Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[
Deflecting again?....Nice try...It doesn't wash.
Lerner did what she did. Those emails are somewhere. Those hard drives were never "disabled"....Eventually all of this will come to the surface for public scrutiny.
You're just pissed because one of yours got soooooooooooooo busted.
Oh, you misused "alternative".....The proper term is "alternate"..As in "other"....
She targeted conservative 501c-4's...It got so thick, she was forced to assign blame. So she kicked the can to Cincinnati. When those people spoke up, Lerner got canned.
Like I said, she is busted and you're just pissed that it can longer be swept under the rug.
yes. she shared her opinion in a private conversation.what makes her an "operative?"Missed the point. Again.
Lerner is a Democratic operative. That she was initially appointed by Bush is irrelevant.
So you dont see any difference between someone who writes a check and someone who calls members of the opposition assholes and crazies? Do you think Lindsay Graham is an asshole and a crazy? What about Boehner? How about Mitch McConnell?
that's what makes her bush appointment relevant. if we are to believe she was maliciously targeting tea party groups because she disagreed with them we have to believe that she somehow kept her bias to herself for 30+ years of government employment and was able to disregard all sense of personal and professional ethics, based on nothing more than political donations and an email where she calls assholes assholes.
and yes, i think there is a difference. there is much more commitment in giving money than there is calling someone an asshole in an email.
She didnt keep her bias to herself. That's the point of this thread. Which...you...missed.
At lest were beyond the pretense that Lerner was apolitical and appointed by Bush.
Do you think there's a difference between writing a check to a political party and referring to the opposite party as assholes and crazies?
that she was appointed by bush is a fact, not a pretense.
as to the second part, no, i don't. those members of extreme groups referenced are assholes and crazies. even apolitical people should think so.
or are we pretending those views are mainstream now?
Missed the point. Again.
Lerner is a Democratic operative. That she was initially appointed by Bush is irrelevant.
So you dont see any difference between someone who writes a check and someone who calls members of the opposition assholes and crazies? Do you think Lindsay Graham is an asshole and a crazy? What about Boehner? How about Mitch McConnell?
[
Deflecting again?....Nice try...It doesn't wash.
Lerner did what she did. Those emails are somewhere. Those hard drives were never "disabled"....Eventually all of this will come to the surface for public scrutiny.
You're just pissed because one of yours got soooooooooooooo busted.
Oh, you misused "alternative".....The proper term is "alternate"..As in "other"....
She targeted conservative 501c-4's...It got so thick, she was forced to assign blame. So she kicked the can to Cincinnati. When those people spoke up, Lerner got canned.
Like I said, she is busted and you're just pissed that it can longer be swept under the rug.
NO, guy, I'm not worried about this. The fact you are leaking blackberry texts of private conversations kinds of smells of desperation. It's like a little kid waving his arms up and down trying to get attention.
Because most people don't really care.
You can pout all day, but unless Holder has a brain fart and appoints a special prosecutor, you got nothing.
[
Deflecting again?....Nice try...It doesn't wash.
Lerner did what she did. Those emails are somewhere. Those hard drives were never "disabled"....Eventually all of this will come to the surface for public scrutiny.
You're just pissed because one of yours got soooooooooooooo busted.
Oh, you misused "alternative".....The proper term is "alternate"..As in "other"....
She targeted conservative 501c-4's...It got so thick, she was forced to assign blame. So she kicked the can to Cincinnati. When those people spoke up, Lerner got canned.
Like I said, she is busted and you're just pissed that it can longer be swept under the rug.
NO, guy, I'm not worried about this. The fact you are leaking blackberry texts of private conversations kinds of smells of desperation. It's like a little kid waving his arms up and down trying to get attention.
Because most people don't really care.
You can pout all day, but unless Holder has a brain fart and appoints a special prosecutor, you got nothing.
And most people don't care because there's nothing to 'care' about there are no facts, no evidence, nothing documented that the president was in any way 'involve' or authorized a 'cover up.'
The only thing they've proven is that like most of the people Bush appointed, Lerner wasn't a particularly good manager.
A least she didn't manage to lose any major cities.
yes. she shared her opinion in a private conversation.what makes her an "operative?"
that's what makes her bush appointment relevant. if we are to believe she was maliciously targeting tea party groups because she disagreed with them we have to believe that she somehow kept her bias to herself for 30+ years of government employment and was able to disregard all sense of personal and professional ethics, based on nothing more than political donations and an email where she calls assholes assholes.
and yes, i think there is a difference. there is much more commitment in giving money than there is calling someone an asshole in an email.
She didnt keep her bias to herself. That's the point of this thread. Which...you...missed.
so... what's the point of the thread? that she had an opinion?
yes. she shared her opinion in a private conversation.She didnt keep her bias to herself. That's the point of this thread. Which...you...missed.
so... what's the point of the thread? that she had an opinion?
An opinion she is not permitted to have.
THAT is the point.
Her bias precluded her from doing her job to the best of her ability.
Had she been a conservative, she would have been dismissed from her job and terminated from ALL federal employment
The only thing they've proven is that like most of the people Bush appointed, Lerner wasn't a particularly good manager.
A least she didn't manage to lose any major cities.
IF she was so bad why didnt Obama fire her?
She obviously did exactly that.
It is absurd to say, We know she had nothing but contempt for conservative Republicans. We know she was under pressure to "do something" about such groups after Citizens United. We know that she had a BOLO list of such groups to subject to extra scrutiny, but there is no evidence it was a politically motivated attempt to suppress such groups.
It boggles the mnd anyone would believe that. It is obvious that is what happened.
And STILL not one of you libs had dared to answer the question put to you. That is "if Lerner had targeted liberal groups, what say you?"....
Lois Lerner, former IRS Chief has had her left leanings exposed in new releases of emails where she refers to conservatives as "assholes" and "crazies"..
Now, as a federal official sworn with the duty of leading a federal dept where by which all are treated equally, Lerner permitted here political bias to influence the manner in which she did her job.
She is well on her way to being prosecuted by Congress and perhaps even faces many civil suits from her victims.
After all the denials by Obama and the circling of the wagons by the complicit media, the commentary of "there is no there there", it seems Lerner and the IRS have a BIG problem.
Ex-IRS Official Called Conservatives 'Crazies - ABC News
Lois Lerner, former IRS Chief has had her left leanings exposed in new releases of emails where she refers to conservatives as "assholes" and "crazies"..
Now, as a federal official sworn with the duty of leading a federal dept where by which all are treated equally, Lerner permitted here political bias to influence the manner in which she did her job.
She is well on her way to being prosecuted by Congress and perhaps even faces many civil suits from her victims.
After all the denials by Obama and the circling of the wagons by the complicit media, the commentary of "there is no there there", it seems Lerner and the IRS have a BIG problem.
Ex-IRS Official Called Conservatives 'Crazies - ABC News
Obviously you and others on the right are oblivious to how desperate and ridiculous you sound.
She obviously did exactly that.
It is absurd to say, We know she had nothing but contempt for conservative Republicans. We know she was under pressure to "do something" about such groups after Citizens United. We know that she had a BOLO list of such groups to subject to extra scrutiny, but there is no evidence it was a politically motivated attempt to suppress such groups.
It boggles the mnd anyone would believe that. It is obvious that is what happened.
Lois Lerner, former IRS Chief has had her left leanings exposed in new releases of emails where she refers to conservatives as "assholes" and "crazies"..
Now, as a federal official sworn with the duty of leading a federal dept where by which all are treated equally, Lerner permitted here political bias to influence the manner in which she did her job.
She is well on her way to being prosecuted by Congress and perhaps even faces many civil suits from her victims.
After all the denials by Obama and the circling of the wagons by the complicit media, the commentary of "there is no there there", it seems Lerner and the IRS have a BIG problem.
Ex-IRS Official Called Conservatives 'Crazies - ABC News
Obviously you and others on the right are oblivious to how desperate and ridiculous you sound.
Throwing out facts and logical theories now is sounding desperate? No, I think it is Democrats desperate to make the whole mess go away. It wont. The more that comes out the harder it is to deny what is obvious: Lerner was operating under orders from Democrats to kneecap conservative drives in the upcoming election by delaying their tax free status applications and subjecting them to unusual levels of scrutiny. That is illegal, btw.
But once it comes out, liberals will be saying, Well these tea party groups are terrorists. We should be suppressing them!
Obviously you and others on the right are oblivious to how desperate and ridiculous you sound.
Throwing out facts and logical theories now is sounding desperate? No, I think it is Democrats desperate to make the whole mess go away. It wont. The more that comes out the harder it is to deny what is obvious: Lerner was operating under orders from Democrats to kneecap conservative drives in the upcoming election by delaying their tax free status applications and subjecting them to unusual levels of scrutiny. That is illegal, btw.
But once it comes out, liberals will be saying, Well these tea party groups are terrorists. We should be suppressing them!
the conspiracy grows! now it's not just her own contempt and decision to disregard personal and professional ethics - now she's taking orders from "democrats" to do so.
