Illegals already cutting through Trump's multi billion $ wall...

Articulated like a typical Trump minion.
Walls make sense on some parts of the border but not on most of the border. Most of the wall that has been built since Trump came to office was approved and funded while Obama was President.
Trump makes a complex problem overly simple for very stupid people like you. He says all people trying to get in the US are bad, the answer is a wall along the entire US-mexico border. The minions eat it up. We need to understand all the different people trying to get in the US and address each group and a wall is not the best solution along the entire US-Mexico border. But a dumbass like you will never understand.
F-off, Muddbrain. Have you been to the entire border to know which parts "make sense" and which don't? There is absolutely NO REASON to be against a border wall out in the middle of nowhere down at the border UNLESS YOU SIMPLY WANT THOSE PEOPLE COMING IN. We can afford it. We need it. Lying shitstains like you never prove a thing with your lies--- --- Trump has NEVER said that all people coming from Mexico are "bad," merely that they are breaking the law and are a potential security risk.
Another articulation of border security that only a Trump brain dead minion could come up with.
Maintaining and securing a wall the entire length of the US-Mexico border is impossible. There are many tech solutions at different places along the border that could be more secure, less expensive to install and less expensive to maintain.
Plus the majority of illegals in the US come in through airports not the southern border.
But dumbass Trump minions like simple answers that do not work for complex questions because they are absolute super dumbasses.
Wrong again, moron. All your "tech solutions" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. All some future Hillary has to do is stop implementing them. The beauty of the wall is that it can't be made to disappear.

Your claim that the majority of illegals come through airports is also a lie.

Whenever Dims don't want to solve a problem, they call it "complex" when we all know the solution is simple.

The final solution is to defeat Dims.


Only a Dimwit like Elmer Fudge could try to spin building a simple wall as a "complex" ineffective problem. We've only been doing it as the de facto way of establishing and enforcing boundaries for at least 11,000 years.

But now it can't even keep out poor, starving, impoverished people with nothing but rags for clothes, who BTW, find it much easier to take a jet in with a passport than to just walk across the border! :21:
I've stood on China's 'Great Wall'. It is in ruins, except the few sections renovated for tourists.
Do you actually believe the wall has to last 2000 years or it's a waste of money?
 
Of course it's relevant. I know they aren't proposing what Israel built. That's the problem. We don't need something as massive as Israel's wall, but we do need something made from concrete that is 30 feet tall. It will be cheaper per mile than Israel's wall. I don't think the bollard fence is the best solution. However, any serious wall/fence is better than what you propose, which is nothing.
My proposal would involve concentrating on the legal crossings, you know, where the real problems are.
ROFL! Your proposal is doing nothing.

Who do you think you're fooling?
It's not my job to have a proposal. I'm not in charge. I don't have any power over the border.
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.
it's what you say when you look in a mirror. I get it.
 
F-off, Muddbrain. Have you been to the entire border to know which parts "make sense" and which don't? There is absolutely NO REASON to be against a border wall out in the middle of nowhere down at the border UNLESS YOU SIMPLY WANT THOSE PEOPLE COMING IN. We can afford it. We need it. Lying shitstains like you never prove a thing with your lies--- --- Trump has NEVER said that all people coming from Mexico are "bad," merely that they are breaking the law and are a potential security risk.
Another articulation of border security that only a Trump brain dead minion could come up with.
Maintaining and securing a wall the entire length of the US-Mexico border is impossible. There are many tech solutions at different places along the border that could be more secure, less expensive to install and less expensive to maintain.
Plus the majority of illegals in the US come in through airports not the southern border.
But dumbass Trump minions like simple answers that do not work for complex questions because they are absolute super dumbasses.
Wrong again, moron. All your "tech solutions" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. All some future Hillary has to do is stop implementing them. The beauty of the wall is that it can't be made to disappear.

Your claim that the majority of illegals come through airports is also a lie.

Whenever Dims don't want to solve a problem, they call it "complex" when we all know the solution is simple.

The final solution is to defeat Dims.


Only a Dimwit like Elmer Fudge could try to spin building a simple wall as a "complex" ineffective problem. We've only been doing it as the de facto way of establishing and enforcing boundaries for at least 11,000 years.

But now it can't even keep out poor, starving, impoverished people with nothing but rags for clothes, who BTW, find it much easier to take a jet in with a passport than to just walk across the border! :21:
I've stood on China's 'Great Wall'. It is in ruins, except the few sections renovated for tourists.
Do you actually believe the wall has to last 2000 years or it's a waste of money?
he should go to europe.
 
Of course it's relevant. I know they aren't proposing what Israel built. That's the problem. We don't need something as massive as Israel's wall, but we do need something made from concrete that is 30 feet tall. It will be cheaper per mile than Israel's wall. I don't think the bollard fence is the best solution. However, any serious wall/fence is better than what you propose, which is nothing.
My proposal would involve concentrating on the legal crossings, you know, where the real problems are.
ROFL! Your proposal is doing nothing.

Who do you think you're fooling?
It's not my job to have a proposal. I'm not in charge. I don't have any power over the border.
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.
So you can't submit a proposal, because you don't have any control over the border, but you are qualified to attack those who do?

The reality is that you're just a fucking dumbass without a clue.
 
My proposal would involve concentrating on the legal crossings, you know, where the real problems are.
ROFL! Your proposal is doing nothing.

Who do you think you're fooling?
It's not my job to have a proposal. I'm not in charge. I don't have any power over the border.
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.
So you can't submit a proposal, because you don't have any control over the border, but you are qualified to attack those who do?

The reality is that you're just a fucking dumbass without a clue.


enforce the laws on the books and quit spending billions chasing your ass.
 
ROFL! Your proposal is doing nothing.

Who do you think you're fooling?
It's not my job to have a proposal. I'm not in charge. I don't have any power over the border.
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.
So you can't submit a proposal, because you don't have any control over the border, but you are qualified to attack those who do?

The reality is that you're just a fucking dumbass without a clue.


enforce the laws on the books and quit spending billions chasing your ass.
which laws are those? tell me the one especially that says foreigners are allowed to enter our country illegally? Oh, and the one that says we can't protect our border.
 
ROFL! Your proposal is doing nothing.

Who do you think you're fooling?
It's not my job to have a proposal. I'm not in charge. I don't have any power over the border.
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.
So you can't submit a proposal, because you don't have any control over the border, but you are qualified to attack those who do?

The reality is that you're just a fucking dumbass without a clue.


enforce the laws on the books and quit spending billions chasing your ass.
Dims will never enforce our immigration laws, moron. You have already demonstrated that.
 
Of course it's relevant. I know they aren't proposing what Israel built. That's the problem. We don't need something as massive as Israel's wall, but we do need something made from concrete that is 30 feet tall. It will be cheaper per mile than Israel's wall. I don't think the bollard fence is the best solution. However, any serious wall/fence is better than what you propose, which is nothing.
My proposal would involve concentrating on the legal crossings, you know, where the real problems are.
ROFL! Your proposal is doing nothing.

Who do you think you're fooling?
It's not my job to have a proposal. I'm not in charge. I don't have any power over the border.
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.

BUT YOU JUST MADE A PROPOSAL:
My proposal would involve concentrating on the legal crossings, you know, where the real problems are.
Then you said: It's not my job to have a proposal. Then you claimed: No proposals required.
Pretty hard to debate a person whose opinion changes ever 5 minutes.
Maybe what you call "stupid" are simply things you don't understand or agree with.
But how can you understand or agree with anything when you don't even know what you think?
That is the DEFINITION of "stupid."
 
My proposal would involve concentrating on the legal crossings, you know, where the real problems are.
ROFL! Your proposal is doing nothing.

Who do you think you're fooling?
It's not my job to have a proposal. I'm not in charge. I don't have any power over the border.
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.
So you can't submit a proposal, because you don't have any control over the border, but you are qualified to attack those who do?

The reality is that you're just a fucking dumbass without a clue.
I live on the border. For many many years. I shop at stores on the border. I cross into Tijuana by car and on foot. I see these 'walls' every single day.

I know that they are easily defeated and their only purpose is to give red state nutters a false sense of security from the 'hordes of Meemaw raper/killers!'

I know the real problem areas are the legal border crossings.

The proposals I've seen on this site are just nonsense.
 
ROFL! Your proposal is doing nothing.

Who do you think you're fooling?
It's not my job to have a proposal. I'm not in charge. I don't have any power over the border.
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.
So you can't submit a proposal, because you don't have any control over the border, but you are qualified to attack those who do?

The reality is that you're just a fucking dumbass without a clue.
I live on the border. For many many years. I shop at stores on the border. I cross into Tijuana by car and on foot. I see these 'walls' every single day.

I know that they are easily defeated and their only purpose is to give red state nutters a false sense of security from the 'hordes of Meemaw raper/killers!'

I know the real problem areas are the legal border crossings.

The proposals I've seen on this site are just nonsense.
so no one easily defeated any of it. but, hey, you got your throw and go out there.
 
ROFL! Your proposal is doing nothing.

Who do you think you're fooling?
It's not my job to have a proposal. I'm not in charge. I don't have any power over the border.
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.
So you can't submit a proposal, because you don't have any control over the border, but you are qualified to attack those who do?

The reality is that you're just a fucking dumbass without a clue.
I live on the border. For many many years. I shop at stores on the border. I cross into Tijuana by car and on foot. I see these 'walls' every single day.

I know that they are easily defeated and their only purpose is to give red state nutters a false sense of security from the 'hordes of Meemaw raper/killers!'

I know the real problem areas are the legal border crossings.

The proposals I've seen on this site are just nonsense.
Your testimonial evidence is 100% worthless. For one thing, why should anyone believe you? For another, we have empirical evidence that shows walls are 99% effective.

Your claim that they don't work is just wind blowing out your ugly ass.
 
ROFL! Your proposal is doing nothing.

Who do you think you're fooling?
It's not my job to have a proposal. I'm not in charge. I don't have any power over the border.
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.
So you can't submit a proposal, because you don't have any control over the border, but you are qualified to attack those who do?

The reality is that you're just a fucking dumbass without a clue.
I live on the border. For many many years. I shop at stores on the border. I cross into Tijuana by car and on foot. I see these 'walls' every single day.

I know that they are easily defeated and their only purpose is to give red state nutters a false sense of security from the 'hordes of Meemaw raper/killers!'

I know the real problem areas are the legal border crossings.

The proposals I've seen on this site are just nonsense.

the proposals here come from rw idiots, why wouldnt they be nonsense ..
 
F-off, Muddbrain. Have you been to the entire border to know which parts "make sense" and which don't? There is absolutely NO REASON to be against a border wall out in the middle of nowhere down at the border UNLESS YOU SIMPLY WANT THOSE PEOPLE COMING IN. We can afford it. We need it. Lying shitstains like you never prove a thing with your lies--- --- Trump has NEVER said that all people coming from Mexico are "bad," merely that they are breaking the law and are a potential security risk.
Another articulation of border security that only a Trump brain dead minion could come up with.
Maintaining and securing a wall the entire length of the US-Mexico border is impossible. There are many tech solutions at different places along the border that could be more secure, less expensive to install and less expensive to maintain.
Plus the majority of illegals in the US come in through airports not the southern border.
But dumbass Trump minions like simple answers that do not work for complex questions because they are absolute super dumbasses.
Wrong again, moron. All your "tech solutions" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. All some future Hillary has to do is stop implementing them. The beauty of the wall is that it can't be made to disappear.

Your claim that the majority of illegals come through airports is also a lie.

Whenever Dims don't want to solve a problem, they call it "complex" when we all know the solution is simple.

The final solution is to defeat Dims.


Only a Dimwit like Elmer Fudge could try to spin building a simple wall as a "complex" ineffective problem. We've only been doing it as the de facto way of establishing and enforcing boundaries for at least 11,000 years.

But now it can't even keep out poor, starving, impoverished people with nothing but rags for clothes, who BTW, find it much easier to take a jet in with a passport than to just walk across the border! :21:
I've stood on China's 'Great Wall'. It is in ruins, except the few sections renovated for tourists.
Do you actually believe the wall has to last 2000 years or it's a waste of money?

Yep! If the wall doesn't last 2,000 years and doesn't keep out 100% of anyone trying to get through, climb over or tunnel under it, it is a total waste of effort and money. INEFFECTIVE! And as proof of that, the Democrats are prepared to hold up their list of all the things they have done that effective. :spinner::lmao::lmao::spinner:
 
It's not my job to have a proposal. I'm not in charge. I don't have any power over the border.
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.
So you can't submit a proposal, because you don't have any control over the border, but you are qualified to attack those who do?

The reality is that you're just a fucking dumbass without a clue.
I live on the border. For many many years. I shop at stores on the border. I cross into Tijuana by car and on foot. I see these 'walls' every single day.

I know that they are easily defeated and their only purpose is to give red state nutters a false sense of security from the 'hordes of Meemaw raper/killers!'

I know the real problem areas are the legal border crossings.

The proposals I've seen on this site are just nonsense.
Your testimonial evidence is 100% worthless. For one thing, why should anyone believe you? For another, we have empirical evidence that shows walls are 99% effective.

Your claim that they don't work is just wind blowing out your ugly ass.
Oh I don't really care if you believe me or not. Your choice.

I find that most red state nutters choose to believe their own version of reality, often spoon fed to them by their Dear Orange Leader.
 
My proposal would involve concentrating on the legal crossings, you know, where the real problems are.
ROFL! Your proposal is doing nothing.

Who do you think you're fooling?
It's not my job to have a proposal. I'm not in charge. I don't have any power over the border.
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.

BUT YOU JUST MADE A PROPOSAL:
My proposal would involve concentrating on the legal crossings, you know, where the real problems are.
Then you said: It's not my job to have a proposal. Then you claimed: No proposals required.
Pretty hard to debate a person whose opinion changes ever 5 minutes.
Maybe what you call "stupid" are simply things you don't understand or agree with.
But how can you understand or agree with anything when you don't even know what you think?
That is the DEFINITION of "stupid."
I should have used the word 'idea' instead of proposal. A proposal involves far more than a couple of vague ideas. I thought everyone knew that.
 
And mainstream media works for the Dems
Trump is my leader, what ever he says is the truth, what ever he tells me to do, I do, Trump is my god. Those who question him are the devil. I will do anything to protect my messiah.


Still no pictures
And mainstream media works for the Dems
Trump is my leader, what ever he says is the truth, what ever he tells me to do, I do, Trump is my god. Those who question him are the devil. I will do anything to protect my messiah.


Still no pictures
View attachment 288020
I'm thinking they used Jet Fuel. . .

:71:

ymzun.jpg
Interesting if jet fuel got that hot it would melt portions of the jet engine LOL

In an engine, fuel is used to cool the engine, not air. Same goes for Rocket Motors. But if you introduce jet fuel or Kerosene into a cross ventilation you end up with a blast furnace capable of melting metal quickly. That is how a Blow Torch works. That's how a blast furnace works and that is what happened with the twin towers. Your conspiracy is dumb, really dumb.
 
I am a Trump minion. He is my god, my leader. Whatever he says, I support. Those who do npt take his word as gospel I will destroy.
Anyone who opposes the wall is a douchebag and an imbecile.
Articulated like a typical Trump minion.
Walls make sense on some parts of the border but not on most of the border. Most of the wall that has been built since Trump came to office was approved and funded while Obama was President.
Trump makes a complex problem overly simple for very stupid people like you. He says all people trying to get in the US are bad, the answer is a wall along the entire US-mexico border. The minions eat it up. We need to understand all the different people trying to get in the US and address each group and a wall is not the best solution along the entire US-Mexico border. But a dumbass like you will never understand.
F-off, Muddbrain. Have you been to the entire border to know which parts "make sense" and which don't? There is absolutely NO REASON to be against a border wall out in the middle of nowhere down at the border UNLESS YOU SIMPLY WANT THOSE PEOPLE COMING IN. We can afford it. We need it. Lying shitstains like you never prove a thing with your lies--- --- Trump has NEVER said that all people coming from Mexico are "bad," merely that they are breaking the law and are a potential security risk.
Another articulation of border security that only a Trump brain dead minion could come up with.
Maintaining and securing a wall the entire length of the US-Mexico border is impossible. There are many tech solutions at different places along the border that could be more secure, less expensive to install and less expensive to maintain.
Plus the majority of illegals in the US come in through airports not the southern border.
But dumbass Trump minions like simple answers that do not work for complex questions because they are absolute super dumbasses.

Another articulation of border security that only a Trump brain dead minion could come up with.

View attachment 288168

Look Elmer Glue, THERE IS NO BORDER SECURITY with the DNC! The Chinese built a wall the whole length of their country to keep out the Mongols, the Israelis surround their country with a wall, but we the greatest military power on the planet can't build an effect deterrent to keep most illegal aliens out?

:auiqs.jpg:

Yes, I can think of a very effective tech solution that doesn't need a wall. Post signs saying KEEP OUT. All trespassers will be shot. Then station robot drones and motion activated mini guns to take out anything moving across the border. Have BP come by once a week to throw the dead bodies back into Mexico. End of problem.

Now that you have revealed that you are in favor of abolishing the Bill of Rights, and that you are a rabid facist, I now know that there is absolutely no point in responding to your posts in the future.
 
Articulated like a typical Trump minion.
Walls make sense on some parts of the border but not on most of the border. Most of the wall that has been built since Trump came to office was approved and funded while Obama was President.
Trump makes a complex problem overly simple for very stupid people like you. He says all people trying to get in the US are bad, the answer is a wall along the entire US-mexico border. The minions eat it up. We need to understand all the different people trying to get in the US and address each group and a wall is not the best solution along the entire US-Mexico border. But a dumbass like you will never understand.
F-off, Muddbrain. Have you been to the entire border to know which parts "make sense" and which don't? There is absolutely NO REASON to be against a border wall out in the middle of nowhere down at the border UNLESS YOU SIMPLY WANT THOSE PEOPLE COMING IN. We can afford it. We need it. Lying shitstains like you never prove a thing with your lies--- --- Trump has NEVER said that all people coming from Mexico are "bad," merely that they are breaking the law and are a potential security risk.
Another articulation of border security that only a Trump brain dead minion could come up with.
Maintaining and securing a wall the entire length of the US-Mexico border is impossible. There are many tech solutions at different places along the border that could be more secure, less expensive to install and less expensive to maintain.
Plus the majority of illegals in the US come in through airports not the southern border.
But dumbass Trump minions like simple answers that do not work for complex questions because they are absolute super dumbasses.
Wrong again, moron. All your "tech solutions" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. All some future Hillary has to do is stop implementing them. The beauty of the wall is that it can't be made to disappear.

Your claim that the majority of illegals come through airports is also a lie.

Whenever Dims don't want to solve a problem, they call it "complex" when we all know the solution is simple.

The final solution is to defeat Dims.


Only a Dimwit like Elmer Fudge could try to spin building a simple wall as a "complex" ineffective problem. We've only been doing it as the de facto way of establishing and enforcing boundaries for at least 11,000 years.

But now it can't even keep out poor, starving, impoverished people with nothing but rags for clothes, who BTW, find it much easier to take a jet in with a passport than to just walk across the border! :21:
I've stood on China's 'Great Wall'. It is in ruins, except the few sections renovated for tourists.


...and it was a failure. The Mongols bribed their way through it, and conquered China, and then ruled China for 400 years.
 
Then where do you get off attack proposals other people have made?
Oh it's easy. When I see stupidity, I call it out. No proposals required.
So you can't submit a proposal, because you don't have any control over the border, but you are qualified to attack those who do?

The reality is that you're just a fucking dumbass without a clue.
I live on the border. For many many years. I shop at stores on the border. I cross into Tijuana by car and on foot. I see these 'walls' every single day.

I know that they are easily defeated and their only purpose is to give red state nutters a false sense of security from the 'hordes of Meemaw raper/killers!'

I know the real problem areas are the legal border crossings.

The proposals I've seen on this site are just nonsense.
Your testimonial evidence is 100% worthless. For one thing, why should anyone believe you? For another, we have empirical evidence that shows walls are 99% effective.

Your claim that they don't work is just wind blowing out your ugly ass.
Oh I don't really care if you believe me or not. Your choice.

I find that most red state nutters choose to believe their own version of reality, often spoon fed to them by their Dear Orange Leader.
How Ironic.

I supplied proof that my claims are correct. You supplied jack shit.

Who is being spoon fed own version of reality?
 
F-off, Muddbrain. Have you been to the entire border to know which parts "make sense" and which don't? There is absolutely NO REASON to be against a border wall out in the middle of nowhere down at the border UNLESS YOU SIMPLY WANT THOSE PEOPLE COMING IN. We can afford it. We need it. Lying shitstains like you never prove a thing with your lies--- --- Trump has NEVER said that all people coming from Mexico are "bad," merely that they are breaking the law and are a potential security risk.
Another articulation of border security that only a Trump brain dead minion could come up with.
Maintaining and securing a wall the entire length of the US-Mexico border is impossible. There are many tech solutions at different places along the border that could be more secure, less expensive to install and less expensive to maintain.
Plus the majority of illegals in the US come in through airports not the southern border.
But dumbass Trump minions like simple answers that do not work for complex questions because they are absolute super dumbasses.
Wrong again, moron. All your "tech solutions" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. All some future Hillary has to do is stop implementing them. The beauty of the wall is that it can't be made to disappear.

Your claim that the majority of illegals come through airports is also a lie.

Whenever Dims don't want to solve a problem, they call it "complex" when we all know the solution is simple.

The final solution is to defeat Dims.


Only a Dimwit like Elmer Fudge could try to spin building a simple wall as a "complex" ineffective problem. We've only been doing it as the de facto way of establishing and enforcing boundaries for at least 11,000 years.

But now it can't even keep out poor, starving, impoverished people with nothing but rags for clothes, who BTW, find it much easier to take a jet in with a passport than to just walk across the border! :21:
I've stood on China's 'Great Wall'. It is in ruins, except the few sections renovated for tourists.


...and it was a failure. The Mongols bribed their way through it, and conquered China, and then ruled China for 400 years.
So after it kept them out for 1300 years, they managed to find a way past it?

That's your conception of "not working?"

BTW, The mongols only ruled China for about 200 years.

The leftwing definition of "not working:"

It isn't perfectly indestructible, and it isn't 100% effective for 2000 years.​

Do you know how idiotic you sound?
 

Forum List

Back
Top