Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 96,224
- 71,673
- 3,645
And you would get laughed out of the room.I would ask for a bench trial because then only the Judge could be held accountable, and any funny games would be blindingly obvious.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And you would get laughed out of the room.I would ask for a bench trial because then only the Judge could be held accountable, and any funny games would be blindingly obvious.
And you would get laughed out of the room.
You get tried where you broke the law. Trump should have thought about that way before now.and find a jury in a dark blue city where not one of the jurors was biased against Trump and have a judge who was not biased against Trump? I find that highly unlikely. Is an accused person still forced to stand trial even if it is obvious that they can't have a fair trial? If so, then we have the definition of a kangaroo court.
hmm were any of these criminals standing up in the house, or senate denying electoral votes for Bush's or trumps presidency criminals?
There are a whole lot of indictments which can be done off of that video.Wait, what, I thought this was why Trump was on Trial!
What freakish delusion. Cultists live in an alternate reality.There are a whole lot of indictments which can be done off of that video.
So you are a scumbag hypocrite, tell us something we didn't know douche nozelIrrelevant to whether your MAGA Dear Leader is going down in the criminal law courts.
That's really big of you. Not everyone can admit that they don't want a man who broke no laws to not to go to prison. Hating the orange man is SOP, isn't it?I only care that he loses the election because of this.
Not sure why but I don't want him to go to jail. He should, but I think sending him into exile is enough.
That's 100% accurate. Many of the laws that apply to Republicans don't apply to Democrats all the ones they indicted Trump for, for exampleThank you for another wildly inaccurate false equivalence. You've really contributed to the discussion on a high level.
Negativeyea but so was everyone else. Trump had the luxury of saying he never did it because he was never a politician. But as soon as he got into office, he did it too.
Shut up commie, we already are saying it'd riggedIf he's convicted of anything, he and his sheep will say it was rigged.
Just like the 2020 election. Just like the 2016 primary loss to Cruz. Just like when he didn't win the Emmy in 2017.
His profoundly damaged little ego won't allow it, and his sheep will follow along as always. Proof won't be needed, as usual.
Of course you are. That's cultism for ya.Shut up commie, we already are saying it'd rigged
LOL. And, you would still think that if Trump isn't convicted of anything?Of course it is possible. It's nearly certain.
Maybe Trump cultists are willing to break the law and their oaths and send innocent people to prison. But normal people are not like this.
You bow at the altar of Moloch!Of course you are. That's cultism for ya.
Shut up commie
Negative, they will riot in the streets just like their globalist masters tell them toLOL. And, you would still think that if Trump isn't convicted of anything?
I completley understand you, Rush talked about people like you all the time
Indeed, I'm well-aware of the Limbaugh influence on you sheep. You just love being told what to think.I completley understand you, Rush talked about people like you all the time
The thing is, all Americans, including Trump, have the right not to be victims of abusive litigation just because someone doesn't like you or seeks revenge on you.The stage is set. One group is convinced the game is already rigged and no guilty verdict is valid while another group is convinced that there can only be one acceptable verdict and will complain it's not valid (the jury didn't have enough haters on it, the judge is in on a conspiracy, the prosecution was lousy, etc.) if TRUMP! is NOT convicted. In fact, they'll lose their little minds if they don't get to see pictures of him in an orange jumpsuit (that aren't photoshopped, they're already panting over those). Either way, there's likely to be blood in the streets or howling at the clouds, or both. These verdicts will be more divisive than OJ's.
Give it break, people. Your lives won't change one way or the other because of these trials. Of course, it could be argued that the coming devastation of the US wouldn't be as bad if Quid Pro and Cackles had to leave office, but that's another argument.
Yes, if acquitted by a unanimous jury. Of course.LOL. And, you would still think that if Trump isn't convicted of anything?