Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"I expect to see some interesting, and completely idiotic responses!"
The above quoted is truly idiotic.
The 'confederate' flag has not been 'banned.'
Consequently the thread premise fails as a false comparison fallacy.
The ignorance and stupidity of the thread premise is monumental, a failure of galactic proportions.
Citizens are at liberty to display the 'confederate' flag in any venue they so desire, just as Muslims are at liberty to practice their faith – both immune from attack by the state.
Stupid, moronic, idiotic thread.
That's OK... how many citizens has that flagged killed?....I can give you a BODY COUNT of muslim murders!
Dear Vigilante
When the large Buddha statues were destroyed by the Taliban, the world historians cried out at a loss of priceless cultural history,
but this did not cause religious insult to the Buddhist leaders or followers who do not depend on this as any kind of icon or idol.
Same with the removal of the Confederate symbols. The Constitutionalists, states rights, and other groups will continue on and do not rely on these flags.
However, the Muslims do rely on their Quran, and their prayers. If you ban those, you do disrupt the
free exercise of religion of innocent citizens who did nothing to be "deprived of liberty without due process."
I agree with you that it is wrong to send the hate message that "all followers" of a certain ideology are to be punished and demonized for the actions of a few.
As for removing something out of respect, if they AGREE to it that is being civil.
Just like the Muslim group that agreed to back down after protests over their mosques,
they had the right to build and practice their faith anywhere, but out of respect for the
9/11 ground zero site, if people asked to refrain from promoting their mosque near there,
it is just being civil to respect the wishes of the public.
Legally they could have fought it, but if I were their lawyers I would recommend they back off.
And if they developed any display near the WTC, I would suggest a Constitutional historic memorial
and include all the victims, first responders and emergency personnel. Islamic teachings include
natural laws and democratic govt, so that theme would be inclusive and not divisive.
It is just Common Sense to work with people, and be sensitive to both sides,
and I believe our Constitutional laws require us to be equally inclusive and protect all interests.
I would recommend redressing all grievances and solving these conflicts fully, instead of
letting them fester, and arise over and over, because the process wasn't finished by consensus.
Send them all back to Saudi Arabia who has more MONEY than brains, and can take care of their brothers...instead of us, we have ENOUGH with illegal Hispanics!
It's this sort of ignorance, hate, and bigotry that manifests as a reign of terror, not Islam.The flag had been protested against 10 years prior to it's removal...
Islam has been protested against for 1400 years of it's reign of terror.
Dear Vigilante
When the large Buddha statues were destroyed by the Taliban, the world historians cried out at a loss of priceless cultural history,
but this did not cause religious insult to the Buddhist leaders or followers who do not depend on this as any kind of icon or idol.
Same with the removal of the Confederate symbols. The Constitutionalists, states rights, and other groups will continue on and do not rely on these flags.
However, the Muslims do rely on their Quran, and their prayers. If you ban those, you do disrupt the
free exercise of religion of innocent citizens who did nothing to be "deprived of liberty without due process."
I agree with you that it is wrong to send the hate message that "all followers" of a certain ideology are to be punished and demonized for the actions of a few.
As for removing something out of respect, if they AGREE to it that is being civil.
Just like the Muslim group that agreed to back down after protests over their mosques,
they had the right to build and practice their faith anywhere, but out of respect for the
9/11 ground zero site, if people asked to refrain from promoting their mosque near there,
it is just being civil to respect the wishes of the public.
Legally they could have fought it, but if I were their lawyers I would recommend they back off.
And if they developed any display near the WTC, I would suggest a Constitutional historic memorial
and include all the victims, first responders and emergency personnel. Islamic teachings include
natural laws and democratic govt, so that theme would be inclusive and not divisive.
It is just Common Sense to work with people, and be sensitive to both sides,
and I believe our Constitutional laws require us to be equally inclusive and protect all interests.
I would recommend redressing all grievances and solving these conflicts fully, instead of
letting them fester, and arise over and over, because the process wasn't finished by consensus.
Send them all back to Saudi Arabia who has more MONEY than brains, and can take care of their brothers...instead of us, we have ENOUGH with illegal Hispanics!
Dear Vigilante
Let's distinguish the law-abiding citizens who comply with DUE PROCESS under Constitutional standards,
vs. people who act like terrorist vigilantes and issue punishments without due process.
If you fall under the group that would punish people without due process to prove they deserve to lose rights,
you land in the same category as terrorists who don't follow Constitutional laws.
That's fine, you and others like you can be in one group and make laws for yourselves
if you share the same disdain for "due process" and "equal protection of the laws."
You are right about "illegals" in that nobody should be afforded privileges in the US
who hasn't first agreed and been trained to follow the laws of the land.
To be a "lawful" citizen should require Constitutional education and training.
And unfortunately, even our Presidents with Harvard educations don't seem to have
a concept on Constitutional checks on govt. So that's how much work we have to do,
to SCREEN, train and test all citizens for compliance with laws. Even our leaders aren't of passing quality.
I insist we ban all Mosques from government grounds
And ban all of the statues to Mohammed cluttering parks
And no more forcing students in public schools to recite the Koran at the beginning of class.....
I expect to see some interesting, and completely idiotic responses!
I am all for banning mosques in America, just as Confederate Flags have been banned in America.
LOL......
No problem, we can simply BURY them!
Like you have buried all of the confederate flags you have been banned from having on American soil?
LOL
That's OK... how many citizens has that flagged killed?....I can give you a BODY COUNT of muslim murders!
I insist we ban all Mosques from government grounds
And ban all of the statues to Mohammed cluttering parks
And no more forcing students in public schools to recite the Koran at the beginning of class.....
Syriusly do you want to chip in to the $15 million dollar settlement
sought in the case of Ahmed, the student who brought the clock to school?
What about our tax money going to pay that?
Dear Vigilante
When the large Buddha statues were destroyed by the Taliban, the world historians cried out at a loss of priceless cultural history,
but this did not cause religious insult to the Buddhist leaders or followers who do not depend on this as any kind of icon or idol.
Same with the removal of the Confederate symbols. The Constitutionalists, states rights, and other groups will continue on and do not rely on these flags.
However, the Muslims do rely on their Quran, and their prayers. If you ban those, you do disrupt the
free exercise of religion of innocent citizens who did nothing to be "deprived of liberty without due process."
I agree with you that it is wrong to send the hate message that "all followers" of a certain ideology are to be punished and demonized for the actions of a few.
As for removing something out of respect, if they AGREE to it that is being civil.
Just like the Muslim group that agreed to back down after protests over their mosques,
they had the right to build and practice their faith anywhere, but out of respect for the
9/11 ground zero site, if people asked to refrain from promoting their mosque near there,
it is just being civil to respect the wishes of the public.
Legally they could have fought it, but if I were their lawyers I would recommend they back off.
And if they developed any display near the WTC, I would suggest a Constitutional historic memorial
and include all the victims, first responders and emergency personnel. Islamic teachings include
natural laws and democratic govt, so that theme would be inclusive and not divisive.
It is just Common Sense to work with people, and be sensitive to both sides,
and I believe our Constitutional laws require us to be equally inclusive and protect all interests.
I would recommend redressing all grievances and solving these conflicts fully, instead of
letting them fester, and arise over and over, because the process wasn't finished by consensus.
Send them all back to Saudi Arabia who has more MONEY than brains, and can take care of their brothers...instead of us, we have ENOUGH with illegal Hispanics!
Dear Vigilante
Let's distinguish the law-abiding citizens who comply with DUE PROCESS under Constitutional standards,
vs. people who act like terrorist vigilantes and issue punishments without due process.
If you fall under the group that would punish people without due process to prove they deserve to lose rights,
you land in the same category as terrorists who don't follow Constitutional laws.
That's fine, you and others like you can be in one group and make laws for yourselves
if you share the same disdain for "due process" and "equal protection of the laws."
You are right about "illegals" in that nobody should be afforded privileges in the US
who hasn't first agreed and been trained to follow the laws of the land.
To be a "lawful" citizen should require Constitutional education and training.
And unfortunately, even our Presidents with Harvard educations don't seem to have
a concept on Constitutional checks on govt. So that's how much work we have to do,
to SCREEN, train and test all citizens for compliance with laws. Even our leaders aren't of passing quality.
I insist we ban all Mosques from government grounds
And ban all of the statues to Mohammed cluttering parks
And no more forcing students in public schools to recite the Koran at the beginning of class.....
Sounds like a good start!
I expect to see some interesting, and completely idiotic responses!
I am all for banning mosques in America, just as Confederate Flags have been banned in America.
LOL......
No problem, we can simply BURY them!
Like you have buried all of the confederate flags you have been banned from having on American soil?
LOL
That's OK... how many citizens has that flagged killed?....I can give you a BODY COUNT of muslim murders!
Oh I am sure you spend many sleepless nights counting yourself to sleep that way.
Meanwhile- shame you have been banned from having Confederate Flags in America.
Did you bury all of yours- or burn them?
"I expect to see some interesting, and completely idiotic responses!"
The above quoted is truly idiotic.
The 'confederate' flag has not been 'banned.'
Consequently the thread premise fails as a false comparison fallacy.
The ignorance and stupidity of the thread premise is monumental, a failure of galactic proportions.
Citizens are at liberty to display the 'confederate' flag in any venue they so desire, just as Muslims are at liberty to practice their faith – both immune from attack by the state.
Stupid, moronic, idiotic thread.
Why thank you, black shyster for proving my statement...you STILL ARE the dumbest black dude on USMB!
5 Facts About California's Ban of Confederate Flag
www.newsmax.com/.../Confederate-flag...ban/.../65946...
Newsmax Media
Jul 29, 2015 - Although the State of California didn't fly the Confederate flag over its capitol, a state law banning its display on public lands was put in place ...
I am all for banning mosques in America, just as Confederate Flags have been banned in America.
LOL......
No problem, we can simply BURY them!
Like you have buried all of the confederate flags you have been banned from having on American soil?
LOL
That's OK... how many citizens has that flagged killed?....I can give you a BODY COUNT of muslim murders!
Oh I am sure you spend many sleepless nights counting yourself to sleep that way.
Meanwhile- shame you have been banned from having Confederate Flags in America.
Did you bury all of yours- or burn them?
I did neither as I watch scum like you do this!
]
Dear Vigilante
When the large Buddha statues were destroyed by the Taliban, the world historians cried out at a loss of priceless cultural history,
but this did not cause religious insult to the Buddhist leaders or followers who do not depend on this as any kind of icon or idol.
Same with the removal of the Confederate symbols. The Constitutionalists, states rights, and other groups will continue on and do not rely on these flags.
However, the Muslims do rely on their Quran, and their prayers. If you ban those, you do disrupt the
free exercise of religion of innocent citizens who did nothing to be "deprived of liberty without due process."
I agree with you that it is wrong to send the hate message that "all followers" of a certain ideology are to be punished and demonized for the actions of a few.
As for removing something out of respect, if they AGREE to it that is being civil.
Just like the Muslim group that agreed to back down after protests over their mosques,
they had the right to build and practice their faith anywhere, but out of respect for the
9/11 ground zero site, if people asked to refrain from promoting their mosque near there,
it is just being civil to respect the wishes of the public.
Legally they could have fought it, but if I were their lawyers I would recommend they back off.
And if they developed any display near the WTC, I would suggest a Constitutional historic memorial
and include all the victims, first responders and emergency personnel. Islamic teachings include
natural laws and democratic govt, so that theme would be inclusive and not divisive.
It is just Common Sense to work with people, and be sensitive to both sides,
and I believe our Constitutional laws require us to be equally inclusive and protect all interests.
I would recommend redressing all grievances and solving these conflicts fully, instead of
letting them fester, and arise over and over, because the process wasn't finished by consensus.
Send them all back to Saudi Arabia who has more MONEY than brains, and can take care of their brothers...instead of us, we have ENOUGH with illegal Hispanics!
Dear Vigilante
Let's distinguish the law-abiding citizens who comply with DUE PROCESS under Constitutional standards,
vs. people who act like terrorist vigilantes and issue punishments without due process.
If you fall under the group that would punish people without due process to prove they deserve to lose rights,
you land in the same category as terrorists who don't follow Constitutional laws.
That's fine, you and others like you can be in one group and make laws for yourselves
if you share the same disdain for "due process" and "equal protection of the laws."
You are right about "illegals" in that nobody should be afforded privileges in the US
who hasn't first agreed and been trained to follow the laws of the land.
To be a "lawful" citizen should require Constitutional education and training.
And unfortunately, even our Presidents with Harvard educations don't seem to have
a concept on Constitutional checks on govt. So that's how much work we have to do,
to SCREEN, train and test all citizens for compliance with laws. Even our leaders aren't of passing quality.
View attachment 56976
Shame you hate what Teddy said so much.
No problem, we can simply BURY them!
Like you have buried all of the confederate flags you have been banned from having on American soil?
LOL
That's OK... how many citizens has that flagged killed?....I can give you a BODY COUNT of muslim murders!
Oh I am sure you spend many sleepless nights counting yourself to sleep that way.
Meanwhile- shame you have been banned from having Confederate Flags in America.
Did you bury all of yours- or burn them?
I did neither as I watch scum like you do this!
]
But you said the flags were banned.
Are you breaking the law to protect your Confederate flags?
Dear Vigilante
When the large Buddha statues were destroyed by the Taliban, the world historians cried out at a loss of priceless cultural history,
but this did not cause religious insult to the Buddhist leaders or followers who do not depend on this as any kind of icon or idol.
Same with the removal of the Confederate symbols. The Constitutionalists, states rights, and other groups will continue on and do not rely on these flags.
However, the Muslims do rely on their Quran, and their prayers. If you ban those, you do disrupt the
free exercise of religion of innocent citizens who did nothing to be "deprived of liberty without due process."
I agree with you that it is wrong to send the hate message that "all followers" of a certain ideology are to be punished and demonized for the actions of a few.
As for removing something out of respect, if they AGREE to it that is being civil.
Just like the Muslim group that agreed to back down after protests over their mosques,
they had the right to build and practice their faith anywhere, but out of respect for the
9/11 ground zero site, if people asked to refrain from promoting their mosque near there,
it is just being civil to respect the wishes of the public.
Legally they could have fought it, but if I were their lawyers I would recommend they back off.
And if they developed any display near the WTC, I would suggest a Constitutional historic memorial
and include all the victims, first responders and emergency personnel. Islamic teachings include
natural laws and democratic govt, so that theme would be inclusive and not divisive.
It is just Common Sense to work with people, and be sensitive to both sides,
and I believe our Constitutional laws require us to be equally inclusive and protect all interests.
I would recommend redressing all grievances and solving these conflicts fully, instead of
letting them fester, and arise over and over, because the process wasn't finished by consensus.
Send them all back to Saudi Arabia who has more MONEY than brains, and can take care of their brothers...instead of us, we have ENOUGH with illegal Hispanics!
Dear Vigilante
Let's distinguish the law-abiding citizens who comply with DUE PROCESS under Constitutional standards,
vs. people who act like terrorist vigilantes and issue punishments without due process.
If you fall under the group that would punish people without due process to prove they deserve to lose rights,
you land in the same category as terrorists who don't follow Constitutional laws.
That's fine, you and others like you can be in one group and make laws for yourselves
if you share the same disdain for "due process" and "equal protection of the laws."
You are right about "illegals" in that nobody should be afforded privileges in the US
who hasn't first agreed and been trained to follow the laws of the land.
To be a "lawful" citizen should require Constitutional education and training.
And unfortunately, even our Presidents with Harvard educations don't seem to have
a concept on Constitutional checks on govt. So that's how much work we have to do,
to SCREEN, train and test all citizens for compliance with laws. Even our leaders aren't of passing quality.
View attachment 56976
Shame you hate what Teddy said so much.
You fool, did they, IN FACT, turn American in every way, as the FOUNDER of the American PROGRESSIVE PARTY said??
"I expect to see some interesting, and completely idiotic responses!"
The above quoted is truly idiotic.
The 'confederate' flag has not been 'banned.'
Consequently the thread premise fails as a false comparison fallacy.
The ignorance and stupidity of the thread premise is monumental, a failure of galactic proportions.
Citizens are at liberty to display the 'confederate' flag in any venue they so desire, just as Muslims are at liberty to practice their faith – both immune from attack by the state.
Stupid, moronic, idiotic thread.
Why thank you, black shyster for proving my statement...you STILL ARE the dumbest black dude on USMB!
5 Facts About California's Ban of Confederate Flag
www.newsmax.com/.../Confederate-flag...ban/.../65946...
Newsmax Media
Jul 29, 2015 - Although the State of California didn't fly the Confederate flag over its capitol, a state law banning its display on public lands was put in place ...
Like I said- I am fine with banning mosques exactly the same way the Confederate flag is 'banned'
Let me know if you find any mosques on California public land.
