FA_Q2
Gold Member
Yes, history is wrong because you are to ignorant to bother looking at it.That is objectively false.Yes I can read.You should be careful calling people dumb ass when you are being an utter idiot.
They did not remove Saddam after desert storm - 298 US casualties
Bush removes him - over 200K Iraqi's killed, over 4k US casualties and the nation is still in turmoil
Do you not understand WHY we are still there when we were able to walk away after Desert Storm? It is because the political power base REMAINED.
DUMBASS.... I said that was the mistake they made... NOT removing Saddam after Desert Storm. Can you read?
You are still being an idiot here. The entire reason that Desert Storm did not have the same fallout that occurred the second time we went there was BECAUSE he was never removed. Had he been removed the first time, Desert Storm would have turned into what we have now - just earlier. A massive occupation with hundreds of thousands dead.
Wrong... the only reason more people died the second time is because we left him in power the first time.
You cannot remove the political power base in a nation and not have drastic consequences for it. Such has been the case in Syria as well. Removing a government is very messy and VERY bloody - even more so when it is a foreign power doing so. Every time it happens, every single time, it results in horrors. When you walk into it without the fortitude to survive those horrors you get what we have in Syria and Iraq.
Even our own removal and replacement of our government was written in blood.
Wrong, at that time the people were perfect for change. If you talk to people that actually had dealings with the soldiers of Iraq that surrendered during Desert Storm, they just wanted to go home and be with their families, they didn't like Saddam, they feared him.
This display of idiocy is no longer worth my time/