🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Intelligence Community: On second thought, Hillary's emails did not contain top secrets

Hillary Clinton emails increasingly classified; 1 in 20 messages contained secrets - Washington Times

More than 5 percent of the latest batch of emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, released Wednesday, contain classified information — or twice the rate of the previous releases, raising tricky questions about whether the department is finding more secrets or being more thorough in screening the messages.

The emails also show an effort to hack into Mrs. Clinton’s personal account by sending her fake traffic tickets with a Trojan horse file attached. If she had clicked on the file, the hackers could have gained access to her computer.

All told, at least 400 messages out of nearly 12,000 emails released so far contain information that the government now deems classified.

But 214 of those messages came in the latest batch of 3,869 messages, for a classification rate of 5.5 percent.

The messages were not marked classified at the time they were sent — usually in 2010 or 2011, for the latest batch — but the government has gone back and determined that they contained information that shouldn’t be public.

Top Secret rated secure servers don't get phishing and spam emails BullWinkle.. And it's a LOT more than 2 classified messages in question. Why did you ever sell your brain to scam artists like Politico? You need to broaden your reading unless you enjoy mental bondage..
 
Well BullWinkle, there have been DOZENS of emails deemed classified on those servers. .

1) Retroactively?
2) Who deemed them classified?

Are you saying she NEVER sent or received an email to/from ANY foreign official?
now this is a stupid question ...what we are saying she never sent a classified email to her private server... if the email became classified after the fact, not her problem
 
Funny, I don't recall ever saying a damned thing about the server being hacked. Would you provide a quote to that effect? While your at it how about a link showing her lawyer had a current clearance?

His clearance was specified as "top secret" in Congressional hearings. This is the guy who is was an EMPLOYEE of state working outside of their legal dept, but also somehow entitled to represent Clinton as an attorney.. The "top secret" clearance really does not tell us WHAT classified information he was entitled to handle or view.

From what I've read he had clearance to review documents for the Benghazi hearings but only in the secure environment of the State Dept. He did not have clearance to retain or store any classified materials, and his office was not a certified repository for classified information.
From what you've read in Breitbart?
whirleynutdaily???? newsmax???? or maybe the old fox noise

Yeah --- like you should really worry about that when the whole source for this bogus OP is Politico..
Debate the facts -- not the sources. Because nowadays, unless you're willing to accept a lot of sources on both sides, you might as well place half your brain on vacation..
politico deals in more factual information then whirleynutdaily, newsmax, or fox noise ... the problem you have is you hate it when politico is right....
 
Last edited:
In a flip flop that is going to make the Hillary-obsessed conservative members of this board, Politico reports that the Clinton e-mails contained no top secrets as the DNI previously said. James Clapper himself is admitting the "oops".

It is likely that conservatives in this board will pretend this is a cover-up as they always do when they are wrong.
Key Clinton emails did not contain highly classified secrets, inquiry finds

:lmao:

Politico Lefto? You have to be kidding, whey would their sucking off the Democrats again surprise anyone?
 
In a flip flop that is going to make the Hillary-obsessed conservative members of this board, Politico reports that the Clinton e-mails contained no top secrets as the DNI previously said. James Clapper himself is admitting the "oops".

It is likely that conservatives in this board will pretend this is a cover-up as they always do when they are wrong.
Key Clinton emails did not contain highly classified secrets, inquiry finds

:lmao:

Politico Lefto? You have to be kidding, whey would their sucking off the Democrats again surprise anyone?

source plate river network: also you can find it on politico

Getting hired by Hillary Clinton was a major coup for a small IT management company in Denver. But Platte River Networks didn't — and couldn't — talk about its new client back in June 2013.

And when Platte River became the latest name to emerge in the Clinton e-mail controversy, the company maintained its silence — until last week, when it hired a crisis-communications expert to defend against political innuendo, death threats and allegations that it stored her e-mail in the bathroom of a downtown Denver loft.

"There never was, at any time, data belonging to the Clintons stored in Denver. Ever," said Dovetail Solutions CEO Andy Boian, who added that Clinton's server was always in a New Jersey data center. "We do not store data in any bathrooms."

Platte River Networks had no prior relationship with Hillary Clinton, said Boian, whose online biography says he served on Bill Clinton's 1992 presidential transition team.

Hillary Clinton's decision to have an employee set up a private e-mail server in her New York home in 2008 has plagued the former secretary of state's presidential campaign.

The FBI is investigating whether any of her private e-mails contained sensitive information and should have been classified — and not stored on a computer inside her house.

the same story from politico that it posted ... I don't use politico for a source ... I went to Plate river network for the info about this so-callled bathroom server, that your types buy hook line an sinker ... becasue of your hate towards dems/liberals and Hillary ... you nut jobs will believe just about anything thats told to you against lefty
 
Hillary Clinton emails increasingly classified; 1 in 20 messages contained secrets - Washington Times

More than 5 percent of the latest batch of emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, released Wednesday, contain classified information — or twice the rate of the previous releases, raising tricky questions about whether the department is finding more secrets or being more thorough in screening the messages.

The emails also show an effort to hack into Mrs. Clinton’s personal account by sending her fake traffic tickets with a Trojan horse file attached. If she had clicked on the file, the hackers could have gained access to her computer.

All told, at least 400 messages out of nearly 12,000 emails released so far contain information that the government now deems classified.

But 214 of those messages came in the latest batch of 3,869 messages, for a classification rate of 5.5 percent.

The messages were not marked classified at the time they were sent — usually in 2010 or 2011, for the latest batch — but the government has gone back and determined that they contained information that shouldn’t be public.

Top Secret rated secure servers don't get phishing and spam emails BullWinkle.. And it's a LOT more than 2 classified messages in question. Why did you ever sell your brain to scam artists like Politico? You need to broaden your reading unless you enjoy mental bondage..

the below statement from your post never happen... its all made up
"The emails also show an effort to hack into Mrs. Clinton’s personal account by sending her fake traffic tickets with a Trojan horse file attached. If she had clicked on the file, the hackers could have gained access to her computer."

you may want it to be true but it never happen ... more bull shit from the right
 
Hillary Clinton emails increasingly classified; 1 in 20 messages contained secrets - Washington Times

More than 5 percent of the latest batch of emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, released Wednesday, contain classified information — or twice the rate of the previous releases, raising tricky questions about whether the department is finding more secrets or being more thorough in screening the messages.

The emails also show an effort to hack into Mrs. Clinton’s personal account by sending her fake traffic tickets with a Trojan horse file attached. If she had clicked on the file, the hackers could have gained access to her computer.

All told, at least 400 messages out of nearly 12,000 emails released so far contain information that the government now deems classified.

But 214 of those messages came in the latest batch of 3,869 messages, for a classification rate of 5.5 percent.

The messages were not marked classified at the time they were sent — usually in 2010 or 2011, for the latest batch — but the government has gone back and determined that they contained information that shouldn’t be public.

Top Secret rated secure servers don't get phishing and spam emails BullWinkle.. And it's a LOT more than 2 classified messages in question. Why did you ever sell your brain to scam artists like Politico? You need to broaden your reading unless you enjoy mental bondage..
the below statement here is bull shit ... and we know it

All told, at least 400 messages out of nearly 12,000 emails released so far contain information that the government now deems classified."

Never happen and you can show any FBI report that says different

this statement here below is also bull shit... and we know it...

"The messages were not marked classified at the time they were sent — usually in 2010 or 2011, for the latest batch — but the government has gone back and determined that they contained information that shouldn’t be public."

your statement says it was not marked as classified ... this was to get you to believe it was changed by sayin it was then changed ... by you saying "It shouldn’t be public"... this too is a misleading statements from the right, it was said to imply she kept classified information on her server ... the FBI clearly said that it was marked as sensitive in nature, and never was reclassified as classified... so you again supported a lie ... just because of your hate towards dems/linerals and hillary clinton
 
Last edited:
So once Hillary looks like a winner again the left wing propagandists come out and tell us oh no she did nothing wrong. It's like them saying Hillary vindicated herself on Benghazi when we know for a fact she lied about it.
 
You obviously have never held a security clearance and have no Idea what a secure server is. The security around the servers physical location must meet government requirements. I don't think a bathroom closet in a loft in Denver, where any employee there had full access to it, would meet those requirements. But hey, feel free to keep deluding yourself.

Another lie. The Denver Post debunked this: Platte River Networks: Clinton e-mail server was never in Denver
You are the #1 lier in this forum.

First time I've seen that one, so Platte River and their employees just had access to the data on the server, they didn't physically have custody of it, oh wait, they delivered it to the FBI so they had to have some sort of custody. Was this data center in NJ a government approved storage facility for sensitive and classified data?
Back up. You said that Platte had the server in a bathroom. Don't move on to other topics without explaining where the fuck you read that nonsense, and why you were not skeptical about it. Was it Breitbart?

I don't do breitbart, here's one source:
http://nypost.com/2015/08/18/hillarys-email-server-was-run-out-of-an-old-bathroom-closet/

Another, which was quoted in the post article.
Hillary's email firm had its servers in the bathroom

Now answer my questions.
He doesnt do Breitbart. He does Murdoch.
 
Well BullWinkle, there have been DOZENS of emails deemed classified on those servers. .

1) Retroactively?
2) Who deemed them classified?

Are you saying she NEVER sent or received an email to/from ANY foreign official?
now this is a stupid question ...what we are saying she never sent a classified email to her private server... if the email became classified after the fact, not her problem

If she had an email exchange with any foreign official, that email is automatically born classified by State Dept protocol. So no, it's not a dumb question, it's a way to demonstrate you idiots have no freaking clue what the hell you're talking about.
 
Well BullWinkle, there have been DOZENS of emails deemed classified on those servers. .

1) Retroactively?
2) Who deemed them classified?

Are you saying she NEVER sent or received an email to/from ANY foreign official?
now this is a stupid question ...what we are saying she never sent a classified email to her private server... if the email became classified after the fact, not her problem

If she had an email exchange with any foreign official, that email is automatically born classified by State Dept protocol. So no, it's not a dumb question, it's a way to demonstrate you idiots have no freaking clue what the hell you're talking about.
If she ran all of her correspondence off her private server how could she possibly do her job without sending or receiving classified emails?
 
Well BullWinkle, there have been DOZENS of emails deemed classified on those servers. .

1) Retroactively?
2) Who deemed them classified?

Are you saying she NEVER sent or received an email to/from ANY foreign official?
now this is a stupid question ...what we are saying she never sent a classified email to her private server... if the email became classified after the fact, not her problem

That's not way classified material is handled, treated or secured. Hillary was responsible for KNOWING the classification of material in ANY message that crossed her eyes. REGARDLESS of whether it bears a proper label or not. Every individual protecting a certain security class KNOWS classified info when they read it.

And as Secretary of State -- she was the one to be enforcing the proper discipline for classified material in that organization. NOT --- being an ABUSER of that system..
 
Hillary Clinton emails increasingly classified; 1 in 20 messages contained secrets - Washington Times

More than 5 percent of the latest batch of emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, released Wednesday, contain classified information — or twice the rate of the previous releases, raising tricky questions about whether the department is finding more secrets or being more thorough in screening the messages.

The emails also show an effort to hack into Mrs. Clinton’s personal account by sending her fake traffic tickets with a Trojan horse file attached. If she had clicked on the file, the hackers could have gained access to her computer.

All told, at least 400 messages out of nearly 12,000 emails released so far contain information that the government now deems classified.

But 214 of those messages came in the latest batch of 3,869 messages, for a classification rate of 5.5 percent.

The messages were not marked classified at the time they were sent — usually in 2010 or 2011, for the latest batch — but the government has gone back and determined that they contained information that shouldn’t be public.

Top Secret rated secure servers don't get phishing and spam emails BullWinkle.. And it's a LOT more than 2 classified messages in question. Why did you ever sell your brain to scam artists like Politico? You need to broaden your reading unless you enjoy mental bondage..
the below statement here is bull shit ... and we know it

All told, at least 400 messages out of nearly 12,000 emails released so far contain information that the government now deems classified."

Never happen and you can show any FBI report that says different

this statement here below is also bull shit... and we know it...

"The messages were not marked classified at the time they were sent — usually in 2010 or 2011, for the latest batch — but the government has gone back and determined that they contained information that shouldn’t be public."

your statement says it was not marked as classified ... this was to get you to believe it was changed by sayin it was then changed ... by you saying "It shouldn’t be public"... this too is a misleading statements from the right, it was said to imply she kept classified information on her server ... the FBI clearly said that it was marked as sensitive in nature, and never was reclassified as classified... so you again supported a lie ... just because of your hate towards dems/linerals and hillary clinton

It's only bullshit if you're a mushroom and have been feeding on the shit you read in Politico.. Check the NY Times.. You'll see the same exact numbers. NOT TWO emails. That's a ploy to bury the story. Politico's JOB is to bury the story and launch an army of mind-numbed droids amongst the public claiming "none of this ever happened".. Good droid --- Down Boy...
 
Hillary Clinton emails increasingly classified; 1 in 20 messages contained secrets - Washington Times

More than 5 percent of the latest batch of emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, released Wednesday, contain classified information — or twice the rate of the previous releases, raising tricky questions about whether the department is finding more secrets or being more thorough in screening the messages.

The emails also show an effort to hack into Mrs. Clinton’s personal account by sending her fake traffic tickets with a Trojan horse file attached. If she had clicked on the file, the hackers could have gained access to her computer.

All told, at least 400 messages out of nearly 12,000 emails released so far contain information that the government now deems classified.

But 214 of those messages came in the latest batch of 3,869 messages, for a classification rate of 5.5 percent.

The messages were not marked classified at the time they were sent — usually in 2010 or 2011, for the latest batch — but the government has gone back and determined that they contained information that shouldn’t be public.

Top Secret rated secure servers don't get phishing and spam emails BullWinkle.. And it's a LOT more than 2 classified messages in question. Why did you ever sell your brain to scam artists like Politico? You need to broaden your reading unless you enjoy mental bondage..
the below statement here is bull shit ... and we know it

All told, at least 400 messages out of nearly 12,000 emails released so far contain information that the government now deems classified."

Never happen and you can show any FBI report that says different

this statement here below is also bull shit... and we know it...

"The messages were not marked classified at the time they were sent — usually in 2010 or 2011, for the latest batch — but the government has gone back and determined that they contained information that shouldn’t be public."

your statement says it was not marked as classified ... this was to get you to believe it was changed by sayin it was then changed ... by you saying "It shouldn’t be public"... this too is a misleading statements from the right, it was said to imply she kept classified information on her server ... the FBI clearly said that it was marked as sensitive in nature, and never was reclassified as classified... so you again supported a lie ... just because of your hate towards dems/linerals and hillary clinton

It's only bullshit if you're a mushroom and have been feeding on the shit you read in Politico.. Check the NY Times.. You'll see the same exact numbers. NOT TWO emails. That's a ploy to bury the story. Politico's JOB is to bury the story and launch an army of mind-numbed droids amongst the public claiming "none of this ever happened".. Good droid --- Down Boy...
Billy is an idiot and belongs on Iggy. He repeats Hillary's talking point that the messages werent marked Classified.
It is irrelevant what they were marked. If they were classified she violated the law. And they were.
 
Hillary Clinton emails increasingly classified; 1 in 20 messages contained secrets - Washington Times

More than 5 percent of the latest batch of emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, released Wednesday, contain classified information — or twice the rate of the previous releases, raising tricky questions about whether the department is finding more secrets or being more thorough in screening the messages.

The emails also show an effort to hack into Mrs. Clinton’s personal account by sending her fake traffic tickets with a Trojan horse file attached. If she had clicked on the file, the hackers could have gained access to her computer.

All told, at least 400 messages out of nearly 12,000 emails released so far contain information that the government now deems classified.

But 214 of those messages came in the latest batch of 3,869 messages, for a classification rate of 5.5 percent.

The messages were not marked classified at the time they were sent — usually in 2010 or 2011, for the latest batch — but the government has gone back and determined that they contained information that shouldn’t be public.

Top Secret rated secure servers don't get phishing and spam emails BullWinkle.. And it's a LOT more than 2 classified messages in question. Why did you ever sell your brain to scam artists like Politico? You need to broaden your reading unless you enjoy mental bondage..
the below statement here is bull shit ... and we know it

All told, at least 400 messages out of nearly 12,000 emails released so far contain information that the government now deems classified."

Never happen and you can show any FBI report that says different

this statement here below is also bull shit... and we know it...

"The messages were not marked classified at the time they were sent — usually in 2010 or 2011, for the latest batch — but the government has gone back and determined that they contained information that shouldn’t be public."

your statement says it was not marked as classified ... this was to get you to believe it was changed by sayin it was then changed ... by you saying "It shouldn’t be public"... this too is a misleading statements from the right, it was said to imply she kept classified information on her server ... the FBI clearly said that it was marked as sensitive in nature, and never was reclassified as classified... so you again supported a lie ... just because of your hate towards dems/linerals and hillary clinton

It's only bullshit if you're a mushroom and have been feeding on the shit you read in Politico.. Check the NY Times.. You'll see the same exact numbers. NOT TWO emails. That's a ploy to bury the story. Politico's JOB is to bury the story and launch an army of mind-numbed droids amongst the public claiming "none of this ever happened".. Good droid --- Down Boy...
as I said, I don't read politico, never have ... the only time I've ever seen anything from politico is when some one post it here ... I realize you're too stupid to understand what I posted ... I get it ... coming from you a half brain dead repub-lie-tard, and yes your post is so full of half truths and innuendo, but mainly total bull shit... like I said you're too stupid and lead around by the nose by your handlers... we get it ... you must love the taste of that koolaid you've been dumb down with ... its just like the lie hillaries email server was kept in a bathroom that too has been shown to be a lie...
 
Hillary Clinton emails increasingly classified; 1 in 20 messages contained secrets - Washington Times

More than 5 percent of the latest batch of emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, released Wednesday, contain classified information — or twice the rate of the previous releases, raising tricky questions about whether the department is finding more secrets or being more thorough in screening the messages.

The emails also show an effort to hack into Mrs. Clinton’s personal account by sending her fake traffic tickets with a Trojan horse file attached. If she had clicked on the file, the hackers could have gained access to her computer.

All told, at least 400 messages out of nearly 12,000 emails released so far contain information that the government now deems classified.

But 214 of those messages came in the latest batch of 3,869 messages, for a classification rate of 5.5 percent.

The messages were not marked classified at the time they were sent — usually in 2010 or 2011, for the latest batch — but the government has gone back and determined that they contained information that shouldn’t be public.

Top Secret rated secure servers don't get phishing and spam emails BullWinkle.. And it's a LOT more than 2 classified messages in question. Why did you ever sell your brain to scam artists like Politico? You need to broaden your reading unless you enjoy mental bondage..
the below statement here is bull shit ... and we know it

All told, at least 400 messages out of nearly 12,000 emails released so far contain information that the government now deems classified."

Never happen and you can show any FBI report that says different

this statement here below is also bull shit... and we know it...

"The messages were not marked classified at the time they were sent — usually in 2010 or 2011, for the latest batch — but the government has gone back and determined that they contained information that shouldn’t be public."

your statement says it was not marked as classified ... this was to get you to believe it was changed by sayin it was then changed ... by you saying "It shouldn’t be public"... this too is a misleading statements from the right, it was said to imply she kept classified information on her server ... the FBI clearly said that it was marked as sensitive in nature, and never was reclassified as classified... so you again supported a lie ... just because of your hate towards dems/linerals and hillary clinton

It's only bullshit if you're a mushroom and have been feeding on the shit you read in Politico.. Check the NY Times.. You'll see the same exact numbers. NOT TWO emails. That's a ploy to bury the story. Politico's JOB is to bury the story and launch an army of mind-numbed droids amongst the public claiming "none of this ever happened".. Good droid --- Down Boy...
Billy is an idiot and belongs on Iggy. He repeats Hillary's talking point that the messages werent marked Classified.
It is irrelevant what they were marked. If they were classified she violated the law. And they were.
show us one email that was marked classified... nobody in the FBI has said they were... so show us all here rabbi how stupid you really are ... we love to watch you implode
 
Well BullWinkle, there have been DOZENS of emails deemed classified on those servers. .

1) Retroactively?
2) Who deemed them classified?

Are you saying she NEVER sent or received an email to/from ANY foreign official?
now this is a stupid question ...what we are saying she never sent a classified email to her private server... if the email became classified after the fact, not her problem

That's not way classified material is handled, treated or secured. Hillary was responsible for KNOWING the classification of material in ANY message that crossed her eyes. REGARDLESS of whether it bears a proper label or not. Every individual protecting a certain security class KNOWS classified info when they read it.

And as Secretary of State -- she was the one to be enforcing the proper discipline for classified material in that organization. NOT --- being an ABUSER of that system..
so now you're a mind reader too ... you're one talented ass hole I would say ... so far not one of her emails have turned up to be called classified and you can't produce anyone in the congress or the fbi that has said they were... not any republican in the house or senate or the FBI has said any of the emails on her server so far has been reclassified and you can't produce one person ...
 
Well BullWinkle, there have been DOZENS of emails deemed classified on those servers. .

1) Retroactively?
2) Who deemed them classified?

Are you saying she NEVER sent or received an email to/from ANY foreign official?
now this is a stupid question ...what we are saying she never sent a classified email to her private server... if the email became classified after the fact, not her problem

That's not way classified material is handled, treated or secured. Hillary was responsible for KNOWING the classification of material in ANY message that crossed her eyes. REGARDLESS of whether it bears a proper label or not. Every individual protecting a certain security class KNOWS classified info when they read it.

And as Secretary of State -- she was the one to be enforcing the proper discipline for classified material in that organization. NOT --- being an ABUSER of that system..
p.s.
we aren't talking about how classified material is handle ... the allegation is that hillary had classified material on her sever ... to date not one has turned up to be classified on her server... and you of all people can't say there is
 
Well BullWinkle, there have been DOZENS of emails deemed classified on those servers. .

1) Retroactively?
2) Who deemed them classified?

Are you saying she NEVER sent or received an email to/from ANY foreign official?
now this is a stupid question ...what we are saying she never sent a classified email to her private server... if the email became classified after the fact, not her problem

That's not way classified material is handled, treated or secured. Hillary was responsible for KNOWING the classification of material in ANY message that crossed her eyes. REGARDLESS of whether it bears a proper label or not. Every individual protecting a certain security class KNOWS classified info when they read it.

And as Secretary of State -- she was the one to be enforcing the proper discipline for classified material in that organization. NOT --- being an ABUSER of that system..
p.s.
we aren't talking about how classified material is handle ... the allegation is that hillary had classified material on her sever ... to date not one has turned up to be classified on her server... and you of all people can't say there is

So you're claiming she never ever contacted any foreign official thorough her email?
 
Well BullWinkle, there have been DOZENS of emails deemed classified on those servers. .

1) Retroactively?
2) Who deemed them classified?

Are you saying she NEVER sent or received an email to/from ANY foreign official?
now this is a stupid question ...what we are saying she never sent a classified email to her private server... if the email became classified after the fact, not her problem

If she had an email exchange with any foreign official, that email is automatically born classified by State Dept protocol. So no, it's not a dumb question, it's a way to demonstrate you idiots have no freaking clue what the hell you're talking about.
If she ran all of her correspondence off her private server how could she possibly do her job without sending or receiving classified emails?
apparently you didn't listen to the benghazi hearing.. her private emails went to her private server that weren't marked as sensitive or classified her classified emails went to a government server ... this was staten in the benghazi hearing by clinton
 

Forum List

Back
Top