Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except she didn't, as I proved already. Investigators going after Clinton did not find them credible, only right wing Clinton haters did.And y'all investigated Clinton to hell and back again. You got him. He paid a fine. He was disbarred.
Yeah, right. as he should have been. The women accusing Clinton were credible. the ones charging Trump have not established that he did anything unlawful, its not against the law to have affairs or to pay a porn slut for her silence. It is against the law to abuse an underling in the workplace.
there is not equivalency between Clintons proven actions and Trump's alleged actions.
But as I told someone earlier, I don't care what Trump did before becoming president. I care that he is getting things done for the American people, unlike Clinton, both bushes, and Obama.
If they had been credible, the GOP wouldn’t have had to settle on a blow job between consenting adults.
You seem to care an awful lot about the Clintons...who are private citizens not in power.
Why are we still discussing what was a non sequiter from the get go? You don’t like my sig picture? It seems to bother trumpsters and makes them think of Bill Clinton for some weird reason.
the Clinton victims were credible and told the truth, that's why Hillary tried to destroy them with lies and slander.
A BJ in the oval office of the USA between the president and an intern is not sex between consenting adults, he was taking advantage of his position, her naivte, and his power over her as her employer.
That's your perception, not hers. Yes, it was an inappropriate relationship because of the power dynamics, but it was consensual.
As to your silly cartoon, It reminds me why I put you on ignore several months ago. you are unable to debate the issues intelligently and everything you post is driven by your lesbianism, and your crusade to call in normal.
And yet it is YOU that has to bring up my sexuality in unrelated threads...like this one and YOU that is fixated on the Clintons, having to bring them into a conversation that had nothing to do with them. Why?
the Clintons get brought up to point out the hypocrisy of you liberals, sorry if that concept is beyond your mental abilities.
If the Clinton victims were lying why did they Clintons pay them off? You are hopelessly naïve. It doesn't matter if Lewinsky was a willing participant, the boss/employee relationship is the problem. Many CEOs have been fired for just that kind of workplace relationships.
Except she didn't, as I proved already. Investigators going after Clinton did not find them credible, only right wing Clinton haters did.Yeah, right. as he should have been. The women accusing Clinton were credible. the ones charging Trump have not established that he did anything unlawful, its not against the law to have affairs or to pay a porn slut for her silence. It is against the law to abuse an underling in the workplace.
there is not equivalency between Clintons proven actions and Trump's alleged actions.
But as I told someone earlier, I don't care what Trump did before becoming president. I care that he is getting things done for the American people, unlike Clinton, both bushes, and Obama.
If they had been credible, the GOP wouldn’t have had to settle on a blow job between consenting adults.
You seem to care an awful lot about the Clintons...who are private citizens not in power.
Why are we still discussing what was a non sequiter from the get go? You don’t like my sig picture? It seems to bother trumpsters and makes them think of Bill Clinton for some weird reason.
the Clinton victims were credible and told the truth, that's why Hillary tried to destroy them with lies and slander.
A BJ in the oval office of the USA between the president and an intern is not sex between consenting adults, he was taking advantage of his position, her naivte, and his power over her as her employer.
That's your perception, not hers. Yes, it was an inappropriate relationship because of the power dynamics, but it was consensual.
As to your silly cartoon, It reminds me why I put you on ignore several months ago. you are unable to debate the issues intelligently and everything you post is driven by your lesbianism, and your crusade to call in normal.
And yet it is YOU that has to bring up my sexuality in unrelated threads...like this one and YOU that is fixated on the Clintons, having to bring them into a conversation that had nothing to do with them. Why?
the Clintons get brought up to point out the hypocrisy of you liberals, sorry if that concept is beyond your mental abilities.
If the Clinton victims were lying why did they Clintons pay them off? You are hopelessly naïve. It doesn't matter if Lewinsky was a willing participant, the boss/employee relationship is the problem. Many CEOs have been fired for just that kind of workplace relationships.
In 1993 they were fired? Who, allegedly, did the Clintons “pay off”? Do you mean settlement agreements? Does a settlement agreement indicate guilt always? (If you say “yes”, Bill O’Reilly and Donald Trump are guilty) What do you want to fire Bill Clinton from? What does Bill Clinton have to do with the topic?
Except she didn't, as I proved already. Investigators going after Clinton did not find them credible, only right wing Clinton haters did.If they had been credible, the GOP wouldn’t have had to settle on a blow job between consenting adults.
You seem to care an awful lot about the Clintons...who are private citizens not in power.
Why are we still discussing what was a non sequiter from the get go? You don’t like my sig picture? It seems to bother trumpsters and makes them think of Bill Clinton for some weird reason.
the Clinton victims were credible and told the truth, that's why Hillary tried to destroy them with lies and slander.
A BJ in the oval office of the USA between the president and an intern is not sex between consenting adults, he was taking advantage of his position, her naivte, and his power over her as her employer.
That's your perception, not hers. Yes, it was an inappropriate relationship because of the power dynamics, but it was consensual.
As to your silly cartoon, It reminds me why I put you on ignore several months ago. you are unable to debate the issues intelligently and everything you post is driven by your lesbianism, and your crusade to call in normal.
And yet it is YOU that has to bring up my sexuality in unrelated threads...like this one and YOU that is fixated on the Clintons, having to bring them into a conversation that had nothing to do with them. Why?
the Clintons get brought up to point out the hypocrisy of you liberals, sorry if that concept is beyond your mental abilities.
If the Clinton victims were lying why did they Clintons pay them off? You are hopelessly naïve. It doesn't matter if Lewinsky was a willing participant, the boss/employee relationship is the problem. Many CEOs have been fired for just that kind of workplace relationships.
In 1993 they were fired? Who, allegedly, did the Clintons “pay off”? Do you mean settlement agreements? Does a settlement agreement indicate guilt always? (If you say “yes”, Bill O’Reilly and Donald Trump are guilty) What do you want to fire Bill Clinton from? What does Bill Clinton have to do with the topic?
are you on drugs? smoking crack? living under a rock?
What do you think a settlement agreement is if not a pay off to either buy someone's silence, or keep the matter out of court. and yes, it appears that O'Reilly and Trump paid women to be quiet-------that is not illegal and happens every day.
Bill Clinton was "fired" impeached for lying under oath. I personally know of 2 CEOs that were fired for having sexual affairs with underlings, there have also been congressmen, senators, and governors who have lost their jobs for screwing employees. Probably some of them were women sexually harassing other women.
You are either very naïve or very uninformed if you are unaware of this.
Except she didn't, as I proved already. Investigators going after Clinton did not find them credible, only right wing Clinton haters did.the Clinton victims were credible and told the truth, that's why Hillary tried to destroy them with lies and slander.
A BJ in the oval office of the USA between the president and an intern is not sex between consenting adults, he was taking advantage of his position, her naivte, and his power over her as her employer.
That's your perception, not hers. Yes, it was an inappropriate relationship because of the power dynamics, but it was consensual.
As to your silly cartoon, It reminds me why I put you on ignore several months ago. you are unable to debate the issues intelligently and everything you post is driven by your lesbianism, and your crusade to call in normal.
And yet it is YOU that has to bring up my sexuality in unrelated threads...like this one and YOU that is fixated on the Clintons, having to bring them into a conversation that had nothing to do with them. Why?
the Clintons get brought up to point out the hypocrisy of you liberals, sorry if that concept is beyond your mental abilities.
If the Clinton victims were lying why did they Clintons pay them off? You are hopelessly naïve. It doesn't matter if Lewinsky was a willing participant, the boss/employee relationship is the problem. Many CEOs have been fired for just that kind of workplace relationships.
In 1993 they were fired? Who, allegedly, did the Clintons “pay off”? Do you mean settlement agreements? Does a settlement agreement indicate guilt always? (If you say “yes”, Bill O’Reilly and Donald Trump are guilty) What do you want to fire Bill Clinton from? What does Bill Clinton have to do with the topic?
are you on drugs? smoking crack? living under a rock?
What do you think a settlement agreement is if not a pay off to either buy someone's silence, or keep the matter out of court. and yes, it appears that O'Reilly and Trump paid women to be quiet-------that is not illegal and happens every day.
Bill Clinton was "fired" impeached for lying under oath. I personally know of 2 CEOs that were fired for having sexual affairs with underlings, there have also been congressmen, senators, and governors who have lost their jobs for screwing employees. Probably some of them were women sexually harassing other women.
You are either very naïve or very uninformed if you are unaware of this.
None of those CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing what Clinton did. He had a consensual affair with an intern. There was nothing illegal about it, which is why they had to try to get him for lying about the BJ. not the BJ itself. Today, the behavior would be addressed differently than it was then.
If you believe a settlement is admission of guilt,then Trump is guilty of scamming people.
Judge finalizes $25 million Trump University settlement for students of 'sham university'
Except she didn't, as I proved already. Investigators going after Clinton did not find them credible, only right wing Clinton haters did.
That's your perception, not hers. Yes, it was an inappropriate relationship because of the power dynamics, but it was consensual.
And yet it is YOU that has to bring up my sexuality in unrelated threads...like this one and YOU that is fixated on the Clintons, having to bring them into a conversation that had nothing to do with them. Why?
the Clintons get brought up to point out the hypocrisy of you liberals, sorry if that concept is beyond your mental abilities.
If the Clinton victims were lying why did they Clintons pay them off? You are hopelessly naïve. It doesn't matter if Lewinsky was a willing participant, the boss/employee relationship is the problem. Many CEOs have been fired for just that kind of workplace relationships.
In 1993 they were fired? Who, allegedly, did the Clintons “pay off”? Do you mean settlement agreements? Does a settlement agreement indicate guilt always? (If you say “yes”, Bill O’Reilly and Donald Trump are guilty) What do you want to fire Bill Clinton from? What does Bill Clinton have to do with the topic?
are you on drugs? smoking crack? living under a rock?
What do you think a settlement agreement is if not a pay off to either buy someone's silence, or keep the matter out of court. and yes, it appears that O'Reilly and Trump paid women to be quiet-------that is not illegal and happens every day.
Bill Clinton was "fired" impeached for lying under oath. I personally know of 2 CEOs that were fired for having sexual affairs with underlings, there have also been congressmen, senators, and governors who have lost their jobs for screwing employees. Probably some of them were women sexually harassing other women.
You are either very naïve or very uninformed if you are unaware of this.
None of those CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing what Clinton did. He had a consensual affair with an intern. There was nothing illegal about it, which is why they had to try to get him for lying about the BJ. not the BJ itself. Today, the behavior would be addressed differently than it was then.
If you believe a settlement is admission of guilt,then Trump is guilty of scamming people.
Judge finalizes $25 million Trump University settlement for students of 'sham university'
yes, many CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing the same kinds of things with subordinate employees, I personally know of two in the company I worked for.
a settlement is either an admission of guilt or a payment to keep the issue out of court and the media.
I get it that you don't like Trump and that's just fine, but to continually make up lies about him degrades you and removes what little credibility you liberals have left.
the Clintons get brought up to point out the hypocrisy of you liberals, sorry if that concept is beyond your mental abilities.
If the Clinton victims were lying why did they Clintons pay them off? You are hopelessly naïve. It doesn't matter if Lewinsky was a willing participant, the boss/employee relationship is the problem. Many CEOs have been fired for just that kind of workplace relationships.
In 1993 they were fired? Who, allegedly, did the Clintons “pay off”? Do you mean settlement agreements? Does a settlement agreement indicate guilt always? (If you say “yes”, Bill O’Reilly and Donald Trump are guilty) What do you want to fire Bill Clinton from? What does Bill Clinton have to do with the topic?
are you on drugs? smoking crack? living under a rock?
What do you think a settlement agreement is if not a pay off to either buy someone's silence, or keep the matter out of court. and yes, it appears that O'Reilly and Trump paid women to be quiet-------that is not illegal and happens every day.
Bill Clinton was "fired" impeached for lying under oath. I personally know of 2 CEOs that were fired for having sexual affairs with underlings, there have also been congressmen, senators, and governors who have lost their jobs for screwing employees. Probably some of them were women sexually harassing other women.
You are either very naïve or very uninformed if you are unaware of this.
None of those CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing what Clinton did. He had a consensual affair with an intern. There was nothing illegal about it, which is why they had to try to get him for lying about the BJ. not the BJ itself. Today, the behavior would be addressed differently than it was then.
If you believe a settlement is admission of guilt,then Trump is guilty of scamming people.
Judge finalizes $25 million Trump University settlement for students of 'sham university'
yes, many CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing the same kinds of things with subordinate employees, I personally know of two in the company I worked for.
a settlement is either an admission of guilt or a payment to keep the issue out of court and the media.
I get it that you don't like Trump and that's just fine, but to continually make up lies about him degrades you and removes what little credibility you liberals have left.
I’m not making up anything about Trump. You’re the one that said Trump is guilty of scamming people. He settled after all.
In 1993 they were fired? Who, allegedly, did the Clintons “pay off”? Do you mean settlement agreements? Does a settlement agreement indicate guilt always? (If you say “yes”, Bill O’Reilly and Donald Trump are guilty) What do you want to fire Bill Clinton from? What does Bill Clinton have to do with the topic?
are you on drugs? smoking crack? living under a rock?
What do you think a settlement agreement is if not a pay off to either buy someone's silence, or keep the matter out of court. and yes, it appears that O'Reilly and Trump paid women to be quiet-------that is not illegal and happens every day.
Bill Clinton was "fired" impeached for lying under oath. I personally know of 2 CEOs that were fired for having sexual affairs with underlings, there have also been congressmen, senators, and governors who have lost their jobs for screwing employees. Probably some of them were women sexually harassing other women.
You are either very naïve or very uninformed if you are unaware of this.
None of those CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing what Clinton did. He had a consensual affair with an intern. There was nothing illegal about it, which is why they had to try to get him for lying about the BJ. not the BJ itself. Today, the behavior would be addressed differently than it was then.
If you believe a settlement is admission of guilt,then Trump is guilty of scamming people.
Judge finalizes $25 million Trump University settlement for students of 'sham university'
yes, many CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing the same kinds of things with subordinate employees, I personally know of two in the company I worked for.
a settlement is either an admission of guilt or a payment to keep the issue out of court and the media.
I get it that you don't like Trump and that's just fine, but to continually make up lies about him degrades you and removes what little credibility you liberals have left.
I’m not making up anything about Trump. You’re the one that said Trump is guilty of scamming people. He settled after all.
playing hardball in business is not scamming, its business. Now, if you are interested in scamming people shall we discuss the Clinton foundation and Haiti? or the Clinton foundation and Uranium one? or maybe we can discuss Sharpton owing 4 million is back taxes.
are you on drugs? smoking crack? living under a rock?
What do you think a settlement agreement is if not a pay off to either buy someone's silence, or keep the matter out of court. and yes, it appears that O'Reilly and Trump paid women to be quiet-------that is not illegal and happens every day.
Bill Clinton was "fired" impeached for lying under oath. I personally know of 2 CEOs that were fired for having sexual affairs with underlings, there have also been congressmen, senators, and governors who have lost their jobs for screwing employees. Probably some of them were women sexually harassing other women.
You are either very naïve or very uninformed if you are unaware of this.
None of those CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing what Clinton did. He had a consensual affair with an intern. There was nothing illegal about it, which is why they had to try to get him for lying about the BJ. not the BJ itself. Today, the behavior would be addressed differently than it was then.
If you believe a settlement is admission of guilt,then Trump is guilty of scamming people.
Judge finalizes $25 million Trump University settlement for students of 'sham university'
yes, many CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing the same kinds of things with subordinate employees, I personally know of two in the company I worked for.
a settlement is either an admission of guilt or a payment to keep the issue out of court and the media.
I get it that you don't like Trump and that's just fine, but to continually make up lies about him degrades you and removes what little credibility you liberals have left.
I’m not making up anything about Trump. You’re the one that said Trump is guilty of scamming people. He settled after all.
playing hardball in business is not scamming, its business. Now, if you are interested in scamming people shall we discuss the Clinton foundation and Haiti? or the Clinton foundation and Uranium one? or maybe we can discuss Sharpton owing 4 million is back taxes.
You said a settlement is an admission of guilt. In your words, Trump is guilty of scamming people.
Judge finalizes $25 million Trump University settlement for students of 'sham university'
None of those CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing what Clinton did. He had a consensual affair with an intern. There was nothing illegal about it, which is why they had to try to get him for lying about the BJ. not the BJ itself. Today, the behavior would be addressed differently than it was then.
If you believe a settlement is admission of guilt,then Trump is guilty of scamming people.
Judge finalizes $25 million Trump University settlement for students of 'sham university'
yes, many CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing the same kinds of things with subordinate employees, I personally know of two in the company I worked for.
a settlement is either an admission of guilt or a payment to keep the issue out of court and the media.
I get it that you don't like Trump and that's just fine, but to continually make up lies about him degrades you and removes what little credibility you liberals have left.
I’m not making up anything about Trump. You’re the one that said Trump is guilty of scamming people. He settled after all.
playing hardball in business is not scamming, its business. Now, if you are interested in scamming people shall we discuss the Clinton foundation and Haiti? or the Clinton foundation and Uranium one? or maybe we can discuss Sharpton owing 4 million is back taxes.
You said a settlement is an admission of guilt. In your words, Trump is guilty of scamming people.
Judge finalizes $25 million Trump University settlement for students of 'sham university'
wrong, seabiscuit. I said it is EITHER an admission of guilt or a payment to keep the issue out of court and the media, sometimes both as in the case of Michael Jackson.
Whether Trump was personally responsible for the Trump university scam and payment is unknown to me. If you have evidence that he is personally responsible I am sure that CNN would give you a handsome payment for that information.
It seems to me that it was a business venture that went bad, as many do and the customers (students) were compensated. Nothing illegal or immoral about that.
yes, many CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing the same kinds of things with subordinate employees, I personally know of two in the company I worked for.
a settlement is either an admission of guilt or a payment to keep the issue out of court and the media.
I get it that you don't like Trump and that's just fine, but to continually make up lies about him degrades you and removes what little credibility you liberals have left.
I’m not making up anything about Trump. You’re the one that said Trump is guilty of scamming people. He settled after all.
playing hardball in business is not scamming, its business. Now, if you are interested in scamming people shall we discuss the Clinton foundation and Haiti? or the Clinton foundation and Uranium one? or maybe we can discuss Sharpton owing 4 million is back taxes.
You said a settlement is an admission of guilt. In your words, Trump is guilty of scamming people.
Judge finalizes $25 million Trump University settlement for students of 'sham university'
wrong, seabiscuit. I said it is EITHER an admission of guilt or a payment to keep the issue out of court and the media, sometimes both as in the case of Michael Jackson.
Whether Trump was personally responsible for the Trump university scam and payment is unknown to me. If you have evidence that he is personally responsible I am sure that CNN would give you a handsome payment for that information.
It seems to me that it was a business venture that went bad, as many do and the customers (students) were compensated. Nothing illegal or immoral about that.
So your standard applies to Bill Clinton. He paid a settlement to keep the issue out of the courts and the media.
Trump University scammed people and Trump paid a settlement. Since it was already in the courts and all over the media, the settlement, in your words, is an admission of guilt. Trump is a scam artist and you are being conned.
dude, they want this country to fail. it is what obammy was doing. he was pure muslim evil. it just came out he was helping the Iranians get around sanctions. can't make it up. And it's what the dems wanted.Yeah, we can just feel the love coming from you and the right.Haters: BLM, antifa, dems, libs, media pukes, NY times, the view, Hollywood, academia. the hate is 98% left wing based, because hate is their only campaign tactic, they have nothing else.
The love of our country, the constitution, freedom, self determination. Yes, its quite obvious and used to come from all political sides. Now, you on the left seem to hate everything this country stands for as well as all of us who believe in this great country.
dude, your sad.The real issue is that partisans spend time hating each other via messageboards and news outlets of choice ..
Whereas if you get up off your ass, youd see that its same shit, diff day and the vast majority is getting along same as it ever was.
Lighten the fuck up, this drama queening is beyond nauseating.
I disagree. The president's daughter being called a kunt on national TV is a first. We're going in the wrong direction.
Really? You think that's where it dissolved? (It was cable TV)
There have been a hell of a lot more "firsts" with Trump before a comedian called someone a c-word during a bit.
I’m not making up anything about Trump. You’re the one that said Trump is guilty of scamming people. He settled after all.
playing hardball in business is not scamming, its business. Now, if you are interested in scamming people shall we discuss the Clinton foundation and Haiti? or the Clinton foundation and Uranium one? or maybe we can discuss Sharpton owing 4 million is back taxes.
You said a settlement is an admission of guilt. In your words, Trump is guilty of scamming people.
Judge finalizes $25 million Trump University settlement for students of 'sham university'
wrong, seabiscuit. I said it is EITHER an admission of guilt or a payment to keep the issue out of court and the media, sometimes both as in the case of Michael Jackson.
Whether Trump was personally responsible for the Trump university scam and payment is unknown to me. If you have evidence that he is personally responsible I am sure that CNN would give you a handsome payment for that information.
It seems to me that it was a business venture that went bad, as many do and the customers (students) were compensated. Nothing illegal or immoral about that.
So your standard applies to Bill Clinton. He paid a settlement to keep the issue out of the courts and the media.
Trump University scammed people and Trump paid a settlement. Since it was already in the courts and all over the media, the settlement, in your words, is an admission of guilt. Trump is a scam artist and you are being conned.
I know nothing about the Trump university deal, and neither do you. We both do know that Clinton abused women and took advantage of them for years and that Hillary then tried to destroy his victims to keep the Clinton crime family operational.
Your sig pic shows everyone exactly how biased and juvenile you are. Which one are you and which is your girlfriend? Why do you two get turned on dressing up like Trump? Seems kinda sick to me.
Who do you hate? I poke fun at idiots, but I do not hate. Hate is reserved for extreme circumstances. Young son or daughter kidnapped etc.Hatred is really at the root of most of our problems. We can't really even talk anymore without hating upon one another. Has it ever occurred to anyone, for instance, that our hateful society is breeding the kids that go on shooting sprees? I posit that America's biggest problem is its hateful people.
Except she didn't, as I proved already. Investigators going after Clinton did not find them credible, only right wing Clinton haters did.the Clinton victims were credible and told the truth, that's why Hillary tried to destroy them with lies and slander.
A BJ in the oval office of the USA between the president and an intern is not sex between consenting adults, he was taking advantage of his position, her naivte, and his power over her as her employer.
That's your perception, not hers. Yes, it was an inappropriate relationship because of the power dynamics, but it was consensual.
As to your silly cartoon, It reminds me why I put you on ignore several months ago. you are unable to debate the issues intelligently and everything you post is driven by your lesbianism, and your crusade to call in normal.
And yet it is YOU that has to bring up my sexuality in unrelated threads...like this one and YOU that is fixated on the Clintons, having to bring them into a conversation that had nothing to do with them. Why?
the Clintons get brought up to point out the hypocrisy of you liberals, sorry if that concept is beyond your mental abilities.
If the Clinton victims were lying why did they Clintons pay them off? You are hopelessly naïve. It doesn't matter if Lewinsky was a willing participant, the boss/employee relationship is the problem. Many CEOs have been fired for just that kind of workplace relationships.
In 1993 they were fired? Who, allegedly, did the Clintons “pay off”? Do you mean settlement agreements? Does a settlement agreement indicate guilt always? (If you say “yes”, Bill O’Reilly and Donald Trump are guilty) What do you want to fire Bill Clinton from? What does Bill Clinton have to do with the topic?
are you on drugs? smoking crack? living under a rock?
What do you think a settlement agreement is if not a pay off to either buy someone's silence, or keep the matter out of court. and yes, it appears that O'Reilly and Trump paid women to be quiet-------that is not illegal and happens every day.
Bill Clinton was "fired" impeached for lying under oath. I personally know of 2 CEOs that were fired for having sexual affairs with underlings, there have also been congressmen, senators, and governors who have lost their jobs for screwing employees. Probably some of them were women sexually harassing other women.
You are either very naïve or very uninformed if you are unaware of this.
None of those CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing what Clinton did. He had a consensual affair with an intern. There was nothing illegal about it, which is why they had to try to get him for lying about the BJ. not the BJ itself. Today, the behavior would be addressed differently than it was then.
If you believe a settlement is admission of guilt,then Trump is guilty of scamming people.
Judge finalizes $25 million Trump University settlement for students of 'sham university'
Slippery slope then. Sigh...Except she didn't, as I proved already. Investigators going after Clinton did not find them credible, only right wing Clinton haters did.
That's your perception, not hers. Yes, it was an inappropriate relationship because of the power dynamics, but it was consensual.
And yet it is YOU that has to bring up my sexuality in unrelated threads...like this one and YOU that is fixated on the Clintons, having to bring them into a conversation that had nothing to do with them. Why?
the Clintons get brought up to point out the hypocrisy of you liberals, sorry if that concept is beyond your mental abilities.
If the Clinton victims were lying why did they Clintons pay them off? You are hopelessly naïve. It doesn't matter if Lewinsky was a willing participant, the boss/employee relationship is the problem. Many CEOs have been fired for just that kind of workplace relationships.
In 1993 they were fired? Who, allegedly, did the Clintons “pay off”? Do you mean settlement agreements? Does a settlement agreement indicate guilt always? (If you say “yes”, Bill O’Reilly and Donald Trump are guilty) What do you want to fire Bill Clinton from? What does Bill Clinton have to do with the topic?
are you on drugs? smoking crack? living under a rock?
What do you think a settlement agreement is if not a pay off to either buy someone's silence, or keep the matter out of court. and yes, it appears that O'Reilly and Trump paid women to be quiet-------that is not illegal and happens every day.
Bill Clinton was "fired" impeached for lying under oath. I personally know of 2 CEOs that were fired for having sexual affairs with underlings, there have also been congressmen, senators, and governors who have lost their jobs for screwing employees. Probably some of them were women sexually harassing other women.
You are either very naïve or very uninformed if you are unaware of this.
None of those CEOs were fired in the 90s for doing what Clinton did. He had a consensual affair with an intern. There was nothing illegal about it, which is why they had to try to get him for lying about the BJ. not the BJ itself. Today, the behavior would be addressed differently than it was then.
If you believe a settlement is admission of guilt,then Trump is guilty of scamming people.
Judge finalizes $25 million Trump University settlement for students of 'sham university'
Good news and bad news Clinton was not "fired" for having an affair, he was impeached for committing perjury to a Grand Jury and Obstruction of Justice.
It's hateful to carry because of the 13%, as you've said you do. Take the mote out of your own eye before removing the beam from your neighbour's. Stop hating your fellow citizens.Is it hateful to state that blacks are seven times more likely than whites to commit murder?
The 13%. He even carries due to that hate.Who [K9Buck] do you hate?
