oreo
Gold Member
If it doesn't exist there wouldn't be two ongoing criminal investigations regarding it right now. One for Flynn & Russian collusion, and another for Obstruction of Justice.
Tell me Oreo, I am a Special Investigator with virtually unlimited power. Even the President of the United States must comply with me. I have a whole team, a virtual Who's Who of top attorneys to assist me. You hire me to look into a suspicion of Obstruction of Justice. Obstruct what? Interfere with an ongoing investigation into Flynn. It all centers around a few comments made one afternoon in a room.
Now, how long does that take to look into? Minutes, hours, days?
What would you think if after WEEKS, I still hadn't come to a conclusion? Months? Just WTF have I been doing? If you hired me to "investigate" such a matter and still could not reach a conclusion after many weeks, all the while charging huge fees, what would you think of your decision to hire me?
Can you think of a single job out there where such delays would be permissible and tolerated? IN ANY OTHER POSITION, such slowness would be deemed incompetence and get you fired. Why then do we look upon investigators and instead call it "thoroughness?" The longer they spend, the more "thorough" and "competent" we call them, yet in ANY OTHER FIELD, you would be seen the other way!
Watergate took 2 years 7 months--and in comparison this investigation is moving at the speed of light. I believe they have a lot of evidence at this point in time--and the last time I heard anything they were looking into banking accounts, trying to track the money back into who or what company may be involved in this, if any.
Just last week, Paul Manafort, Trump's former campaign manager was required by the Justice department to register as a foreign agent. He was working for the Russians in the 2012-2014 era actually receiving 17 million from them regarding Russian/Ukraine and as an adviser to them to advise on U.S relations.
Paul Manafort retroactively registers with Justice Dept. as foreign agent
Trump surrogates met with the Russian ambassador in Cleveland at the RNC convention and actually were writing foreign policy with him. They installed into the Republican platform that "We will not arm the Ukranians against pro-Russian separtists." Since Comey testified that July was the month that this investigation started, it was probably because of this.
More Trump advisers disclose meeting with Russia's ambassador - CNNPolitics.comGordon had advocated for language in the GOP platform that the Ukrainians not be armed in their battle against pro-Russian separatists, an effort was ultimately successful. But Gordon says he was simply advocating what Trump himself had expressed -- that he did not wish to see major war break out over the situation in Ukraine
So we have this clause tying into Paul Manafort right now--and John McCain wanted to know why this was inserted into the Republican platform a couple of months ago.
There's really no reason to have this kind of communication going back & forth with the Russians in the middle of a campaign season, on an election you're not even close to winning. Russians can't vote or donate campaign cash, and it's clear they weren't trading cookie recipes. This is not a "ruse"--there is definitely something going on with this administration and the Russians. I believe Robert Mueller is looking for the MOTIVE right now. We don't know it all yet--but it's coming.
Last edited: