Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The translator ias far as I know is Ustadha Aisha Bewley,Care to tell us who the translator was? It was Muhsin Khan, was it not?And it can be found on page 580 of the Islamic University of Medinas translation of Sahih al-Bukharis Hadith. There it opens Bukharis Book of Jihad.
You can go to your mosque and check it yourself.
The post stands as the most accurate interpretation of the meaning of the Quran.The Noble Quran translation is in total harmony with what is know of the early history of Islam.
What really amazes me though is all of the Millions of Muslims that are so misinformed about such matters. Somebody should denounce all of this bloodshed and terror.
You want the Jews out of Israel as well?What really amazes me though is all of the Millions of Muslims that are so misinformed about such matters. Somebody should denounce all of this bloodshed and terror.
OK I will do that right now:
The Western nations should immediately get out of Iraq and Afghanistain and stop all of this bloodshed and terror.
There I said it.
Now are you Happy???
If you have ever been listening 'to my words.You want the Jews out of Israel as well?What really amazes me though is all of the Millions of Muslims that are so misinformed about such matters. Somebody should denounce all of this bloodshed and terror.
OK I will do that right now:
The Western nations should immediately get out of Iraq and Afghanistain and stop all of this bloodshed and terror.
There I said it.
Now are you Happy???
Farrakhan???I thought Id ask you are a well of entertaining wackballary
I figured since Farrakhan came out with some new buttery you might be in the mood as well.
I ask because I know that Muhsin Khan produced one of the only English translations of the full Sahih Bukhari. If I'm not mistaken, Aisha Bewley is a Sufi...The translator ias far as I know is Ustadha Aisha Bewley,
You can go to your mosque and check it yourself.
Muhsin Khan's Qur'an is little more than a polemic against non-Wahhabi religious beliefs, disguised as a legitimate translation. You'll eventually realize that his rendition is more reflective of his personal beliefs than it is of the Qur'an's true words. Then again, you may not know this because you may have no basis for comparison. Hopefully, seeing that Muhsin Khan lies to his readers unabashedly (2:190 "jihad" commentary) and that he attempts to alter verses whose meanings have already been established and accepted by all Muslims (al-Fatiha) will help you understand that his translation is inadequate.The post stands as the most accurate interpretation of the meaning of the Quran.The Noble Quran translation is in total harmony with what is know of the early history of Islam.
What really amazes me though is all of the Millions of Muslims that are so misinformed about such matters.
One mans actions do not represent a billion Muslims.The fact is "kalam" your Islam doesn't explain the Islam people see on the news,
Mine does.
People dont care about unicorns,Your Islam doesn't exists in the real world.
They want to know what is real.
The killing of civilians was considered OK because civilians are taxpayers and are non-believers, Loucks said. He wouldnt disclose where the attacks were supposed to take place.
8:39. And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily Allah doth see all that they do.
8:39
And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world[]]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do
Khan is superior in clarity.
I would take that up with media outlets.The fact is "kalam" your Islam doesn't explain the Islam people see on the news,
Perhaps it does for those who are naive enough to think that every crime committed in the Muslim world is attributable to religiosity and Islamic teachings. Admittedly, this sentiment seems to be somewhat widespread. Pay attention to the actions of "terrorists" and you'll find that they uphold the aspects of Islam that benefit their cause and ignore those aspects that don't. It has been made a mockery of in the worst way through its widespread use as a political tool... what a shame.Mine does.
No, they want a simple explanation. It has been provided for them in the form of Islam. Genocide in Africa? "Islam did it." Rape? "Islam did it." Any and all strife that takes place in North Africa, South Asia, and the Middle East? "Islam did it." Who can blame people for choosing an easy explanation? Why examine the myriad political, economic, social, and cultural influences that give rise to these issues when the blame can simply be placed on Islam? People may think they want to know what's real, but what they're really looking for are explanations that they can quickly and easily understand. As far as I'm concerned, this is confirmed by people being more interested in what's "on the news" than what's in the books.People dont care about unicorns,Your Islam doesn't exists in the real world. They want to know what is real.
You will forgive me if I don't consider Tarek Mehanna an authority on Islam.The killing of civilians was considered OK because civilians are taxpayers and are non-believers, Loucks said. He wouldnt disclose where the attacks were supposed to take place.
McVeigh was an Atheist.One mans actions do not represent a billion Muslims.The fact is "kalam" your Islam doesn't explain the Islam people see on the news,
Mine does.
People dont care about unicorns,Your Islam doesn't exists in the real world.
They want to know what is real.
The killing of civilians was considered OK because civilians are taxpayers and are non-believers, Loucks said. He wouldnt disclose where the attacks were supposed to take place.
Just as Timmothy McVeighs actions do not represent a billion Christians.
8:39. And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily Allah doth see all that they do.
8:39
And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world[]]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do
Khan is superior in clarity.
Khan imposes his own definitions and interprets verses beyond their actual meaning. Case in point: "(disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh)"
The suggestion that fitnah denotes "disbelief and polytheism" is ludicrously inaccurate. It can connote temptation, but this is neither the primary usage nor is it in any way equivalent to meaning "disbelief." The suggested meaning is certainly not the definition of the word used in the verse, fitnatun.
The passage being discussed:
وَقَٰتِلُوهُمْ حَتَّىٰ لَا تَكُونَ فِتْنَةٌۭ وَيَكُونَ ٱلدِّينُ كُلُّهُۥ لِلَّهِ ۚ فَإِنِ ٱنتَهَوْا۟ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ بِمَا يَعْمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌۭ
Waqatiloohum hatta la takoona fitnatun wayakoona alddeenu kulluhu lillahi faini intahaw fainna Allaha bima yaAAmaloona baseerun
"Fight them, till there is no [fitnatun] and the religion is God's entirely; then if they give over, surely God sees the things they do"
Fitnatun: "persecution, trial, probation, burning, assaying, reply, excuse, war, means whereby the condition of a person is evinced in respect of good or evil, hardship, punishment, answer, temptation, burning with fire."
Moreover, this addition is baseless: "(in the whole of the world)"
"The religion" (ie: Islam) is distinct from "worship."
Muhsin Khan's translation is quite poor. Plus, we know that he lies in his discussion of jihad. You're simply not being rational. Of course, you already know this.
