Indiana school superintendent charged after pretending sick student was her son to get him treatment

[Soupnazi630]

this is the kind of action that warrants a pardon

An Indiana school superintendent was arrested for helping out a sick student by putting him on her health insurance

Its an indictment of US healthcare. She took a sick child to the doctor who refused to treat the kid because he couldnt pay.? Thats Victorian. We used to have shit like that before we had the NHS.

Because doctors are your slaves who are not permitted to charge for their labor.

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

Jesus was a myth and under your sick and inferior system doctors are forced to work the way others dictate

 

[Soupnazi630]

this is the kind of action that warrants a pardon

An Indiana school superintendent was arrested for helping out a sick student by putting him on her health insurance

Its an indictment of US healthcare. She took a sick child to the doctor who refused to treat the kid because he couldnt pay.? Thats Victorian. We used to have shit like that before we had the NHS.

Because doctors are your slaves who are not permitted to charge for their labor.

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

It's amazing to me that the people who have not committed their way to the Lord, who do not proclaim Him their Savior are always the QUICKEST ones to know and say exactly what He would do in every situation.

Ain't that a kick in the head?

So Jesus would have turned away a sick child ?

Yes actually if that kid was not one of his own

He only helped his own people meaning believers

 

[Soupnazi630]

this is the kind of action that warrants a pardon

An Indiana school superintendent was arrested for helping out a sick student by putting him on her health insurance

Its an indictment of US healthcare. She took a sick child to the doctor who refused to treat the kid because he couldnt pay.? Thats Victorian. We used to have shit like that before we had the NHS.

Because doctors are your slaves who are not permitted to charge for their labor.

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

The Jesus character never supported socialist ideas
He told his followers to help others but he never told them to steal from others to provide that help

 

[SweetSue92]

Its an indictment of US healthcare. She took a sick child to the doctor who refused to treat the kid because he couldnt pay.? Thats Victorian. We used to have shit like that before we had the NHS.

Because doctors are your slaves who are not permitted to charge for their labor.

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

It's amazing to me that the people who have not committed their way to the Lord, who do not proclaim Him their Savior are always the QUICKEST ones to know and say exactly what He would do in every situation.

Ain't that a kick in the head?

So Jesus would have turned away a sick child ?

Yes actually if that kid was not one of his own

He only helped his own people meaning believers

Not true, where did you get that? Everyone He helped was basically Jews; there were no "Christians" yet, to speak of. And He didn't help just Jews; he also spoke to the Samaritan woman, the Canaanite woman....

 

[Soupnazi630]

Because doctors are your slaves who are not permitted to charge for their labor.

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

It's amazing to me that the people who have not committed their way to the Lord, who do not proclaim Him their Savior are always the QUICKEST ones to know and say exactly what He would do in every situation.

Ain't that a kick in the head?

So Jesus would have turned away a sick child ?

Yes actually if that kid was not one of his own

He only helped his own people meaning believers

Not true, where did you get that? Everyone He helped was basically Jews; there were no "Christians" yet, to speak of. And He didn't help just Jews; he also spoke to the Samaritan woman, the Canaanite woman....

And they all believed in him

He never helped a non believer

Pay attention to details when you read the book

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Its an indictment of US healthcare. She took a sick child to the doctor who refused to treat the kid because he couldnt pay.? Thats Victorian. We used to have shit like that before we had the NHS.

Because doctors are your slaves who are not permitted to charge for their labor.

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

It's amazing to me that the people who have not committed their way to the Lord, who do not proclaim Him their Savior are always the QUICKEST ones to know and say exactly what He would do in every situation.

Ain't that a kick in the head?

So Jesus would have turned away a sick child ?

Jesus would not have, Tommy. But Jesus is no longer with us, here, in the flesh. He is seated at the Right Hand of the Father at the moment, see. What he said about the government is this: give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's. That means, to me, to gov't you give the bare minimum and you give to charity apart from government.

In any case my former statement stands. It's those who read the words of Jesus the least and who seek to know Him the least who always crow about "THIS IS WHAT JESUS WOULD WANT". It's insulting Tommy, you probably little know how prideful it is.

I am glad that you accept the Christian ethos behind socialism. Its an implicit rejection of the American dog eat dog culture. You just havent realised that yet.

 

[SweetSue92]

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

It's amazing to me that the people who have not committed their way to the Lord, who do not proclaim Him their Savior are always the QUICKEST ones to know and say exactly what He would do in every situation.

Ain't that a kick in the head?

So Jesus would have turned away a sick child ?

Yes actually if that kid was not one of his own

He only helped his own people meaning believers

Not true, where did you get that? Everyone He helped was basically Jews; there were no "Christians" yet, to speak of. And He didn't help just Jews; he also spoke to the Samaritan woman, the Canaanite woman....

And they all believed in him

He never helped a non believer

Pay attention to details when you read the book

Well of course. He wasn't going to heal someone against their will, if that's what you mean. God is never a God of force. For Jesus to heal a person who did "Not believe in Him" means He would approach a skeptical person maybe not even desirous of healing from Him and "force" the healing. Jesus doesn't do that. Jesus WOULD even heal if there was faith with some doubt mixed in ("I believe; help me in my unbelief!") but forced healings? Nope

 

[Soupnazi630]

Because doctors are your slaves who are not permitted to charge for their labor.

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

It's amazing to me that the people who have not committed their way to the Lord, who do not proclaim Him their Savior are always the QUICKEST ones to know and say exactly what He would do in every situation.

Ain't that a kick in the head?

So Jesus would have turned away a sick child ?

Jesus would not have, Tommy. But Jesus is no longer with us, here, in the flesh. He is seated at the Right Hand of the Father at the moment, see. What he said about the government is this: give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's. That means, to me, to gov't you give the bare minimum and you give to charity apart from government.

In any case my former statement stands. It's those who read the words of Jesus the least and who seek to know Him the least who always crow about "THIS IS WHAT JESUS WOULD WANT". It's insulting Tommy, you probably little know how prideful it is.

I am glad that you accept the Christian ethos behind socialism. Its an implicit rejection of the American dog eat dog culture. You just havent realised that yet.

There is no Christian ethos behind it.

 

[SweetSue92]

Because doctors are your slaves who are not permitted to charge for their labor.

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

It's amazing to me that the people who have not committed their way to the Lord, who do not proclaim Him their Savior are always the QUICKEST ones to know and say exactly what He would do in every situation.

Ain't that a kick in the head?

So Jesus would have turned away a sick child ?

Jesus would not have, Tommy. But Jesus is no longer with us, here, in the flesh. He is seated at the Right Hand of the Father at the moment, see. What he said about the government is this: give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's. That means, to me, to gov't you give the bare minimum and you give to charity apart from government.

In any case my former statement stands. It's those who read the words of Jesus the least and who seek to know Him the least who always crow about "THIS IS WHAT JESUS WOULD WANT". It's insulting Tommy, you probably little know how prideful it is.

I am glad that you accept the Christian ethos behind socialism. Its an implicit rejection of the American dog eat dog culture. You just havent realised that yet.

More shoving words in people's mouths Tommy. If you want to know why your posts are so reviled on these boards, that's why. The tactic is beyond juvenile, it's hostile. The "I'm glad", followed by stating something that you KNOW the poster doesn't mean, is nasty. Stop it.

Socialism is not only not Christian, it is patently anti-Christian. Nothing in the Bible ever said to pawn off your charity on the government. That's a fail.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

this is the kind of action that warrants a pardon

An Indiana school superintendent was arrested for helping out a sick student by putting him on her health insurance

Its an indictment of US healthcare. She took a sick child to the doctor who refused to treat the kid because he couldnt pay.? Thats Victorian. We used to have shit like that before we had the NHS.

Because doctors are your slaves who are not permitted to charge for their labor.

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

Jesus was a myth and under your sick and inferior system doctors are forced to work the way others dictate

Your Doctors work under the direction of cororate goons. Thats why they turn away sick children.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It's amazing to me that the people who have not committed their way to the Lord, who do not proclaim Him their Savior are always the QUICKEST ones to know and say exactly what He would do in every situation.

Ain't that a kick in the head?

So Jesus would have turned away a sick child ?

Yes actually if that kid was not one of his own

He only helped his own people meaning believers

Not true, where did you get that? Everyone He helped was basically Jews; there were no "Christians" yet, to speak of. And He didn't help just Jews; he also spoke to the Samaritan woman, the Canaanite woman....

And they all believed in him

He never helped a non believer

Pay attention to details when you read the book

Well of course. He wasn't going to heal someone against their will, if that's what you mean. God is never a God of force. For Jesus to heal a person who did "Not believe in Him" means He would approach a skeptical person maybe not even desirous of healing from Him and "force" the healing. Jesus doesn't do that. Jesus WOULD even heal if there was faith with some doubt mixed in ("I believe; help me in my unbelief!") but forced healings? Nope

I do not mean that

I mean what I said he strictly helped those who believed in him and had faith

 

[Soupnazi630]

this is the kind of action that warrants a pardon

An Indiana school superintendent was arrested for helping out a sick student by putting him on her health insurance

Its an indictment of US healthcare. She took a sick child to the doctor who refused to treat the kid because he couldnt pay.? Thats Victorian. We used to have shit like that before we had the NHS.

Because doctors are your slaves who are not permitted to charge for their labor.

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

Jesus was a myth and under your sick and inferior system doctors are forced to work the way others dictate

Your Doctors work under the direction of cororate goons. Thats why they turn away sick children.

They work for who they choose to work for and becoming a doctor does not make one a slave who owes his or her labor to others

Corporations work through voluntary trade not violent force as your system does.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

It's amazing to me that the people who have not committed their way to the Lord, who do not proclaim Him their Savior are always the QUICKEST ones to know and say exactly what He would do in every situation.

Ain't that a kick in the head?

So Jesus would have turned away a sick child ?

Jesus would not have, Tommy. But Jesus is no longer with us, here, in the flesh. He is seated at the Right Hand of the Father at the moment, see. What he said about the government is this: give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's. That means, to me, to gov't you give the bare minimum and you give to charity apart from government.

In any case my former statement stands. It's those who read the words of Jesus the least and who seek to know Him the least who always crow about "THIS IS WHAT JESUS WOULD WANT". It's insulting Tommy, you probably little know how prideful it is.

I am glad that you accept the Christian ethos behind socialism. Its an implicit rejection of the American dog eat dog culture. You just havent realised that yet.

More shoving words in people's mouths Tommy. If you want to know why your posts are so reviled on these boards, that's why. The tactic is beyond juvenile, it's hostile. The "I'm glad", followed by stating something that you KNOW the poster doesn't mean, is nasty. Stop it.

Socialism is not only not Christian, it is patently anti-Christian. Nothing in the Bible ever said to pawn off your charity on the government. That's a fail.

But you have already accepted that Jesus would not have turned away this sick child. Neither would the NHS. They are on the same page.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It's amazing to me that the people who have not committed their way to the Lord, who do not proclaim Him their Savior are always the QUICKEST ones to know and say exactly what He would do in every situation.

Ain't that a kick in the head?

So Jesus would have turned away a sick child ?

Jesus would not have, Tommy. But Jesus is no longer with us, here, in the flesh. He is seated at the Right Hand of the Father at the moment, see. What he said about the government is this: give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's. That means, to me, to gov't you give the bare minimum and you give to charity apart from government.

In any case my former statement stands. It's those who read the words of Jesus the least and who seek to know Him the least who always crow about "THIS IS WHAT JESUS WOULD WANT". It's insulting Tommy, you probably little know how prideful it is.

I am glad that you accept the Christian ethos behind socialism. Its an implicit rejection of the American dog eat dog culture. You just havent realised that yet.

More shoving words in people's mouths Tommy. If you want to know why your posts are so reviled on these boards, that's why. The tactic is beyond juvenile, it's hostile. The "I'm glad", followed by stating something that you KNOW the poster doesn't mean, is nasty. Stop it.

Socialism is not only not Christian, it is patently anti-Christian. Nothing in the Bible ever said to pawn off your charity on the government. That's a fail.

But you have already accepted that Jesus would not have turned away this sick child. Neither would the NHS. They are on the same page.

Wrong.

The NHS forces other to treat the child the Jesus character never did that or advocated it

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Its an indictment of US healthcare. She took a sick child to the doctor who refused to treat the kid because he couldnt pay.? Thats Victorian. We used to have shit like that before we had the NHS.

Because doctors are your slaves who are not permitted to charge for their labor.

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

Jesus was a myth and under your sick and inferior system doctors are forced to work the way others dictate

Your Doctors work under the direction of cororate goons. Thats why they turn away sick children.

They work for who they choose to work for and becoming a doctor does not make one a slave who owes his or her labor to others

Corporations work through voluntary trade not violent force as your system does.

I have already shown you that our Doctors can choose to work for themselves. Therefore your "slave" comments are risible. Please show me this violent force you froth about.

 

[SweetSue92]

It's amazing to me that the people who have not committed their way to the Lord, who do not proclaim Him their Savior are always the QUICKEST ones to know and say exactly what He would do in every situation.

Ain't that a kick in the head?

So Jesus would have turned away a sick child ?

Jesus would not have, Tommy. But Jesus is no longer with us, here, in the flesh. He is seated at the Right Hand of the Father at the moment, see. What he said about the government is this: give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's. That means, to me, to gov't you give the bare minimum and you give to charity apart from government.

In any case my former statement stands. It's those who read the words of Jesus the least and who seek to know Him the least who always crow about "THIS IS WHAT JESUS WOULD WANT". It's insulting Tommy, you probably little know how prideful it is.

I am glad that you accept the Christian ethos behind socialism. Its an implicit rejection of the American dog eat dog culture. You just havent realised that yet.

More shoving words in people's mouths Tommy. If you want to know why your posts are so reviled on these boards, that's why. The tactic is beyond juvenile, it's hostile. The "I'm glad", followed by stating something that you KNOW the poster doesn't mean, is nasty. Stop it.

Socialism is not only not Christian, it is patently anti-Christian. Nothing in the Bible ever said to pawn off your charity on the government. That's a fail.

But you have already accepted that Jesus would not have turned away this sick child. Neither would the NHS. They are on the same page.

Jesus is the Son of God, Tommy. His resources are limitless. He never "runs out". If any adult would have brought this child to Jesus, Jesus--the Judge of all mankind--would have been able to ascertain whether the human was on the up and up. To perfectly judge this.

Jesus is not the NHS. The NHS is not Jesus.

Everyone---above is the very problem with Leftists. They really, honestly think Utopia can happen and Big Daddy Government is "on the same page" as Jesus.

God. Help. Us.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Because doctors are your slaves who are not permitted to charge for their labor.

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

Jesus was a myth and under your sick and inferior system doctors are forced to work the way others dictate

Your Doctors work under the direction of cororate goons. Thats why they turn away sick children.

They work for who they choose to work for and becoming a doctor does not make one a slave who owes his or her labor to others

Corporations work through voluntary trade not violent force as your system does.

I have already shown you that our Doctors can choose to work for themselves. Therefore your "slave" comments are risible. Please show me this violent force you froth about.

It is a government program

By definition all government programs are rooted in force and violence


You have shown no such thing.

 

[SweetSue92]

So Jesus would have turned away a sick child ?

Yes actually if that kid was not one of his own

He only helped his own people meaning believers

Not true, where did you get that? Everyone He helped was basically Jews; there were no "Christians" yet, to speak of. And He didn't help just Jews; he also spoke to the Samaritan woman, the Canaanite woman....

And they all believed in him

He never helped a non believer

Pay attention to details when you read the book

Well of course. He wasn't going to heal someone against their will, if that's what you mean. God is never a God of force. For Jesus to heal a person who did "Not believe in Him" means He would approach a skeptical person maybe not even desirous of healing from Him and "force" the healing. Jesus doesn't do that. Jesus WOULD even heal if there was faith with some doubt mixed in ("I believe; help me in my unbelief!") but forced healings? Nope

I do not mean that

I mean what I said he strictly helped those who believed in him and had faith

Of course. Because to help those who didn't believe in Him, who did not have faith, would have been to force Himself on them. God does not do that. Neither does Jesus. You are free to go your way.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

Jesus was a myth and under your sick and inferior system doctors are forced to work the way others dictate

Your Doctors work under the direction of cororate goons. Thats why they turn away sick children.

They work for who they choose to work for and becoming a doctor does not make one a slave who owes his or her labor to others

Corporations work through voluntary trade not violent force as your system does.

I have already shown you that our Doctors can choose to work for themselves. Therefore your "slave" comments are risible. Please show me this violent force you froth about.

It is a government program

By definition all government programs are rooted in force and violence


You have shown no such thing.

Post 17

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Jesus was a myth and under your sick and inferior system doctors are forced to work the way others dictate

Your Doctors work under the direction of cororate goons. Thats why they turn away sick children.

They work for who they choose to work for and becoming a doctor does not make one a slave who owes his or her labor to others

Corporations work through voluntary trade not violent force as your system does.

I have already shown you that our Doctors can choose to work for themselves. Therefore your "slave" comments are risible. Please show me this violent force you froth about.

It is a government program

By definition all government programs are rooted in force and violence


You have shown no such thing.

Post 17

Private London GP | Same Day Appointments Only £39
Actually they can and do. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Socialism ensures that the sick are never turned away. Its what Jesus would have wanted.

Wrong

One more time the Jesus helped those in need and told his followers to do the same

He never advocated redistribution of wealth or forcing others to help those in need which your inferior system does.