If Bernie endorses Clinton, he betrays his supporters

[Dot Com]

After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.

Knee Grow, Please!!

He'll give her a glowing endorsement and his dumb free shit base will line up to blow her

I don't think so Frank57 unless she accepts his "saving/rebuilding the middle-class" platform into her crony corporatist elite platform

After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.

Knee Grow, Please!!

He'll give her a glowing endorsement and his dumb free shit base will line up to blow her

I don't think so Frank57 unless she accepts his "saving/rebuilding the middle-class" platform into her crony corporatist elite platform

Look at Jilly, she doesn't care how corrupt Hillary is or that Goldman Sachs lists her as an asset in their financial statements.

Party> Principles

They're as bad as Establ Repub- supporters

 

[CrusaderFrank]

in 2008 she actually got more votes than obama but "the establishment" shoved her aside for the opportunity to nominate obama.

Nope. While she had more popular votes, she was crushed in the delegate count. No one shoved her aside.

If you need the math explained to you, let me know.

So she had more votes, but the Establishment selected Obama, right?

 

[g5000]

I don't know if Valerie will be back to ask about the 2008 campaign and what happened to Hillary back then, and I have to leave soon, so I will leave this post in the eventuality anyone who doesn't understand that would like to know what happened.

I will use an analogy.

Team A and Team B play 7 baseball games against each other.

In the first game, Team A scores 54 runs and Team B scored 25. Team A wins the game.

In the second game, Team A scores 35 runs and Team B scores 15. Team A wins again.

Third game: Team A scored 2 runs, Team B scores 4 runs. Team B wins.

Fourth game: Team A scores 14 runs, Team B scores 18. Team B wins.

Fifth game: Team A scores 5, Team B scores 7. Team B wins.

Sixth game: Team A scores 8, Team B scores 12. Tream B wins.

Seventh game: Team A scores 2, Team B scored 3. Team B wins.


In seven games, Team A scored 120 runs. Team B scored 84 runs.

Team A scored more runs, but Team B won 5 out of 7 games.

Just so with Clinton and Obama. Clinton won in two really populous states (California and New York) that had a lot of voters in each state. But she won far fewer states than Obama.

And that is how Clinton had more votes but a lot less delegates than Obama. A lot of her votes were from the two really big states in which she won.

You don't want New York and California always deciding who a nominee is going to be, do you?

 

[g5000]

in 2008 she actually got more votes than obama but "the establishment" shoved her aside for the opportunity to nominate obama.

Nope. While she had more popular votes, she was crushed in the delegate count. No one shoved her aside.

If you need the math explained to you, let me know.

So she had more votes, but the Establishment selected Obama, right?

Wrong. See post 43.

 

[Dot Com]

I don't know if Valerie will be back to ask about the 2008 campaign and what happened to Hillary back then, and I have to leave soon, so I will leave this post in the eventuality anyone who doesn't understand that would like to know what happened.

I will use an analogy.

Team A and Team B play 7 baseball games against each other.

In the first game, Team A scores 54 runs and Team B scored 25. Team A wins the game.

In the second game, Team A scores 35 runs and Team B scores 15. Team A wins again.

Third game: Team A scored 2 runs, Team B scores 4 runs. Team B wins.

Fourth game: Team A scores 14 runs, Team B scores 18. Team B wins.

Fifth game: Team A scores 5, Team B scores 7. Team B wins.

Sixth game: Team A scores 8, Team B scores 12. Tream B wins.

Seventh game: Team A scores 2, Team B scored 3. Team B wins.


In seven games, Team A scored 120 runs. Team B scored 84 runs.

Team A scored more runs, but Team B won 5 out of 7 games.

Just so with Clinton and Obama. Clinton won in two really populous states (California and New York) that had a lot of voters in each state. But she won far fewer states than Obama.

And that is how Clinton had more votes but a lot less delegates than Obama. A lot of her votes were from the two really big states in which she won.

You don't want New York and California always deciding who a nominee is going to be, do you?

She, like Jillian, won't be back because they are Dem party drones AND, more than likely, are voting for her because she is also female and they want to see a female Pres. in their lifetime no matter how corrupt she is (HRC) Sniper Fire Broke when we left the WH Wearing sunglasses to a committee hearing about her Benghazi activities Paid (WELL) Goldman speeches etc, etc....

 

[guno]

Indeed, and they may well retaliate.

yep we will run right out and vote the cracka goy party

 

[Valerie]

I don't know if Valerie will be back to ask about the 2008 campaign and what happened to Hillary back then, and I have to leave soon, so I will leave this post in the eventuality anyone who doesn't understand that would like to know what happened.

I will use an analogy.

Team A and Team B play 7 baseball games against each other.

In the first game, Team A scores 54 runs and Team B scored 25. Team A wins the game.

In the second game, Team A scores 35 runs and Team B scores 15. Team A wins again.

Third game: Team A scored 2 runs, Team B scores 4 runs. Team B wins.

Fourth game: Team A scores 14 runs, Team B scores 18. Team B wins.

Fifth game: Team A scores 5, Team B scores 7. Team B wins.

Sixth game: Team A scores 8, Team B scores 12. Tream B wins.

Seventh game: Team A scores 2, Team B scored 3. Team B wins.


In seven games, Team A scored 120 runs. Team B scored 84 runs.

Team A scored more runs, but Team B won 5 out of 7 games.

Just so with Clinton and Obama. Clinton won in two really populous states (California and New York) that had a lot of voters in each state. But she won far fewer states than Obama.

And that is how Clinton had more votes but a lot less delegates than Obama. A lot of her votes were from the two really big states in which she won.

You don't want New York and California always deciding who a nominee is going to be, do you?

tl;dr

 

[Valerie]

ACTUAL individual votes cast in 2008:
2008 Democratic Popular Vote | RealClearPolitics

Obama 17,535,458

Clinton 17,822,145

 

[g5000]

I don't know if Valerie will be back to ask about the 2008 campaign and what happened to Hillary back then, and I have to leave soon, so I will leave this post in the eventuality anyone who doesn't understand that would like to know what happened.

I will use an analogy.

Team A and Team B play 7 baseball games against each other.

In the first game, Team A scores 54 runs and Team B scored 25. Team A wins the game.

In the second game, Team A scores 35 runs and Team B scores 15. Team A wins again.

Third game: Team A scored 2 runs, Team B scores 4 runs. Team B wins.

Fourth game: Team A scores 14 runs, Team B scores 18. Team B wins.

Fifth game: Team A scores 5, Team B scores 7. Team B wins.

Sixth game: Team A scores 8, Team B scores 12. Tream B wins.

Seventh game: Team A scores 2, Team B scored 3. Team B wins.


In seven games, Team A scored 120 runs. Team B scored 84 runs.

Team A scored more runs, but Team B won 5 out of 7 games.

Just so with Clinton and Obama. Clinton won in two really populous states (California and New York) that had a lot of voters in each state. But she won far fewer states than Obama.

And that is how Clinton had more votes but a lot less delegates than Obama. A lot of her votes were from the two really big states in which she won.

You don't want New York and California always deciding who a nominee is going to be, do you?

tl;dr

So you are a willfully stupid person. Check. I've often said you rubes have the intellectual capacity of a bumper sticker. I guess that's why you swallow the manufactured bullshit fed to you in bite sized morsels by your favorite propaganda outlets.

 

[hangover]

After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.

Bernie feels that it is far more important Clinton win than Trump.

Simple as that.

True but his supporters may not see it that way. Another "least of the worst" choice.

"Voting for the lesser of two evils, is still voting for evil."

 

[Dot Com]

After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.

Bernie feels that it is far more important Clinton win than Trump.

Simple as that.

True but his supporters may not see it that way. Another "least of the worst" choice.

"Voting for the lesser of two evils, is still voting for evil."

thats why I was going to sit this one out until Bernie jumped into the fray.

 

[hangover]

After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.

Bernie feels that it is far more important Clinton win than Trump.

Simple as that.

True but his supporters may not see it that way. Another "least of the worst" choice.

"Voting for the lesser of two evils, is still voting for evil."

thats why I was going to sit this one out until Bernie jumped into the fray.

I think a lot of Bernie supporters are going to vote Green Party...I for one.

 

[g5000]

After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.

Bernie feels that it is far more important Clinton win than Trump.

Simple as that.

True but his supporters may not see it that way. Another "least of the worst" choice.

"Voting for the lesser of two evils, is still voting for evil."

thats why I was going to sit this one out until Bernie jumped into the fray.

I think a lot of Bernie supporters are going to vote Green Party...I for one.

A lot of Bernie supporters weren't going to vote, even if Bernie was the nominee. Most of Bernie's supporters are young and/or lower income, and those people don't vote.

 

[Valerie]

people who parrot the "hillary is evil" talking point are so ridiculous.

hillary is an incredibly accomplished leader who political hacks have demonized as if she is "evil".

for decades hillary haters have pounded her reputation with shameless lies about her record.

those who claim "she'll say anything to get elected" simply just aren't paying attention.

when uninformed people parrot, that's one thing...

but when the hater hacks who know better blatantly lie about her record, they aren't "evil" at all.

right? riiiiight.

 

[Valerie]

Praise for Hillary Clinton
PRAISE FROM:
REPUBLICANS
DEMOCRATS
FOREIGN LEADERS
FAMOUS PEOPLE
PRESS
EXPERTS
BUSINESS LEADERS

 

[Valerie]

Praise for Hillary Clinton

 

[Tehon]

After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.

Bernie feels that it is far more important Clinton win than Trump.

Simple as that.

True but his supporters may not see it that way. Another "least of the worst" choice.

"Voting for the lesser of two evils, is still voting for evil."

thats why I was going to sit this one out until Bernie jumped into the fray.

I think a lot of Bernie supporters are going to vote Green Party...I for one.

That has been my plan as well.

 

[Valerie]

Bernie Sanders: 'Maybe I shouldn't say this: I like Hillary Clinton'

Bernie Sanders, the independent Vermont senator who is running for the Democratic presidential nomination on 2016, on Sunday denied that he would be a “spoiler” for the electoral chances of the establishment favourite and said: “Maybe I shouldn’t say this: I like Hillary Clinton.”


Sanders also asked if the media would “allow us to have a serious debate”, and said: “Or is the only way you get media attention by ripping apart somebody else?”




Sanders, a self-declared “democratic socialist” who has repeatedly championed social reform on a Scandinavian model and attacked the influence and behaviour of the wealthiest sections of society, appeared on CNN. He was asked how he differed from Clinton on income inequality, a key issue in both campaigns so far.


“It’s one thing to talk about it, it’s one thing to act on it,” Sanders said.


“I’ve never run a negative political ad in my life,” Sanders said. “…I believe in serious debates on serious issues. I’ve known Hillary Clinton for 25 years. Maybe I shouldn’t say this: I like Hillary Clinton. I respect Hillary Clinton."


“Will the media, among others, allow us to have a civil debate on civil issues? Or is the only way you get media attention by ripping apart somebody else?”

Bernie Sanders: 'Maybe I shouldn't say this: I like Hillary Clinton'

 

[g5000]

Praise for Hillary Clinton
PRAISE FROM:
REPUBLICANS
DEMOCRATS
FOREIGN LEADERS
FAMOUS PEOPLE
PRESS
EXPERTS
BUSINESS LEADERS

AFTER Benghazi, Trump says Hillary was the greatest Secretary of State of all time:

 

[g5000]

Trump in 2008: Hillary Clinton would make a "great" president - CBS News