Upon the government's motion made within one year of sentencing, the court may reduce a sentence if the defendant, after sentencing, provided substantial assistance in investigating or prosecuting another person.

(2) Later Motion. Upon the government's motion made more than one year after sentencing, the court may reduce a sentence if the defendant's substantial assistance involved:

(A) information not known to the defendant until one year or more after sentencing;

(B) information provided by the defendant to the government within one year of sentencing, but which did not become useful to the government until more than one year after sentencing; or

(C) information the usefulness of which could not reasonably have been anticipated by the defendant until more than one year after sentencing and which was promptly provided to the government after its usefulness was reasonably apparent to the defendant."

Huh?

WTF are you trying to say?

don't you read your own posts? campaign finance. He only plead to campaign finance as a rule 35 reduction in his sentencing. dude, I added the rule. read it. Campaign finance wasn't illegal and it wasn't against the law if it was done. He plead guilty to that as a way to reduce his sentence. fk I hate your kind of stupid.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

If Trump broke the law, he should be held accountable.

What laws did he break? What will the charges be?

Campaign-finance laws are about “a thing of value“.
When Trump squashed the information about his intimacies with porn stars and playboy bunnies by paying them and threatening them then he’s keeping information away from the American people that could change the outcome of the election. A thing of value.
And he did it to change the election. And then he created shell companies to secretly pay them so they couldn’t trace the money back to Donald Trump.
Keeping this information from the American people is a felony. Because it changed the outcome of an election. And that’s only the most obvious one. There’s all the ethical stuff too, that they barely looked at.

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Except Cohen has been convicted of it, dope.
He's named Trump as a co conspirator. He provided the reimbursement checks as evidence.

But there is no proof that the check is actually a reimbursement check that's just his word against Trump's

There's also no proof it's a "retainer for services". Which is why they can't show a retainer agreement. There isn't one.

Now if you're putting out a steady stream of $35000 checks, eleven or whatever it is, that's going to raise questions about what that''s for. At the very minimum with IRS. If that's a retainer fee, fine, show the contract. If not --- what is it?

I imagine Weisselberg can clear this up very quickly.

 

[Synthaholic]

Congressman Jordan PWNS the clueless Clinton stooge Cohen.

Cohen is a Clinton stooge? When did Cohen work for Clinton?

Who is Cohen lawyer Davis a CLINTON 25 year associate!....Love how stupid Deranged is!

Clinton never went to jail no matter how Republicans tried.

And no matter how they lied. I would want the best. Wouldn’t you?

Oh wait, no, you want Trump, clearly not the best.

For 25 years they have been investigating Hillary and have jack shit to show for it.

 

[jc456]

Campaign-finance laws are about “a thing of value“.
When Trump squashed the information about his intimacies with porn stars and playboy bunnies by paying them and threatening them then he’s keeping information away from the American people that could change the outcome of the election. A thing of value.
And he did it to change the election. And then he created shell companies to secretly pay them so they couldn’t trace the money back to Donald Trump.
Keeping this information from the American people is a felony. Because it changed the outcome of an election. And that’s only the most obvious one. There’s all the ethical stuff too, that they barely looked at.

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Except Cohen has been convicted of it, dope.
He's named Trump as a co conspirator. He provided the reimbursement checks as evidence.

But there is no proof that the check is actually a reimbursement check that's just his word against Trump's

There's also no proof it's a "retainer for services". Which is why they can't show a retainer agreement. There isn't one.

Now if you're putting out a steady stream of $35000 checks, eleven or whatever it is, that's going to raise questions about what that''s for. At the very minimum with IRS. If that's a retainer fee, fine, show the contract. If not --- what is it?

I imagine Weisselberg can clear this up very quickly.

why hasn't he, it's been two fking years.

 

[jc456]

Congressman Jordan PWNS the clueless Clinton stooge Cohen.

Cohen is a Clinton stooge? When did Cohen work for Clinton?

Who is Cohen lawyer Davis a CLINTON 25 year associate!....Love how stupid Deranged is!

Clinton never went to jail no matter how Republicans tried.

And no matter how they lied. I would want the best. Wouldn’t you?

Oh wait, no, you want Trump, clearly not the best.

For 25 years they have been investigating Hillary and have jack shit to show for it.

what part of owning the DOJ and FBI didn't you get?

 

[Synthaholic]

This is the exact reason why the powerful and connected are rarely held accountable for their actions. People don’t care as long as they agree with their politics. Fucking fools.

This is why whomever is the Democratic President in 2021 appoints Eliot Spitzer as Attorney General.

 

[The Purge]

Congressman Jordan PWNS the clueless Clinton stooge Cohen.

Cohen is a Clinton stooge? When did Cohen work for Clinton?

Who is Cohen lawyer Davis a CLINTON 25 year associate!....Love how stupid Deranged is!

Clinton never went to jail no matter how Republicans tried.

And no matter how they lied. I would want the best. Wouldn’t you?

Oh wait, no, you want Trump, clearly not the best.

For 25 years they have been investigating Hillary and have jack shit to show for it.

We have the texts and emails stating they would do nothing to that murderous Cu nt....and this where her crimes are spelled out and then .....

 

[Synthaholic]

If Trump broke the law, he should be held accountable.

What laws did he break? What will the charges be?

Campaign-finance laws are about “a thing of value“.
When Trump squashed the information about his intimacies with porn stars and playboy bunnies by paying them and threatening them then he’s keeping information away from the American people that could change the outcome of the election. A thing of value.
And he did it to change the election. And then he created shell companies to secretly pay them so they couldn’t trace the money back to Donald Trump.
Keeping this information from the American people is a felony. Because it changed the outcome of an election. And that’s only the most obvious one. There’s all the ethical stuff too, that they barely looked at.

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Except Cohen has been convicted of it, dope.
He's named Trump as a co conspirator. He provided the reimbursement checks as evidence.

But there is no proof that the check is actually a reimbursement check that's just his word against Trump's

No, his word and Weisselberg’s word, and the other two guys Cohen listed - their words, too.

These people are not going to prison to protect the Abominable Slow Man.

 

[The Purge]

This is the exact reason why the powerful and connected are rarely held accountable for their actions. People don’t care as long as they agree with their politics. Fucking fools.

This is why whomever is the Democratic President in 2021 appoints Eliot Spitzer as Attorney General.

Correction...Carlos Danger ...AKA Anthony Weiner....lololol

 

[Hutch Starskey]

His"boss" was directly involved in one of those felonies, dope.

Directly involved? No. Cohen simply lied/misinformed as to how long he worked on the possible joint venture building project in Russia. Read the plea deal. And, by the way, he needn’t have lied, as doing business in Russia is not against the law.
AMERICAN COMPANIES OPERATING IN RUSSIA | Association of Accredited Public Policy Advocates to the European Union
In total there are almost 3,000 American companies in Russia, and the U.S. is also the leader in terms of foreign companies in Special Economic Zones, with 11 projects.

American Companies Thriving In Russia: Is There Something To Be Ashamed About?
Aug 03, 2016 · American Companies Thriving In Russia: Is There Something To Be Ashamed About? Kenneth Rapoza ... Boeing and the Ural Federal University for joint research and developmentprojects.

I'm talking about the payment and campaign finance violation, dope.

that was a rule 35 add. go look up rule 35. he pleaded guilty for a lighter sentence on campaign finance claim, that wasn't illegal. Rule 35.

Rule 35. Correcting or Reducing a Sentence

"(b) Reducing a Sentence for Substantial Assistance.

(1) In General. Upon the government's motion made within one year of sentencing, the court may reduce a sentence if the defendant, after sentencing, provided substantial assistance in investigating or prosecuting another person.

(2) Later Motion. Upon the government's motion made more than one year after sentencing, the court may reduce a sentence if the defendant's substantial assistance involved:

(A) information not known to the defendant until one year or more after sentencing;

(B) information provided by the defendant to the government within one year of sentencing, but which did not become useful to the government until more than one year after sentencing; or

(C) information the usefulness of which could not reasonably have been anticipated by the defendant until more than one year after sentencing and which was promptly provided to the government after its usefulness was reasonably apparent to the defendant."

Huh?

WTF are you trying to say?

don't you read your own posts? campaign finance. He only plead to campaign finance as a rule 35 reduction in his sentencing. dude, I added the rule. read it. Campaign finance wasn't illegal and it wasn't against the law if it was done. He plead guilty to that as a way to reduce his sentence. fk I hate your kind of stupid.

WTF?

A person cannot be charged with something that is not a crime, dope. Let alone plead guilty.

You need to post a court document that shows, "He only plead to campaign finance as a rule 35 reduction in his sentencing."

 

[Synthaholic]

If Trump broke the law, he should be held accountable.

What laws did he break? What will the charges be?

Campaign-finance laws are about “a thing of value“.
When Trump squashed the information about his intimacies with porn stars and playboy bunnies by paying them and threatening them then he’s keeping information away from the American people that could change the outcome of the election. A thing of value.
And he did it to change the election. And then he created shell companies to secretly pay them so they couldn’t trace the money back to Donald Trump.
Keeping this information from the American people is a felony. Because it changed the outcome of an election. And that’s only the most obvious one. There’s all the ethical stuff too, that they barely looked at.

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Except Cohen has been convicted of it, dope.
He's named Trump as a co conspirator. He provided the reimbursement checks as evidence.

But there is no proof that the check is actually a reimbursement check that's just his word against Trump's

There's also no proof it's a "retainer for services". Which is why they can't show a retainer agreement. There isn't one.

Now if you're putting out a steady stream of $35000 checks, eleven or whatever it is, that's going to raise questions about what that''s for. At the very minimum with IRS. If that's a retainer fee, fine, show the contract. If not --- what is it?

This would also mean that Cohen is working for free, which is ridiculous. I’m sure Cohen also has the actual checks that paid him for his services as legal council. Was Trump paying him twice? No.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Except Cohen has been convicted of it, dope.
He's named Trump as a co conspirator. He provided the reimbursement checks as evidence.

But there is no proof that the check is actually a reimbursement check that's just his word against Trump's

There's also no proof it's a "retainer for services". Which is why they can't show a retainer agreement. There isn't one.

Now if you're putting out a steady stream of $35000 checks, eleven or whatever it is, that's going to raise questions about what that''s for. At the very minimum with IRS. If that's a retainer fee, fine, show the contract. If not --- what is it?

I imagine Weisselberg can clear this up very quickly.

why hasn't he, it's been two fking years.

Cohen just presented the checks yesterday, dope.

Don't reply to my posts without reading and understanding them.

 

[Synthaholic]

Campaign-finance laws are about “a thing of value“.
When Trump squashed the information about his intimacies with porn stars and playboy bunnies by paying them and threatening them then he’s keeping information away from the American people that could change the outcome of the election. A thing of value.
And he did it to change the election. And then he created shell companies to secretly pay them so they couldn’t trace the money back to Donald Trump.
Keeping this information from the American people is a felony. Because it changed the outcome of an election. And that’s only the most obvious one. There’s all the ethical stuff too, that they barely looked at.

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Except Cohen has been convicted of it, dope.
He's named Trump as a co conspirator. He provided the reimbursement checks as evidence.

But there is no proof that the check is actually a reimbursement check that's just his word against Trump's

There's also no proof it's a "retainer for services". Which is why they can't show a retainer agreement. There isn't one.

Now if you're putting out a steady stream of $35000 checks, eleven or whatever it is, that's going to raise questions about what that''s for. At the very minimum with IRS. If that's a retainer fee, fine, show the contract. If not --- what is it?

Since he has about 12 of them it could be $35,000 a month his paycheck

And what if Cohen has the checks that were actually used to pay him for his legal services? Are you going to claim Trump paid him twice, for a year?

 

[Synthaholic]

If Trump broke the law, he should be held accountable.

What laws did he break? What will the charges be?

Campaign-finance laws are about “a thing of value“.
When Trump squashed the information about his intimacies with porn stars and playboy bunnies by paying them and threatening them then he’s keeping information away from the American people that could change the outcome of the election. A thing of value.
And he did it to change the election. And then he created shell companies to secretly pay them so they couldn’t trace the money back to Donald Trump.
Keeping this information from the American people is a felony. Because it changed the outcome of an election. And that’s only the most obvious one. There’s all the ethical stuff too, that they barely looked at.

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Except Cohen has been convicted of it, dope.
He's named Trump as a co conspirator. He provided the reimbursement checks as evidence.

But there is no proof that the check is actually a reimbursement check that's just his word against Trump's

That comes when the signatories testify under oath. Weisselberg would be my choice. He already has immunity in these matters.

We don’t know that he has immunity, which would be specific to narrow aspects of his cooperation, or a ‘cooperation agreement’, which is a blanket immunity for anything he was involved with.

 

[Synthaholic]

Messing with the People's Choice of their elected official could backfire on the DEM's

The people’s choice was Hillary Clinton, with 3 million more of the people’s votes.

Bill Clinton was also the people’s choice yet Republicans messed with that, so you’re talking out your ass.

 

[The Purge]

Cohen....expressed shame for his association President Donald Trump...."

This, from a sleazy, slime ball attorney who made a lot of money being "associated" with Trump. Ingrate.

In reality, it should be Trump who is ashamed for associating himself with this lowlife rat.

Why the demonRATS thought it a good idea to have a convicted liar testify, is baffling to sane people. But then I remind myself, they're demonRATS.

They won't be able to rely on the veracity of anything he says in the hearing given the fact that....well....he's a liar. Guilty of lying in a Senate Committee hearing no less. The House demonRATS hatred outweighs their judgment.

I see the mobster Gambino's son says Cohen will get "whacked" in prison. Inmates love Trump but they hate rats and snitches.

He's lucky he's not testifying against Hillary or he'd be "whacked" before he went to prison.

Nobody likes a snitch, except the demonRATS in the House apparently.

 

[The Purge]

Messing with the People's Choice of their elected official could backfire on the DEM's

The people’s choice was Hillary Clinton, with 3 million more of the people’s votes.

Bill Clinton was also the people’s choice yet Republicans messed with that, so you’re talking out your ass.

Yes we UNDERSTAND YOU don't believe in Constitutional law with the electoral college...Anti-American piece of shit!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Campaign-finance laws are about “a thing of value“.
When Trump squashed the information about his intimacies with porn stars and playboy bunnies by paying them and threatening them then he’s keeping information away from the American people that could change the outcome of the election. A thing of value.
And he did it to change the election. And then he created shell companies to secretly pay them so they couldn’t trace the money back to Donald Trump.
Keeping this information from the American people is a felony. Because it changed the outcome of an election. And that’s only the most obvious one. There’s all the ethical stuff too, that they barely looked at.

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Campaign finance law infringements are a painless wrist slap for candidates. Duhhh!

Except Cohen has been convicted of it, dope.
He's named Trump as a co conspirator. He provided the reimbursement checks as evidence.

But there is no proof that the check is actually a reimbursement check that's just his word against Trump's

That comes when the signatories testify under oath. Weisselberg would be my choice. He already has immunity in these matters.

We don’t know that he has immunity, which would be specific to narrow aspects of his cooperation, or a ‘cooperation agreement’, which is a blanket immunity for anything he was involved with.

He had immunity regarding Cohen. I don't know if he could testify in open session without stepping on other investigations though.
Trump financial chief 'given immunity'

 

[jc456]

This is the exact reason why the powerful and connected are rarely held accountable for their actions. People don’t care as long as they agree with their politics. Fucking fools.

This is why whomever is the Democratic President in 2021 appoints Eliot Spitzer as Attorney General.

then you will wake and boomba, there's trump. too fking funny.