In a First, U.S. Admits Drones Have Killed 4 Americans


You only have two choices:

a. Let him live, and allow this grave and mortal danger to your fellow Americans to continue to exist.

b. Kill him, and eliminate this grave and mortal danger to your fellow Americans.

What is your decision?

Crickets...

Shall we assume (a) by default?

WTF?

How about you've got a better chance at being in a car accident and we have due process.
Fear mongering over "grave and imminent danger" is fucking played out and passe in the world of demagoguery.
 

You only have two choices:

a. Let him live, and allow this grave and mortal danger to your fellow Americans to continue to exist.

b. Kill him, and eliminate this grave and mortal danger to your fellow Americans.

What is your decision?

Crickets...

Shall we assume (a) by default?

WTF? How about you've got a better chance at being in a car accident and we have due process. Fear mongering over "grave and imminent danger" is fucking played out and passe in the world of demagoguery.

None of this answers the question.

Your entire counterpoint (thin as it is) is predicated upon the idea that Due Process is not possible and that you are being lied-to.

Let's level the playing field and get past all this background noise and eliminate any substantive barriers to putting you in the decision-making chair and calling upon you to make a decision.

Let's assume that YOU are in control and that you CAN assure Due Process and have DONE so.

Let's assume that YOU are convinced of grave and mortal danger from the prospective target.

There... all fixed...

The choice is still in front of you...

You have the responsibility...

Decide, please...

(a) or (b)?
 
Last edited:
Multiple crickets...

A regular Cricket symphony...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoiV7c46C1A]Nature Sounds for Relaxing, Meditation & Sleep...Night Time Crickets - YouTube[/ame]
 
Crickets...

Shall we assume (a) by default?

WTF? How about you've got a better chance at being in a car accident and we have due process. Fear mongering over "grave and imminent danger" is fucking played out and passe in the world of demagoguery.

None of this answers the question.

Your entire counterpoint (thin as it is) is predicated upon the idea that Due Process is not possible and that you are being lied-to.

Let's level the playing field and get past all this background noise and eliminate any substantive barriers to putting you in the decision-making chair and calling upon you to make a decision.

Let's assume that YOU are in control and that you CAN assure Due Process and have DONE so.

Let's assume that YOU are convinced of grave and mortal danger from the prospective target.

There... all fixed...

The choice is still in front of you...

You have the responsibility...

Decide, please...

(a) or (b)?

False premise.
 
"...False premise."

Weighed+and+Measured.jpg


"You have been weighed... you have been measured... and you have been found wanting..."

But thank you for playing.

If you lack the courage to take a stand even in a hypothetical scenario, then you are definitely less than the person who takes-on that job in real life.

And, if you are less than that person, your assessment of that person can be safely set aside as less worthy then the object of the exercise.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, and you can o ahead on with your logical fallacy. Us logical and rational folks will continue to giggle at your stupidity.
 

Forum List

Back
Top