It Begins: California Begins Indoctrinating Children Into The LGBT Lifestyle Against Parents Wishes

[Wyatt earp]

Don't you get tired taking up space here by saying stupid, pointless shit that in no way contributes to the topic?

I support heterosexuals.

I support human beings and all life on earth and the earth itself. We are all Gods and Goddesses, with the exception of the bigots ofcourse

I support heterosexuals.

. I support marriage between a man and a woman. Guess I'm old fashioned now right ?? LOL.

So do I . I am a man married to a woman. But I also support the idea that all people should be able to marry the person who that are romantically and sexually attracted to regardless of the respective gender. To believe otherwise is narrow minded and selfish. Oh, and stupid.

No marriage should between a man and woman


It should of been just civil Union's and leave it at that..

Not in your face crap..that's childish

 

[deanrd]

Before they were just suggesting it. Now, California parents have no choice: It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents

It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents
By
Warner Todd Huston
-
December 27, 2017
Share
Despite their reputation for being the “Party of choice,” Democrats in California have ruled that parents are not allowed to opt their school-aged children out of the mandatory LGBT indoctrination in the state-sponsored school system.

Naturally, far left-wing California has become the first state in the Union to force kids to use LGBT inclusive textbooks. But at the same time it left no legal way for parents to opt out from the propaganda.

The gay propaganda law supposedly requires a “‘fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful’ treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance,” according to Truth Revolt.

State publisher Mark Jarrett cited several historical figures who *might* have been gay saying that his textbooks will essentially make these historical figures gay icons.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

It should be noted that men sharing expenses with other men and living together was an extremely common thing in our country’s history. Senators did it, Congressmen did it, and so do regular Americans all across the nation.

In Fact, it was extremely common even into the 20th century. It has only been since WWII that Americans developed a sense that living completely on alone with no co-habitating partners, whether platonic or romantic, was considered the thing to do.

As to President Buchanan, gay activists have tried to claim him as their own for decades but there is no direct proof of his sexual proclivities.

Gay activists have also ridiculously tried to make President Abraham Lincoln gay, as well.

The radical gay agenda is infused throughout California’s textbooks, Truth Revolt report:

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade. Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News. They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks. In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

So, to appease the radical gay lobby, California is now taking what are supposed to be factual school textbooks and filling them with “speculation” on the sexual leanings of historical figures despite the FACT that the facts are not known.

California is now officially indoctrinating, not educating, its children.​

Oh those people in California. Trying to teach their children not to hate. What is wrong with them? Don't they know hate is a good thing? And murder is obviously the next step.

Oh, you can learn so much from those on the right.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Before they were just suggesting it. Now, California parents have no choice: It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents

It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents
By
Warner Todd Huston
-
December 27, 2017
Share
Despite their reputation for being the “Party of choice,” Democrats in California have ruled that parents are not allowed to opt their school-aged children out of the mandatory LGBT indoctrination in the state-sponsored school system.

Naturally, far left-wing California has become the first state in the Union to force kids to use LGBT inclusive textbooks. But at the same time it left no legal way for parents to opt out from the propaganda.

The gay propaganda law supposedly requires a “‘fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful’ treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance,” according to Truth Revolt.

State publisher Mark Jarrett cited several historical figures who *might* have been gay saying that his textbooks will essentially make these historical figures gay icons.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

It should be noted that men sharing expenses with other men and living together was an extremely common thing in our country’s history. Senators did it, Congressmen did it, and so do regular Americans all across the nation.

In Fact, it was extremely common even into the 20th century. It has only been since WWII that Americans developed a sense that living completely on alone with no co-habitating partners, whether platonic or romantic, was considered the thing to do.

As to President Buchanan, gay activists have tried to claim him as their own for decades but there is no direct proof of his sexual proclivities.

Gay activists have also ridiculously tried to make President Abraham Lincoln gay, as well.

The radical gay agenda is infused throughout California’s textbooks, Truth Revolt report:

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade. Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News. They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks. In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

So, to appease the radical gay lobby, California is now taking what are supposed to be factual school textbooks and filling them with “speculation” on the sexual leanings of historical figures despite the FACT that the facts are not known.

California is now officially indoctrinating, not educating, its children.​

Oh those people in California. Trying to teach their children not to hate. What is wrong with them? Don't they know hate is a good thing? And murder is obviously the next step.

Oh, you can learn so much from those on the right.

They need to teach the children to love heteros.

 

[beagle9]

I support heterosexuals.

I support human beings and all life on earth and the earth itself. We are all Gods and Goddesses, with the exception of the bigots ofcourse

I support heterosexuals.

. I support marriage between a man and a woman. Guess I'm old fashioned now right ?? LOL.

So do I . I am a man married to a woman. But I also support the idea that all people should be able to marry the person who that are romantically and sexually attracted to regardless of the respective gender. To believe otherwise is narrow minded and selfish. Oh, and stupid.

How about cross-species marriage? Bulldogs? Robots? Favorite plant life?

. Already happening ain't it ? LOL.

 

[Rustic]

Before they were just suggesting it. Now, California parents have no choice: It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents

It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents
By
Warner Todd Huston
-
December 27, 2017
Share
Despite their reputation for being the “Party of choice,” Democrats in California have ruled that parents are not allowed to opt their school-aged children out of the mandatory LGBT indoctrination in the state-sponsored school system.

Naturally, far left-wing California has become the first state in the Union to force kids to use LGBT inclusive textbooks. But at the same time it left no legal way for parents to opt out from the propaganda.

The gay propaganda law supposedly requires a “‘fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful’ treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance,” according to Truth Revolt.

State publisher Mark Jarrett cited several historical figures who *might* have been gay saying that his textbooks will essentially make these historical figures gay icons.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

It should be noted that men sharing expenses with other men and living together was an extremely common thing in our country’s history. Senators did it, Congressmen did it, and so do regular Americans all across the nation.

In Fact, it was extremely common even into the 20th century. It has only been since WWII that Americans developed a sense that living completely on alone with no co-habitating partners, whether platonic or romantic, was considered the thing to do.

As to President Buchanan, gay activists have tried to claim him as their own for decades but there is no direct proof of his sexual proclivities.

Gay activists have also ridiculously tried to make President Abraham Lincoln gay, as well.

The radical gay agenda is infused throughout California’s textbooks, Truth Revolt report:

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade. Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News. They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks. In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

So, to appease the radical gay lobby, California is now taking what are supposed to be factual school textbooks and filling them with “speculation” on the sexual leanings of historical figures despite the FACT that the facts are not known.

California is now officially indoctrinating, not educating, its children.​

Typical of Crazy Cali

 

[skye]

My GOD why don't they let children play in peace and be children....they deserve that....

Fuck sex and lifestyle.....let children live their childhood years in peace!

 

[Rustic]

There was a time where people didn't want their kids being "indoctrinated" by racial integration either.

Perhaps just maybe, schools are trying to make the future generation a bit more tolerant of others.

Progressives are the most intolerant of people, second only to Muslims. Shit for brains

 

[Rustic]

What do you clowns think will happen ?

Do you think the kids will listen to these lessons and turn gay ?

Seriously ?

Being gay is a choice, dip shit
Lol

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

There was a time where people didn't want their kids being "indoctrinated" by racial integration either.

Perhaps just maybe, schools are trying to make the future generation a bit more tolerant of others.

Progressives are the most intolerant of people, second only to Muslims. Shit for brains

That is a moronic response . No relevance!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Rustic]

`
`
I'm bisexual but I only speak for myself. As a parent, no matter how supposedly "well intended " a law, I generally support parents rights over the states intentions..

You mean the parents right to have their children taught a white washed version of history and to grow up to believe that LGBT people are just freaks with no value to society like the bigots on this board?

You sound like a bitch in heat...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

My GOD why don't they let children play in peace and be children....they deserve that....

Fuck sex and lifestyle.....let children live their childhood years in peace!

Children have enough problems trying to navigate life without this stupid shit being thrown in the mix

 

[Rustic]

You mean the parents right to have their children taught a white washed version of history and to grow up to believe that LGBT people are just freaks with no value to society like the bigots on this board?

`
I'm a civil libertarian. It applies to all, even those I vehemently disagree with. To that extent, I will not now, nor ever, allow the state to usurp the natural law of parental rights, which would include the parental right of their child's education. Force of law the worst possible way to attempt to change human behavior.

A Libertarian! That explains a lot. Maybe the parents should just determine the entire curriculum and do away with the school boards? Oh, and what about the rights of parents who do want their kids to learn about LGBT history??

The problem with that though is that you will have any many different ideas as to what should be taught as there are parents. Maybe we van have one child per class. Do you see the folly you position

I'm waiting or just one person to provide an honest and rational answer to the question of what harm is done by this being taught.

The parents that want this crap taught to their kids should be able to opt in, But the parents that don’t want anything to do with this crap should not have their kids exposed to it.

 

[Rustic]

Shocking stuff. Why oh why are schools trying to teach kids about cultures and lifestyles that they may not be aware of ?

This isn't teaching kids about cultures and lifestyles. This is brainwashing kids into immoral and evil sexual perversions, and grooming them for further abuse by perverts. In a sane society, anyone who willingly had any part in this would be prosecuted as a sex offender,and kept in prison and away from children for the rest of their wretched lives.

It is, of course, no surprise at all to see you defending this sexual abuse of children.

If we dont teach our kids they will grow up as twisted and ignorant as yourself.

Teach them what? How to be a perverted homo?

It's obvious enough why sick perverts such as Tommy Tainant want children to be groomed and indoctrinated into accepting sexual perversion and abuse.

On a properly run board this comment would be deleted.
Get some help you sick fuck.

You seem to be the sick fuck, Forcing people into shit they want nothing to do with.

 

[Rustic]

Parents will have to work extra hard to counter the propaganda. The school is preparing students for adult sex with a same sex partner. Possibly the teachers themselves.

I honestly don't know if you're stupid enough to believe that, or just a vicious liar.

Schools should have to ask permission from the parents to teach such sick shit to the kids.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Before they were just suggesting it. Now, California parents have no choice: It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents

It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents
By
Warner Todd Huston
-
December 27, 2017
Share
Despite their reputation for being the “Party of choice,” Democrats in California have ruled that parents are not allowed to opt their school-aged children out of the mandatory LGBT indoctrination in the state-sponsored school system.

Naturally, far left-wing California has become the first state in the Union to force kids to use LGBT inclusive textbooks. But at the same time it left no legal way for parents to opt out from the propaganda.

The gay propaganda law supposedly requires a “‘fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful’ treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance,” according to Truth Revolt.

State publisher Mark Jarrett cited several historical figures who *might* have been gay saying that his textbooks will essentially make these historical figures gay icons.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

It should be noted that men sharing expenses with other men and living together was an extremely common thing in our country’s history. Senators did it, Congressmen did it, and so do regular Americans all across the nation.

In Fact, it was extremely common even into the 20th century. It has only been since WWII that Americans developed a sense that living completely on alone with no co-habitating partners, whether platonic or romantic, was considered the thing to do.

As to President Buchanan, gay activists have tried to claim him as their own for decades but there is no direct proof of his sexual proclivities.

Gay activists have also ridiculously tried to make President Abraham Lincoln gay, as well.

The radical gay agenda is infused throughout California’s textbooks, Truth Revolt report:

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade. Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News. They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks. In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

So, to appease the radical gay lobby, California is now taking what are supposed to be factual school textbooks and filling them with “speculation” on the sexual leanings of historical figures despite the FACT that the facts are not known.

California is now officially indoctrinating, not educating, its children.​

Oh those people in California. Trying to teach their children not to hate. What is wrong with them? Don't they know hate is a good thing? And murder is obviously the next step.

Oh, you can learn so much from those on the right.

Well liberals have a 45 year head start on legal murder now don't they?

 

[Leo123]

The parents that want this crap taught to their kids should be able to opt in, But the parents that don’t want anything to do with this crap should not have their kids exposed to it.

Yeah, maybe the schools can set up a 'speical ed' class for those sexually handicapped kids whose parents haven't told them what sex they really are.

 

[Rustic]

A Libertarian! That explains a lot. Maybe the parents should just determine the entire curriculum and do away with the school boards? Oh, and what about the rights of parents who do want their kids to learn about LGBT history??The problem with that though is that you will have any many different ideas as to what should be taught as there are parents. Maybe we van have one child per class. Do you see the folly you positionI'm waiting or just one person to provide an honest and rational answer to the question of what harm is done by this being taught.

`
`
I see no folly in my position. It's just that your opinion differs from mine. You have no ethical or moral high ground to judge from, nor do I. I'm simply stating I will not allow the state to usurp parental rights.You disagree. So be it.

Again, what about the rights of the parents who want LGBT history taught. ? You can't have an opt out unless you have two versions of the same text book. You want to usurp the rights of others.

“LGBT history” should be an absolute opt in, Parents and their kids that want nothing to do with it should have absolutely no exposure to the suck shit.
What is wrong with that?
Unless your a control freak...

 

[Rustic]

It isn't hard for me to believe Californians are sick enough to support this.

I really don't think they had a choice or even care anymore. Many no hablo English.

Or maybe they are smart enough to know that this policy is not a threat in any way. That the bigots are hyping it up and spreading hysteria

There's no reason for it. Let parents teach their kids what they want about the topic.

. If parents have no say in what their children are being taught, then welcome to communism, socialism, Marxism, and the indoctrination of your children with any such vehicles like these to be used. Sad times in America.

Providing facts is not indoctrination. It is education. Got any?

No one should be forced... That so-called type of education should be 100 percent voluntary.
Keep it to yourselves

 

[Rustic]

Why does that unholy shit have to be taught in schools fer chrissakes? Parents are supposed to teach their kids about sex, not sick perversion. By the time kids are 12 years old they learn that crap from one another. I sure as hell don't want my kids to learn about the birds and the bees from some flaming faggot.

You're another one who does not understand what is actually being taught, do you? You just jumped on the moronic OP without even bothering to research this issue. That is irresponsible and just plain stupid.

Keep your lifestyles to yourselves, Don’t force that shit on other people that want nothing to do with it

 

[Rustic]

Before they were just suggesting it. Now, California parents have no choice: It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents

It Begins: California Announces Ban for Parents
By
Warner Todd Huston
-
December 27, 2017
Share
Despite their reputation for being the “Party of choice,” Democrats in California have ruled that parents are not allowed to opt their school-aged children out of the mandatory LGBT indoctrination in the state-sponsored school system.

Naturally, far left-wing California has become the first state in the Union to force kids to use LGBT inclusive textbooks. But at the same time it left no legal way for parents to opt out from the propaganda.

The gay propaganda law supposedly requires a “‘fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful’ treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance,” according to Truth Revolt.

State publisher Mark Jarrett cited several historical figures who *might* have been gay saying that his textbooks will essentially make these historical figures gay icons.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

It should be noted that men sharing expenses with other men and living together was an extremely common thing in our country’s history. Senators did it, Congressmen did it, and so do regular Americans all across the nation.

In Fact, it was extremely common even into the 20th century. It has only been since WWII that Americans developed a sense that living completely on alone with no co-habitating partners, whether platonic or romantic, was considered the thing to do.

As to President Buchanan, gay activists have tried to claim him as their own for decades but there is no direct proof of his sexual proclivities.

Gay activists have also ridiculously tried to make President Abraham Lincoln gay, as well.

The radical gay agenda is infused throughout California’s textbooks, Truth Revolt report:

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade. Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News. They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks. In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

So, to appease the radical gay lobby, California is now taking what are supposed to be factual school textbooks and filling them with “speculation” on the sexual leanings of historical figures despite the FACT that the facts are not known.

California is now officially indoctrinating, not educating, its children.​

You mean by not teaching kids to be disgusting bigots like you?

You cannot indoctrinate anyone into a gay lifestyle, moron

There’s no reason to force that shit on other people, keep your lifestyles to yourselves.