Is CNN an arm of the Democrat/Progressive party? They sure appear to be....

Damn CNN lies lol
HYPOCRITES
In case you missed it, CNN recently dug up video footage(1999) of GOP Senators Mitch McConnell(KY), Lindsey Graham(SC), and Chuck Grassley(IA) explaining their reasons for supporting President Bill Clinton’s impeachment. Listening to the explanations given by Senators McConnell, Graham and Grassley in support of Clinton’s impeachment in 1999 and considering the fact that all of them are now staunch defenders, even abetters of President Trump who is accused of doing ...
See More
Bill Clinton broke the law. President Trump hasn’t broken any law. Idiot. :eusa_doh:

“Butthurt voter” isn’t grounds for impeachment, snowflake.
 
Fox News is the Right Wing media outlet...

MSNBC is the Left Wing media outlet...

CNN formerly played it down the middle, however...

Funding sources for CNN have changed...

With the advent of Cuomo, Lemon, et al, political impartiality has gone out the window...
 
CNN formerly played it down the middle, however...
91BF58E9-DBDC-4390-BA05-AEA32E6689D6.gif
 
THIS IS CNN: Reporter helps Kamala Harris try on clothes during campaign stop - The American Mirror


Instead of covering the candidate for president they decide to help her shop for clothes. Hard hitting journalism right there folks!

View attachment 246475
That's not even debatable anymore. During prime time, they are at 100% negative coverage of Donald Trump. They are Democratic Party meat puppets who take their talking points for the day directly from the Party that owns them.
 
...That's not even debatable anymore. During prime time, they are at 100% negative coverage of Donald Trump. They are Democratic Party meat puppets who take their talking points for the day directly from the Party that owns them.
Not to worry.

Faux News has its nose so far up DJT's arse that they make up for it.
 
CNN formerly played it down the middle,

Biggest load of bullshit I've seen in awhile on here.

CNN was NEVER a down the middle station.
CNN bends over backward to not offend Trump. It’s pathetic. They hired his dumbass advisors like Stephen Moore, Kayleigh McEnany, Jeffrey Lord, Paris Dennard, and Rick Fucking Santorum. They always frame stories to give Trump the benefit of the doubt, or subconsciously validate him, like this:

Jon Voight: Oscar winner calls Trump the greatest president since Lincoln - CNNPolitics

Why ‘Oscar winner’ instead of ‘Actor’?
 
Damn CNN lies lol
HYPOCRITES
In case you missed it, CNN recently dug up video footage(1999) of GOP Senators Mitch McConnell(KY), Lindsey Graham(SC), and Chuck Grassley(IA) explaining their reasons for supporting President Bill Clinton’s impeachment. Listening to the explanations given by Senators McConnell, Graham and Grassley in support of Clinton’s impeachment in 1999 and considering the fact that all of them are now staunch defenders, even abetters of President Trump who is accused of doing ...
See More
Bill Clinton broke the law. President Trump hasn’t broken any law. Idiot. :eusa_doh:

“Butthurt voter” isn’t grounds for impeachment, snowflake.
MORON 900 prosecutors said if he wasn't president the crimes laid at his feet would put him in jail He's a scumbag ,,,a republican ,,but I repeat myself
 
Damn CNN lies lol
HYPOCRITES
In case you missed it, CNN recently dug up video footage(1999) of GOP Senators Mitch McConnell(KY), Lindsey Graham(SC), and Chuck Grassley(IA) explaining their reasons for supporting President Bill Clinton’s impeachment. Listening to the explanations given by Senators McConnell, Graham and Grassley in support of Clinton’s impeachment in 1999 and considering the fact that all of them are now staunch defenders, even abetters of President Trump who is accused of doing ...
See More
Bill Clinton broke the law. President Trump hasn’t broken any law. Idiot. :eusa_doh:

“Butthurt voter” isn’t grounds for impeachment, snowflake.
MORON 900 prosecutors said if he wasn't president the crimes laid at his feet would put him in jail He's a scumbag ,,,a republican ,,but I repeat myself

They would not put him in jail, but would indict. All 900 would lose in court. There was no underlying crime. Firing Mueller for perceived "bias" would not have ended the investigation, Rod Rosenstein would have appointed an "unbiased" prosecutor. No matter how you look at it the deep state are the criminals with their coup attempts.
 
Damn CNN lies lol
HYPOCRITES
In case you missed it, CNN recently dug up video footage(1999) of GOP Senators Mitch McConnell(KY), Lindsey Graham(SC), and Chuck Grassley(IA) explaining their reasons for supporting President Bill Clinton’s impeachment. Listening to the explanations given by Senators McConnell, Graham and Grassley in support of Clinton’s impeachment in 1999 and considering the fact that all of them are now staunch defenders, even abetters of President Trump who is accused of doing ...
See More
Bill Clinton broke the law. President Trump hasn’t broken any law. Idiot. :eusa_doh:

“Butthurt voter” isn’t grounds for impeachment, snowflake.
MORON 900 prosecutors said if he wasn't president the crimes laid at his feet would put him in jail He's a scumbag ,,,a republican ,,but I repeat myself

They would not put him in jail, but would indict. All 900 would lose in court. There was no underlying crime. Firing Mueller for perceived "bias" would not have ended the investigation, Rod Rosenstein would have appointed an "unbiased" prosecutor. No matter how you look at it the deep state are the criminals with their coup attempts.
If what you say had an OUNCE of truth to it you'd call Barr a pos and in Trumps pocket ,,and instead you call Barr unbiased
 
Damn CNN lies lol
HYPOCRITES
In case you missed it, CNN recently dug up video footage(1999) of GOP Senators Mitch McConnell(KY), Lindsey Graham(SC), and Chuck Grassley(IA) explaining their reasons for supporting President Bill Clinton’s impeachment. Listening to the explanations given by Senators McConnell, Graham and Grassley in support of Clinton’s impeachment in 1999 and considering the fact that all of them are now staunch defenders, even abetters of President Trump who is accused of doing ...
See More
Bill Clinton broke the law. President Trump hasn’t broken any law. Idiot. :eusa_doh:

“Butthurt voter” isn’t grounds for impeachment, snowflake.
MORON 900 prosecutors said if he wasn't president the crimes laid at his feet would put him in jail He's a scumbag ,,,a republican ,,but I repeat myself

They would not put him in jail, but would indict. All 900 would lose in court. There was no underlying crime. Firing Mueller for perceived "bias" would not have ended the investigation, Rod Rosenstein would have appointed an "unbiased" prosecutor. No matter how you look at it the deep state are the criminals with their coup attempts.
If what you say had an OUNCE of truth to it you'd call Barr a pos and in Trumps pocket ,,and instead you call Barr unbiased

Barr is a true professional. The fact that Trump was attacked by the deep state seems to have escaped you. The truth is still unfolding. Somehow I don't think that you will accept it. Yet if Mueller had proven that Trump had conspired we would have impeached and removed him. So if Trump is proven innocent, and the deep state guilty, will you accept that, or are you simply too partisan?
 
CNN formerly played it down the middle,

Biggest load of bullshit I've seen in awhile on here.

CNN was NEVER a down the middle station.
We will have to agree to disagree about that.

To my way of thinking, CNN took a hard left turn somewhere in the 2002-2004 time frame, as Iraq unfolded.

Before that, I would have trusted their op-ed pieces far more than either Faux or MessyNBC.

But... maybe that's just me.
 
THIS IS CNN: Reporter helps Kamala Harris try on clothes during campaign stop - The American Mirror


Instead of covering the candidate for president they decide to help her shop for clothes. Hard hitting journalism right there folks!

View attachment 246475
If she thinks that Harris is going to win, this is likely an attempted suck up for press secretary job? Who knows.

I sure would be interested in seeing the paychecks of all the CNN employees. I wonder how much of their money comes from the DNC?

Perhaps they should disclose their tax returns, eh?
 
THIS IS CNN: Reporter helps Kamala Harris try on clothes during campaign stop - The American Mirror


Instead of covering the candidate for president they decide to help her shop for clothes. Hard hitting journalism right there folks!

View attachment 246475
THIS IS CNN: Reporter helps Kamala Harris try on clothes during campaign stop - The American Mirror


Instead of covering the candidate for president they decide to help her shop for clothes. Hard hitting journalism right there folks!

View attachment 246475
Bullshit

Last week, for example, we learned that Sarah Isgur Flores, a GOP operative who has never worked as a journalist, will be joining CNN as one of the network’s political editors. The exact contours of Isgur’s role remain unclear ― in part because of CNN’s lack of transparency in discussing her position ― but it appears she will be helping to shape the political coverage of an outlet whose agenda-setting power plays a part in determining which stories receive national attention and how they are covered.

The arguments against CNN’s bizarre move are legion: Isgur is a longtime Republican political operative who most recently served as a spokesperson for former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, a position she gained after personally pledging her loyalty to the president. She has no experience in journalism, yet her job will now be helping to guide its production, and she previously denounced the network as the “Clinton News Network.” In her role at the Justice Department, she defended the administration’s war on leakers — and now will be working with reporters who have confidential government sources; her variety of conflicts of interest have forced CNN to silo her off from vast swaths of political news.

For CNN, though, the appeal is simple: It “strongly suggests that the network’s big thinkers — including head honcho Jeff Zucker — are aiming for a kind of false fairness: a defensive, both-sides-are-equal kind of political coverage that inevitably fails to serve the voting public,” The Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan wrote last week.

CNN has consistently failed to grapple with its unique vulnerability to this form of false balance. The coverage favors stories about optics, scandal and the political horse race over policy.
Cable News Learned Nothing From 2016. Sarah Isgur's Hire Is Proof. | HuffPost

Liberal media my ass.
Too funny.

ONE token Republican -- not even a conservative -- who has been given a job that is nothing more than window dressing, and you take this as a betrayal that CNN is not liberal. The problem is, CNN was never liberal. They have always been full blown progressive. BTW, the writer outted himself with the line, "are aiming for a kind of false fairness: a defensive, both-sides-are-equal kind of political coverage that inevitably fails to serve the voting public,”

Fairness in coverage is now 'false' because we know that progressives have no use for people who have a different world view from their own.
 
After George Bush whooped the Dem's ass twice the liberal media came out openly 100% biased in favor of Dems and have been trying to rig elections for them ever since.
 
THIS IS CNN: Reporter helps Kamala Harris try on clothes during campaign stop - The American Mirror


Instead of covering the candidate for president they decide to help her shop for clothes. Hard hitting journalism right there folks!

View attachment 246475
THIS IS CNN: Reporter helps Kamala Harris try on clothes during campaign stop - The American Mirror


Instead of covering the candidate for president they decide to help her shop for clothes. Hard hitting journalism right there folks!

View attachment 246475
Bullshit

Last week, for example, we learned that Sarah Isgur Flores, a GOP operative who has never worked as a journalist, will be joining CNN as one of the network’s political editors. The exact contours of Isgur’s role remain unclear ― in part because of CNN’s lack of transparency in discussing her position ― but it appears she will be helping to shape the political coverage of an outlet whose agenda-setting power plays a part in determining which stories receive national attention and how they are covered.

The arguments against CNN’s bizarre move are legion: Isgur is a longtime Republican political operative who most recently served as a spokesperson for former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, a position she gained after personally pledging her loyalty to the president. She has no experience in journalism, yet her job will now be helping to guide its production, and she previously denounced the network as the “Clinton News Network.” In her role at the Justice Department, she defended the administration’s war on leakers — and now will be working with reporters who have confidential government sources; her variety of conflicts of interest have forced CNN to silo her off from vast swaths of political news.

For CNN, though, the appeal is simple: It “strongly suggests that the network’s big thinkers — including head honcho Jeff Zucker — are aiming for a kind of false fairness: a defensive, both-sides-are-equal kind of political coverage that inevitably fails to serve the voting public,” The Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan wrote last week.

CNN has consistently failed to grapple with its unique vulnerability to this form of false balance. The coverage favors stories about optics, scandal and the political horse race over policy.
Cable News Learned Nothing From 2016. Sarah Isgur's Hire Is Proof. | HuffPost

Liberal media my ass.
Too funny.

ONE token Republican -- not even a conservative -- who has been given a job that is nothing more than window dressing, and you take this as a betrayal that CNN is not liberal. The problem is, CNN was never liberal. They have always been full blown progressive. BTW, the writer outted himself with the line, "are aiming for a kind of false fairness: a defensive, both-sides-are-equal kind of political coverage that inevitably fails to serve the voting public,”

Fairness in coverage is now 'false' because we know that progressives have no use for people who have a different world view from their own.
You don’t realize no media that is corporate controlled is liberal or progressive. They are liberal about what they want to be liberal about. Otherwise they are rinos and corporate democrats.

Those corporatists are not really telling you everything . Just what they want to tell you.

By the way, they use those liberal stories to get you to show up and vote every two years but tells liberal minded people hillary is no different than trump. Doubletalk lies and bullshit
 

Forum List

Back
Top