Intelligence Community: On second thought, Hillary's emails did not contain top secrets

[Moonglow]

 

[flacaltenn]

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

 

[OKTexas]

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

 

[flacaltenn]

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Secure my ass. You hear folks in the media making the same stupid comments and speculations. Secure in that sense literally means under lock and key and physically controlled under security regulations and practices..

"You mean wipe it with a cloth? " Says the Secretary of State responsible for overseeing security of classified information at our State Dept. Clinton's never much did care too much for "procedures and regulations" or those pesky security types.

 

[A Perez]

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't true that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

By the way, you haven't deleted or edited the posts were you lied about the server being hacked. You debunked your own comment by linking to news saying they TRIED to hack the server, but couldn't.

 

[Obiwan]

1. Rand Paul: Clapper lied to Congress - The...
   www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2013/06/18/...Cached
   Jun 17, 2013 · Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Tuesday that Director of National Intelligence James Clapper lied to Congress during a March hearing. "What I'm saying is that ...

Rand Paul says goofy stuff all the time. How is this time any different?

So state YOUR service and classification authority...

See, Libs don't know shit...

But the geniuses always spout off...

State your credentials, or fuck off...

What the hell are you talking about? Exactly what classification is required to know Rand Paul can go from fairly sane to bat shit crazy in 3.2 seconds.........just like his daddy.

State your security clearance or fuck off...

 

[Obiwan]

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't trust that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

Same to you.....

State your clearance

 

[A Perez]

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

What classified material?

 

[flacaltenn]

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't trust that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

It is the CONTENT of the message that determines the classification. You won't be trusted with clearances if you can't recognize classified material when you see it.

And AGAIN -- you assuming facts that you don't know shit about. There is not just ONE top security clearance. Folks are cleared in HUNDREDS of different ways for the situations they are allowed to participate in...

 

[A Perez]

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't trus

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't trust that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

Same to you.....

State your clearance

t that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

Same to you.....

State your clearance

Huh?

 

[flacaltenn]

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't trust that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

Same to you.....

State your clearance

You know that can't happen. You just have to live with the fact that most ALL Americans don't have a clue about how State Security works or the gymnastics that folks go thru to keep things secure and safe.. OR -- the sacrifices that millions of Americans make to hold and honor their clearances.

Hilliary is pissing off all those 10s of Millions of folks who were ever bound by that trust...

 

[A Perez]

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't trust that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

It is the CONTENT of the message that determines the classification. You won't be trusted with clearances if you can't recognize classified material when you see it.

And AGAIN -- you assuming facts that you don't know shit about. There is not just ONE top security clearance. Folks are cleared in HUNDREDS of different ways for the situations they are allowed to participate in...

You are incoherent. When did I say it is NOT the content that makes things classified? Are you on drugs? The content in those emails did not make it classified.

 

[flacaltenn]

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't trus

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't trust that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

Same to you.....

State your clearance

t that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

Same to you.....

State your clearance

Huh?

Yeah.. Huh?? We can't tell you. And you don't have a clue. But be CERTAIN that there are 10s of Millions of us that know how these things work..

 

[OKTexas]

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't true that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

By the way, you haven't deleted or edited the posts were you lied about the server being hacked. You debunked your own comment by linking to news saying they TRIED to hack the server, but couldn't.

Funny, I don't recall ever saying a damned thing about the server being hacked. Would you provide a quote to that effect? While your at it how about a link showing her lawyer had a current clearance?

 

[flacaltenn]

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't trust that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

It is the CONTENT of the message that determines the classification. You won't be trusted with clearances if you can't recognize classified material when you see it.

And AGAIN -- you assuming facts that you don't know shit about. There is not just ONE top security clearance. Folks are cleared in HUNDREDS of different ways for the situations they are allowed to participate in...

You are incoherent. When did I say it is NOT the content that makes things classified? Are you on drugs?

You are hung up on whether the message bears any markings as to it's classification. That is totally irrelevant. The people communicating are trusted to RECOGNIZE and TREAT classified material with respect and assure that it is never compromised by the kind of workarounds that Hillary decided to allowed herself..

 

[BULLDOG]

1. Rand Paul: Clapper lied to Congress - The...
   www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2013/06/18/...Cached
   Jun 17, 2013 · Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Tuesday that Director of National Intelligence James Clapper lied to Congress during a March hearing. "What I'm saying is that ...

Rand Paul says goofy stuff all the time. How is this time any different?

So state YOUR service and classification authority...

See, Libs don't know shit...

But the geniuses always spout off...

State your credentials, or fuck off...

What the hell are you talking about? Exactly what classification is required to know Rand Paul can go from fairly sane to bat shit crazy in 3.2 seconds.........just like his daddy.

State your security clearance or fuck off...

Again, WHAT? You might have taken some bad acid. Why don't you lay down for a while?

 

[flacaltenn]

Would this be the same James Clapper who lied to congress? It doesn't matter what the classification was, if it was classified even confidential, it was still a violation of law to have it on an unsecured server. Just more equivocation from the regressives to attempt to salvage the hildabeast.

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't true that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

By the way, you haven't deleted or edited the posts were you lied about the server being hacked. You debunked your own comment by linking to news saying they TRIED to hack the server, but couldn't.

Funny, I don't recall ever saying a damned thing about the server being hacked. Would you provide a quote to that effect? While your at it how about a link showing her lawyer had a current clearance?

His clearance was specified as "top secret" in Congressional hearings. This is the guy who is was an EMPLOYEE of state working outside of their legal dept, but also somehow entitled to represent Clinton as an attorney.. The "top secret" clearance really does not tell us WHAT classified information he was entitled to handle or view.

 

[Obiwan]

The server wasnt unsecured. Idiot. And which law is that?

Certainly you're joking. Folks who have never had security clearances have no idea what a "secure server" is in that context. When you handle classified materials -- it is YOUR responsibility to know what should be treated as classified. Because if you are the author -- YOU make the classification decision. And even if you're NOT the author -- if someone is writing to you and they know or assume that you have been cleared to handle this material, then they EXPECT you to treat it as classified. As Sec State --- HER JOB was to know what is classified and what is not. Because she was cleared and briefed into most every classified program dealing with foreign affairs.

Having a commercial hosted server is NOWHERE NEAR the requirements for securing classified material. We know that folks lacking clearances of ANY kind shared that server.. Because she was ordering tea and bagels and talking to her daughter on it..

Idiot..

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't trus

And we know people who had no clearance had full access to the contents of that unsecured server. The people at Platte River Tech, the company they hired to back it up and her lawyer all had access with no clearance.

Thats troubling only if the information in the server was classified, but it wasn't. Idiot. Typing "classified!" in a message board doesn't make it classified. Not to mention that it isn't trust that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

Same to you.....

State your clearance

t that her lawyer had security clearance. He did.

Same to you.....

State your clearance

Huh?

Huh???

Thank you for admitting your absolute ignorance about classified material, DUMBASS!!!

 

[Obiwan]

1. Rand Paul: Clapper lied to Congress - The...
   www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2013/06/18/...Cached
   Jun 17, 2013 · Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Tuesday that Director of National Intelligence James Clapper lied to Congress during a March hearing. "What I'm saying is that ...

Rand Paul says goofy stuff all the time. How is this time any different?

So state YOUR service and classification authority...

See, Libs don't know shit...

But the geniuses always spout off...

State your credentials, or fuck off...

What the hell are you talking about? Exactly what classification is required to know Rand Paul can go from fairly sane to bat shit crazy in 3.2 seconds.........just like his daddy.

State your security clearance or fuck off...

Again, WHAT? You might have taken some bad acid. Why don't you lay down for a while?

Again, state your clearance and service, Idiot...

Or submit your concession

 

[flacaltenn]

Just so that A. Perez doesn't think FlaCalTenn is bullshitting him -- I'll let a senator tell you that ALL "top secret" clearances are not alike. And that's it's insufficient to say that the lawyer had "one"...

Sen. Grassley Grills Hillary Clinton's Lawyer About Security Clearance - Breitbart



Senator Grassley notes these developments in his letter to Kendall, then sets about challenging the glib assurances from Clintonworld that Kendall was fully cleared and properly trained to handle the data placed in his custody:

In light of that particular classification, which generally requires advanced protocols such as a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) and other similar arrangements to possess and view, it appears the FBI has determined that your clearance is not sufficient to allow you to maintain custody of the emails. Consistent with that determination, the FBI is now in custody of not only the thumb drives previously in your possession that allegedly contain all of Secretary Clinton’s emails, but also Secretary Clinton’s personal server that was used to maintain the top secret emails outside of a government facility.

Further reporting indicates that Secretary Clinton may have provided you copies of her emails in December 2014 and that government officials realized that the emails contained classified information in May 2015 yet the Department of State did not deliver a safe to store the thumb drives until July 2015. Thus, since at least May 2015 and possibly December 2014, it appears that in addition to not having an adequate security clearance, you did not have the appropriate tools in place to secure the thumb drives. Even with the safe, there are questions as to whether it was an adequate mechanism to secure TS/SCI material. Given the importance of securing and protecting classified information, especially TS/SCI material, it is imperative to confirm when, how, and why you, and any of your associates, received a security clearance in connection with your representation of Ms. Clinton and whether it was active while you had custody of Secretary Clinton’s emails.

Appears that even her "top secret" lawyer had no genuine appreciation of the proper procedures or handling and is likely WHY all that was whisked out of his hands by the FBI....