Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Nothing wrong with having a crush on your boss...
Also nothing wrong with having a relationship with your boss if mutually agreed upon with no agendas.
And if the relationship broke apart. What do you think will happen to the boss and the company they work for? Lawsuit.
Having a crush to your boss or employees is normal that doesn't mean you go offering them favors. You just have to keep your feeling private and professional.
i got it right the first time: only crony-ism is inappropriate, dear.why do you believe human sexuality is "inappropriate"?why do you believe human sexuality is "wrong"?only crony-ism is inappropriate, dear.
No. A boss having sex with an employee is inappropriate too.
I don't, and have not said that I do.
quibbling with irrelevant terms, mr.diversion?
I am not quibbling with irrelevant terms. You are inventing what you want me to have said.
A boss having an affair with an employee is inappropriate because of the power he has, the upheaval and discontent it causes with other employees, and because it goes against company policies.
It is not about the sex itself, but about the relationship.
i got it right the first time: only crony-ism is inappropriate, dear.why do you believe human sexuality is "inappropriate"?why do you believe human sexuality is "wrong"?No. A boss having sex with an employee is inappropriate too.
I don't, and have not said that I do.
quibbling with irrelevant terms, mr.diversion?
I am not quibbling with irrelevant terms. You are inventing what you want me to have said.
A boss having an affair with an employee is inappropriate because of the power he has, the upheaval and discontent it causes with other employees, and because it goes against company policies.
It is not about the sex itself, but about the relationship.
Equality demands that the Person who can handle the heat the least, put their shoes back on and get out of the kitchen.. Omg there goes the irony meter again.What makes you think she owes you answers?I thought she had something against tall black men since she never turned around to face me when I went to her cubicle to ask a question. But I found out from this other black lady that she does the same thing to her when she goes to her cubicle. But she is not racist because she is very chatty with one black girl at the job so she is just ignorant.
So instead of me saying this and losing my job I rather pretend that she doesn't exist
"Can you please turn around and face me like a normal person when I am asking you a fucking question you dumb bitch"
lol
It's just common sense to turn and face someone when the person come to your cubicle.
Did she invite you to her cubicle for a Q & A session? Or were you just rudely intruding?
her position is for problem resolution and if she can't handle it she needs to quit
I my case; it is why i believe in honesty and female bosses simply informing me when it is my turn, and when it is not.Nothing wrong with having a crush on your boss...
Also nothing wrong with having a relationship with your boss if mutually agreed upon with no agendas.
And if the relationship broke apart. What do you think will happen to the boss and the company they work for? Lawsuit.
Having a crush to your boss or employees is normal that doesn't mean you go offering them favors. You just have to keep your feeling private and professional.
what? a Firm in the private sector claiming to have some sort of "police power" over freedom of association and contract? how Socialist.i got it right the first time: only crony-ism is inappropriate, dear.why do you believe human sexuality is "inappropriate"?why do you believe human sexuality is "wrong"?
I don't, and have not said that I do.
quibbling with irrelevant terms, mr.diversion?
I am not quibbling with irrelevant terms. You are inventing what you want me to have said.
A boss having an affair with an employee is inappropriate because of the power he has, the upheaval and discontent it causes with other employees, and because it goes against company policies.
It is not about the sex itself, but about the relationship.
Find me a company that allows bosses to fuck their underlings. I doubt there are any. So, aside from the other reasons, it is against company policy. That makes it inappropriate.
The Presidency of the United States (though admittedly not a company).i got it right the first time: only crony-ism is inappropriate, dear.why do you believe human sexuality is "inappropriate"?why do you believe human sexuality is "wrong"?
I don't, and have not said that I do.
quibbling with irrelevant terms, mr.diversion?
I am not quibbling with irrelevant terms. You are inventing what you want me to have said.
A boss having an affair with an employee is inappropriate because of the power he has, the upheaval and discontent it causes with other employees, and because it goes against company policies.
It is not about the sex itself, but about the relationship.
Find me a company that allows bosses to fuck their underlings. I doubt there are any. So, aside from the other reasons, it is against company policy. That makes it inappropriate.
Nothing wrong with having a crush on your boss...
Also nothing wrong with having a relationship with your boss if mutually agreed upon with no agendas.
And if the relationship broke apart. What do you think will happen to the boss and the company they work for? Lawsuit.
Having a crush to your boss or employees is normal that doesn't mean you go offering them favors. You just have to keep your feeling private and professional.
No doubt it could get complicated. Haven't you seen West Side Story though? ... when loves comes so strong, there is not right or wrong... anyway, I guess you could always find another job then date your boss
i got it right the first time: only crony-ism is inappropriate, dear.why do you believe human sexuality is "inappropriate"?why do you believe human sexuality is "wrong"?No. A boss having sex with an employee is inappropriate too.
I don't, and have not said that I do.
quibbling with irrelevant terms, mr.diversion?
I am not quibbling with irrelevant terms. You are inventing what you want me to have said.
A boss having an affair with an employee is inappropriate because of the power he has, the upheaval and discontent it causes with other employees, and because it goes against company policies.
It is not about the sex itself, but about the relationship.
what? a Firm in the private sector claiming to have some sort of "police power" over freedom of association and contract? how Socialist.i got it right the first time: only crony-ism is inappropriate, dear.why do you believe human sexuality is "inappropriate"?I don't, and have not said that I do.
quibbling with irrelevant terms, mr.diversion?
I am not quibbling with irrelevant terms. You are inventing what you want me to have said.
A boss having an affair with an employee is inappropriate because of the power he has, the upheaval and discontent it causes with other employees, and because it goes against company policies.
It is not about the sex itself, but about the relationship.
Find me a company that allows bosses to fuck their underlings. I doubt there are any. So, aside from the other reasons, it is against company policy. That makes it inappropriate.
it probably depends; especially in modern times.i got it right the first time: only crony-ism is inappropriate, dear.why do you believe human sexuality is "inappropriate"?why do you believe human sexuality is "wrong"?
I don't, and have not said that I do.
quibbling with irrelevant terms, mr.diversion?
I am not quibbling with irrelevant terms. You are inventing what you want me to have said.
A boss having an affair with an employee is inappropriate because of the power he has, the upheaval and discontent it causes with other employees, and because it goes against company policies.
It is not about the sex itself, but about the relationship.
Maybe YOU will screw your employee but it's a very bad idea. A decent boss will never go that.
Sounds like a totalitarian dictatorship. You are only paying for a work ethic.what? a Firm in the private sector claiming to have some sort of "police power" over freedom of association and contract? how Socialist.i got it right the first time: only crony-ism is inappropriate, dear.why do you believe human sexuality is "inappropriate"?
quibbling with irrelevant terms, mr.diversion?
I am not quibbling with irrelevant terms. You are inventing what you want me to have said.
A boss having an affair with an employee is inappropriate because of the power he has, the upheaval and discontent it causes with other employees, and because it goes against company policies.
It is not about the sex itself, but about the relationship.
Find me a company that allows bosses to fuck their underlings. I doubt there are any. So, aside from the other reasons, it is against company policy. That makes it inappropriate.
Maybe you work in the environment that do not have rules like third world countries? That is why you have such fucked up opinion.
If I found out that one of my executives are going out with their subordinates. I will find a way to terminate both or just my executive.
Sounds like a totalitarian dictatorship. You are only paying for a work ethic.what? a Firm in the private sector claiming to have some sort of "police power" over freedom of association and contract? how Socialist.i got it right the first time: only crony-ism is inappropriate, dear.I am not quibbling with irrelevant terms. You are inventing what you want me to have said.
A boss having an affair with an employee is inappropriate because of the power he has, the upheaval and discontent it causes with other employees, and because it goes against company policies.
It is not about the sex itself, but about the relationship.
Find me a company that allows bosses to fuck their underlings. I doubt there are any. So, aside from the other reasons, it is against company policy. That makes it inappropriate.
Maybe you work in the environment that do not have rules like third world countries? That is why you have such fucked up opinion.
If I found out that one of my executives are going out with their subordinates. I will find a way to terminate both or just my executive.
What was the suit over; "wrongful termination"?Sounds like a totalitarian dictatorship. You are only paying for a work ethic.what? a Firm in the private sector claiming to have some sort of "police power" over freedom of association and contract? how Socialist.i got it right the first time: only crony-ism is inappropriate, dear.
Find me a company that allows bosses to fuck their underlings. I doubt there are any. So, aside from the other reasons, it is against company policy. That makes it inappropriate.
Maybe you work in the environment that do not have rules like third world countries? That is why you have such fucked up opinion.
If I found out that one of my executives are going out with their subordinates. I will find a way to terminate both or just my executive.
I was sued because of such behavior and so is my other friends that own business. This very common and is always a very bad idea to have such a relationship.
Did you fuck the chick or do you own a business and a supervisor harassed someone?Sounds like a totalitarian dictatorship. You are only paying for a work ethic.what? a Firm in the private sector claiming to have some sort of "police power" over freedom of association and contract? how Socialist.i got it right the first time: only crony-ism is inappropriate, dear.
Find me a company that allows bosses to fuck their underlings. I doubt there are any. So, aside from the other reasons, it is against company policy. That makes it inappropriate.
Maybe you work in the environment that do not have rules like third world countries? That is why you have such fucked up opinion.
If I found out that one of my executives are going out with their subordinates. I will find a way to terminate both or just my executive.
I was sued because of such behavior and so is my other friends that own business. This very common and is always a very bad idea to have such a relationship.
"Wrongful Penetration"What was the suit over; "wrongful termination"?Sounds like a totalitarian dictatorship. You are only paying for a work ethic.what? a Firm in the private sector claiming to have some sort of "police power" over freedom of association and contract? how Socialist.Find me a company that allows bosses to fuck their underlings. I doubt there are any. So, aside from the other reasons, it is against company policy. That makes it inappropriate.
Maybe you work in the environment that do not have rules like third world countries? That is why you have such fucked up opinion.
If I found out that one of my executives are going out with their subordinates. I will find a way to terminate both or just my executive.
I was sued because of such behavior and so is my other friends that own business. This very common and is always a very bad idea to have such a relationship.
What was the suit over; "wrongful termination"?Sounds like a totalitarian dictatorship. You are only paying for a work ethic.what? a Firm in the private sector claiming to have some sort of "police power" over freedom of association and contract? how Socialist.Find me a company that allows bosses to fuck their underlings. I doubt there are any. So, aside from the other reasons, it is against company policy. That makes it inappropriate.
Maybe you work in the environment that do not have rules like third world countries? That is why you have such fucked up opinion.
If I found out that one of my executives are going out with their subordinates. I will find a way to terminate both or just my executive.
I was sued because of such behavior and so is my other friends that own business. This very common and is always a very bad idea to have such a relationship.
Did you fuck the chick or do you own a business and a supervisor harassed someone?Sounds like a totalitarian dictatorship. You are only paying for a work ethic.what? a Firm in the private sector claiming to have some sort of "police power" over freedom of association and contract? how Socialist.Find me a company that allows bosses to fuck their underlings. I doubt there are any. So, aside from the other reasons, it is against company policy. That makes it inappropriate.
Maybe you work in the environment that do not have rules like third world countries? That is why you have such fucked up opinion.
If I found out that one of my executives are going out with their subordinates. I will find a way to terminate both or just my executive.
I was sued because of such behavior and so is my other friends that own business. This very common and is always a very bad idea to have such a relationship.
did that former employee actually like her job and you are sure it was not just a ploy to "extort" money for sex.What was the suit over; "wrongful termination"?Sounds like a totalitarian dictatorship. You are only paying for a work ethic.what? a Firm in the private sector claiming to have some sort of "police power" over freedom of association and contract? how Socialist.
Maybe you work in the environment that do not have rules like third world countries? That is why you have such fucked up opinion.
If I found out that one of my executives are going out with their subordinates. I will find a way to terminate both or just my executive.
I was sued because of such behavior and so is my other friends that own business. This very common and is always a very bad idea to have such a relationship.
Nope. Sexual harassment. The victim sued her director and me. I did not actually fired him. I asked him to resign after 18 years of employment.
did that former employee actually like her job and you are sure it was not just a ploy to "extort" money for sex.What was the suit over; "wrongful termination"?Sounds like a totalitarian dictatorship. You are only paying for a work ethic.Maybe you work in the environment that do not have rules like third world countries? That is why you have such fucked up opinion.
If I found out that one of my executives are going out with their subordinates. I will find a way to terminate both or just my executive.
I was sued because of such behavior and so is my other friends that own business. This very common and is always a very bad idea to have such a relationship.
Nope. Sexual harassment. The victim sued her director and me. I did not actually fired him. I asked him to resign after 18 years of employment.
