Is the Jack Smith indictment of Donald Trump "Election Interference"? (Poll)

[Blisterfinger]

No, either should Pence.
THEY cooperated and were honest.

Trump WASN'T.

So Biden didn't break the law by keeping those classified documents for a decade? Taking them in the first place?

 

[Marener]

For instance, who authorized DoJ to open this case? NARA can’t, and Joe says he didn’t…

The DoJ doesn’t need authorization to open the case. They just need reasonable suspicion that laws were broken.

That’s not an unanswered question.

 

[GWV5903]

That is what Top Secret means

Again, provide facts that CLASSIFIED, not UNCLASSIFIED docs were in his possession, I understand facts are not something you can get your hands on…

 

[Skylar]

The PRA was written after the Espionage Act.
The PRA governs ALL presidential records, period.

So no where in the PRA does it say that ex-presidents are exempt from the Espionage act. The Espionage Act is never even mentioned by the PRA.

You lied.

If your argument had merit, you wouldn't have had to lie.

 

[Skylar]

Again, provide facts that CLASSIFIED, not UNCLASSIFIED docs were in his possession, I understand facts are not something you can get your hands on…

Trump lamenting about how he didn't declassify a doc he was showing a staffer in a transcript of a recording in his indictment.

There is no record of any of the documents seized at Mar-a-lago having been declassified.Trump claimed there was a standing order to automatically declassify any document he took.

If even ONE of the documents he took was classified, then there was no such such standing order.

And Trump admitted that the doc he was showing off to a staffer.....hadn't been declassified.

Ignore as you will. Your willful ignorance won't matter.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Are you really this stupid?

You seem to be.

There’s nothing here, it will be another futile attempt to bring him down and again he will prevail...

Juries will decide that.

You’re part of the problem, you’re like cancer, how do you justify this nonsense?

So...............You can't read?
I explained why.

Go away, the majority of Americans don’t want you here!!

No, just teabaggers, like their dear leader, they can't stand the truth.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

How did he endanger this country? Can you provide facts or did you pull this out of thin air?

WTF?
Keeping documents in a club.
Where anyone can wander into the ballroom or the bathroom and read or copy any document they wish.
Trump may as well kept them at a shopping mall, with the amount of people, that had weddings, parties, meetings, fundraisers and other functions there.

You really ARE that stupid.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Donald Trump is a leading presidential candidate for the 2024 election.

President: general election : 2024 Polls

The latest political polls and polling averages from FiveThirtyEight.

projects.fivethirtyeight.com

By indicting Trump now Jack Smith is potentially removing the leading 2024 presidential candidate from voters.

Can the judge postpone or dismiss the indictment charges to be sure that the electorate can vote for their preferred president?

Lets take a poll, especially considering the past democrat charges against Trump (Russian collusion, the Steele Dossier, Operations Crossfire-Hurricane and Crossfire Razor, the FBI Gestapo paying Twitter & FB to censor the Biden laptop story, the CIA lying about the laptop calling it Russian Disinformation scamming 2020 voters, and the MSM's constant 95% negative coverage of Trump, but covering up for Biden, etc. You all know that "the LAW" is being subverted in favor of democrats.

Otherwise all presidential candidates would get some kind of immunity.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

So Biden didn't break the law by keeping those classified documents for a decade?

Yes.

Taking them in the first place?

Yes.

So ...................?

 

[j-mac]

Lock her up

Lock him up

 

[j-mac]

The DoJ doesn’t need authorization to open the case. They just need reasonable suspicion that laws were broken.

That’s not an unanswered question.

Wrong….The NRA is not a criminal statute. So, Joe is lying….as usual.

 

[kyzr]

So no where in the PRA does it say that ex-presidents are exempt from the Espionage act. The Espionage Act is never even mentioned by the PRA.
You lied. If your argument had merit, you wouldn't have had to lie.

Lindsay Graham, an ex-Navy JAG lawyer and a US Senator said to George Stephanopolous that charging Trump via the Espionage Act was total bullshit.
I never said that ex-presidents are "exempt" from the EA, but the PRA should cover NARA document possession issues.
Bill Barr said that Trump is toast, so it looks bad for the Trump team...except he isn't losing any votes???
That is amazing. Trump is gaining support, not losing it.

 

[kyzr]

Otherwise all presidential candidates would get some kind of immunity.

Arresting your leading opponent is "banana republic" stuff. It cuts both ways.

 

[j-mac]

Lindsay Graham, an ex-Navy JAG lawyer and a US Senator said to George Stephanopolous that charging Trump via the Espionage Act was total bullshit.
I never said that ex-presidents are "exempt" from the EA, but the PRA should cover NARA document possession issues.
Bill Barr said that Trump is toast, so it looks bad for the Trump team...except he isn't losing any votes???
That is amazing. Trump is gaining support, not losing it.

 

[rightwinger]

Lindsay Graham, an ex-Navy JAG lawyer and a US Senator said to George Stephanopolous that charging Trump via the Espionage Act was total bullshit.
I never said that ex-presidents are "exempt" from the EA, but the PRA should cover NARA document possession issues.
Bill Barr said that Trump is toast, so it looks bad for the Trump team...except he isn't losing any votes???
That is amazing. Trump is gaining support, not losing it.

Trump is gaining support among those who already vote for him.
With more indictments on the way, Trumps campaign is about nothing but victimhood and how unfair everyone is to him.

I don’t think this will convince the 84 million who voted against him in 2020 to change their minds

 

[rightwinger]

Arresting your leading opponent is "banana republic" stuff. It cuts both ways.

And what do you call demanding Ukraine come up with evidence against your leading opponent?

 

[berg80]

Is the Jack Smith indictment of Donald Trump "Election Interference"?​

There's a counter to that question. It goes something like this. Are the unproven China/Burisma allegations made against President Biden by Repubs and right wing media "election interference?"

 

[kyzr]

Trump is gaining support among those who already vote for him.
With more indictments on the way, Trumps campaign is about nothing but victimhood and how unfair everyone is to him.
I don’t think this will convince the 84 million who voted against him in 2020 to change their minds

Trump is also winning independents who see that the DOJ is being weaponized against Republicans.

If the 81m who voted for BIDEN in 2020 vote for him again, it just shows how dumb they are.

That's why we have elections. To give voters a chance to go from the wrong track to the right track.

 

[kyzr]

And what do you call demanding Ukraine come up with evidence against your leading opponent?

Oppo research. Like when Hillary paid Russians for dirt on Trump, the "Steele Dossier".
Except Biden actually took bribes from (Burisma?) Ukraine, and the Steele Dossier was bullshit.

 

[kyzr]

Is the Jack Smith indictment of Donald Trump "Election Interference"?​

There's a counter to that question. It goes something like this. Are the unproven China/Burisma allegations made against President Biden by Repubs and right wing media "election interference?"

Unproven? That 1023 proves it.

That the FBI Gestapo is covering up for Biden, like they did in 2020, calling Hunter's laptop "Russian Disinformation" is major ""election interference".