Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Horseshit. What else you got?From exactly what we're seeing right now, using lawfare to attack a political opponent and contorting written law to force a guilty verdict.
The SCOTUS says you are wrong.Horseshit. What else you got?
Prove it.The SCOTUS says you are wrong.
Doubtful.... And if it is they've already damaged themselves by being selectively prosecutorial.Horseshit. What else you got?
This.............https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.1.0_1.pdf
........isn't lawfare. It's enforcement of black letter law.
I dunno, he's been awfully quiet the last few days.IMO .... I have a feeling Trump is counting on it.
Everything you're writing is just recycled, debunked horseshit we've all seen before.And if it is they've already damaged themselves by being selectively prosecutorial.
No, they aren't. It's a crime in New York too.Mixing state and Federal prosecutions. It will bog down I think. Too much string and chewing gum between the two.
I shut down your nonsense fool.Prove it.
That isn't happening.
Prosecuting criminals is an everyday thing, The only extraordinary thing happening here is that we have our first criminal ex president.
Who is "they?" Trump could have prosecuted Hillary but didn't because he had no case. Trump is being prosecuted because the DoJ, state of NY, and state of GA have cases authorized by grand juries.Doubtful.... And if it is they've already damaged themselves by being selectively prosecutorial.
![]()
The Founding Fathers Couldn't Have Foreseen Trump—But They Immunized Him
Although the Republican or Democratic Parties didn't exist during the times of George Washington and James Madison, bitter partisanship and gamesmanship did.www.newsweek.com
It wasn't relative for the grand juries who voted to authorize indictments based on the evidence presented to them.Criminality is a relative viewpoint especially in the context of prosecutorial law.
You don't know what a grand jury is, or that only the prosecution gets to present it's biased side and the defendant has no opportunity to defend themselves.It wasn't relative for the grand juries who voted to authorize indictments based on the evidence presented to them.
That's a fatuous analogy.Meh .... I think it will fall apart where the state meets the federal. Two entirely different jurisdictions. That's what happened with the ballot issue.
Yeah... nope. That's why these things are written out. Codified.Criminality is a relative viewpoint especially in the context of prosecutorial law.
What I know is you folks continually try to make Trump's prosecutions about Dems unilaterally going after Don for political purposes. Never acknowledging the indictments are evidence based.You don't know what a grand jury is, or that only the prosecution gets to present it's biased side and the defendant has no opportunity to defend themselves.