TNHarley
Diamond Member
- Sep 27, 2012
- 93,453
- 55,591
- 2,605
- Thread starter
- #201
Ahh the people that came up with it, contradicted their own books? Really?By simply reading what genesis says, no one but me but would understand it? Thanks for the compliment, but there are billions of literate humans on this planet.Lol There was man before water and oxygen? How did that work out?yea, it also says no plants and no water
Are you just trolling or do you have a point?
"not a man to till the ground"
How else could someone interpret that?
I suppose you have a point. You are only one that will understand it.
Summation: God created the heavens and the earth; he created the water, land, etc. THEN he created man. WHEN God created Adam man, the Bible says there was no man to till the ground. Where did you go south on such a few so easy sentences?
Again, one theory holds that Genesis chapter 2 is a repeat of Genesis chapter 1. Either way, the order of things does not change. I simply think that when God created the chay beings, that accounts for the pre-Adamic race.
If you like debating this stuff so much, maybe you should actually read it before trying to debate it.
AGAIN< "pre adamic" theory is PAGANISM
Know this:
You don't have a clue about biblical history. The pre-Adamic view was the first viewpoint of the people that are responsible for the Old Testament. You are trying to bluff your way out of this one and demonstrating either really poor reading comprehension skills or terrible attempts to B.S. your way through the thread.
It would appear to me that IF you could find these made up theories to which you claim existed, they probably co-opted the idea from the earliest Christians.
Pre-adamites were pagan responses to the abrahamic version of creation.
Julian the apostate for example. Or Isaac de La Peyrère. He cited the bibles contradictions for his theory. There are records of this. Do you have records? I can post links. Can you? Im kinda getting tired of your broken record response of "uh-uh"