If Bernie endorses Clinton, he betrays his supporters

sure, just like every other president i've ever voted for, it's all about the genitalia :cuckoo:
she release her Goldman cheerleader transcripts yet? :eusa_think: Why not? :eusa_whistle:

Thats the 3rd time I've asked you corporatist grl
 
because she doesn't have to and her opposition's desperate lies aka artful smears are amusing, and telling.

what is the quid pro quo you fear... do you know?

hillary is smart enough to know her opponents have no interest in viewing them thru an honest lens anyway.
 
because she doesn't have to and her opposition's desperate lies aka artful smears are amusing, and telling.

what is the quid pro quo you fear... do you know?

hillary is smart enough to know her opponents have no interest in viewing them thru an honest lens anyway.
ummm..... the public will be the judge of that not the wall st puppet (HRC)
 
Valerie, rightwinger & NYcarbineer, Ravi, Jillian, etc.... corporatist Dem voters

178672.png
 
He'll endorse her.

The alternative is ridiculous and he knows it.
Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.

He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.
Cankles is a war mongering corporatist. He couldn't endorse her for president and retain anything that people found likable. Except for the lefties that already support the elitist ****.
and his supporters will move over and vote with the Donald. They at least will show they have integrity. anti establishment.
 
After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.
Bernie feels that it is far more important Clinton win than Trump.

Simple as that.
If Bernie endorses Clinton, his supporters will be disillusioned with the democrat party as I have been for over twenty years. Most, like me will vote for the Green party candidate, and Bernie will go down in disgrace. There is no difference between Trump and Clinton...they are both war mongers...both corporate flunkies....both narcissists... and neither will fix anything for the next four years...so Bernie has nothing to lose by endorsing a third party.


To put it simply--if Bernie Sanders does not endorse Hillary Clinton, he will be committing political suicide. That means that he and his fruitcake policies would have no support from other Democrats for decades to come. He would be ridiculed and censored in the Senate.
 
Bernie is a tool. He bows before the hillary. He knows she butters his bread. Hes already bent over for her several times.
 
After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.






Yup, he won't. Hopefully he'll run Independent.


He changed his party status to run on the Democrat ticket and scorch donations from Democrats. He goes back to Independent now, he'll be the most hated man in Washington D.C. His credibility and his policies go up in smoke.
 
To put it simply--if Bernie Sanders does not endorse Hillary Clinton, he will be committing political suicide. That means that he and his fruitcake policies would have no support from other Democrats for decades to come. He would be ridiculed and censored in the Senate.

As a good little sheep would say.
bernie has been speaking against corporatist on both sides for years. It would be hypocritical and a complete sell out if he endorsed an eitist/corporatist like Hillary "Big Money" Clinton
 
After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.

Spoken like an ideologue that supports Sanders. Standing up for your principles will get Trump elected. You are an idiot.
 
He'll endorse her.

The alternative is ridiculous and he knows it.
Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.

He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.

only a party shrill such as yourself would say that endorsing someone who is the polar opposite of what you are is an exercise in integrity.

Shrill? Too stupid.

You weirdo. I'm a Bernie supporter...but I'm realistic. I am not a democrat. I'm a liberal. Bernie knows....as I do...that Hillary Clinton is more liberal than anyone that the GOP has to offer. She's even more liberal than Trump.

You say things....but they aren't based in fact. Silly nutter.
 
He'll endorse her.

The alternative is ridiculous and he knows it.
Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.

He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.

only a party shrill such as yourself would say that endorsing someone who is the polar opposite of what you are is an exercise in integrity.

Shrill? Too stupid.

You weirdo. I'm a Bernie supporter...but I'm realistic. I am not a democrat. I'm a liberal. Bernie knows....as I do...that Hillary Clinton is more liberal than anyone that the GOP has to offer. She's even more liberal than Trump.

You say things....but they aren't based in fact. Silly nutter.


Lone there is but a nickles difference between a Democrat and a Repuclican once voted.
Just look at Obama...corporatist/elitist to the core.

Here is an exercise...we are more alike than you think, we all are. The party dividers have us convinced otherwise.

Tell me how many of these statements you DISAGREE with..

1) Corporatism, and it's resulting dramatic concentration of wealth is one of the greatest threats to our way of lives.
2) The concerns/needs and welfare of the vast majority of Americans are overwhelmingly ignored in favor of special interest by both parties.
3) Employee compensation is purposefully being reduced to improve the bottom line, and further engorge the wealthy elite. (reduced benefits, the disappearance of pensions, wage stagnation, reduced/eliminated retirement matching)
4) The Federal government, along with state governments have been writing legislation and bureaucratic red tape that favors large businesses, and increasingly making it harder and harder for small businesses to develop and compete. This is happening regardless of what party the state is known to support.
5) The Federal Government, along with State Governments are complicit with the dramatic decrease of private ownership in favor of corporate ownership of property and wealth.

How many?
 
He'll endorse her.

The alternative is ridiculous and he knows it.
Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.

He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.

only a party shrill such as yourself would say that endorsing someone who is the polar opposite of what you are is an exercise in integrity.

Shrill? Too stupid.

You weirdo. I'm a Bernie supporter...but I'm realistic. I am not a democrat. I'm a liberal. Bernie knows....as I do...that Hillary Clinton is more liberal than anyone that the GOP has to offer. She's even more liberal than Trump.

You say things....but they aren't based in fact. Silly nutter.


Lone there is but a nickles difference between a Democrat and a Repuclican once voted.
Just look at Obama...corporatist/elitist to the core.

Here is an exercise...we are more alike than you think, we all are. The party dividers have us convinced otherwise.

Tell me how many of these statements you DISAGREE with..

1) Corporatism, and it's resulting dramatic concentration of wealth is one of the greatest threats to our way of lives.
2) The concerns/needs and welfare of the vast majority of Americans are overwhelmingly ignored in favor of special interest by both parties.
3) Employee compensation is purposefully being reduced to improve the bottom line, and further engorge the wealthy elite. (reduced benefits, the disappearance of pensions, wage stagnation, reduced/eliminated retirement matching)
4) The Federal government, along with state governments have been writing legislation and bureaucratic red tape that favors large businesses, and increasingly making it harder and harder for small businesses to develop and compete. This is happening regardless of what party the state is known to support.
5) The Federal Government, along with State Governments are complicit with the dramatic decrease of private ownership in favor of corporate ownership of property and wealth.

How many?

Cool we agree on that stuff.

Keep going.
 
He'll endorse her.

The alternative is ridiculous and he knows it.
Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.

He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.

only a party shrill such as yourself would say that endorsing someone who is the polar opposite of what you are is an exercise in integrity.

Shrill? Too stupid.

You weirdo. I'm a Bernie supporter...but I'm realistic. I am not a democrat. I'm a liberal. Bernie knows....as I do...that Hillary Clinton is more liberal than anyone that the GOP has to offer. She's even more liberal than Trump.

You say things....but they aren't based in fact. Silly nutter.


Hillary has become as socialist as Comrade Sanders.


Hillary Expected to Adopt All of Sanders’s Positions by Noon
 
After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.

Me thinks he will be a good loyalist and march to Mrs. Tuzla Clinton's drum.

After all, while the republicans with upwards of 16 candidates were bitch slapping each other Bernie and Mrs. Tuzla were playing patty cake. The republicans had real debate the democrats, put on a show.
 
Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.

He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.

only a party shrill such as yourself would say that endorsing someone who is the polar opposite of what you are is an exercise in integrity.

Shrill? Too stupid.

You weirdo. I'm a Bernie supporter...but I'm realistic. I am not a democrat. I'm a liberal. Bernie knows....as I do...that Hillary Clinton is more liberal than anyone that the GOP has to offer. She's even more liberal than Trump.

You say things....but they aren't based in fact. Silly nutter.


Lone there is but a nickles difference between a Democrat and a Repuclican once voted.
Just look at Obama...corporatist/elitist to the core.

Here is an exercise...we are more alike than you think, we all are. The party dividers have us convinced otherwise.

Tell me how many of these statements you DISAGREE with..

1) Corporatism, and it's resulting dramatic concentration of wealth is one of the greatest threats to our way of lives.
2) The concerns/needs and welfare of the vast majority of Americans are overwhelmingly ignored in favor of special interest by both parties.
3) Employee compensation is purposefully being reduced to improve the bottom line, and further engorge the wealthy elite. (reduced benefits, the disappearance of pensions, wage stagnation, reduced/eliminated retirement matching)
4) The Federal government, along with state governments have been writing legislation and bureaucratic red tape that favors large businesses, and increasingly making it harder and harder for small businesses to develop and compete. This is happening regardless of what party the state is known to support.
5) The Federal Government, along with State Governments are complicit with the dramatic decrease of private ownership in favor of corporate ownership of property and wealth.

How many?

Cool we agree on that stuff.

Keep going.

Ok, so now you see why some conservatives (the ones who are not party shrills themselves) have some common ground with Bernie. He is an anti-corporatist, he is the ONLY one talking about wealth concentration and the loss of private ownership in a meaningful way.
Hillary, in my objective and honest opinion is the worst choice between the top 3 or 4. She is a corporatist through and through. She is perhaps the most big money/globally connected politician in Washington. She is polar opposite of what any sane liberal would support that is not deeply mired in party blindness.
Trump? I have no idea what the man thinks. Anyone who says they do - is not listening. The man contradicts himself in the same conversation! He is VERY good at saying populist ideas, but I honestly haven't the faintest clue if he believes what he says. Like Hillary, he has played both sides of the fence for his personal gains as she has. Of course she does it 1,000 times more.
My problem with Bernie is he is also a wild card. At the same time he is deeply mistaken about the need for America to maintain a very strong military. As well as his mantra to "tax ourselves into prosperity". That is a complete fairy tale. Won't happen now or ever. I do not believe he is strong enough to fight the corruption of a bought Congress and Senate.

Having said all that, many of us, both sides want the same basic things. And even agree on most core needs and problems.
We can't get our heads out of our asses believing and repeating the party elites and media playing us for fools - keeping us divided so we don't dare upset the glorious bonanza they all enjoy at our expense.
Both sides,
 

Forum List

Back
Top