Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wasn’t trying to refute the findings. I don’t need to refute the findings. Because like I said before, a study is not a definitive test. And it certainly isn’t evidence for anyone who wasn’t in the study.So what isn't a refutation of the findings.
Probably because the musket and blunderbuss was all they knew at the time and all they could imagine.Why do you believe the founders used the generic term “arms” instead of muskets?
What type(s) of arms?No. Not at all. The right to bear arms shall not be infringed. The right to bear arms is specifically called out in the 2nd amendment.
If muskets were all they knew then why did they use the phrase arms? I say it’s because they understood that firearms would advance.Probably because the musket and blunderbuss was all they knew at the time and all they could imagine.
I am sure if James Madison had had a Crystal ball that would have let him see the carnage inflicted upon the country from all the weapons in existence now in ADDITION to what he intended, the U.S. Constitution would read more like....
"The right to keep and bear arms?
Fuuuuck you!"
The kind that any light infantry ought to possess. Today that’s semiautomatic rifles, pistols and shotguns with high capacity magazines.What type(s) of arms?
No I'm not inclined to apologize. It wasn't an insult it was a simple statement of facts. It doesn't bother that you are unable to refute them and that civilization marches on regardless of your inability to understand the science.Rando on the internet? I’m trying very hard to be civil here. Why are you trying to make this personal? So if you want to continue this discussion with me I suggest you apologize. There are plenty of trolls that would love to trade insults with you. I’m not one of them.
Nice chatting with you.No I'm not inclined to apologize. It wasn't an insult it was a simple statement of facts.
Look closer.
A definitive test being a nebulous and arbitrary standard you just invented.I wasn’t trying to refute the findings. I don’t need to refute the findings. Because like I said before, a study is not a definitive test. And it certainly isn’t evidence for anyone who wasn’t in the study.
Hilarious chatting with you.Nice chatting with you.
Are the bathrooms in your house gender specific?
Look at you flipping off AmericansProbably because the musket and blunderbuss was all they knew at the time and all they could imagine.
I am sure if James Madison had had a Crystal ball that would have let him see the carnage inflicted upon the country from all the weapons in existence now in ADDITION to what he intended, the U.S. Constitution would read more like....
"The right to keep and bear arms?
Fuuuuck you!"
Aren't you 57 years old or something?Why? Gen x like myself will beat the crap out of them if they ever touch them
You obviously do not understand statistics in any way, shape or form. You are an idiot!I see you play same bullshit game in all the threads. My god, that's TWO times you denied quantitative correlation in less than an hour, even using the word itself. So you think if you play stupid people will "follow stupid".
It may correlate further than that, sure, but following correlation through to its end usually begins to reveal causation. So I would definitely say that this person is on the right track even though they may not have nailed it yet.
You bothered.to.write all that irrelevant drivel just.to sound like a 10th grade smartass??You obviously do not understand statistics in any way, shape or form. You are an idiot!
Her is an example of why you simply do not understand
Liam collected data on the sales of ice cream cones and air conditioners in his hometown. He found that when ice cream sales were low, air conditioner sales tended to be low and that when ice cream sales were high, air conditioner sales tended to be high.
- Liam can conclude that sales of ice cream cones and air conditioner are positively correlated.
- Liam can't conclude that selling more ice cream cones causes more air conditioners to be sold. It is likely that the increases in the sales of both ice cream cones and air conditioners are caused by a third factor, an increase in temperature!
Lesson concluded. Now, answer my question as to why you think the leaks occurred near two NATO countries?
“… And when you loose control, you'll reap the harvest you have sown” Pink Floyd
A 10th grade smartass is apparently a fucking genius when compared to you.You bothered.to.write all that irrelevant drivel just.to sound like a 10th grade smartass??
Their choice to do with their own bodies what they want. Not to tell other people who identify as women what they can do with theirs.
