Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You love waiting till you know who will win to vote, and call yourself a winner all the time, and think you must be an intellectual giant, hint you are not. The biggest part of it all is you are actually a sniveling coward who refuses to think for yourselfIndeed, I'm well-aware of the Limbaugh influence on you sheep. You just love being told what to think.
The funny thing is, I'm a far better capitalist than YOU could ever DREAM of being.
LOL. That's funny. So, you are against a fair trial and if you don't get what you want, you will scream the trial wasn't fair.Yes, if acquitted by a unanimous jury. Of course.
Again, I think you confuse the Trump cult with us normal people.
Oh come on. Plenty of evidence in MI and GA he broke the law. Probably AZ too. Fake electors? Not turning over classified documents, then lying to FBI agents. You think this is all because they are out to get him and he's innocent?That's really big of you. Not everyone can admit that they don't want a man who broke no laws to not to go to prison. Hating the orange man is SOP, isn't it?
Quite correct. Trump will get no more of a fair trail in those deep blue cities. Just like Biden, Hillary etc would not get a fair trial in Wyoming or rural Idaho.and find a jury in a dark blue city where not one of the jurors was biased against Trump and have a judge who was not biased against Trump? I find that highly unlikely. Is an accused person still forced to stand trial even if it is obvious that they can't have a fair trial? If so, then we have the definition of a kangaroo court.
Anything is theoretically possible.and find a jury in a dark blue city where not one of the jurors was biased against Trump and have a judge who was not biased against Trump? I find that highly unlikely. Is an accused person still forced to stand trial even if it is obvious that they can't have a fair trial? If so, then we have the definition of a kangaroo court.
A lot of it will actually have to do with the judge. In the EJ Carroll case the judge allowed the prosecution free reign to do just about anything they wanted while squashing just about everything Trump lawyers wanted.Anything is theoretically possible.
But the odds are very much against a fair trial.
Even a fair judge cannot stem a tsunami of biased prospective jurors.A lot of it will actually have to do with the judge. In the EJ Carroll case the judge allowed the prosecution free rein to do just about anything they wanted while squashing just about everything Trump lawyers wanted.
I didn't state or imply anything like that. I said he will almost certainly get a fair trial, and i would still feel it was fair even after an acquittal.LOL. That's funny. So, you are against a fair trial and if you don't get what you want, you will scream the trial wasn't fair.
He almost certainly will not get a fair trial, especially in DC. numb nutsI didn't state or imply anything like that. I said he will almost certainly get a fair trial, and i would still feel it was fair even after an acquittal.
Pay attention, numbnuts.
Of course he will.He almost certainly will not get a fair trial, especially in DC. numb nuts
If I were them I would demand the investigation of all jurors and alternates for bias. Just answering questions is not good enough.Even a fair judge cannot stem a tsunami of biased prospective jurors.
Jury selection is gonna be a bitch for team Trump.
Why "of course?" Where is the evidence that Dims give a damn about justice? They certainly haven't demonstrated it in here. Dims are fucking NAZIs who conduct show trials and lock up their political opponents. They demonstrated their interest in fairness with the ridiculous Jan 6 hearing with no committee members chosen by Republicans.Of course he will.
Just because you cultists would break the law to convict your enemies doesn't mean normal people are like that.
I literally answered that question in the second sentence of my post.Why "of course?"
I think the majority of what is driving this is exactly that, and why I've said that if he had just announced he was retiring from politics and never running again, the charges would have evaporated "for the good of the nation". Heck, they may have even directed Quid Pro Joe to pardon him for anything he might be in trouble for. As for jail, I don't think that's in the cards because no one has even claimed he should lose his SS detail, and it would be virtually impossible for them to do their jobs in a prison. No, I think the worst he will get is a fine and MAYBE house arrest in very opulent surroundings for a few months.
No, it's not possible.and find a jury in a dark blue city where not one of the jurors was biased against Trump and have a judge who was not biased against Trump? I find that highly unlikely. Is an accused person still forced to stand trial even if it is obvious that they can't have a fair trial? If so, then we have the definition of a kangaroo court.
Yes, you do.What freakish delusion. Cultists live in an alternate reality.
Since this is all you whiners have, I wnr give you a hard time.Yes, you do.
And you would get laughed out of the courtroom.If I were them I would demand the investigation of all jurors and alternates for bias. Just answering questions is not good enough.
That's what appeals are for. In a case like this, the first verdict is far from the last. And, quite frankly, it only takes one to have a hung jury, so there's that.And you would get laughed out of the courtroom.
Like I said... you cultists live in an alternate reality.
And this would get laughed out of court on appeal. You would need some sort of overwhelming, concrete evidence of a juror's bias.That's what appeals are for.
