Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hearsay covers both doing and saying.....
No it does not.
Absolutely it does. It covers unverified information - ie "So and so DID something" or "so-and-so SAID something"....
Credible, unimpeachable, un-bias eyewitness & 911 recordings puts Zimmerman on his back on the ground screaming for help more than 20 times while Martin continued to beat him. Zimmerman was justified in shooting Martin.
Credible, unimpeachable, un-bias eyewitness & 911 recordings puts Zimmerman on his back on the ground screaming for help more than 20 times while Martin continued to beat him. Zimmerman was justified in shooting Martin.
Zimmerman would have never been on his back if he would have backed off as the police told him to do. If I had followed a kid with skittles in his hand a gun in mine I would expect to be pummeled while laying on my back, too.
No it does not.
Absolutely it does. It covers unverified information - ie "So and so DID something" or "so-and-so SAID something"....
Hearsay is not unverified information, it is indirect information. Hearsay involves you getting talking to someone else and repeating what they said, period. You might talk about what they say they did, but you are still talking about what they said.
Feel free to provide any kind of link to prove me wrong, even a really bad crime novel.
Credible, unimpeachable, un-bias eyewitness & 911 recordings puts Zimmerman on his back on the ground screaming for help more than 20 times while Martin continued to beat him. Zimmerman was justified in shooting Martin.
Zimmerman would have never been on his back if he would have backed off as the police told him to do. If I had followed a kid with skittles in his hand a gun in mine I would expect to be pummeled while laying on my back, too.
There are a LOT of bleeding hearts for the killer here.
How can the guy who expressed his concern about a guy following him suddenly become the aggressor? How does a young man walking home with tea and skittles become the agitator in this?
Yeah, but rdean dated him from 1997-2002. So there is that to consider.
Elsewhere, some vacuous rw demands to know who would cheer a heart attack and yet, read this forum - you'll find a lot rw's making excuses for the wanton murder of a 17 year old kid and worse, making excuses for the killer.
Oh, but that's different, right?
You're right. It IS different.
Cheney isn't black.
Credible, unimpeachable, un-bias eyewitness & 911 recordings puts Zimmerman on his back on the ground screaming for help more than 20 times while Martin continued to beat him. Zimmerman was justified in shooting Martin.
Zimmerman would have never been on his back if he would have backed off as the police told him to do. If I had followed a kid with skittles in his hand a gun in mine I would expect to be pummeled while laying on my back, too.
Umm, no.
Hearsay is I say you said something, not me saying you did something.
its zimmermans words vs a dead kid....oh boy...
Still not hearsay. And, like it or not, there is evidence that supports Zimmerman's story, and witnesses that saw him on the ground under Martin.
But, like I said in my OP, I am not going to let facts change my opinion, Zimmermen should be hunted down and killed. It is good to see I am not the only one to think that way.
A 17 year old boy goes out to get a snack and a can of tea. No prior record, no prior problems with fighting or aggressiveness. A man that has had prior problems on both accounts is out with a gun. He follows the boy, and, in spite of being told not to, confronts him. The boy asks "Why are you following me?", the man asks, "What are you doing here". That is the last we know of the exchange, what we do know, is that a fight ensued, and the man with the gun killed the boy.
From this alone, I would say a murder took place. The man had no right to confront the boy. At that point, the boy had the right to do whatever he could, not knowing what the fellow was up to.
Yet, once again, the wingnuts have come down on the side of the criminal.
Except for that pesky eye witness account of the Kid attacking Zimmerman. Except for the fact we have prior knowledge now that the "kid" has been violent with at least one bus driver. Except for the fact an eye witness saw Martin knock Zimmerman to the ground, pound his head on the ground. Yup lets ignore all those facts shall we?
Credible, unimpeachable, un-bias eyewitness & 911 recordings puts Zimmerman on his back on the ground screaming for help more than 20 times while Martin continued to beat him. Zimmerman was justified in shooting Martin.
The Grand Jury already met and released the findings? The victim is reported to have been on the phone until a couple minutes before the killing, police do not report taking twenty+ minutes to get there after the killer called and was cautioned. I see the pro KILLER groups are consistent in siding with the killer. Contribute to his defense fund, offer your home as a safe refuge, PLEASE.
No, I wonder why THIS victim received so little attention from law enforcement until DEMONSTRATIONS took place, and why there is a firm defense of the killer by so many who decry street crimes.
Its been a month since he was shot by Zimmerman. Unlike the non-existent comparison that Trajan tries and fails to make, the police knew who the killer was and still let him go. They probably also knew his long and very violent history but they still let him go.
Since when do the parents of murdered children have to demonstrate in order to get theie child's killer arrested?
And, to my knowledge, this jerk STILL has not been arrested.
Why not?
No, he was not on "neighborhood watch" because that neighborhood did not have a watch group. He self-appointed himself to the position of captain of a non-existent watch group.
I've heard the tape. He very clearly says "coon".
Zimmerman would have never been on his back if he would have backed off as the police told him to do. If I had followed a kid with skittles in his hand a gun in mine I would expect to be pummeled while laying on my back, too.
There are a LOT of bleeding hearts for the killer here.
We dont have all the facts. But you have cast judgement.
Nuff said.
Credible, unimpeachable, un-bias eyewitness & 911 recordings puts Zimmerman on his back on the ground screaming for help more than 20 times while Martin continued to beat him. Zimmerman was justified in shooting Martin.
How can the guy who expressed his concern about a guy following him suddenly become the aggressor? How does a young man walking home with tea and skittles become the agitator in this?
There are a LOT of bleeding hearts for the killer here.
We dont have all the facts. But you have cast judgement.
Nuff said.
No, it could be self defense, involuntary manslaughter, voluntary manslaughter, 2nd degree murder. I don't see 1st degree murder, but the first presentation of the evidence will be to the Grand Jury, such as it is. I do not see the purpose of bringing the Feds in either at this point, it could just cloud the proceedings.
