Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
she release her Goldman cheerleader transcripts yet? Why not?sure, just like every other president i've ever voted for, it's all about the genitalia
That is a dumb statement without meaning, employed by someone trying to sound like it is."corrupt" is a nebulous term employed by simpletons...
ummm..... the public will be the judge of that not the wall st puppet (HRC)because she doesn't have to and her opposition's desperate lies aka artful smears are amusing, and telling.
what is the quid pro quo you fear... do you know?
hillary is smart enough to know her opponents have no interest in viewing them thru an honest lens anyway.
well that is automatically no integrity,Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.He'll endorse her.
The alternative is ridiculous and he knows it.
He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.
and his supporters will move over and vote with the Donald. They at least will show they have integrity. anti establishment.Cankles is a war mongering corporatist. He couldn't endorse her for president and retain anything that people found likable. Except for the lefties that already support the elitist ****.Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.He'll endorse her.
The alternative is ridiculous and he knows it.
He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.
If Bernie endorses Clinton, his supporters will be disillusioned with the democrat party as I have been for over twenty years. Most, like me will vote for the Green party candidate, and Bernie will go down in disgrace. There is no difference between Trump and Clinton...they are both war mongers...both corporate flunkies....both narcissists... and neither will fix anything for the next four years...so Bernie has nothing to lose by endorsing a third party.Bernie feels that it is far more important Clinton win than Trump.After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.
Simple as that.
After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.
Yup, he won't. Hopefully he'll run Independent.
To put it simply--if Bernie Sanders does not endorse Hillary Clinton, he will be committing political suicide. That means that he and his fruitcake policies would have no support from other Democrats for decades to come. He would be ridiculed and censored in the Senate.
After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.
Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.He'll endorse her.
The alternative is ridiculous and he knows it.
He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.
only a party shrill such as yourself would say that endorsing someone who is the polar opposite of what you are is an exercise in integrity.
Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.He'll endorse her.
The alternative is ridiculous and he knows it.
He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.
only a party shrill such as yourself would say that endorsing someone who is the polar opposite of what you are is an exercise in integrity.
Shrill? Too stupid.
You weirdo. I'm a Bernie supporter...but I'm realistic. I am not a democrat. I'm a liberal. Bernie knows....as I do...that Hillary Clinton is more liberal than anyone that the GOP has to offer. She's even more liberal than Trump.
You say things....but they aren't based in fact. Silly nutter.
Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.He'll endorse her.
The alternative is ridiculous and he knows it.
He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.
only a party shrill such as yourself would say that endorsing someone who is the polar opposite of what you are is an exercise in integrity.
Shrill? Too stupid.
You weirdo. I'm a Bernie supporter...but I'm realistic. I am not a democrat. I'm a liberal. Bernie knows....as I do...that Hillary Clinton is more liberal than anyone that the GOP has to offer. She's even more liberal than Trump.
You say things....but they aren't based in fact. Silly nutter.
Lone there is but a nickles difference between a Democrat and a Repuclican once voted.
Just look at Obama...corporatist/elitist to the core.
Here is an exercise...we are more alike than you think, we all are. The party dividers have us convinced otherwise.
Tell me how many of these statements you DISAGREE with..
1) Corporatism, and it's resulting dramatic concentration of wealth is one of the greatest threats to our way of lives.
2) The concerns/needs and welfare of the vast majority of Americans are overwhelmingly ignored in favor of special interest by both parties.
3) Employee compensation is purposefully being reduced to improve the bottom line, and further engorge the wealthy elite. (reduced benefits, the disappearance of pensions, wage stagnation, reduced/eliminated retirement matching)
4) The Federal government, along with state governments have been writing legislation and bureaucratic red tape that favors large businesses, and increasingly making it harder and harder for small businesses to develop and compete. This is happening regardless of what party the state is known to support.
5) The Federal Government, along with State Governments are complicit with the dramatic decrease of private ownership in favor of corporate ownership of property and wealth.
How many?
Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.He'll endorse her.
The alternative is ridiculous and he knows it.
He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.
only a party shrill such as yourself would say that endorsing someone who is the polar opposite of what you are is an exercise in integrity.
Shrill? Too stupid.
You weirdo. I'm a Bernie supporter...but I'm realistic. I am not a democrat. I'm a liberal. Bernie knows....as I do...that Hillary Clinton is more liberal than anyone that the GOP has to offer. She's even more liberal than Trump.
You say things....but they aren't based in fact. Silly nutter.
After all his rhetoric about her corrupt campaign financing, and the corrupt democratic party, to concede to her would be like joining the evil she is owned by. Bernie would be capitulating to the corporate greed that got her the nomination. It is Sanders obligation to endorse a third party instead of Shrill.
Or he could keep his integrity and not endorse anyone. Despite the stereo-type, not ALL lefties are void of principles and integrity.
He will endorse her and keep his integrity. He's a politician.
only a party shrill such as yourself would say that endorsing someone who is the polar opposite of what you are is an exercise in integrity.
Shrill? Too stupid.
You weirdo. I'm a Bernie supporter...but I'm realistic. I am not a democrat. I'm a liberal. Bernie knows....as I do...that Hillary Clinton is more liberal than anyone that the GOP has to offer. She's even more liberal than Trump.
You say things....but they aren't based in fact. Silly nutter.
Lone there is but a nickles difference between a Democrat and a Repuclican once voted.
Just look at Obama...corporatist/elitist to the core.
Here is an exercise...we are more alike than you think, we all are. The party dividers have us convinced otherwise.
Tell me how many of these statements you DISAGREE with..
1) Corporatism, and it's resulting dramatic concentration of wealth is one of the greatest threats to our way of lives.
2) The concerns/needs and welfare of the vast majority of Americans are overwhelmingly ignored in favor of special interest by both parties.
3) Employee compensation is purposefully being reduced to improve the bottom line, and further engorge the wealthy elite. (reduced benefits, the disappearance of pensions, wage stagnation, reduced/eliminated retirement matching)
4) The Federal government, along with state governments have been writing legislation and bureaucratic red tape that favors large businesses, and increasingly making it harder and harder for small businesses to develop and compete. This is happening regardless of what party the state is known to support.
5) The Federal Government, along with State Governments are complicit with the dramatic decrease of private ownership in favor of corporate ownership of property and wealth.
How many?
Cool we agree on that stuff.
Keep going.