bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,309
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #761
Secession doesn't require a change in the Constitution.
You just made a statement of belief that is not supported by history and the facts. My comments were a statement of fact established by history.
The OP contains the proof that it is supported by history and the facts.
You have yet to post any facts.
The OP was legal opinion. A person can have a legal opinion and even try and support it but that doesn't mean it is correct or would be seen as sufficient in the eyes of the law.
What I said was a fact.
It wasn't a legal "opinion." It was a legal argument using logic and facts. What you spout in here is opinion. It has no basis in either logic or fact.
I would hope the legal opinion tried to use logic and facts. The problem is that the criteria for establishing if something is legal or not is a little higher than that.
Oh really? You wouldn't know it by reading the latest Court ruling on gay marriage or Obamacare. Those don't even refer to any actual text in the Constitution.
The same goes the Texas v. White ruling your so fond of. It contains outright lies.