jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 138,839
- 28,955
- 2,180
the burden is on the prosecution, the judge is blind in our justice system.The burden is in the judge. It's the judges job to explain the law.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the burden is on the prosecution, the judge is blind in our justice system.The burden is in the judge. It's the judges job to explain the law.
so anything goes damn the law huh? just as long as it's trump right?
He deserves to be held accountable for his crimes and he was.come on dude, step up and say trump doesn't deserve to be alive. go for it!!! you fking cuck
The prosecutors don't explain the laws, the judge does.the burden is on the prosecution, the judge is blind in our justice system.
it was claimed unprecedented, so how can there be precedence genius?No. Precedent.
what's that have to with burden of proof?The prosecutors don't explain the laws, the judge does.
The judge has an impeccable record and 16 years experience.
You have paid media pundits telling you what you want to hear.
The precedent for the felony escalation is the people vs taveras.it was claimed unprecedented, so how can there be precedence genius?
The jury determined the burden of proof was satisfied when the determined Trump was guilty.what's that have to with burden of proof?
1. Hur didn't say he couldn't get a conviction. He said a jury would have a hard time convicting someone as pathetic as old Joe Biden.I choose because he didn't think he could get a conviction...which is what Hurr said.
I disagree. That doesn't even make sense.Pedophilia is a serious crime...one of the most serious. Showering with your 3 old daughter isn't even illegal.
Your logic is seriously flawed.
Encounters means both.
1. Hur didn't say he couldn't get a conviction. He said a jury would have a hard time convicting someone as pathetic as old Joe Biden.
2. Child molester fits if you don't like pedophile.
![]()
Did Joe Biden Molest His Daughter Ashley Biden? Speculations After Personal Diary of 'Sex Addict' Daughter Reveals He Showered With Her
Ashley Biden's diary was found by a woman who moved into her old house in Palm Springs, Florida.www.ibtimes.sg
Yep taken into custody.3. Encounters mean taken into custody by CBP. What happens depends on the president.
1. Joe Biden let 12,000,000 illegals into the US.
2.Trump deported them to Mexico
![]()
Biden administration officially ends Trump's 'remain in Mexico' asylum policy
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said the controversial policy did "not adequately or sustainably enhance border management."www.nbcnews.com
Mark Levin said the USSC can review if a legal 'Writ" is written.Again, that isn't what he said...but the essence is the same. Yes, he didn't think a GJ would indict him.
Posting an opinion piece of someone else who agrees with you without proof is not an argument.
Yep taken into custody.
Let's get back to the thread topic.
I will discuss any of your off topic grievances in an appropriate thread, new or old. Just send me a message or post a link here. Thanks.
Your quoted document is actually a court reply to defense filings/motions. It also highlights Merchan's denial to reveal the 'secret' charges.No. Felonies. They were in the first degree, not the second.
My point is the claim that nobody knows the underlying crimes, as espoused by Trump, is nonsense. Trump's team knew back in February.Your quoted document is actually a court reply to defense filings/motions. It also highlights Merchan's denial to reveal the 'secret' charges.
These are the motions that defense will base any appeals on.
So what's your point?
Then why did Merchan deny their request to list the particulars. Then why did media on both sides of the aisle, for weeks, say the same thing about these mystery charges? And why, even now it still is being claimed.M
My point is the claim that nobody knows the underlying crimes, as espoused by Trump, is nonsense. Trump's team knew back in February.
Why would Trump claim he doesn't know the crimes when his team responded to the motions months before the trial?
Why do so many Trump supporters claim nobody knew/knows the crimes?
Then why did Merchan deny their request to list the particulars.
Then why did media on both sides of the aisle, for weeks, say the same thing about these mystery charges? And why, even now it still is being claimed.
It's no big scoop. It simply renders your claim that the judge didn't tell Trump or his team what the predicate crimes were and spotlights Trump's lie that he didn't know what the crimes were.To think you have some big scoop here is laughable.
Your information.........page 25 I think. So you didn't read your own link? Only 30 pages.Link please.
Well His defense didn't, that's about all that matters.Because Trump tweeted it.
Your information.........page 25 I think. So you didn't read your own link? Only 30 pages.
They are in the court document.Well His defense didn't, that's about all that matters.
Where you going with this?If the Trump team didn't even read the responses to the motions filed...well, to put it lightly, that's Trumps team's problem.
SCOTUS shouldn’t be making decisions for partisan political reasons.That would be a good outcome before the election.
No one is above the Law and no one is below the Law.SCOTUS shouldn’t be making decisions for partisan political reasons.