Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You must be new to politics. That's how it works.And yet he met with the Ukraine president and you didn't. I'm not taking him at his word without proof, but if he can prove his claim, the party's over for trump.Murphy couldn't find his ass with both hands. Get another source.The Washington Post just released an article showing a Democrat Senator is claiming he met personally with Zelensky, and that the new Ukrainian president felt Trump was using the money over his head to get him to investigate Biden...
Trump ordered hold on military aid days before calling Ukrainian president, officials say
Trump on Monday repeated his denial of doing anything improper and insisted that his July 25 conversation with Zelensky was “a perfect phone call.” He also hinted that he may release a transcript of it.
White House spokesman Hogan Gidley rejected claims that Trump was engaged in a quid pro quo. “But because the media wants this story to be true so badly, they’ll once again manufacture a frenzy and drive ignorant, fake stories to attack this president,” Gidley said.
It appears the Ukrainian leader came away from the discussion with a different impression. Murphy, who spoke with Zelensky during an early September visit to Ukraine, said Monday that the Ukrainian president “directly” expressed concerns at their meeting that “the aid that was being cut off to Ukraine by the president was a consequence” of his unwillingness to launch an investigation into the Bidens.
... now the question is -- can Murphy prove that conversation.
If Mueller can prove it, the party's over.
If Brennan can prove it, the party's over.
If Comey can prove it, the party's over.
If Blasey-Ford can prove it, the party's over.
If Murphy can prove it, the party's over.
Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera ...
You must be new to politics. That's how it works.And yet he met with the Ukraine president and you didn't. I'm not taking him at his word without proof, but if he can prove his claim, the party's over for trump.Murphy couldn't find his ass with both hands. Get another source.The Washington Post just released an article showing a Democrat Senator is claiming he met personally with Zelensky, and that the new Ukrainian president felt Trump was using the money over his head to get him to investigate Biden...
Trump ordered hold on military aid days before calling Ukrainian president, officials say
Trump on Monday repeated his denial of doing anything improper and insisted that his July 25 conversation with Zelensky was “a perfect phone call.” He also hinted that he may release a transcript of it.
White House spokesman Hogan Gidley rejected claims that Trump was engaged in a quid pro quo. “But because the media wants this story to be true so badly, they’ll once again manufacture a frenzy and drive ignorant, fake stories to attack this president,” Gidley said.
It appears the Ukrainian leader came away from the discussion with a different impression. Murphy, who spoke with Zelensky during an early September visit to Ukraine, said Monday that the Ukrainian president “directly” expressed concerns at their meeting that “the aid that was being cut off to Ukraine by the president was a consequence” of his unwillingness to launch an investigation into the Bidens.
... now the question is -- can Murphy prove that conversation.
If Mueller can prove it, the party's over.
If Brennan can prove it, the party's over.
If Comey can prove it, the party's over.
If Blasey-Ford can prove it, the party's over.
If Murphy can prove it, the party's over.
Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera ...
You keep trying until so nothing sticks.
- whitewater
- cattlegate
- filegate
- travelgate
- Vincefostergate
- Monikagate
Biden isn't even "my guy." I don't want him to be president. .
Tramp says Biden, and therefore himself, should get the electric chair!!!!!So, Trump may have done what Biden did as VP...the nerve
fair enoughAnd yet he met with the Ukraine president and you didn't. I'm not taking him at his word without proof, but if he can prove his claim, the party's over for trump.Murphy couldn't find his ass with both hands. Get another source.The Washington Post just released an article showing a Democrat Senator is claiming he met personally with Zelensky, and that the new Ukrainian president felt Trump was using the money over his head to get him to investigate Biden...
Trump ordered hold on military aid days before calling Ukrainian president, officials say
Trump on Monday repeated his denial of doing anything improper and insisted that his July 25 conversation with Zelensky was “a perfect phone call.” He also hinted that he may release a transcript of it.
White House spokesman Hogan Gidley rejected claims that Trump was engaged in a quid pro quo. “But because the media wants this story to be true so badly, they’ll once again manufacture a frenzy and drive ignorant, fake stories to attack this president,” Gidley said.
It appears the Ukrainian leader came away from the discussion with a different impression. Murphy, who spoke with Zelensky during an early September visit to Ukraine, said Monday that the Ukrainian president “directly” expressed concerns at their meeting that “the aid that was being cut off to Ukraine by the president was a consequence” of his unwillingness to launch an investigation into the Bidens.
... now the question is -- can Murphy prove that conversation.
The Washington Post just released an article showing a Democrat Senator is claiming he met personally with Zelensky, and that the new Ukrainian president felt Trump was using the money over his head to get him to investigate Biden...
Trump ordered hold on military aid days before calling Ukrainian president, officials say
Trump on Monday repeated his denial of doing anything improper and insisted that his July 25 conversation with Zelensky was “a perfect phone call.” He also hinted that he may release a transcript of it.
White House spokesman Hogan Gidley rejected claims that Trump was engaged in a quid pro quo. “But because the media wants this story to be true so badly, they’ll once again manufacture a frenzy and drive ignorant, fake stories to attack this president,” Gidley said.
It appears the Ukrainian leader came away from the discussion with a different impression. Murphy, who spoke with Zelensky during an early September visit to Ukraine, said Monday that the Ukrainian president “directly” expressed concerns at their meeting that “the aid that was being cut off to Ukraine by the president was a consequence” of his unwillingness to launch an investigation into the Bidens.
... now the question is -- can Murphy prove that conversation.
LOLOLWashington COMPOST...Consider the sources.
Its a lie and a deception... These liberal pieces of shit are now doing anything and everything to get Trump and any lie is ok... Its now imploding on the liars...
When you say, "Washington COMPOST," you mean the news agency that broke open Waatergate.
NO.. I mean the current sick, lame, and lazy liars you have there now... They used to shoot dead horses.. now you flog them.. They need to put this pile of rotting garbage out of its misery..LOLOLWashington COMPOST...Consider the sources.
Its a lie and a deception... These liberal pieces of shit are now doing anything and everything to get Trump and any lie is ok... Its now imploding on the liars...
When you say, "Washington COMPOST," you mean the news agency that broke open Waatergate.
Mid sixties was civil rights and anti war-even Watergate came after-just too many scandal-like issues to follow.You must be new to politics. That's how it works.And yet he met with the Ukraine president and you didn't. I'm not taking him at his word without proof, but if he can prove his claim, the party's over for trump.Murphy couldn't find his ass with both hands. Get another source.The Washington Post just released an article showing a Democrat Senator is claiming he met personally with Zelensky, and that the new Ukrainian president felt Trump was using the money over his head to get him to investigate Biden...
Trump ordered hold on military aid days before calling Ukrainian president, officials say
Trump on Monday repeated his denial of doing anything improper and insisted that his July 25 conversation with Zelensky was “a perfect phone call.” He also hinted that he may release a transcript of it.
White House spokesman Hogan Gidley rejected claims that Trump was engaged in a quid pro quo. “But because the media wants this story to be true so badly, they’ll once again manufacture a frenzy and drive ignorant, fake stories to attack this president,” Gidley said.
It appears the Ukrainian leader came away from the discussion with a different impression. Murphy, who spoke with Zelensky during an early September visit to Ukraine, said Monday that the Ukrainian president “directly” expressed concerns at their meeting that “the aid that was being cut off to Ukraine by the president was a consequence” of his unwillingness to launch an investigation into the Bidens.
... now the question is -- can Murphy prove that conversation.
If Mueller can prove it, the party's over.
If Brennan can prove it, the party's over.
If Comey can prove it, the party's over.
If Blasey-Ford can prove it, the party's over.
If Murphy can prove it, the party's over.
Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera ...
You keep trying until so nothing sticks.
- whitewater
- cattlegate
- filegate
- travelgate
- Vincefostergate
- Monikagate
If you consider the mid-1960s new, so be it.
The thing is at this time, you people are the peanut gallery, attempting a coup.
He also claims Zelensky conveyed to him he felt the money was on the condition investigating Biden's son. The only question now is -- can he prove that. If he can, the House will have no choice but to impeach.Same senator that made that claim also said this.
From the same article:
“I don’t think it really matters . . . whether the president explicitly told the Ukrainians that they wouldn’t get their security aid if they didn’t interfere in the 2020 elections,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). “There is an implicit threat in every demand that a United States president makes of a foreign power. . . . That foreign country knows that if they don’t do it, there are likely to be consequences.”
By that logic any time a president asks anything it is a threat.
And, more importantly, why would he use this type of equivocation if there was clear proof.
"I don't think it really matters whether the President explicitly told...."
Umm, yes it does. Of course it does. Unless what people say doesn't matter. It's what others would like to read into it for their own purposes that matter more than the words actually spoken.
good grief.
Every time they do this it comes back to splatter them..View attachment 280735 I figure at some point they would stop spreading shit...
Attacking the source – typical rightwing cowardice, dishonesty, and sophistry.
Dumbfuck, that's why I said he needs proof.The Washington Post just released an article showing a Democrat Senator is claiming he met personally with Zelensky, and that the new Ukrainian president felt Trump was using the money over his head to get him to investigate Biden...
Trump ordered hold on military aid days before calling Ukrainian president, officials say
Trump on Monday repeated his denial of doing anything improper and insisted that his July 25 conversation with Zelensky was “a perfect phone call.” He also hinted that he may release a transcript of it.
White House spokesman Hogan Gidley rejected claims that Trump was engaged in a quid pro quo. “But because the media wants this story to be true so badly, they’ll once again manufacture a frenzy and drive ignorant, fake stories to attack this president,” Gidley said.
It appears the Ukrainian leader came away from the discussion with a different impression. Murphy, who spoke with Zelensky during an early September visit to Ukraine, said Monday that the Ukrainian president “directly” expressed concerns at their meeting that “the aid that was being cut off to Ukraine by the president was a consequence” of his unwillingness to launch an investigation into the Bidens.
... now the question is -- can Murphy prove that conversation.
That's called "hearsay", dumbass!
LolLOLOLWashington COMPOST...Consider the sources.
Its a lie and a deception... These liberal pieces of shit are now doing anything and everything to get Trump and any lie is ok... Its now imploding on the liars...
When you say, "Washington COMPOST," you mean the news agency that broke open Waatergate.
You mean the newspaper that was once respected 45 YEARS AGO?
Paid $140 million tax payer dollars by Tramp to say otherwise! But you knew that already.Zelensky says otherwise.
If pigs were to fly.......
His son is his own businessWell, no, Biden served the interests of the U.S. while trump served his own interests of trying to eliminate a political rival going into an election. So no, not the same thing.So, Trump may have done what Biden did as VP...the nerveThe Washington Post just released an article showing a Democrat Senator is claiming he met personally with Zelensky, and that the new Ukrainian president felt Trump was using the money over his head to get him to investigate Biden...
Trump ordered hold on military aid days before calling Ukrainian president, officials say
Trump on Monday repeated his denial of doing anything improper and insisted that his July 25 conversation with Zelensky was “a perfect phone call.” He also hinted that he may release a transcript of it.
White House spokesman Hogan Gidley rejected claims that Trump was engaged in a quid pro quo. “But because the media wants this story to be true so badly, they’ll once again manufacture a frenzy and drive ignorant, fake stories to attack this president,” Gidley said.
It appears the Ukrainian leader came away from the discussion with a different impression. Murphy, who spoke with Zelensky during an early September visit to Ukraine, said Monday that the Ukrainian president “directly” expressed concerns at their meeting that “the aid that was being cut off to Ukraine by the president was a consequence” of his unwillingness to launch an investigation into the Bidens.
... now the question is -- can Murphy prove that conversation.
Murphy was NOT alone when he spoke to Zeleinsky!The Washington Post just released an article showing a Democrat Senator is claiming he met personally with Zelensky, and that the new Ukrainian president felt Trump was using the money over his head to get him to investigate Biden...
Trump ordered hold on military aid days before calling Ukrainian president, officials say
Trump on Monday repeated his denial of doing anything improper and insisted that his July 25 conversation with Zelensky was “a perfect phone call.” He also hinted that he may release a transcript of it.
White House spokesman Hogan Gidley rejected claims that Trump was engaged in a quid pro quo. “But because the media wants this story to be true so badly, they’ll once again manufacture a frenzy and drive ignorant, fake stories to attack this president,” Gidley said.
It appears the Ukrainian leader came away from the discussion with a different impression. Murphy, who spoke with Zelensky during an early September visit to Ukraine, said Monday that the Ukrainian president “directly” expressed concerns at their meeting that “the aid that was being cut off to Ukraine by the president was a consequence” of his unwillingness to launch an investigation into the Bidens.
... now the question is -- can Murphy prove that conversation.
That's called "hearsay", dumbass!
