ISIS seizes Saddam's chemical weapons

[LadyGunSlinger]

Obama committed an awful blunder funding & arming very questionable Rebel groups in Syria. This current chaos in Iraq is the awful Blow Back on that. He was warned that these people were very dangerous Al Qaeda-linked groups. A very tragic blunder.

You must have missed the DNC talking points. No matter what AlBaraqi Hussein does, it's Bush's fault.

Oh i know. Iraq is Bush's blunder. That just has to be acknowledged. But this current chaos is on Obama. Putin and Russia warned him not to fund & arm these terror-linked Rebel groups in Syria. But he became so obsessed with getting rid of Assad. It's very reminiscent of Bush's obsession with getting rid of Hussein. Sometimes you have to live with the lesser of two evils. Assad is the safer play in Syria. Obama chose the wrong side to back. And this is the awful Blow Back.

Totally agree with everything you said.

 

[paulitician]

funny, I recall him saying congress should approve a war if it wanted one. I don't recall them doing so.

I know the bomb bomb bomb iran loons want permanent and endless war but really...

Obama committed an awful blunder funding & arming very questionable Rebel groups in Syria. This current chaos in Iraq is the awful Blow Back on that. He was warned that these people were very dangerous Al Qaeda-linked groups. A very tragic blunder.

It was the GOP who demanded arming the Syrian rebels.

Yes, they both blew it. We should have stayed out of it. We shouldn't have funded & armed anyone in the Syrian War. Here's some of the awful Blow Back...

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Except it's still not a lie.

You seem to think that just because the so called "experts" think the Weapons are duds that there are no weapons.

But the fact is whether they are duds or not, the weapons exist assuming this isn't some short of pretext to go back in.

You can't win the "They don't exist" argument so you switched it to the "They are old unworkable weapons" and pretend as though you are still winning the "They don't exist" argument.

The only way the chemical weapons don't exist are if the story is fabricated. But if the story is true, the question whether they work doesn't negate the fact that they clearly exist.

So anyone claiming there are no chemical weapons in Iraq are either lying or misinformed.

George W. Bush, 2005:

"...everybody thought there was weapons of mass destruction. There weren't any..."


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/19/politics/19text-bush.html?pagewanted=6

LMFAO Now the librul rats are running try to abandon their own stink ship they created and once again blaming Buuuuuuuuuushhhhhhhhhhhhh for their slogan and party mantra, "BUSH LIED PEOPLE DIED." They have rotten egg all over their faces. It's sooo funny. lol

 

[Siete]

You people are stupid.

According to the CIA, the facility was bombed extensively during the Persian Gulf War in 1991, ending its ability to produce chemical weapons. U.N. weapons inspectors subsequently destroyed equipment and stockpiles there, most of the complex was razed by the Iraqis, and the remainder was extensively looted, the agency said in a 2007 report.

Rebels seize former chemical weapons plant; Sistani urges formation of new government - The Washington Post

Now see if you can respond with something even more stupid.

I already explained that little factoid ...... water on a duck.

they wont respond because they ignore it.

 

[jillian]

Obama committed an awful blunder funding & arming very questionable Rebel groups in Syria. This current chaos in Iraq is the awful Blow Back on that. He was warned that these people were very dangerous Al Qaeda-linked groups. A very tragic blunder.

It was the GOP who demanded arming the Syrian rebels.

Yes, they both blew it. We should have stayed out of it. We shouldn't have funded & armed anyone in the Syrian War. Here's some of the awful Blow Back...

not what you wrote, is it, bubbalah?

I seem to recall McCain and his boyfriend graham running around demanding we go to war for them.

... again...

 

[NYcarbineer]

You people are stupid.

According to the CIA, the facility was bombed extensively during the Persian Gulf War in 1991, ending its ability to produce chemical weapons. U.N. weapons inspectors subsequently destroyed equipment and stockpiles there, most of the complex was razed by the Iraqis, and the remainder was extensively looted, the agency said in a 2007 report.

Rebels seize former chemical weapons plant; Sistani urges formation of new government - The Washington Post

Now see if you can respond with something even more stupid.

I already explained that little factoid ...... water on a duck.

they wont respond because they ignore it.

They're schizophrenic, literally, clinically. They cannot recognize what is real.

 

[paulitician]

It was the GOP who demanded arming the Syrian rebels.

Yes, they both blew it. We should have stayed out of it. We shouldn't have funded & armed anyone in the Syrian War. Here's some of the awful Blow Back...

not what you wrote, is it, bubbalah?

I seem to recall McCain and his boyfriend graham running around demanding we go to war for them.

... again...

Yes, they blew it too. We should have stayed out of it. Assad is the safer play. Putin and Russia have been telling us that all along. But for some reason Obama became so hell-bent on getting rid of Assad. Obviously he's made some very bad decisions. These Rebel groups were very questionable all along. Now look at the havoc they're wreaking in both Syria and Iraq.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Except it's still not a lie.

You seem to think that just because the so called "experts" think the Weapons are duds that there are no weapons.

But the fact is whether they are duds or not, the weapons exist assuming this isn't some short of pretext to go back in.

You can't win the "They don't exist" argument so you switched it to the "They are old unworkable weapons" and pretend as though you are still winning the "They don't exist" argument.

The only way the chemical weapons don't exist are if the story is fabricated. But if the story is true, the question whether they work doesn't negate the fact that they clearly exist.

So anyone claiming there are no chemical weapons in Iraq are either lying or misinformed.

George W. Bush, 2005:

"...everybody thought there was weapons of mass destruction. There weren't any..."


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/19/politics/19text-bush.html?pagewanted=6

LMFAO Now the librul rats are running try to abandon their own stink ship they created and once again blaming Buuuuuuuuuushhhhhhhhhhhhh for their slogan and party mantra, "BUSH LIED PEOPLE DIED." They have rotten egg all over their faces. It's sooo funny. lol

See what I mean by schizophrenic?

 

[JimH52]

The US has some very dirty hands in Iraq. We have made it a habit to support who we feel is the least of two evils. RR certainly gave us a great example:

Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Carbie use to sing that mantra as if he was the author of it personally. LOL What's wrong? Not having a good year? ;-)

 

[paulitician]

What a wonderfully insane Foreign Policy we have, huh? We fund & arm brutal terror-linked Rebel groups to kill the Iranian-backed Assad, while at the same time vowing to support the Iranian-backed Iraq Government by killing the same terrorists we've supported in Syria.

Wow, what a mess.

 

[BlindBoo]

These are the brutal cretins Obama has supported in the Syrian War. Now they're rampaging across Iraq as well. A very sad blunder for sure.

funny, I recall him saying congress should approve a war if it wanted one. I don't recall them doing so.

I know the bomb bomb bomb iran loons want permanent and endless war but really...

Obama committed an awful blunder funding & arming very questionable Rebel groups in Syria. This current chaos in Iraq is the awful Blow Back on that. He was warned that these people were very dangerous Al Qaeda-linked groups. A very tragic blunder.

So why was McCain saying Obama wasn't doing enough arming the rebs?

 

[Moonglow]

The GOP on this board do not like McCain because he is not what the Tea Parfty majority want him to do..

 

[BlindBoo]

Yeah, that info was in the OPs links too

You people are stupid.

According to the CIA, the facility was bombed extensively during the Persian Gulf War in 1991, ending its ability to produce chemical weapons. U.N. weapons inspectors subsequently destroyed equipment and stockpiles there, most of the complex was razed by the Iraqis, and the remainder was extensively looted, the agency said in a 2007 report.

Rebels seize former chemical weapons plant; Sistani urges formation of new government - The Washington Post

Now see if you can respond with something even more stupid.

 

[paulitician]

According to our Government, the Sunni Al Qaeda-linked Rebels are the 'Good Guys' in Syria. But they're the 'Bad Guys' in Iraq. Huh?? Say Whaaa??

 

[paulitician]

The GOP on this board do not like McCain because he is not what the Tea Parfty majority want him to do..

McCain and Obama have agreed on funding & arming Sunni 'Rebels' in Syria. And unfortunately, that's turned out to be a horrific blunder. These groups are wreaking havoc all across Syria and Iraq.

 

[BlindBoo]

What a wonderfully insane Foreign Policy we have, huh? We fund & arm brutal terror-linked Rebel groups to kill the Iranian-backed Assad, while at the same time vowing to support the Iranian-backed Iraq Government by killing the same terrorists we've supported in Syria.

Wow, what a mess.

Lets see the data on what groups in Syria we have sent arm to, and while you're at it lets see what arms we've them with.

 

[asaratis]

The right certainly does love their bogeymen. Big market for adult diapers there. Everyone else edges away from the righties, due to the smell.

You must be a fan of Bill Maher. You're emulating him here...making cute but adolescent jokes about conservatives in a vain attempt to come across as an intelligent person.

Bill Maher is a third rate, pseudo-intellegent shock jock....and you're practicing his skills, as you remain not equipped to participate in an honest debate.

 

[paulitician]

What a wonderfully insane Foreign Policy we have, huh? We fund & arm brutal terror-linked Rebel groups to kill the Iranian-backed Assad, while at the same time vowing to support the Iranian-backed Iraq Government by killing the same terrorists we've supported in Syria.

Wow, what a mess.

Lets see the data on what groups in Syria we have sent arm to, and while you're at it lets see what arms we've them with.

Here's a hint, they're not 'Good Guys.' They're brutal terrorists for the most part. We shouldn't have funded and armed anyone in Syria. It's the root-cause of this current chaos.

 

[Kosh]

What a wonderfully insane Foreign Policy we have, huh? We fund & arm brutal terror-linked Rebel groups to kill the Iranian-backed Assad, while at the same time vowing to support the Iranian-backed Iraq Government by killing the same terrorists we've supported in Syria.

Wow, what a mess.

Lets see the data on what groups in Syria we have sent arm to, and while you're at it lets see what arms we've them with.

Congress secretly approves U.S. weapons flow to 'moderate' Syrian rebels

Congress secretly approves U.S. weapons flow to 'moderate' Syrian rebels | Reuters