idb
Gold Member
- Dec 26, 2010
- 14,968
- 2,565
That's right. THEY didn't dumbass. Iraq is the only place the lib media can correctly say WMD was not found. Can the lib media guarantee you they didn't go somewhere else?
I'll wait for the answer to that.
Crickets.....
Contrary to the neo-conservatard dogma you Wrongpublican bigots love so much, absence of evidence is evidence of absence. Until you can prove Saddam moved nukes to another country--and until you are able to name the specific country they allegedly went to--we enlightened lybyryls must assume that you're blowing smoke.
Or maybe it's not smoke, but rather the steam shooting from your ears after being wrong about Iraq for over a decade.
Really shiphead? You wanna throw the first punch, you freak? Go ahead. I just want to make a note for the record.
Now....back to the real topic. Yes, I expect people of your intellectual disability to do exactly that.
To an intelligent person, there are three potential explanations. Even 10 yr olds can brainstorm this.
They were there but haven't been found in the country we sent troops in to search.
They were not there in the first place.
They were there but were moved.
Let me say this again for you slow dullards.
They were there but haven't been found in the country we sent troops in to search.
They were not there in the first place.
They were there but were moved.
An intelligent person would exhaust all three explanations before shutting the case.
You...being the intellectually challenged that you are...do not follow laws of logic. You follow laws of deceit.
The only steam coming from anyone's ears is you libtards hysterically freaking out as your dumdum hero crashes and burns in the polls and destroys your party for years to come.![]()
No-one's shutting the case.
You're still free to find some WMDs there and show them to the world.
Since you're so keen on logic - only one of your possibilities includes WMDs actually being in Iraq.
One out of three.
It was worthwhile invading a country, destroying it, losing thousands of American lives, spending trillions of dollars, causing the deaths of tens or hundreds of thousands of civilians, setting off a Middle East conflagration that has generally made the world a less safe place for a one in three chance?
Before invading wouldn't it have been better if...maybe...how did YOU put it..."An intelligent person would exhaust all...explanations..."?
How's that for logic?