Indictment Handed Down in J6 Investigation

[Slade3200]

But….but….but….”fight like hell ”
It’s ALL they have

That’s not even in the indictment… you haven’t read it have you

 

[Faun]

 

[Billiejeens]

I'd take issue with that.

It was sarcasm aimed at one of the retards.

 

[Faun]

That’s not even in the indictment… you haven’t read it have you

Give 'em a copy of See Spot Run. That's something they're capable of reading.

 

[mudwhistle]

Read it, coward.

An indictment isn't worth the paper it was printed on without evidence.
Stop trying to claim it's the same as a conviction or even evidence.
Taking into consideration Jack Smith's history, spending time reading his cock&bull indictments is time you can never get back.

 

[Rawley]

It was sarcasm aimed at one of the retards.

Got it. Sarcasm is often tough on chart boards. Shit, half the crap the loons post I would swear is sarcasm but they really mean it.

 

[mudwhistle]

Give 'em a copy of See Spot Run. That's something they're capable of reading.

Wow....that was really clever. *not*

 

[g5000]

 

[Slade3200]

An indictment isn't worth the paper it was printed on without evidence.
Stop trying to claim it's the same as a conviction or even evidence.
Taking into consideration Jack Smith's history, spending time reading his cock&bull indictments is time you can never get back.

Hahaha, you think they indicted after years of investigating with no evidence?!?! Haha

Ok well I guess we shall see in court

 

[mudwhistle]

Got it. Sarcasm is often tough on chart boards. Shit, half the crap the loons post I would swear is sarcasm but they really mean it.

The crap these DOJ assholes produce these days makes just about every legal scholar worth his salt shake his head in disgust.

 

[Faun]

Sorry, but your PITA indictment party does not work, and I predict this indictment may not even see the light of day it's so anti-Constitutional with re to Amendment 1.

How does it violate the First Amendment?

 

[mudwhistle]

Yet this is exactly what Democrats did in 2016 almost word for word.

 

[Rawley]

Do you have a point in posting this paragraph?

 

[Billiejeens]

Yet this is exactly what Democrats did in 2016 almost word for word.

Not a defense
It's different when they do it.

 

[g5000]

Trump-commissioned report undercut his claims of dead and double voters​

​

“So dead people voted, and I think the number is close to 5,000 people. And they went to obituaries. They went to all sorts of methods to come up with an accurate number, and a minimum is close to about 5,000 voters,” he said, without citing his study.

But a report commissioned by his own campaign dated one day prior told a different story: Researchers paid by Trump’s team had “high confidence” of only nine dead voters in Fulton County, defined as ballots that may have been cast by someone else in the name of a deceased person. They believed there was a “potential statewide exposure” of 23 such votes across the Peach State — or 4,977 fewer than the “minimum” Trump claimed.



This is what we find throughout Trump's indictment. Trump lied, and knew he was lying.

His own research firms proved there was no fraud which would affect the outcome of the election.

A second firm hired by Trump campaign found no evidence of election fraud​

​

“No substantive voter fraud was uncovered in my investigations looking for it, nor was I able to confirm any of the outside claims of voter fraud that I was asked to look at,” he said. “Every fraud claim I was asked to investigate was false.”

Block said he recently received a subpoena from special counsel Jack Smith’s office and met with federal prosecutors in Washington, but he declined to discuss his interactions with them. Block said he contemporaneously sent his findings disputing fraud claims in writing to the Trump campaign in late 2020.


So not just one, but TWO research firms hired by Trump found no fraud.

And what did Trump do with these reports?

He BURIED them. And then continued his Big Lie.

 

[Billiejeens]

Hahaha, you think they indicted after years of investigating with no evidence?!?! Haha

Ok well I guess we shall see in court

They are indicting because the guy they installed after the coup is swimming in legal peril.

 

[Faun]

Nothing illegal about saying the election was stolen. Hillary said the same thing when she lost.

She may have said some of the same things but she didn't do some of the same things.

 

[Catsnmeters]

What does that have to do with my post?

 

[g5000]

And so...knowing he was lying, Donald Trump then threatened the Republican Secretary of State in Georgia with prosecution if the Secretary didn't go along with Trump's Big Lie.

Talk about weaponizing the federal government! Talk about persecuting your political opponents!

 

[Lastamender]

There are 3 statutes mentioned in the indictment. You can't even say which one is about the First Amendment.

As always, all you do is spout nonsense and parade your ignorance.

All you do is support liars and criminals. Sucks to be a lowlife traitor.